REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

She's against gay marriage and looks FANTASTIC in a bikini

POSTED BY: WHOZIT
UPDATED: Friday, April 24, 2009 21:28
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2226
PAGE 1 of 2

Monday, April 20, 2009 11:39 AM

WHOZIT


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517137,00.html

If she had said she was for it, she would have won and been put in a movie with George Clooney. Maybe they can find a roll for her on 24?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 12:23 PM

BYTEMITE


I'm too scared to look. Is it Ann Coulter?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 12:25 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
I'm too scared to look. Is it Ann Coulter?




Hardly.

Whao - nice bikini.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 12:26 PM

CHRISISALL


However, she's clearly *for* breast augmentation.


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 12:46 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Just because your old lady doesn't have as nice a pair doesn't mean you have to hate.







NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 1:23 PM

WHOZIT


She's not backing down!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517215,00.html

Why'd that creep even ask that question in the 1st place, I thought they were more interested in world peace?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 1:39 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


I heard about this, and the 'judge' is some gay activist, trying to make a political statement. It's customary to NOT ask contestants about political or religious issues, and yet they hoped to sabotage Ms California, knowing in advance her views.

He should be censured, of course, but he won't be, not in this P.C., upside down world.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 1:40 PM

PIRATECAT


CA, I was thinking that same thing. I want natural.

"Battle of Serenity, Mal. Besides Zoe here, how many-" "I'm talkin at you! How many men in your platoon came out of their alive".

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 8:42 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I found this quote curious:

-=-=-=-

"It's ugly," said Scott Ihrig, a gay man, who attended the pageant with his partner. "I think it's ridiculous that she got first runner-up. That is not the value of 95 percent of the people in this audience. Look around this audience and tell me how many gay men there are."

-=-=-=-

Were they all wearing signs?

--Anthony



"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 9:55 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
I'm too scared to look. Is it Ann Coulter?


It's Miss California USA, who answered a question by a gay activist judge (perez hilton) for the pageant produced by another gay activist (Keith Lewis). The gay activist judge later explained that her answer to a question which is normally not allowed in the pageant was the sole reason she did not win the title.

I conjured the most appropriate question would be this: why are Female Beauty Pageants being produced and judged by GAY guys? Why cannot they judge their GAY pageants and let Hetero Men judge who we like to represent Female Beauty? Why are Hetero Men allowing Gays to dictate who we should consider attractive to Hetero Men?
THAT is seriously twisted.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 10:08 PM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:

I conjured the most appropriate question would be this: why are Female Beauty Pageants being produced and judged by GAY guys? Why cannot they judge their GAY pageants and let Hetero Men judge who we like to represent Female Beauty? Why are Hetero Men allowing Gays to dictate who we should consider attractive to Hetero Men?
THAT is seriously twisted.



Speaking of twisted, why should hetero men be th sole judges of female beauty? As a woman, I have some serious opinions about it, myself.

And I sincerely doubt that a beauty pageant is supposed to dictate hetero men's norm of beauty. I doubt it's about hetero men at all.



ETA: I tend to think it was inappropriate to ask the question, but then I'm not very familiar with beauty pageants. What sorts of questions are usually asked and what are they supposed to test? If she had declared that she believes women ought to not vote and not work - upon being asked - would that legitimately influence the judgment?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, April 20, 2009 11:38 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by AnthonyT:
Hello,

I found this quote curious:

-=-=-=-

"It's ugly," said Scott Ihrig, a gay man, who attended the pageant with his partner. "I think it's ridiculous that she got first runner-up. That is not the value of 95 percent of the people in this audience. Look around this audience and tell me how many gay men there are."

-=-=-=-

Were they all wearing signs?

--Anthony





Never heard of Gay-dar ? You don't think a gay man can tell whether other gay men might be at an event which is likely to attract other gay men or not ? A beauty pageant isn't exactly the standard hang out for gay men, I'm guessin'.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 21, 2009 1:50 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Quote:

Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:

I conjured the most appropriate question would be this: why are Female Beauty Pageants being produced and judged by GAY guys? Why cannot they judge their GAY pageants and let Hetero Men judge who we like to represent Female Beauty? Why are Hetero Men allowing Gays to dictate who we should consider attractive to Hetero Men?
THAT is seriously twisted.



Speaking of twisted, why should hetero men be th sole judges of female beauty? As a woman, I have some serious opinions about it, myself.

And I sincerely doubt that a beauty pageant is supposed to dictate hetero men's norm of beauty. I doubt it's about hetero men at all.



ETA: I tend to think it was inappropriate to ask the question, but then I'm not very familiar with beauty pageants. What sorts of questions are usually asked and what are they supposed to test? If she had declared that she believes women ought to not vote and not work - upon being asked - would that legitimately influence the judgment?



Bingo. I tend to think of beauty pageants as being pretty close to the gayest things ever. The women are so overly tarted-up that they end up looking like drag queens. If you're a straight man and you're that hard up for something on TV to whack it to, just give up and go get yourself some porn. Jesus won't mind, I promise.

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:23 AM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...


So much is faked it's like who has the best cgi.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:27 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
However, she's clearly *for* breast augmentation.


I believe that every woman has a right to large breasts. Its in the Constitution...the Elastic Clause.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you"- Chrisisall, 2009.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:31 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Speaking of twisted, why should hetero men be th sole judges of female beauty? As a woman, I have some serious opinions about it, myself.

And I sincerely doubt that a beauty pageant is supposed to dictate hetero men's norm of beauty. I doubt it's about hetero men at all.


That dog don't hunt. Hetero men are the sole judges of female beauty. Everyone else has a right to their opinion...but its just an opinion. Hetero men (and hot lesbians) set the standard.

The opposite is true as well.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you"- Chrisisall, 2009.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 21, 2009 3:46 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by PirateCat:
CA, I was thinking that same thing. I want natural.


She looks to be a very pretty girl who wanted both the stick-figure model thinness and B-cup a little more weight would naturally bring.
What a shame.
These pageants are a joke anyway, always have been. T&A + make believe girlfriends for 13 year olds.


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:29 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Quote:

Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:

I conjured the most appropriate question would be this: why are Female Beauty Pageants being produced and judged by GAY guys? Why cannot they judge their GAY pageants and let Hetero Men judge who we like to represent Female Beauty? Why are Hetero Men allowing Gays to dictate who we should consider attractive to Hetero Men?
THAT is seriously twisted.



Speaking of twisted, why should hetero men be th sole judges of female beauty? As a woman, I have some serious opinions about it, myself.

And I sincerely doubt that a beauty pageant is supposed to dictate hetero men's norm of beauty. I doubt it's about hetero men at all.



ETA: I tend to think it was inappropriate to ask the question, but then I'm not very familiar with beauty pageants. What sorts of questions are usually asked and what are they supposed to test? If she had declared that she believes women ought to not vote and not work - upon being asked - would that legitimately influence the judgment?



Consider the illogic of having people who are not attracted to females, sometimes repulsed by female sexuality, and/or find the thought of heterosexual sex with females repugnant to be the arbiters of female attractiveness - if that isn't obviously illogical, you should stay away from sci fi forums.
The questions asked are not to delve into politics or religion. Apparently weather is allowed. Other contestants where not asked political questions, only this contestant was singled out, clearly an unfairness perpetrated by the gay activist.
Knowing that the questions are not allowed to be political or religious and then being sandbagged by an obvious political question in violation of the contest rules should have resulted in the judge being disbarred from the contest.

It would be less illogical for gay guys to be judging the gay studmen pageant, or gay drag pageants (which they exclude hetero men from judging), or even lesbian women to judge a female beauty pageant (beacuse they at least find females sexually attractive instead of repulsive).

By having the gay producer select the activist gay for judging females, the implication seems clear that they consider one type of sexual orientation to rule over an opposite sexual orientation to be preferable, so they should be overjoyed that this contestant agreed that one sexual orientaion (heterosexuals) should control the opposite sexual orientation (homos) - otherwise they prove themselves the epitome of hypocrity, not that logic has any standing among gays.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:03 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
However, she's clearly *for* breast augmentation.


I believe that every woman has a right to large breasts. Its in the Constitution...the Elastic Clause.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you"- Chrisisall, 2009.



She might be for it, but upon further review, I do believe hers are natural.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:29 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

...they prove themselves the epitome of hypocrity, not that logic has any standing among gays.



I had no idea you were gay. You must be, though, since you also seem to subscribe to the "hypocrity" that one group should have control over another. How else do you explain the "heteros" trying to decide whether gays are good enough to be married?

And seriously, I've never known a straight man who watched these beauty pageants.

Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course...

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 3:30 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
upon further review, I do believe hers are natural.


Nope, not possible. I reviewed the youtube entries, and am trained in anatomy- they are aftermarket work all right.


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:39 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:

Consider the illogic of having people who are not attracted to females, sometimes repulsed by female sexuality, and/or find the thought of heterosexual sex with females repugnant to be the arbiters of female attractiveness - if that isn't obviously illogical, you should stay away from sci fi forums.



I think the illogic is yours in assuming that all beauty must be related to sex or sexual attraction.

Or assuming that finding the thought of sex with a woman repulsive means finding THEM or their beauty repulsive.

I don't generally want to have sex with women and there are plenty men I don't want to have sex with and it's not a direct correlation to whether or not I consider them beautiful. I consider women generally more beautiful than men, and there's a number of men I'd class beautiful but am not attracted to.

And yes, what I find beautiful in women or men might be different from what their prospective sexual partner might find beautiful in them. But neither are they necessarily diametrically opposed things, and when you take into account every one's opinion, I'm sure you can arrive at a standard of beauty that meets most people's taste.

I find it silly to tie beauty to sexual attraction.

Quote:


The questions asked are not to delve into politics or religion. Apparently weather is allowed. Other contestants where not asked political questions, only this contestant was singled out, clearly an unfairness perpetrated by the gay activist.
Knowing that the questions are not allowed to be political or religious and then being sandbagged by an obvious political question in violation of the contest rules should have resulted in the judge being disbarred from the contest.



Then it is like I suspected unfair and I agree with you that the judge was in the wrong.

Quote:



By having the gay producer select the activist gay for judging females, the implication seems clear that they consider one type of sexual orientation to rule over an opposite sexual orientation to be preferable, so they should be overjoyed that this contestant agreed that one sexual orientaion (heterosexuals) should control the opposite sexual orientation (homos) - otherwise they prove themselves the epitome of hypocrity, not that logic has any standing among gays.



You're losing me there.

I agree that the judge was in the wrong for dragging politics into what should be a politics-free zone, but by the same token you should leave the sexuality of the judges out of the concept of beauty pageants, because I doubt most of them are there to Be Oppressively Gay, but instead to enjoy a frilly event with pretty women and voice their opinion on aesthetics and other merits of the contestants.

Why does it not occur to you to broaden beauty beyond the scope of sex? Surely you yourself consider people and things beautiful based on more than only sexual attraction?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 6:00 AM

PARTICIPANT


Quote:

Originally posted by pizmobeach:
So much is faked it's like who has the best cgi.



So whats the problem


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 6:55 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Chris,
Yours is a popular view, I concur. However, she's a fine specimen and there are adhesives which do wonders in that dept. I personally think ALL contestants should be judged on their original issue parts, and after market add ons need not apply.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 9:22 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Obviously SHE never saw the movie Miss Congeniality!Doesn't she know that the only answer they allow is "World peace"?

Oh and BTW... I can't imagine what's happening to Whozit's bagel right now. Or, maybe the problem is that I can.
---------------------------------
It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:09 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
she's a fine specimen

No doubt. But she could use a few more calories IMO.


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:34 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Obviously SHE never saw the movie Miss Congeniality!Doesn't she know that the only answer they allow is "World peace"?



Damn, I thought it was "whirled peas"!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:56 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Good for her. She had the courage to state her mind. I'm sure a lot of other girls chose the stock politically correct response designed to appease the haters.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:32 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Question: Why is a gay man even judging a Miss USA contest anyway?? If you don't drink or enjoy wine, are you a good candidate to be a wine taster?




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:34 AM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Question: Why is a gay man even judging a Miss USA contest anyway?? If you don't drink or enjoy wine, are you a good candidate to be a wine taster?






Because female beauty is not like wine. You don't have to drink it to appreciate it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:48 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Question: Why is a gay man even judging a Miss USA contest anyway?? If you don't drink or enjoy wine, are you a good candidate to be a wine taster?





Do you have to be an artist to appreciate art?

ETA: Let me get this straight (no pun intended): You don't want gays to have any say in what straight people do?

Savor the irony...

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 4:05 AM

BYTEMITE


Although, if there WAS actual misogyny involved? Suddenly the world of high fashion makes a WHOLE lot more sense.

The shoes alone...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 5:44 AM

THATWEIRDGIRL


Her answer is contrary to my own, but I didn't think it was delivered in a malicious of offensive way. She said she loved her country. She said she thought it was great that states could decide for themselves, but for her personally she was against. I am one who thinks she was targeted because she is CA. It was not a fair question for the pageant (been in a pageant myself). I didn't watch the competition so I don't have an opinion on who deserved to win. My opinion is she was sandbagged.

---
Sometimes I lie awake at night, and I ask, "Where have I gone wrong?" Then a voice says to me, "This is going to take more than one night."
-- Charlie Brown
www.thatcostumegirl.com
www.thatweirdgirl.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 6:58 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by thatweirdgirl:
Her answer is contrary to my own, but I didn't think it was delivered in a malicious of offensive way. She said she loved her country. She said she thought it was great that states could decide for themselves, but for her personally she was against. I am one who thinks she was targeted because she is CA. It was not a fair question for the pageant (been in a pageant myself). I didn't watch the competition so I don't have an opinion on who deserved to win. My opinion is she was sandbagged.

---
Sometimes I lie awake at night, and I ask, "Where have I gone wrong?" Then a voice says to me, "This is going to take more than one night."
-- Charlie Brown
www.thatcostumegirl.com
www.thatweirdgirl.com




Tend to agree - it's a question that shouldn't have even come up.

I do find the reactions to the question, the questioner, and the contestant and her answer somewhat telling, though...

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 7:19 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Question: Why is a gay man even judging a Miss USA contest anyway?? If you don't drink or enjoy wine, are you a good candidate to be a wine taster?





Do you have to be an artist to appreciate art?

ETA: Let me get this straight (no pun intended): You don't want gays to have any say in what straight people do?

Savor the irony...

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.



See, there you go again. I question a Gay man judging women ( like they know what qualities to even look for ), and you quickly distort my point. Typical.

The vulgar and tasteless remarks that the queer judge ( I won't bother mentioning his name, and yes, I'm TRYING to be derogatory towards him by using that term ) later made about Ms California are what should have disqualified him , more than anything. That's where his true character ( or lack there of ) was on display. He's so far beneath the contestants he judged, it's a joke.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:02 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Question: Why is a gay man even judging a Miss USA contest anyway?? If you don't drink or enjoy wine, are you a good candidate to be a wine taster?




Because female beauty is not like wine. You don't have to drink it to appreciate it.



But she answered the question correctly. How so ? It was her honest opinion, and it represents the opinion of the people of California. She, being Ms California, did right.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:30 PM

AGENTROUKA


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Question: Why is a gay man even judging a Miss USA contest anyway?? If you don't drink or enjoy wine, are you a good candidate to be a wine taster?




Because female beauty is not like wine. You don't have to drink it to appreciate it.



But she answered the question correctly. How so ? It was her honest opinion, and it represents the opinion of the people of California. She, being Ms California, did right.







Which has nothing to do with gay men judging female beauty pageants... I already stated that I disagree with this question being asked in the first place, so why are you bringing this up when the tangent was about female beauty?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:39 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Question: Why is a gay man even judging a Miss USA contest anyway?? If you don't drink or enjoy wine, are you a good candidate to be a wine taster?





Do you have to be an artist to appreciate art?

ETA: Let me get this straight (no pun intended): You don't want gays to have any say in what straight people do?

Savor the irony...

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.



See, there you go again. I question a Gay man judging women ( like they know what qualities to even look for ), and you quickly distort my point. Typical.



So I ask you to look at your remarks in another light, from another point of view, and I'm trying to "distort" your point? YOU question a gay man wanting to try to tell you anything, yet you don't see the hypocrisy inherent in telling HIM what is and isn't right. You question a gay man's ability to appreciate female beauty, yet you set yourself up as the arbiter of what constitutes love and marriage - especially for gays!

Yes, your hypocrisy IS quite typical.

Quote:


The vulgar and tasteless remarks that the queer judge ( I won't bother mentioning his name, and yes, I'm TRYING to be derogatory towards him by using that term ) later made about Ms California are what should have disqualified him , more than anything. That's where his true character ( or lack there of ) was on display. He's so far beneath the contestants he judged, it's a joke.



You find his remarks so vile and tasteless that the first thing you go to is calling him a "queer" - as if that isn't vulgar and tasteless in and of itself. And you admit that you're TRYING to be derogatory towards him, so don't try to weasel out of that one. So YOUR vulgar and derogatory remarks about the gay judge should disqualify you from having any say about him - at least, according to YOUR logic.

And yes, we've all seen your TRUE character. Or lack thereof.



Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:05 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Just because your old lady doesn't have as nice a pair doesn't mean you have to hate.

Ha ha ha ha, my lady's "pair" would have you in awe, my poor, desperate friend. I know they do that to me!

*hopes my Wife doesn't find this in poor taste...*

SCREW IT! They're real, and they're spectacular!


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:23 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Just because your old lady doesn't have as nice a pair doesn't mean you have to hate.

Ha ha ha ha, my lady's "pair" would have you in awe, my poor, desperate friend. I know they do that to me!

*hopes my Wife doesn't find this in poor taste...*

SCREW IT! They're real, and they're spectacular!


The laughing Chrisisall



No pix, no proof!

(Just kiddin' ya. Don't go Bruce Lee on me!)



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:28 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I question a Gay man judging women ( like they know what qualities to even look for ), and you quickly distort my point. Typical.


I dislike that they couldn't just respect her honest opinion, but I accept their judgement of beauty; I as a straight male can comfortably say that Johnny Depp & Bruce Lee are and were beautiful men. You need to remove those biased glasses before shooting your mouth off about that which you have prejudices about, AU.


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:31 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

No pix, no proof!


She would definitely kill me, Mike...she broke my leg once in Aikido class, you know.
Sexy.


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:34 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Yup, Chris - I dislike that they even asked her the question. It's a loaded question that has no place in a beauty pageant. I disagree with her answer, but she got a raw deal, because ANY answer would have had about half the crowd pissed off, it seems.

'Course, it's not like I was ever going to listen to Perez Hilton for advice on... well, ANYTHING. Not because he's gay, but because he's just tacky.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:35 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

No pix, no proof!


She would definitely kill me, Mike...she broke my leg once in Aikido class, you know.
Sexy.


The laughing Chrisisall



In that case, better not tell her I asked! I don't want her coming after ME!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:53 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

In that case, better not tell her I asked!

It's that Latin blood- here, just for "pair" reference, think Salma Hayek from Desperado...


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 4:20 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Ay Carumba! O Dios mio!


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:58 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I question a Gay man judging women ( like they know what qualities to even look for ), and you quickly distort my point. Typical.


I dislike that they couldn't just respect her honest opinion, but I accept their judgement of beauty; I as a straight male can comfortably say that Johnny Depp & Bruce Lee are and were beautiful men. You need to remove those biased glasses before shooting your mouth off about that which you have prejudices about, AU.


The laughing Chrisisall


Without that question, she had the title. All other aspects of the contest placed her total in first place. Only the ZERO that perezhilton gave her knocked her down to 2nd place. The Gay Activist thought that one facet of the contest outweighed all other considerations enough to merit giving her a zero. She knew the title was in danger once he sandbagged her, and yet she stood true to the truthful answer and answered honestly, which is far better than could be said for him.
It's a shame that the dishonest and deceitful person was the judge (and is being celebrated), and the honest person was penalized for being honest and not deceitful about a topic not even allowed to be broached.
I had understood the primary purpose of the Q&A for pageants was the exposure of poise, the smooth reply to a question which may or may not require thought, in front a of a live audience. Similar traits are tested by debate teams and game shows. Performance under pressure. I did not see Miss CA stutter or break out in hives even though she was being sandbagged and knew it, thus she showed the best poise of all contestants, but yet was penalized for it. Really a shame, and gays should feel collectively ashamed that their self-proclaimed spokesgay has revealed his rabid intolerance.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:42 PM

BIGRICHARD


I see the points from both sides, and I don't really have a problem with gay men judging a beauty pageant. Just Perez Hilton judging one. I don't like that guy at all. Mind you, I'd have to say, them judging this is a bit like me judging the 'hottest guys'. I'm not saying I don't have an opinion, but, me not being gay, it's mainly just personal opinion and based on what the person seems like, rather than what that person looks like. Hugh Jackman anyone?

But yeah, I don't see why this should have cost her the pageant, as someone else said, she gave her opinion, and if it's a 'beauty' pageant, where alot of it is these women walking around in skimpy little outfits, why should it matter what her opinion is. It's almost like if she said "I dislike Perez Hilton" and lost because of it.

Anyway, the point is, stop talking about CiA's ladyfriend. Or don't. I'm just worried about YOUR safety here guys!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 24, 2009 1:38 AM

RIPWASH


Quote:

Originally posted by BigRichard:
It's almost like if she said "I dislike Perez Hilton" and lost because of it.



Honestly, I think that's how the blow-hard took it.

I agree that the jerk should not have even been allowed to ask the question to begin with and it's probably because of this that judges will now have to have their questions pre-screened (I doubt it) OR these questions will be allowed after all (more likely).

I mean really. The guy's question AND response should have been taken into account when tallying the scores OR someone should have seen his score then gone to him and said, "You're score should be based on HOW she answered the question (poise, confidence, personality, etc.), not whether or not you liked it personally because of your orientation." To say he was obviously there with an agenda . . . ? That's a possibility and to think otherwise may be naive. People like him ALWAYS have their personal agendas in the forefront of EVERYTHING they do. He's a gay activist. That's the heart and soul of everything he does. He almost can't help himself in trying to get other people to make fools of themselves while pushing his train of thought into the spotlight and then mercilessly mocking them for it and, in this case, penalizing them for it.

I don't have a problem with gay men judging these pageants. I think recognition of beauty is universal, but subjective as well. There are some people out there who are considered quite stunningly beautiful by the general public, like Kate Moss, that I have to wholeheartedly disagree with IMHO. She's a stick figure with a very average face.

Zoe: "Get it running again."
Mal: "Yeah"
Zoe: "So not running now"
Mal: "Not so much"
- Out of Gas

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 24, 2009 3:10 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:

Which has nothing to do with gay men judging female beauty pageants... I already stated that I disagree with this question being asked in the first place, so why are you bringing this up when the tangent was about female beauty?



The 'tangent' ? Well, it WAS the Miss USA contest. I think female beauty is sort of implied.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
PC ran amok.
Tue, October 15, 2019 03:05 - 9 posts
Trump is not a sociopath or a narcissist, he has ADHD. Get over it.
Tue, October 15, 2019 01:10 - 25 posts
Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"
Tue, October 15, 2019 00:56 - 2993 posts
Happy Thanksgiving 2019
Mon, October 14, 2019 23:13 - 12 posts
Tulsi Gabbard - now it makes sense
Mon, October 14, 2019 23:09 - 21 posts
Who Is Running In 2020?
Mon, October 14, 2019 22:59 - 275 posts
Intellectual Pastimes
Mon, October 14, 2019 20:14 - 10 posts
Ghosts
Mon, October 14, 2019 17:07 - 45 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!!!
Mon, October 14, 2019 13:33 - 3026 posts
Impeachment Investigation Is Underway, Judiciary Committee Says
Mon, October 14, 2019 11:25 - 680 posts
Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria
Mon, October 14, 2019 10:49 - 957 posts
Middle East media interviews Putin
Mon, October 14, 2019 10:33 - 4 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL