Russia Invades Ukraine. Again by captaincrunch

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Russia Invades Ukraine. Again

POSTED BY: CAPTAINCRUNCH
UPDATED: Friday, April 24, 2026 08:28
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 452097
PAGE 202 of 202

Friday, April 24, 2026 8:05 AM

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

Ukrainian forces continue to strike Russian air defense assets in Russia. Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Forces (USF) Commander Major Robert “Magyar” Brovdi reported that Ukrainian forces struck a Russian Tor-M2 air defense system in Bryansk Oblast overnight on April 22 to 23.[20]

Brovdi stated that Ukrainian USF drone operators have struck a total of 22 Russian air defense systems in Russia and occupied Ukraine thus far in April 2026.

https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive
-campaign-assessment-april-23-2026/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, April 24, 2026 8:28 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

Russia spent 20 years hardening Ukraine by accident. Europe won’t get that gift.

Two decades of hybrid pressure built the Ukraine that stopped Russian tanks in 2022. Moscow has drawn the lesson. NATO’s eastern flank should assume it has months, not decades.

By Olga Chiriac, Nicholas Krohley | 24/04/2026

https://euromaidanpress.com/2026/04/24/russia-spent-20-years-hardening
-ukraine-by-accident-europe-wont-get-that-gift/

For more than twenty years, Russia ran an unrelenting hybrid warfare campaign against Ukraine—patient, sustained, multi-dimensional. It was, in the end, self-defeating.

European governments have spent the same twenty years preparing to be on the receiving end of something like it. They may not get twenty years. Moscow has now watched where that playbook led—a hardened Ukrainian military, a society that cohered under pressure, a war Russia is losing—and has every reason to reach for something faster against NATO's eastern flank.

Russian methods in Ukraine were varied and overlapping: political subversion, economic pressure, cyberattacks, information operations, and the slow corruption of a political class.

Narrowly judged, it worked. Ukraine's economy was repeatedly disrupted. Its politics were penetrated. Donbas tied down the military, produced refugees, and absorbed national attention. Western investors kept their distance. Moscow pursued clear objectives and "red lines"—sometimes strategically, sometimes opportunistically, almost always patiently. Ukraine stayed poor, divided, and, as the Kremlin read it, manageable.

Manageable is not subdued. That is where the doctrine broke.

(NATO’s generals warn of war by 2029. Europe won’t be ready until 2035.
https://euromaidanpress.com/2026/04/07/natos-generals-warn-of-war-by-2
029-europe-wont-be-ready-until-2035/ )

By 2022, Moscow had concluded that hybrid pressure would not deliver what it most wanted: keeping Ukraine inside the Russian orbit and out of Western institutions. The Euromaidan revolution, the EU Association Agreement, deepening military cooperation with NATO and the United States—all of it pointed in one direction, and the direction was away.

So Russia abandoned the "sub-threshold" game and reached for what it thought would settle the question: a full invasion.

What it hit was not the hollowed-out state twenty years of pressure were supposed to have produced. It was a country that had been forged by that pressure. Ukraine had rebuilt its military—much of it on Western assistance unlocked, ironically, by Western alarm over Russia's hybrid aggression. It had hardened its networks. It had walked its energy sector out of Russian dependency. Civil society had the institutional reflexes and grassroots muscle that come from two decades of adversarial pressure.

The citizens, by the time the tanks moved, had already decided what kind of country they wanted. Putin—this is the line everyone repeats now—turned out to be the greatest catalyst of modern Ukrainian nationalism. A nationalism fully cut loose from its Soviet past. With, at this point, no meaningful tie to Russia or Russianness.

Kyiv was supposed to fall in three days. Four years on, Ukraine is still fighting. The hybrid attacks have not stopped—the power grid gets hit again every winter—but Ukrainians have absorbed that into daily life and not shifted on the fundamentals. At the political level, Zelenskyy has shown a maturity few expected, most recently by closing a deal with Saudi Arabia in the middle of a war in Iran. Kyiv is behaving like a serious Western player. The EU, by contrast, is being mocked for its statements of concern.

It would be naive to think Moscow has not absorbed what happened here. Prolonged hybrid warfare, however tactically satisfying, risks making your eventual enemy stronger. It gives them time. It gives them reasons. It hardens institutions. It builds international sympathy, and sympathy, eventually, becomes materiel. If the goal is conquest or capitulation, patience may be the worst option on the menu.

(Ukraine fired its NATO trainers. The alliance is running out of time to learn why.
https://euromaidanpress.com/2026/03/31/ukraine-fired-its-nato-trainers
-the-alliance-is-running-out-of-time-to-learn-why/ )

And the ground has shifted in ways that make faster action easier to imagine, not harder. The rules-based order that imposed at least some friction on overt territorial aggression is unraveling in real time. The current American administration has shown, across several files, that unilateral action in pursuit of national interest is an acceptable instrument again and sometimes a productive one. How Moscow reads all this is still unclear. The signal it is receiving is not. Decisive action is back on the table. "You can just do things," as the phrase goes now.

A core driver of Soviet grand strategy during the Cold War was the fear of surprise. The Nazi invasion of June 1941 and the Great Patriotic War remain foundational experiences—for the state, and for the people. Hardliners in Moscow are gaining ground, and they may yet shift the calculus of a president who has so far leaned on the language of deterrence and strategic restraint.

European planners should be treating this convergence with more urgency than they currently are. If Russia turns next to the Baltic states, or Finland's long border, or another soft edge, there is no reason to assume it will slow-play the way it slow-played Ukraine.

Twenty years of probing before committing? Why would the Kremlin hand a second adversary the same gift?

The decades of pressure that accidentally built Ukrainian resolve and Ukrainian capability will not be extended to NATO's eastern flank. European governments, militaries, and critical infrastructure operators need to achieve in years—perhaps in months—what Ukraine built over decades. Tallinn and Helsinki do not have twenty years. They may not have two.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE
second	04.24 08:05
second	04.24 08:28