REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Exposing the Koch Brothers’ 2014 Plan: Focus On 13 States and Campaign on Social Media

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 22:45
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 705
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, January 15, 2014 1:00 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

The libertarian industrialist brothers David and Charles Koch spent more on 2012 elections than previously believed—$400-plus million, new investigations have found. Buried in that reporting is an even more intriguing detail: where and how their political cartel will campaign in 2014.

If you look at the websites of the Koch-backed non-profits identified by the Center for Responsive Politics ( http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2014/01/koch-network-a-cartological-gu
ide.html
) and mapped even more elaborately by the Washington Post ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/01/06/mapping-the-
koch-brothers-massive-political-network
/), telling tidbits sketch out the frontline strategy of the Koch-backed wing of the GOP. Thirteen states are priorities, and social media will be used for its propagandizing.

The Center for Shared Services ( https://the-css.org/job-board) is a job placement agency for the dozen politicized non-profits funded by the Kochs. Besides the Washington beltway, they are looking for nuts-and-bolts campaign staff in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas and Virginia. They even have a Twitter page for hiring, at FreeMarketRecruiting ( https://twitter.com/CSS_Recruiting).

The Koch groups, which railed against Obama and congressional Democrats in 2012, especially want to hire grassroots organizers and social media experts. One group, the Public Notice ( http://thepublicnotice.org/jobs/), describes itself as “an independent non-profit dedicated to providing facts and insight on the economy and how government policy affects Americans’ financial well-being.” It seeks a “social media engagement specialist,” who will “plan, implement, and optimize numerous paid advertising campaigns on diverse channels such as Facebook, Twitter, Pandora, YouTube, Google, OutBrain.”

This social media campaign position reflects ( http://thepublicnotice.org/jobs/) a shift away from using traditional broadcast media for electioneering, which political consultants say will be the big trend in 2014.

“Campaigns will need… the ability to predict when a conversation on social media has the potential to become rapidly viral or, potentially, nuclear,” wrote Bryan Merica, in Campaign and Elections magazine ( http://www.campaignsandelections.com/magazine/us-edition/359207/the-ne
xt-step-in-social-media-monitoring.thtml
). “Imagine a communications war room staffed by a college intern… A young team member will know when to raise the red flag and alert senior campaign staffers to a quick moving story or sentiment.”

The Kochs' cartel seems to be embracing this strategy. Voters and social media users in its 13 targeted states may soon start seeing messages from any number of little-known Koch-funded groups with anti-government messaging. These include:

• The 60 Plus Association ( http://60plus.org/). Founded in 1992, it tries to be the right-wing version of the American Association of Retired persons, or AARP. The Post found that it spent $4.6 million on ads against Obama, Obamacare and House Democrats in 2012.

• American Commitment ( http://www.americancommitment.org/). Run by a Fox News columnist, it calls for making Obamacare voluntary, opposes minimum wage increases, and is anti-regulatory, pro-fracking, anti-tax and pro-property rights. It urges people to sign a pro-ALEC petition ( http://action.americancommitment.org/6875/amazon-must-reverse-course/), referring to the American Legislative Exchange Council, which drafts and distributes pro-corporate bills to state legislators to push in their home states. In 2012, it spent nearly $1.9 million on ads attacking Obama and Democrats and has online petition drives against Obamacare and in support of the Keystone XL pipeline ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/keystone-down-the-line/).

• American Future Fund ( http://americanfuturefund.com/about-us). This Iowa-based nonprofit spent more than $25 million on ads against Obama and congressional Democrats in 2012, the Post said, saying that $63 million of its $68 million came from money transfers from others in the Koch network. It has attacked the Internal Revenue Service and Federal Election Commission for going after its apparent violations of federal non-profit tax and election laws.

• Generation Opportunity ( http://generationopportunity.org/#axzz2pSbklwyW). This group ran a national get-out-the-vote effort for the GOP in 2012 that emphasized high youth unemployment rates, the Post said. Its issues were opposing Internet taxes and privatizing student loans, its website said.

While these and better-known Koch-backed groups, such as Americans for Prosperity, are planning for campaigns in at least the 13 states mentioned on their websites and on social media, what the public may first see will be attacks on moderate Republicans. That’s because there is a growing split between candidates backed by the Chamber of Commerce and by the Tea Party—which has been bankrolled by the Kochs ( http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer).

U.S. Chamber of Commerce president Tom Donahue last week said his organization, arguably the nation’s most powerful business lobby, would actively oppose Republican candidates who won't vote the way it wants ( http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=0F6D0396-A9A0-44EC-960B- 934BB145955F). “I think they’re well-intentioned,” he said, referring to Tea Party officeholders, “except when they get to Washington, they’re not going to do what we want them to do, so why should we help them get here?”

By next November, you can bet that hundreds of millions will be spent by the Koch cartel to try to take over the Republican Party in primary elections, and then to wrest control of both chambers in Congress. If you’re in a targeted state, the political propaganda will be everywhere—even on your Facebook page and Twitter feed. http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/exposing-koch-brothers-201
4-plan-focus-13-states-and-campaign-social-media?page=0%2C0



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:46 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


The Koch groups, which railed against Obama and congressional Democrats in 2012, especially want to hire grassroots organizers and social media experts.

Good !! That's AWESOME NEWS !!!

YES!

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:53 PM

WHOZIT


They could buy MSNBC and turn it into a home shopping channel.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:39 PM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
The Koch groups, which railed against Obama and congressional Democrats in 2012, especially want to hire grassroots organizers and social media experts.

Good !! That's AWESOME NEWS !!!

YES!




It is fine for a company to have and express a political point of view.

But, kinda think that hiring grassroots organizers is a thing that's likely to backfire.

Grassroots implies that it is something that originated and grew organically.

It is a logical contradiction to hire and fund participants in a grassroots movement. Because that's not grassroots, that's astroturf.

Quote:

Astroturfing is the practice of masking the sponsors of a message (e.g. political, advertising, or public relations) to give the appearance of it coming from a disinterested, grassroots participant.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing

A paid employee is by nature not a disinterested participant.

Creating and funding a political organization itself is fine. But if they want the group they are trying to organize to be legitimate, they really shouldn't refer to it as grassroots.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:45 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

Grassroots implies that it is something that originated and grew organically.

It is a logical contradiction to hire and fund participants in a grassroots movement. Because that's not grassroots, that's astroturf.


Byte nailed it. Koch Brothers are using their billions and their power in ways that are undemocratic (such as hiding who's behind what); that's not grassroots.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sat, May 4, 2024 09:52 - 6397 posts
Worst Mayors of All Time? Which is better gangsta' Mayor Eirc Adams or Mayor telepromoter Eric Adams?
Sat, May 4, 2024 09:45 - 12 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Sat, May 4, 2024 09:12 - 751 posts
Punishing Russia With Sanctions
Sat, May 4, 2024 07:16 - 508 posts
Countdown Clock Until Vladimir Putins' Rule Ends
Sat, May 4, 2024 06:53 - 128 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Sat, May 4, 2024 06:37 - 1032 posts
Another Putin Disaster
Sat, May 4, 2024 06:35 - 1515 posts
"Feminism" really means more Femtacular than you at EVERYTHING.
Sat, May 4, 2024 04:03 - 67 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, May 4, 2024 02:02 - 3616 posts
Durham Report Another Bust. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Sat, May 4, 2024 01:45 - 109 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, May 4, 2024 01:42 - 2368 posts
Unemployment Rate Facts
Fri, May 3, 2024 19:39 - 793 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL