Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Evidence: So where are we now(II) ?
Monday, May 7, 2018 1:36 PM
JEWELSTAITEFAN
Tuesday, May 8, 2018 3:26 PM
SECOND
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Speaking of Evidence, Mueller is trying to hide and cower from his lack of Evidence, but Federal Judge Dabney Friedrich has denied Mueller's request.
Tuesday, May 8, 2018 4:12 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Speaking of Evidence, Mueller is trying to hide and cower from his lack of Evidence, but Federal Judge Dabney Friedrich has denied Mueller's request.Speaking of crooked deals: Money Laundering and Trump https://slate.com/business/2018/05/were-donald-trumps-cash-real-estate-purchases-related-to-money-laundering.html The Washington Post reported Sunday that the Trump Organization had spent more than $400 million in cash acquiring properties, often without taking on any debt at all, beginning in 2006. The president’s son Eric Trump told the Post that the simple explanation was that Trump properties threw off so much cash, there was no need to borrow. Ha-ha-ha, Eric! Good joke! Getting back to how straight businesses run: even if Eric is truthful, experts agree, that’s weird. Real estate buyers usually like to spend as little of their own cash as possible. Big purchases often come with massive loans—like the $1.2 billion mortgage Kushner Cos. took out on its flagship 666 5th Ave. skyscraper when the president’s son-in-law purchased the building in 2007. This was especially true of Donald Trump, a self-styled “King of Debt” who managed to escape disaster in Atlantic City, New Jersey, in part because so little of his own money was invested in the casinos he ran there. And never has it been more true than during the past decade, a period during which historically low interest rates made borrowing money cheaper than ever. There are a few reasons a company might want to buy entirely with cash. Trouble with lenders is one of them. Cash purchases are important if you need to move quickly, something you see with money going into red-hot housing markets like Silicon Valley and out of insecure economies like China and Venezuela. And then, of course, there is the reason that the president’s former chief adviser, Steve Bannon, told Michael Wolff was at the center of the Mueller inquiry: money laundering. Claims of money laundering have long swirled around the purchases made at Trump properties. In November, Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson—whose firm researched Trump at the behest of the conservative Washington Free Beacon, and later hired Christopher Steele to produce the now-infamous opposition research dossier—told a House panel that the firm saw condo sales in Trump buildings that “were suggestive of money-laundering.” Time was money got laundered through such cash-intensive businesses as convenience stores, restaurants, parking garages, and retail. The basic idea is this: If you have a suitcase with $1 million in drug trade profits and you have a pizza place that makes no money, you tell the IRS the pizza place made $1 million, and you empty the suitcase into the cash register. Dirty money made clean through pizza. Or, in the case of Baltimore drug kingpin Avon Barksdale in The Wire, a photocopying business. As Avon’s consigliere Stringer Bell realized, however, real estate can make a superior vessel. An investigation by BuzzFeed News found Trump buildings attracted an enormous number of all-cash purchases by shell companies, two characteristics considered red flags for money laundering. In a hypothetical money-laundering condo purchase made by a shell company, a buyer would endow an anodyne-sounding LLC with profits from illicit proceedings—cocaine trafficking, for example. Two years later, the LLC sells the property to any old joe, and the money—which is now “clean,” sourced from a legitimate real estate transaction—can be deposited into a U.S. bank account or wherever else its owner wants to put it. More at https://slate.com/business/2018/05/were-donald-trumps-cash-real-estate-purchases-related-to-money-laundering.html
Wednesday, May 9, 2018 1:54 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Like a broken record, second feverishly endeavors to deflect the fact that there is No Evidence of Trump! Russia! Collusion! still.
Quote: Last Wednesday, senior FBI and national intelligence officials relayed an urgent message to the White House: Information being sought by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes could endanger a top-secret intelligence source….After the White House sided with the department’s decision to refuse the request, Nunes (R-Calif.) publicly vented his frustration, saying Sunday that he may try to hold Sessions in contempt for refusing to comply. ….For the intelligence agencies, Nunes’s request threatened to cross a red line of compromising sources and methods of U.S. intelligence-gathering, according to people familiar with their views. Intelligence officials fear that providing even a redacted version of the information Nunes seeks could expose that person and damage relationships with other countries that serve as U.S. intelligence partners. ….On Tuesday, House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R.-Wis.) said he had not discussed the matter with Nunes but added that he expected congressional subpoenas to be enforced. “We expect the administration to comply with our document requests,” Ryan said.
Wednesday, May 9, 2018 3:44 PM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Quote:You can decide for yourself whether you believe the intelligence community
Quote:For the intelligence agencies, Nunes’s request threatened to cross a red line of compromising sources and methods of U.S. intelligence-gathering, according to people familiar with their views. Intelligence officials fear that providing even a redacted version of the information Nunes seeks could expose that person and damage relationships with other countries that serve as U.S. intelligence partners.
Wednesday, May 9, 2018 3:48 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:You can decide for yourself whether you believe the intelligence community THEY ARE PAID LIARS, it's their job. Plus, they've been caught lying in the past, so why should I trust anything that they say?
Wednesday, May 9, 2018 3:49 PM
Quote:In my opinion, Signym, you are a lying sack of shit.
Quote:Once you get around to it, you ought to stand behind your recommendations
Wednesday, May 9, 2018 4:43 PM
Wednesday, May 9, 2018 4:55 PM
Wednesday, May 9, 2018 5:31 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Like a broken record, second feverishly endeavors to deflect the fact that there is No Evidence of Trump! Russia! Collusion! still.Jewel, you will not like this story, either: Rep. Devin Nunes has lately taken to demanding that the Justice Department turn over records of the Mueller investigation. For obvious reasons, records of active investigations are normally confidential since the FBI doesn’t want to (a) hurt innocent people who may get caught in their net and (b) doesn’t want to alert the guilty to what they’re doing. Nunes, of course, would very much like to alert the guilty, which is why he wants this stuff. He says he wants it in order to conduct oversight on possible misconduct by Mueller, but I think we can safely laugh that off. All that is bad enough. But it gets worse: Quote: Last Wednesday, senior FBI and national intelligence officials relayed an urgent message to the White House: Information being sought by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes could endanger a top-secret intelligence source….After the White House sided with the department’s decision to refuse the request, Nunes (R-Calif.) publicly vented his frustration, saying Sunday that he may try to hold Sessions in contempt for refusing to comply. ….For the intelligence agencies, Nunes’s request threatened to cross a red line of compromising sources and methods of U.S. intelligence-gathering, according to people familiar with their views. Intelligence officials fear that providing even a redacted version of the information Nunes seeks could expose that person and damage relationships with other countries that serve as U.S. intelligence partners. ….On Tuesday, House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R.-Wis.) said he had not discussed the matter with Nunes but added that he expected congressional subpoenas to be enforced. “We expect the administration to comply with our document requests,” Ryan said. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/risk-to-intelligence-source-who-aided-russia-investigation-at-center-of-latest-showdown-between-nunes-and-justice-dept/2018/05/08/d6fb66f8-5223-11e8-abd8-265bd07a9859_story.html So there you go. You can decide for yourself whether you believe the intelligence community, but they claim that turning over these docs could get people killed. Nunes, however, is so obsessed with covering for Donald Trump that he doesn’t care. He’s the ringleader of the conservative claim that the Mueller probe is a liberal fraud designed to bring down a Republican president, and if that means pretending that the FBI, CIA, NSA, and every other federal agency is corrupt, so be it. If it means leaking information that could get people killed, that’s probably OK too. And Paul Ryan is perfectly fine with this. Welcome to the Republican Party in 2018.
Thursday, May 10, 2018 11:22 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: So I take it that you were equally concerned about Saudi Arabia's payments to the Clinton Foundation, and big pharma's ginormous speaking fees to Hillary? SECOND, may I offer you your own advice? Quote:Once you get around to it, you ought to stand behind your recommendations
Thursday, May 10, 2018 12:42 PM
CAPTAINCRUNCH
... stay crunchy...
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: So I take it that you were equally concerned about Saudi Arabia's payments to the Clinton Foundation, and big pharma's ginormous speaking fees to Hillary? SECOND, may I offer you your own advice? Quote:Once you get around to it, you ought to stand behind your recommendations I bring this up again because I want to reiterate what I posted BEFORE the election: Ethically, TRUMP AND HILLARY WERE ABOUT THE SAME. With maybe Trump having a slight edge because his financial depredations weren't quite on the same grand scale, and his personal failings were about on-par. 'Cause IMHO Hillary is just as skeezy as Trump. To me, the critical difference is WHOSE INTERESTS each candidate represented. Hillary represented the interests and warmongering of the globalist financial elite and the (current) deep state which enforced the interests of the globalist elite. Trump represented the nationalist elite, and clearly the deep state has been gunning for him since before his election. While I knew that he didn't have a viable plan to restore the American economy - AND I SAID SO QUITE OFTEN - at least he would pull us out of those international trade deals, reduce illegal immigration, and stop making war with Russia (and hopefully pull back our military involvement from other places around the world.) In any case, I voted for a loose cannon over "more of the same" and I think I got about what I voted for, even including Trump's apparently irrational grotch against Iran, which I pointed out AT THE TIME was a problem for me.
Thursday, May 10, 2018 2:42 PM
Thursday, May 10, 2018 3:21 PM
Thursday, May 10, 2018 4:00 PM
Thursday, May 10, 2018 4:05 PM
Quote:Like the fifth time you've reminded us.
Quote:It's like you know a shit-storm of epic proportions is coming and it's Trump's fault and you are running away from him as fast as possible.
Quote:Nervous about Bolton? Middle East? North Korea? Russia? (heh heh).
Thursday, May 10, 2018 4:22 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Like the fifth time you've reminded us. Well, since people keep tagging me as being a "Trump supporter" and telling me how awful he is because he's a loose cannon, I'm simply reminding them (you) not to put more words in my mouth. Like YOU just did. Again. Quote:It's like you know a shit-storm of epic proportions is coming and it's Trump's fault and you are running away from him as fast as possible. If I posted that he was a "loose cannon" BEFORE the election, was I "running away" from him then? Show some logic, man! Quote:Nervous about Bolton? Middle East? North Korea? Russia? (heh heh). Not especially. And what does this have to do with RUSSIA!!! ? Anything? I thought the twist in your collective gut was all about RUSSIA!!! That IS what this thread is about isn't it?
Friday, May 11, 2018 7:54 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Well, since people keep tagging me as being a "Trump supporter" and telling me how awful he is because he's a loose cannon, I'm simply reminding them (you) not to put more words in my mouth. Like YOU just did. Again.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: And what does this have to do with RUSSIA!!! ? Anything? I thought the twist in your collective gut was all about RUSSIA!!! That IS what this thread is about isn't it?
Friday, May 11, 2018 7:57 AM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: There are likely some savory crow-eating posts in this thread worthy of preservation before their entire delusion collapses.
Friday, May 11, 2018 8:03 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: He has never had a clue what this thread was about, other than another spot to robo-shit up.
Friday, May 11, 2018 8:08 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: There are likely some savory crow-eating posts in this thread worthy of preservation before their entire delusion collapses. You better do it soon. It appears on the front page of the RWED now there is a topic that can no longer be accessed. Either the fff.net gremlins got to it, or "JJ" figured out how to shut down access to threads he creates.
Friday, May 11, 2018 8:48 AM
Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch: Maybe if you delete all the text in a thread title there won't be anything to click on?
Friday, May 11, 2018 9:02 AM
Quote:Maybe if you delete all the text in a thread title there won't be anything to click on? Well that's what I was thinking too when I saw it. I just didn't want to say it and give everybody else ideas.- SIX
Quote:The original thread does not have a title. Without a title I (and I presume most people) can't access it directly, only thru this link. However, the link as posted by JSF has a problem: The capital "W" at the beginning of www needs to be replaced by lower-case "w" otherwise you will probably get an error message.
Quote:THUGR: Please "Edit thread" to add a title. (As the author of this thread you have the permissions to do so.) Look to the right of the thread, there is a "edit thread" button, click on that and it will allow you to add a title. WITHOUT A TITLE, PEOPLE CANNOT ACCESS THIS THREAD DIRECTLY.
Friday, May 11, 2018 11:59 AM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Friday, May 11, 2018 12:26 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Maybe if you delete all the text in a thread title there won't be anything to click on? Well that's what I was thinking too when I saw it. I just didn't want to say it and give everybody else ideas.- SIXHey, I ASKED THUGR to add a title to his post, I pointed out the problem ... Quote:The original thread does not have a title. Without a title I (and I presume most people) can't access it directly, only thru this link. However, the link as posted by JSF has a problem: The capital "W" at the beginning of www needs to be replaced by lower-case "w" otherwise you will probably get an error message. http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62404 ... and even gave THUGR INSTRUCTIONS on how to fix it. Quote:THUGR: Please "Edit thread" to add a title. (As the author of this thread you have the permissions to do so.) Look to the right of the thread, there is a "edit thread" button, click on that and it will allow you to add a title. WITHOUT A TITLE, PEOPLE CANNOT ACCESS THIS THREAD DIRECTLY. http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62404 I can't help it if THUGR is too stupid to fix his own post (because he posted it without a title), but you can access it thru the link posted by JSF http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62404 You may not have been here for the "title wars", but at one time ANYONE could change the title of a thread. Once that was discovered, Haken changed the permissions for that field to exclude anyone but the author of the thread itself. Now, AFAIK, only the author (in this case "JJ"/THUGR) can change the title of the thread. THUGR, it's up to you. If you want people to be able to access THAT THREAD directly, YOU have to add a title to the thread. If you don't, the problem is all on you, not anyone else.
Friday, May 11, 2018 12:29 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Maybe if you delete all the text in a thread title there won't be anything to click on? Well that's what I was thinking too when I saw it. I just didn't want to say it and give everybody else ideas.- SIXHey, I ASKED THUGR to add a title to his post, I pointed out the problem ... Quote:The original thread does not have a title. Without a title I (and I presume most people) can't access it directly, only thru this link. However, the link as posted by JSF has a problem: The capital "W" at the beginning of www needs to be replaced by lower-case "w" otherwise you will probably get an error message. http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62403 ... and even gave THUGR INSTRUCTIONS on how to fix it. Quote:THUGR: Please "Edit thread" to add a title. (As the author of this thread you have the permissions to do so.) Look to the right of the thread, there is a "edit thread" button, click on that and it will allow you to add a title. WITHOUT A TITLE, PEOPLE CANNOT ACCESS THIS THREAD DIRECTLY. http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62403 I can't help it if THUGR is too stupid to fix his own post (because he posted it without a title), but you can access it thru the link posted by JSF http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62403 You may not have been here for the "title wars", but at one time ANYONE could change the title of a thread. Once that was discovered, Haken changed the permissions for that field to exclude anyone but the author of the thread itself. Now, AFAIK, only the author (in this case "JJ"/THUGR) can change the title of the thread. THUGR, it's up to you. If you want people to be able to access THAT THREAD directly, YOU have to add a title to the thread. If you don't, the problem is all on you, not anyone else. I don't know why you posted a link to the wrong thread. Twice.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Maybe if you delete all the text in a thread title there won't be anything to click on? Well that's what I was thinking too when I saw it. I just didn't want to say it and give everybody else ideas.- SIXHey, I ASKED THUGR to add a title to his post, I pointed out the problem ... Quote:The original thread does not have a title. Without a title I (and I presume most people) can't access it directly, only thru this link. However, the link as posted by JSF has a problem: The capital "W" at the beginning of www needs to be replaced by lower-case "w" otherwise you will probably get an error message. http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62403 ... and even gave THUGR INSTRUCTIONS on how to fix it. Quote:THUGR: Please "Edit thread" to add a title. (As the author of this thread you have the permissions to do so.) Look to the right of the thread, there is a "edit thread" button, click on that and it will allow you to add a title. WITHOUT A TITLE, PEOPLE CANNOT ACCESS THIS THREAD DIRECTLY. http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62403 I can't help it if THUGR is too stupid to fix his own post (because he posted it without a title), but you can access it thru the link posted by JSF http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62403 You may not have been here for the "title wars", but at one time ANYONE could change the title of a thread. Once that was discovered, Haken changed the permissions for that field to exclude anyone but the author of the thread itself. Now, AFAIK, only the author (in this case "JJ"/THUGR) can change the title of the thread. THUGR, it's up to you. If you want people to be able to access THAT THREAD directly, YOU have to add a title to the thread. If you don't, the problem is all on you, not anyone else.
Friday, May 18, 2018 7:36 AM
Friday, May 18, 2018 1:37 PM
Friday, May 18, 2018 1:43 PM
JJ
Friday, May 18, 2018 1:48 PM
Friday, May 18, 2018 2:04 PM
Friday, May 18, 2018 2:42 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Still No Evidence of Collusion? It's only been a year of the Witch Hunt Fishing Expedition.
Friday, May 18, 2018 6:53 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Still No Evidence of Collusion? It's only been a year of the Witch Hunt Fishing Expedition.Still No Evidence of Trump! Russia! Collusion!
Thursday, May 24, 2018 7:18 PM
Thursday, May 31, 2018 1:46 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Still No Evidence? It's been over a year.... And 2 years of trying to Plant Evidence, Fake Evidence, Dream Up Evidence.
Friday, June 1, 2018 12:23 AM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Still No Evidence? It's been over a year.... And 2 years of trying to Plant Evidence, Fake Evidence, Dream Up Evidence.Robert Mueller, the blah blah. One of the most important things to understand about Donald Trump, blah blah. Trump knows that Mueller is blah blah. Mueller is blah blah. Whenever Mueller seems blah blah. But there is no evidence that blah blah. In fact, blah blah. I believe that it is obvious – and has been for more than a year – that Trump Mueller is doing everything he can to obstruct any investigation into evidence More at https://theintercept.com/2018/05/31/trump-russia-mueller-investigation-obstruction-of-justice/
Friday, June 1, 2018 9:09 AM
Friday, June 1, 2018 11:52 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JJ: All I can say to JSF is what? Where do you come up with this shit. T
Saturday, June 2, 2018 8:49 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JJ: All I can say to JSF is what? Where do you come up with this shit. T Try reading the news for a change, Troll.
Saturday, June 2, 2018 10:01 AM
Saturday, June 2, 2018 1:32 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Whatever You Think Of The Trump-Russia Investigation, Whistleblower Reality Winner Deserves Your Support https://theintercept.com/2018/06/02/reality-winner-whistleblower-without-constituency/ By this weekend, Reality Winner, the former NSA contractor accused of releasing national security information to the media, will have been in jail for more than a full year without being convicted of a crime. Her trial, originally scheduled for October 2017, has been pushed back multiple times and is now on the docket for October 2018. It’s anyone’s guess whether the case will drag on even longer. Something curious has happened along the way: Winner’s case fell out of the public consciousness. National media pays scant attention to her plight, and many advocates from the left to the center of the political spectrum — all of whom should have ample reason to loudly protest the many injustices in her case — have been largely silent. The story of Russian interference in the election has dominated front-page headlines for a year. Despite being consistently the most covered news story of the Trump presidency — with a seemingly avid readership — a whistleblower accused of releasing a top-secret National Security Agency document that gave the public an unprecedented window into how U.S. intelligence agencies think Russia tried to interfere has been all but forgotten. Winner’s case is a miscarriage of justice. While powerful Washington figures have gotten off with a slap on the wrist for leaking classified information, Winner remains behind bars after being denied bail on extremely dubious grounds. Up until last month, when lawyer Alex van der Zwaan reported to prison to serve a 30-day sentence related to making false statements in the special counsel investigation, Winner was the only person with any relation to the Russian interference scandal in jail — and she has been there for a year. Democrats and anti-Trump centrists should know better than anyone, thanks to the Hillary Clinton email server scandal, how warped and broken our classification system is — that the “national security risks” proffered by the intelligence community rarely, if ever, hold water. It should be obvious that no one should be prosecuted for trying to alert the public about potential vulnerabilities in our electoral process. More at https://theintercept.com/2018/06/02/reality-winner-whistleblower-without-constituency/
Saturday, June 2, 2018 1:38 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Democrats and anti-Trump centrists should know better than anyone, thanks to the Hillary Clinton email server scandal, how warped and broken our classification system is — that the “national security risks” proffered by the intelligence community rarely, if ever, hold water. It should be obvious that no one should be prosecuted for trying to alert the public about potential vulnerabilities in our electoral process.
Monday, June 11, 2018 11:17 AM
Monday, June 11, 2018 3:24 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Still No Evidence?
Monday, June 11, 2018 3:47 PM
Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Still No Evidence? Still no idea what Mueller knows, do ya?
Monday, June 11, 2018 3:55 PM
Monday, June 11, 2018 4:07 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Still No Evidence? $17 Million wasted on Loitering and Littering from 10 years ago.
Tuesday, June 19, 2018 3:21 PM
Tuesday, June 19, 2018 4:17 PM
REAVERFAN
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: I think people should read these indictments - the genuine originals - rather than continue to steep their brains in US media swill. https://www.justice.gov/sco In regards to the non-Russian nationals like Manafort, zero charges have anything to do with Trump or the election.
Tuesday, June 19, 2018 4:37 PM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL