REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Taliban gunmen shoot 14-year-old girl activist in Pakistan

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Saturday, October 13, 2012 16:40
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3245
PAGE 1 of 2

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:15 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



While the Left phonies up charges of " the war on women " here in the US, it completely and utterly ignores the radical Islamic war on women, which rages around the world, daily.




Quote:



MINGORA, PAKISTAN A Taliban gunman walked up to a bus taking children home from school in Pakistan's volatile Swat Valley on Tuesday and shot and wounded a 14-year-old activist known for championing the education of girls and publicizing atrocities committed by the Taliban, officials said.

The attack in the city of Mingora targeted 14-year-old Malala Yousufzai, who is widely respected for her work to promote the schooling of girls — something that the Taliban strongly opposes. She was nominated last year for the International Children's Peace Prize.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack, calling Malala's work "obscenity."

"This was a new chapter of obscenity, and we have to finish this chapter," said Taliban spokesman Ahsanullah Ahsan by telephone. "We have carried out this attack."



http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57528637/pakistani-teen-girls-acti
vist-malala-yousufzai-shot-on-school-bus-by-taliban-gunman
/


She survived the attack, but the Taliban vow that she's STILL a target, and will finish the job.

This is the enemy, folks. Those who refuse to see with their own eyes, are doing this little girl and all like her a inhumane disservice.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:24 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


We ignore stuff like this? No...YOU focus on it, obsessively. WE're all aware of it, WE all condemn it, WE aren't so stupid as to compare it to the war on women's rights in America. YOU sit hunched over a hot internet, obsessively looking for SOMETHING that YOU can put up here along with the numerous idiotic comparisons YOU make between things that have no comparison because YOU need to keep repeating the same stupidity YOU and ONLY you believe...

Oh, wait, you mean because we pay more attention to what's happening in our own country, what might impact OUR OWN rights, and know we can't do a damned thing about what some bastard insurgent EXACTLY on the other side of the world (it is, you know--I learned that when we moved there; Pakistan/Afghanistan are precisely on the other side of the world from California) does to some poor innocent woman, that means we "ignore" it?

Next step: Not only are we "ignoring" such things, we're no doubt "sympathizing" with them, we no doubt "support" them, we...

oh, shit, you're such a waste of time, with your close-minded (juuuust open enough to shove some FauxNews right-wing talking points in), ignorant, right-wing obsessiveness...

...leaving now to look for an actual, viable thread with intelligent conversation.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:29 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Yes Niki, I do obsess about this topic. Because we're being lied to.

Don't believe me, listen to her.



Watch the whole 19 min,23 second vid if you can, but she really hits it home at around the 11:20 mark.

This is nothing like Viet Nam.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:14 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


What's your solution?









"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:23 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



First and foremost, stop pretending and kidding ourselves, and start actually listening to who they, the radical Islamists say they are. Because they're telling us, all the damn time. We just refuse to listen.

Second, stop lying to the American public. Call the terrorists by their name, Islamic radicals, and cease w/ this crap about 'man caused disasters' or 'work place violence', when talking about the Ft Hood shootings.

Third, make it damn clear that we're not going to allow them to shoot little girls, or saw off the heads of innocence ( like Daniel Pearl ) and get away with it. And make no apologies for hitting back at them, twice as hard, every time they blow up a car, fly a plane into a building, or go on a shooting spree in a down town market.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:35 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:


Third, make it damn clear that we're not going to allow them to shoot little girls, or saw off the heads of innocence ( like Daniel Pearl ) and get away with it. And make no apologies for hitting back at them, twice as hard, every time they blow up a car, fly a plane into a building, or go on a shooting spree in a down town market.




How?


Do you have the names and locations of those who did this?


Or do you just plan on going on a shooting spree in a downtown market or flying a missile into a building?

How do you plan to target those who are doing such acts, and how will you ensure that you don't kill more innocent people than terrorists?


And will you be sending an army into Pakistan to do it, or just a few drones, or what?



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:47 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



How ? Ask Obama. He single handily found bin Laden and killed him.





" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:55 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Yeah, but a 30-year old female law student in suburban Georgetown wants and demands free birth control from the taxpayers! And although we're supposed to have separation of church and state, religious institutions must now cover items for female employees that violate their long-standing religious tenets. Granted these female employees knew their institutions' policies and views beforehand, they somehow recklessly made a free choice to work there nonetheless. THAT's the real war on women, and speakers at the Democrat Convention spent a lot of time trying to educate us all to the grave urgency of the situation. Muslim brutality in the third world? Oh golly gosh, if you're gonna well up like a big softie every time a Muslim girl or woman is honor-raped, or attacked with acid, or whipped, or stoned to death, or shot, or hanged you won't be able to focus on the desperate plight of American women right here at home. It's well-known that Republicans are more evil than the worst of the Muslim mullahs and their good-natured followers. American women are smart and know this, and that's why they're overwhelmingly not supporting their true enemy Mitt Romney.










Hmmm, better than Reuben's.
..One more.
Ben!
..My last one.
Okay.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 1:59 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Watch Kwickie and Niki et al call Lara Logan a 'teabagger' or some such next.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 2:06 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Seriously, Mike? Or are you just making a point?
Quote:

A Taliban gunman walked up to a bus

What are "we" supposed to do about that?
Quote:

start actually listening to who they, the radical Islamists say they are

What does he even mean by that? Like we don't KNOW who they are?
Quote:

stop lying to the American public. Call the terrorists by their name, Islamic radicals

Is someone lying to the American public about terrorists? Are all terrorists "Islamist radicals"? I thought we had a few home-grown ones in there, didn't we? And what's this about the Ft. Hood shooting? I thought it was well known that Nidal Malik Hasan was an islamist radical...he's in custody, paralyzed from the waist down, and there's no evidence he had anyone else working with him. What are we supposed to do that hasn't been done?
Quote:

make it damn clear that we're not going to allow them to shoot little girls...and get away with it

How are we supposed to do that? Start a war with Pakistan and the entire Middle East so we can put a policeman on every corner in case a Taliban gunman walks up to a bus?? How do we "hit back at them"--I thought we already WERE doing that...?

I popped back in to see where this went, but it doesn't seem to have gone anywhere...except that Rap is damned mad about yet another atrocity half-way around the world and somehow feels we should do...something...about it. ???


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 2:20 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Niki - It seems , from your reply, that you did not watch the video I posted.

Much of what I address is mentioned by Lara Logan. The other stuff is in response to the question of what would *I* do.

As for your questions...

What are WE suppose to do about it ? - Try writing your law makers or sending an e-mail to Janet Napolitanio. This govt refuses to call Islamic terrorism by its name. Now, such attacks are 'man caused disasters',and the war on terror is now an 'overseas contingency operation '.




" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 2:37 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Watch Kwickie and Niki et al call Lara Logan a 'teabagger' or some such next.






You're lying again. Might want to see to that.

YOU just made a bogus claim. Cite where I've ever called her such, or admit you're making it up, apologize, and we'll move on.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:34 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Well "stupid" or not to do so - it *IS* comparable, if only because that shit could wind up happening HERE if we let it, and one look at the GOPs conduct shows they're fucking drooling over the notion.
Look, I'd like to help em, and I do in small ways - but so long as we're on the defensive up against the goddamn radical christofascist scum, which differ NOT ONE WHIT from the goddamn Taliban, we're a little *BUSY* here, capsice ?

And shitheels like you cheering em on Rappy, you ain't got no fuckin problem with WHAT they're doin and that's a fact, only with WHO is doing it, cause if your precious jackbooted horde got down with stoning and burning, you'd be right there with em.

So don't shovel your false sympathies at me mister two-fer-one, cause I know better.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:54 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Jong

You are not correct in thinking that religious institutions did not previously cover birth control or plan B emergency contraception:

"... religious institutions must now cover items for female employees that violate their long-standing religious tenets. Granted these female employees knew their institutions' policies and views beforehand ..."


Like Wheaton College, Biola previously covered Plan B and ella in its insurance plans. Biola’s insurance plan covered FDA-approved contraceptives before April 1, the lawsuit states. “The prior inclusion of abortion-inducing drugs like ella and Plan B was neither knowing nor intentional.”

Wheaton and Biola aren’t the only institutions to suddenly realize that they are fighting against a health service they already provide. Some Catholic colleges and hospitals, such as Georgetown University, currently have insurance plans that cover birth control, and 28 states already require organizations to include contraception as part of their prescription insurance plans.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:54 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Frem - you don't know a damn thing, and all the vulgar rhetoric and big talking swagger you phony up in place of coherent conversation won't change 1 damn thing.

Quote:

the goddamn radical christofascist scum, which differ NOT ONE WHIT from the goddamn Taliban


Yeah, that's just crazy talk right there. Oh sure, both camps believe that their imaginary sky daddy talks to them, and tells them how to live the one TRUE way and all that, but the Islamo nutsacks are still living in the 10th century, while at least the vast majority of the Christians had a Reformation and are now on the happy side of the Renaissance.

@ 1kiki. Add 1 more to those opposing O-Care.

Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta files lawsuit against Obamacare

The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta filed a lawsuit today in U.S. District Court in Atlanta against the Obama Administration’s contraception mandate included in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009 (commonly referred to as Obamacare).

“We are undertaking this action because the stakes are so incredibly high,” Wilton Gregory, Archbishop of Atlanta, said in a statement. “Our religious liberty and that of our fellow Catholics and people of other religious faiths as well as those with no professed religious belief throughout the nation are impacted by this proposed action.”

The Atlanta archdiocese joins over 40 other catholic institutions across U.S. that filed similar lawsuits since May 2012.

http://www.examiner.com/article/catholic-archdiocese-of-atlanta-files-
lawsuit-against-obamacare



" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:44 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

First and foremost, stop pretending and kidding ourselves, and start actually listening to who they, the radical Islamists say they are. Because they're telling us, all the damn time. We just refuse to listen.



I think just about everyone knows who these groups are and what they stand for.

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Second, stop lying to the American public. Call the terrorists by their name, Islamic radicals, and cease w/ this crap about 'man caused disasters' or 'work place violence', when talking about the Ft Hood shootings.



They are Islamic radicals, they are also terrorists. Also the Fort Hood shootings where by definitions those things as well. I'm sorry if you have a problem with semantics.

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Third, make it damn clear that we're not going to allow them to shoot little girls, or saw off the heads of innocence ( like Daniel Pearl ) and get away with it. And make no apologies for hitting back at them, twice as hard, every time they blow up a car, fly a plane into a building, or go on a shooting spree in a down town market.



I'm pretty sure we do hit them back. We have drone strikes all the time. It make no sense if we just start large wars and kill a bunch of innocent people in countries we are trying to protect innocent people in.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:50 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:

I think just about everyone knows who these groups are and what they stand for.



This govt refuses to name them. Why ?


Quote:



They are Islamic radicals, they are also terrorists. Also the Fort Hood shootings where by definitions those things as well. I'm sorry if you have a problem with semantics.



Yes, I do have a problem w/ a govt which is so PC, it won't face reality, and deal with who it is we're fighting, why they're fighting us, and how to defeat them. As Lara said, we've only killed the slow and stupid Jihadists. The smart ones we didn't kill, they're still fighting. Or, more importantly, they're just getting started.

Quote:


I'm pretty sure we do hit them back. We have drone strikes all the time. It make no sense if we just start large wars and kill a bunch of innocent people in countries we are trying to protect innocent people in.



We give the Muslim Brotherhood billions of dollars, aid in the revolt in Libya, and we get repaid by our embassies being attacked, our ambassador raped and murdered. We need to stop the flow of $ to those who want us dead.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 2:00 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
This govt refuses to name them. Why ?



I know for a fact that the President and others in the government have talked about many such groups, some on regualar basis.


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Yes, I do have a problem w/ a govt which is so PC, it won't face reality, and deal with who it is we're fighting, why they're fighting us, and how to defeat them. As Lara said, we've only killed the slow and stupid Jihadists. The smart ones we didn't kill, they're still fighting. Or, more importantly, they're just getting started.



Lara is wrong. We are fighting them as effectivly as we can without adding even more to their ranks. Each time we miss step and kill innocent people by accident it fuels their cause. Stepping up attacks would result in more mistakes as such.

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
We give the Muslim Brotherhood billions of dollars, aid in the revolt in Libya, and we get repaid by our embassies being attacked, our ambassador raped and murdered. We need to stop the flow of $ to those who want us dead.



Do you have a citation that we gave money directly to the Brotherhood, or that they conducted the attack in Libya?

See we gave support to the rebels who were a vast mix of different people and groups. Your simplistic view of things such as this is quit child-like.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 6:09 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

As Lara said, we've only killed the slow and stupid Jihadists. The smart ones we didn't kill, they're still fighting. Or, more importantly, they're just getting started.

So what should we expect from them? What's the danger that needs to be fought against? More 9/11 style plots? Afghanistan or Arab Spring countries becoming Jihadist, terror-sponsoring states? What's going to happen that we're not ready for?

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 6:21 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Thank you, Kiki; if I was going to bother to respond further to this ridiculous thread and Rap's ridiculous mentality, I was going to mention that:
Quote:

In preparation to sue over Obamacare, evangelical colleges are more closely examining their existing student health plans — only to discover that they actually already cover the contraceptive services they object to. In their lawsuit, Biola University officials admitted that they were covering birth control and emergency contraception right up until the point that the Obamacare mandate became politicized and they decided it must violate their liberty:
Quote:

Like Wheaton College, Biola previously covered Plan B and ella in its insurance plans. Biola’s insurance plan covered FDA-approved contraceptives before April 1, the lawsuit states. “The prior inclusion of abortion-inducing drugs like ella and Plan B was neither knowing nor intentional.”

Working with several insurance companies for faculty and student plans, Biola did not look into the details of its coverage until the Obama administration’s mandate became an issue for the college, said Biola University President Barry H. Corey.

“Whether or not people were taking advantage of [ella or Plan B], that’s something we weren’t and couldn’t track,” Corey said. “We did realize at that point that our insurance companies should exclude those.”

Apparently emergency contraception — which Biola misleadingly refers to as “abortion-inducing,” in the ongoing misinformation campaign about the female reproductive system — was not a big enough threat to the university’s religious liberty before Obamacare to compel the administration to ensure that its plan didn’t cover it.

Wheaton and Biola aren’t the only institutions to suddenly realize that they are fighting against a health service they already provide. Some Catholic colleges and hospitals, such as Georgetown University, currently have insurance plans that cover birth control, and 28 states already require organizations to include contraception as part of their prescription insurance plans. The religious case against Obamacare is much more about a manufactured right-wing controversy than it is about liberty. http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/08/24/739651/evangelical-colleges
-didnt-figure-out-whether-they-covered-contraception-before-suing-over-obamacare-regulation/
like the source? Same can be found at http://jezebel.com/5931434/christian-college-suing-over-birth-control-
mandate-didnt-realize-it-already-covered-contraception
, http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/legal-challenges/242167-report-wh
eaton-covered-morning-after-pill-before-suing-over-hhs-mandate
, http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2012/august-web-only/evangelical-c
olleges-biola-and-grace-sue-obama-administrati.html
and others. Aside from which, if anyone disagrees with the FACTS cited in the article, please prove them wrong.

That last sentence in the article covers it; it's one more thing the right found to both distract and attack Obama about, nothing more.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:18 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
This govt refuses to name them. Why ?



I know for a fact that the President and others in the government have talked about many such groups, some on regualar basis.


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Yes, I do have a problem w/ a govt which is so PC, it won't face reality, and deal with who it is we're fighting, why they're fighting us, and how to defeat them. As Lara said, we've only killed the slow and stupid Jihadists. The smart ones we didn't kill, they're still fighting. Or, more importantly, they're just getting started.



Lara is wrong. We are fighting them as effectivly as we can without adding even more to their ranks. Each time we miss step and kill innocent people by accident it fuels their cause. Stepping up attacks would result in more mistakes as such.

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
We give the Muslim Brotherhood billions of dollars, aid in the revolt in Libya, and we get repaid by our embassies being attacked, our ambassador raped and murdered. We need to stop the flow of $ to those who want us dead.



Do you have a citation that we gave money directly to the Brotherhood, or that they conducted the attack in Libya?



Or that Ambassador Stevens was raped?

Quote:


See we gave support to the rebels who were a vast mix of different people and groups. Your simplistic view of things such as this is quit child-like.




Saint Reagan compared them favorably to our Founding Fathers.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:49 AM

STORYMARK


And here we see an example in the disconnect between rality and propoganda that those on the hard right embrace.

Rappy think's we're all ignoring the problem of Muslim extremists, because we don't think all Muslims should be suspect, which is based on nothing more than our pointing out that not all Muslims are extremists - ignoring the fact that this little girl is one of the non-violent ones that we speak up to defend.


Note to anyone - Please pity the poor, poor wittle Rappyboy. He's feeling put upon lately, what with all those facts disagreeing with what he believes.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum


"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:55 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Ay-yup Mark. My point exactly. Nothing new about that, nothing to see here, move along folks... ;o)


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:25 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:

Lara is wrong.



ROFLMAO!!!

Do you even know who she is, or what she's endured ? I think she knows a hell of a lot more about what's going on over in the middle east than you.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:27 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
And here we see an example in the disconnect between rality and propoganda that those on the hard right embrace.

Rappy think's we're all ignoring the problem of Muslim extremists, because we don't think all Muslims should be suspect, which is based on nothing more than our pointing out that not all Muslims are extremists - ignoring the fact that this little girl is one of the non-violent ones that we speak up to defend.



Storybook - what I say is irrelevant. What Lara Logan says on this matter, I think deserves a hell of a lot more credence and respect.

And FYI , I'M the one who started this gorram thread, ABOUT the little girl who got shot. I stand with HER. I support HER views. Does that fact completely escape you ? Seems like.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:01 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Do you even know who she is, or what she's endured ? I think she knows a hell of a lot more about what's going on over in the middle east than you.



Yes, and yes. I think those events have most likely clouded her outlook on things.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:04 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
And FYI , I'M the one who started this gorram thread, ABOUT the little girl who got shot. I stand with HER. I support HER views. Does that fact completely escape you ? Seems like.



Guess what, everyone here does as well. We just understand that HER views are not yours. She does not think all Muslims should be looked at as possible radicals.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:40 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Do you even know who she is, or what she's endured ? I think she knows a hell of a lot more about what's going on over in the middle east than you.



Yes, and yes. I think those events have most likely clouded her outlook on things.



What, the outlook of actually having faced that medieval thuggery , first hand, and lived to tell about it ?


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:56 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
What, the outlook of actually having faced that medieval thuggery , first hand, and lived to tell about it ?



Yes. Going though something like that tends to taint a person's perspective.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 6:11 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:


And FYI , I'M the one who started this gorram thread, ABOUT the little girl who got shot. I stand with HER. I support HER views.




Just as long as, y'know, you don't ACTUALLY have to go stand with her, right? Because that's where you draw the line on supporting her views - you'll be happy to cheerlead others who go and fight and serve and die, but you'll never put yourself in the slightest bit of danger for those oh-so-deeply-held convictions, will you, you coward?

Want to show her some REAL support? Want to REALLY stand with her? Get off your ass, quit being the Chairborne Ranger and Keyboard Kommando, and GO DO IT.





"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 6:27 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
What, the outlook of actually having faced that medieval thuggery , first hand, and lived to tell about it ?



Yes. Going though something like that tends to taint a person's perspective.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.



Taint a person's perspective ? So her 13 + years of field reporting from N.Ireland, Africa and Baghdad, all that first hand experience, and being embedded w/ militants fighting Allied forces,BEFORE being viciously attacked in Cairo, did THAT taint her perspective as well ?

Just asking, for clarification.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 2:14 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Taint a person's perspective ? So her 13 + years of field reporting from N.Ireland, Africa and Baghdad, all that first hand experience, and being embedded w/ militants fighting Allied forces,BEFORE being viciously attacked in Cairo, did THAT taint her perspective as well ?



I would say no. I would also say that all those experiences are not as powerful as her being attacked.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 2:19 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Taint a person's perspective ? So her 13 + years of field reporting from N.Ireland, Africa and Baghdad, all that first hand experience, and being embedded w/ militants fighting Allied forces,BEFORE being viciously attacked in Cairo, did THAT taint her perspective as well ?



I would say no. I would also say that all those experiences are not as powerful as her being attacked.



That they weren't as personally impactful on her life, is understandable, but that's not the question being asked. She didn't just hop on a plane and stroll into Cairo one day, and then got nearly gang raped to death, and that "tainted " her view of what's going on in the middle east. She is a seasoned reporter, with a bonafide resume' of field work, first hand knowledge, and a far better understanding of what's going on , at the street level, than most.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 2:25 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
That they weren't as personally impactful on her life, is understandable, but that's not the question being asked. She didn't just hop on a plane and stroll into Cairo one day, and then got nearly gang raped to death, and that "tainted " her view of what's going on in the middle east. She is a seasoned reporter, with a bonafide resume' of field work, first hand knowledge, and a far better understanding of what's going on , at the street level, than most.



Yes she is all those things, but she is also a person that had something very traumatic happen to her. All of her experience as a reported has been at a dispassionate emotional distance. The attack on her was not. So yes I think that that attack my cloud her outlook and override her other experiences.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 2:28 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:

Yes she is all those things, but she is also a person that had something very traumatic happen to her. All of her experience as a reported has been at a dispassionate emotional distance. The attack on her was not. So yes I think that that attack my cloud her outlook and override her other experiences.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.




Wow... the excuse making going on here is unreal.

Even though Lara is an experienced, season reporter, with time spent embedded with militants, and having interviewed Jihadists leaders, talked to the fighters, heard how they view us, the West, and what they're fighting for, you're willing to dismiss ALL that she saw, experienced and reported, for the fact that she was violated and attacked in a square in Cairo. All her experience and knowledge she had on the matter of radical Islamists goes right out the window, because she was beaten, groped and assaulted ?

Just damn.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 4:45 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Pakistan Arrests Three Men In Taliban Shooting Of 15-Year-Old Girl

Quote:



Authorities have arrested three men suspected of having a role in the shooting of Malala Yousafzai, the 15-year-old activist who demanded an education for girls.

NBC News reports:

"Police said the suspects, aged between 17 and 22, had claimed the person who organized the attack Tuesday — in which two other young girls were shot and injured — was a man called Attaullah."

"'During raids in Swat on Thursday night, we captured three culprits involved in attack on Malala,' Swat police chief Gul Afzal Afridi told NBC News by phone. 'During initial interrogation, they revealed that Attaullah was mastermind of the attack and he is still at large,' he added."

Voice of America, the official United States news agency abroad, has some good news on Malala's condition.

They report she is in "satisfactory" condition. "Yousafzai was airlifted from a hospital in the northwestern city of Peshawar to the Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology, the country's top military hospital in Rawalpindi," VoA reports. "Doctors have said Yousafzai has a 70 percent chance of surviving."

As we've told you, Malala was targeted by the Pakistani Taliban for advocating for the education of women, which the group has banned in the Swat Valley.

The shooting has sparked a national conversation that laid bare a that nation's deepest fault line.

The BBC reports that the country has called for a day of prayer today. The BBC adds:

"On Friday, school children dedicated prayers to her recovery in morning assemblies and special prayers will also be offered after weekly prayers at mosques across the country.

"Schools in the Swat Valley closed on Wednesday - the day after the shooting - in protest at the attack. Protests and rallies have also been held in Islamabad, Peshawar, Lahore, Multan as well as in Malala's hometown of Mingora."




http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/10/12/162774984/pakistan-arre
sts-three-men-in-taliban-shooting-of-15-year-old-girl



Wow. We didn't even have to send in an invading army.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 4:50 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Wow... the excuse making going on here is unreal.

Even though Lara is an experienced, season reporter, with time spent embedded with militants, and having interviewed Jihadists leaders, talked to the fighters, heard how they view us, the West, and what they're fighting for, you're willing to dismiss ALL that she saw, experienced and reported, for the fact that she was violated and attacked in a square in Cairo. All her experience and knowledge she had on the matter of radical Islamists goes right out the window, because she was beaten, groped and assaulted ?

Just damn.



No they do not go out the window you mental midget. They have to be taken with a bit of understanding about why she views things the way she does.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 5:01 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


So what exactly ARE Lara Logan's "experience and knowledge" in this area, other than reporting on the news? Does she have advanced degrees in Political Science, Middle Eastern Relations, anything like that?


I've been to the circus, but that doesn't make me a trapeze artist. I watched "Man on Wire", but that doesn't make a tightrope walker.


Aside from her credentials as a reporter, what other expertise does she have in this area?


Are you willing to accept her as an expert witness simply because she's a reporter, or simply because she happens to somewhat agree with your view?


Would you be willing to accept NBC's Richard Engel as an expert? He's a veteran reporter in the area, with lots and lots and lots of experience, and was even gravely injured in an attack. Does that give him extra insight and gravitas, in your book? Does that make him more of a super-expert in the mid-east?


And if you answer "No", then please explain why Lara Logan *IS* acceptable to you as an expert in the area.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 5:30 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
And here we see an example in the disconnect between rality and propoganda that those on the hard right embrace.

Rappy think's we're all ignoring the problem of Muslim extremists, because we don't think all Muslims should be suspect, which is based on nothing more than our pointing out that not all Muslims are extremists - ignoring the fact that this little girl is one of the non-violent ones that we speak up to defend.



Storybook - what I say is irrelevant. What Lara Logan says on this matter, I think deserves a hell of a lot more credence and respect.

And FYI , I'M the one who started this gorram thread, ABOUT the little girl who got shot. I stand with HER. I support HER views. Does that fact completely escape you ? Seems like.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "



But I didn't comment on what Logan said - I commented on what you said. Do try and keep up.

And sure, you stand with the girl - because you saw it as another way to attack. No one beleievs for a second you actually give a shit about her as a person.


Note to anyone - Please pity the poor, poor wittle Rappyboy. He's feeling put upon lately, what with all those facts disagreeing with what he believes.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum


"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 1:25 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:

No they do not go out the window you mental midget. They have to be taken with a bit of understanding about why she views things the way she does.



Ahh yes, the standard unnecessary insult. Well played.

Why dismiss over a decade's worth of knowledge, because she was attacked? Please elaborate.
What 'understanding ' are you talking about there ? If jihadists say they want to kill us, long before she gets attacked, are we NOT suppose to take their word for it ? Your logic is a patchwork here. It does not follow.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 3:34 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


I looked at a transcript of Logan's speech. Sorry, I don't often watch videos.

Here is what I found.

Quote:

"1. "Your deadliest enemies on the Afghan battlefield have completely freedom of movement inside Pakistan with the blessing of the Pakistanis. And every commander that's sat in your shoes has had to try and build a relationship and go through the same motions time and time again. And the effect on the battlefield remains exactly the same: American soldiers continue to die because of the support Pakistan gives to America's enemies."

I believe this to be 100% true. I have seen other reports on this. American's relationship with Pakistan is extremely compromised. I doubt anyone in power trusts the Pakistanis or see this as in any way new information.
What do you suggest the US do about this?



Quote:

"2. To think there is any similarity between this and Viet Nam is ridiculous. The Viet Cong didn't care what you did when you went back to America. The Viet Cong weren't fighting for an Islamic caliphate. The Viet Cong didn't have a global struggle. And it's amazing to me that we constantly ignore what Al-Qaeda and the Taliban and [...] all these groups tell us every day in their own newspapers, in their own statements."


Well, except for that whole red menace thing. Vietnam was part of communism vs the west and at the time the fear of communists taking over/destroying the western way of life is ENTIRELY similar to the fear of Islam. The rhetoric used in both cases was pretty similar. The Vietcong were aided by China in their ideological struggle and for similar, although converse reasons, the US became involved in Vietnam.
I think she got this wrong.

Quote:

3. Our way of life is under attack, and if you think that's government propaganda, if you think that's nonsense, if you think that's warmongering, [then] you're not listening to what the people who are fighting you say about this fight. In your arrogance, you think you write the script.

There are certainly people, citizens, governments and countries who despise the US. Again, what are you going to do? Declare war on everyone who hates the US? That would be a lot of war and to what end?




Quote:

4. If you fail to identify the ideological component to this fight, if you fail to identify what your enemy is really fighting for, if you lie about who they really are, I don't see how you could possible have the right strategy.

Yep, no idea what she is on about. Who doesn't identify who the recent wars have been against? I'd say the big mistake that has been made is that the US supports countries with vile regimes if there is economic advantage to be had. Remember Iraq all those years?? Ideology is only a disguise for ecomomics in the case of the US.


Quote:

5. When I look at what's happening in Libya, there's a big song and dance about whether this was a terrorist attack or a protest. And you just want to scream, "For God's sake! Are you kidding me?" The last time we were attacked like this was the USS Cole, which was a prelude to the 1998 embassy bombings, which was a prelude to 9/11.


So if you call it a terrorist attack, so what? What difference will it make to Libya, a country in the process of destroying itself through civil war or the US?



Quote:

6. And you're sending in FBI to investigate. I hope to God that you're sending in your best clandestine warriors who are going to exact revenge and let the world know that the United States will not be attacked on its own soil, that its ambassadors will not be murdered, and the United States will not stand by and do nothing about it."


Yeah, gotta love a bit of revenge rhetoric. So now what, does she suggest you bomb Libya (again)

Rap, your arguments sucks. Something terrible happened to a young brave girl who deserves the attention of the world's media. She does not deserve to be used as a political handball for American political purposes.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 3:36 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Yeah, but a 30-year old female law student in suburban Georgetown wants and demands free birth control from the taxpayers! And although we're supposed to have separation of church and state, religious institutions must now cover items for female employees that violate their long-standing religious tenets. Granted these female employees knew their institutions' policies and views beforehand, they somehow recklessly made a free choice to work there nonetheless. THAT's the real war on women, and speakers at the Democrat Convention spent a lot of time trying to educate us all to the grave urgency of the situation. Muslim brutality in the third world? Oh golly gosh, if you're gonna well up like a big softie every time a Muslim girl or woman is honor-raped, or attacked with acid, or whipped, or stoned to death, or shot, or hanged you won't be able to focus on the desperate plight of American women right here at home. It's well-known that Republicans are more evil than the worst of the Muslim mullahs and their good-natured followers. American women are smart and know this, and that's why they're overwhelmingly not supporting their true enemy Mitt Romney.


Okay.



So according to this logic, you should never, ever criticise Obama again. How very dare anyone do such a thing when there are seriously corrupt and evil regimes in the world.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 4:01 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:

Rap, your arguments sucks. Something terrible happened to a young brave girl who deserves the attention of the world's media. She does not deserve to be used as a political handball for American political purposes.



Lora Logan was born and raised in S. Africa. SHE is saying these things, and is NOT being used by anyone. Quite the contrary, she's standing UP to the monolithic view points of the world media, which more times than not , ignores what is really going on.

Your continued attempt to dismiss what she says and what she knows merely because of what happened to her in Cairo is what " sucks ". If borders on sexist, at the very least, and is incredibly naive and ignorant.

Per the Vietnam comparison, you got it completely wrong. She's right. Even ignoring the comments by Khrushchev, " We will bury you! ", there is no where near the fervor from any political movement which rivals the blinding zealotry of religious fanaticism. You have 1 country in N.Korea, ruled by a mad gang's unbelievable world view, as they have brain washed an entire country, but that's about it. Heads sawed off, planes flown into buildings, school buses blown up, in than name of Communism = 0. Can't say the same thing for Islamic zealots.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 4:48 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
I looked at a transcript of Logan's speech. Sorry, I don't often watch videos.

Here is what I found.

Quote:

"1. "Your deadliest enemies on the Afghan battlefield have completely freedom of movement inside Pakistan with the blessing of the Pakistanis. And every commander that's sat in your shoes has had to try and build a relationship and go through the same motions time and time again. And the effect on the battlefield remains exactly the same: American soldiers continue to die because of the support Pakistan gives to America's enemies."

I believe this to be 100% true. I have seen other reports on this. American's relationship with Pakistan is extremely compromised. I doubt anyone in power trusts the Pakistanis or see this as in any way new information.
What do you suggest the US do about this?




[Hint: Many conservatives had some major problems with Obama launching the Bin Laden raid without notifying the Pakistani authorities first.]


Quote:


Quote:

"2. To think there is any similarity between this and Viet Nam is ridiculous. The Viet Cong didn't care what you did when you went back to America. The Viet Cong weren't fighting for an Islamic caliphate. The Viet Cong didn't have a global struggle. And it's amazing to me that we constantly ignore what Al-Qaeda and the Taliban and [...] all these groups tell us every day in their own newspapers, in their own statements."


Well, except for that whole red menace thing. Vietnam was part of communism vs the west and at the time the fear of communists taking over/destroying the western way of life is ENTIRELY similar to the fear of Islam. The rhetoric used in both cases was pretty similar. The Vietcong were aided by China in their ideological struggle and for similar, although converse reasons, the US became involved in Vietnam.
I think she got this wrong.




She's got it dead wrong. She's clearly not any kind of Vietnam expert. Maybe she never reported on the area...? During the Vietnam war, and in the run-up to it, we were assured over and over and over again that it was just a "domino", and that if Vietnam fell, the rest of Southeast Asia would soon follow, and then the world could
be swept up in a sea of communism.

Quote:


Quote:

3. Our way of life is under attack, and if you think that's government propaganda, if you think that's nonsense, if you think that's warmongering, [then] you're not listening to what the people who are fighting you say about this fight. In your arrogance, you think you write the script.

There are certainly people, citizens, governments and countries who despise the US. Again, what are you going to do? Declare war on everyone who hates the US? That would be a lot of war and to what end?




If our way of life is under attack, is she (and Rappy) suggesting that we change our way of life?

And if she's suggesting we go to war against these people and fight them everywhere... isn't she suggesting that she thinks we "write the script"? That's a logical disconnect on her part; if we don't write the script, then we have no control over these events at all, and can only react to them, and never change the script or be proactive.

Quote:


Quote:

4. If you fail to identify the ideological component to this fight, if you fail to identify what your enemy is really fighting for, if you lie about who they really are, I don't see how you could possible have the right strategy.

Yep, no idea what she is on about. Who doesn't identify who the recent wars have been against? I'd say the big mistake that has been made is that the US supports countries with vile regimes if there is economic advantage to be had. Remember Iraq all those years?? Ideology is only a disguise for ecomomics in the case of the US.




How long have we been told that our enemy is really Afghanistan? Er, I mean Iraq? Uhhh, I mean Iran? And how many times have we ignored that fifteen of nineteen hijackers were Saudis, and so far as I know, not one of the nineteen was either Afghan or Iraqi or Iranian. Is it possible that Lara Logan doesn't know who they really are? Dang, I was virtually assured that she's the leading mid-east expert...

Quote:


Quote:

5. When I look at what's happening in Libya, there's a big song and dance about whether this was a terrorist attack or a protest. And you just want to scream, "For God's sake! Are you kidding me?" The last time we were attacked like this was the USS Cole, which was a prelude to the 1998 embassy bombings, which was a prelude to 9/11.


So if you call it a terrorist attack, so what? What difference will it make to Libya, a country in the process of destroying itself through civil war or the US?



Quote:

6. And you're sending in FBI to investigate. I hope to God that you're sending in your best clandestine warriors who are going to exact revenge and let the world know that the United States will not be attacked on its own soil, that its ambassadors will not be murdered, and the United States will not stand by and do nothing about it."


Yeah, gotta love a bit of revenge rhetoric. So now what, does she suggest you bomb Libya (again)




Exactly. We have to bomb them again, some more, just to show that NOBODY better ever retaliate against us, or we'll retaliate against them. If you attack us, we'll go apeshit and overreact and invade some uninvolved country. Invading Iraq because of what some Saudis did on 9/11 is like retaliating against Libya by invading Canada. That'll teach 'em!

Quote:


Rap, your arguments sucks. Something terrible happened to a young brave girl who deserves the attention of the world's media. She does not deserve to be used as a political handball for American political purposes.




Oh, he's just in a lather and tizzy because, you know...scary Muslim brown people!





"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 4:51 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Per the Vietnam comparison, you got it completely wrong. She's right. Even ignoring the comments by Khrushchev, " We will bury you! ", there is no where near the fervor from any political movement which rivals the blinding zealotry of religious fanaticism. You have 1 country in N.Korea, ruled by a mad gang's unbelievable world view, as they have brain washed an entire country, but that's about it. Heads sawed off, planes flown into buildings, school buses blown up, in than name of Communism = 0. Can't say the same thing for Islamic zealots.




So communism is soft and cuddly now? Never killed or harmed anybody?


Just damn.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 5:37 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:


Lora Logan was born and raised in S. Africa. SHE is saying these things, and is NOT being used by anyone.


read my post. I never said she was being used by anyone. I said people ie YOU were using the shooting of the young girl for your political purposes.

Quote:

Quite the contrary, she's standing UP to the monolithic view points of the world media, which more times than not , ignores what is really going on.

Or she is supporting and supported by some pretty monolithic media commentators, by the quick scan of the internet.
As for her views on the Taliban being supported by Pakistan, google it to see how unreported it is. It's been newsworthy for at least a year.

Quote:

Your continued attempt to dismiss what she says and what she knows merely because of what happened to her in Cairo is what " sucks ". If borders on sexist, at the very least, and is incredibly naive and ignorant.

I never made any comments to that affect. Please do not accuse me of saying things that I did not.

Quote:

Per the Vietnam comparison, you got it completely wrong. She's right. Even ignoring the comments by Khrushchev, " We will bury you! ", there is no where near the fervor from any political movement which rivals the blinding zealotry of religious fanaticism. You have 1 country in N.Korea, ruled by a mad gang's unbelievable world view, as they have brain washed an entire country, but that's about it. Heads sawed off, planes flown into buildings, school buses blown up, in than name of Communism = 0. Can't say the same thing for Islamic zealots.


You're kind of ignoring the whole Cold War thing here, where America lived in fear for nigh on fifty years, fearing nuclear annihalation, the domino theory. The wars fought by the US between the end of ww2 and the 1990's were all because of the fear of communism destroying the USA's way of life. So the comparisons are entirely justified, even if the details are different.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, October 12, 2012 7:58 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Lara is wrong.- Mac

ROFLMAO!!!Do you even know who she is, or what she's endured ? I think she knows a hell of a lot more about what's going on over in the middle east than you.-rappy


Yes, Lara IS wrong. She's speaking from fear, and is no more accurate about the ME than a person who has just nearly drowned speaking about ocean swimming.

Fear is never a good guide. Let me repeat that: Fear is never a good guide.

Now I could pick out about 5 of Lara's statements that are so fundamentally flawed, which show such a complete and utter lack of perspective, that they completely negate any point she thinks she's making.

But I'm not going to do that. Instead, I'm going to talk about rappy. I think I finally understand him, and it goes back to the "Saddam had WMD" discussion. Now, rappy starts out with a known fact: Saddam had WMD in the 1980s. Then, step by step he discounts all of the other relevant facts... chemical weapons have a shelf life, they need to be produced in TON quantities over and over in order to be significant, they need delivery systems in order to be a threat, they require special precursors and supply lines, no satellite or ground evidence or intel was found of ANY production after the 1980's.... and constructs increasingly implausible scenarios (They were shipped to Syria! Saddam MIGHT have done something) in order to maintain his fear. Ultimately, that fear is used to justify any and all action: Nuke 'em all!.

And that, really, is the point. Rappy WANTS to be scared, because he WANTS to have a justification for anger, and for violence. It makes him feel powerful and in control. He's not trying to solve a problem, he's trying to get high. Over the years he's gone from being an uncertain right-winger afraid of "the other" to a frightened ditto-head to the full jack-boot.

That's why discussing anything with him is useless... you're just getting between him and his high, and his high will not be denied.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 13, 2012 12:37 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
I never made any comments to that affect. Please do not accuse me of saying things that I did not.




ETA - Got your post mixed up w/ M52Nickerson's.


Quote:

There are certainly people, citizens, governments and countries who despise the US. Again, what are you going to do? Declare war on everyone who hates the US? That would be a lot of war and to what end?



I love how you skip over the part of first acknowledging the problem to " what are you going to do , declare war on everyone who htates us ? " . No one has suggested any such thing. But it must be first understood who they are and what they want.

And after a 5 point reply to my comments on Lara Logan, you END with a quick shift over to the 14 yr old girl who was shot ?

Seems a bit disjointed, is all. But no big deal. I can see here that many want to just dismiss anything Lara says, because it involves facing reality.


Also, watch the video. Transcripts don't always convey the whole story.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 13, 2012 12:41 AM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


quote me

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 13, 2012 1:50 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Lara is wrong.- Mac

ROFLMAO!!!Do you even know who she is, or what she's endured ? I think she knows a hell of a lot more about what's going on over in the middle east than you.


Yes, Lara IS wrong. She's speaking from fear, and is no more accurate about the ME than a person who has just nearly drowned speaking about ocean swimming.

Fear is never a good guide. Let me repeat that: Feat is never a good guide.

Now I could pick out about 5 of Lara's statements that are so fundamentally flawed, which show such a complete and utter lack of perspective, that they completely negate any point she thinks she's making.

But I'm not going to do that. Instead, I'm going to talk about rappy. I think I finally understand him, and it goes back to the "Saddam had WMD" discussion. Now, rappy starts out with a known fact: Saddam had WMD in the 1980s. Then, step by step he discounts all of the other relevant facts... chemical weapons have a shelf life, they need to be produced in TON quantities over and over in order to be significant, they need delivery systems in order to be a threat, they require special precursors and supply lines, no satellite or ground evidence or intel was found of ANY production after the 1980's.... and constructs increasingly implausible scenarios (They were shipped to Syria! Saddam MIGHT have done something) in order to maintain his fear. Ultimately, that fear is used to justify any and all action: Nuke 'em all!.

And that, really, is the point. Rappy WANTS to be scared, because he WANTS to have a justification for anger, and for violence. It makes him feel powerful and in control. He's not trying to solve a problem, he's trying to get high. Over the years he's gone from being an uncertain right-winger afraid of "the other" to a frightened ditto-head to the full jack-boot.

That's why discussing anything with him is useless... you're just getting between him and his high, and his high will not be denied.




And of course, the "they shipped them to Syria!" ploy plays right into his need for an enemy to give him his fear-high, since now we'll have to invade Syria because they've got WMD!



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Dangerous Rhetoric coming from our so-called President
Sun, April 28, 2024 18:10 - 2 posts
You can't take the sky from me, a tribute to Firefly
Sun, April 28, 2024 18:06 - 294 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, April 28, 2024 17:49 - 6318 posts
Scientific American Claims It Is "Misinformation" That There Are Just Two Sexes
Sun, April 28, 2024 17:44 - 24 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, April 28, 2024 15:47 - 3576 posts
Elections; 2024
Sun, April 28, 2024 15:39 - 2314 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Sun, April 28, 2024 02:03 - 1016 posts
The Thread of Court Cases Trump Is Winning
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:37 - 20 posts
Case against Sidney Powell, 2020 case lawyer, is dismissed
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:29 - 13 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:28 - 745 posts
Slate: I Changed My Mind About Kids and Phones. I Hope Everyone Else Does, Too.
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:19 - 3 posts
14 Tips To Reduce Tears and Remove Smells When Cutting Onions
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:08 - 9 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL