REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Angry lawmakers challenge lineup at hearing: 'Where are the women?'

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Monday, February 20, 2012 07:34
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 698
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, February 17, 2012 9:15 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

A pair of female Democratic lawmakers had a simple question Thursday about a controversial hearing on Capitol Hill.

"What I want to know is: Where are the women?" Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-New York, said as she began her remarks at the top of hearing titled "Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Conscience?"

Directing her question at Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Maloney was referring to the fact that the first panel of five witnesses at the hearing did not include a woman, even though the discussion touched on the recent controversy over an Obama administration regulation requiring health insurance coverage for contraception.

"When I look at this panel, I don't see one single woman representing the tens of millions of women across the country who want and need insurance coverage for basic, preventative health care services, including family planning," Maloney continued. Then she repeated: "Where are the women?"

Maloney went on to tell Issa that she was "deeply disturbed" that he had rejected a request by the Democrats on the committee to have Sandra Fluke, a student at Georgetown University Law School, testify at Thursday's hearing. Maloney and the other Democrats had hoped to have Fluke testify about a classmate who ended up losing an ovary after she could no longer afford the oral contraceptives prescribed by her doctor to treat ovarian cysts. The medications were not covered by the classmate's student health insurance, according to Maloney.

Maloney was soon backed up by Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., who pointed out that Issa had not responded to Maloney's query about Fluke testifying.

Reacting to Holmes Norton, Issa said that the Democrats had submitted their witnesses later than required by committee rules and had sought permission to have more witnesses testify than the rules allow.

Issa also explained why he had decided that Fluke was not qualified to testify and said that, in lieu of Fluke participating in the hearing, he had instructed his staff to post a link to a 45-minute news conference Fluke had previously participated in "so that the public can see her opinion." Democrats also later sent out a copy of her prepared remarks.

After more prodding from Maloney, Issa turned to the heart of the dispute between himself and the Democrats on the committee.

"We are not having a hearing on the policies or the details related to the single issue of Obamacare and this particular mandate," he said, "This hearing is about religious freedom."

In a later exchange, Holmes Norton appeared to lose her cool as she sought to challenge Issa's reliance on the committee's rules to justify excluding Fluke. But the hearing continued with five men in the first panel who represented different faiths testifying and taking questions from lawmakers. Two other women invited by the Republicans, Dr. Laura Champion and Allison Dabbs Garrett, later testified during a second panel.

In a news conference Thursday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi slammed Issa's decision not to allow Fluke to testify.

"That's a good question for the whole debate," the leading Democrat said, "Where are the women?" http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/16/politics/women-lawmakers-hearing/index.h
tml?hpt=hp_bn3

Well, considering we all know Issa's agenda, why are they surprised?? I heard Fluke interviewed last night, and what she had to say was VERY relevant, damn him. His "reasons" were excuses, obviously.

It's NOT about religion, obviously, it's about politics. And the result IS about women's health, if they gave a shit there wouldn't be any question about it. Instead, just the newest footbal, no more, no less, and curse them for it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 17, 2012 9:22 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important



Hello,

I read this yesterday and had to shake my head. If they were trying to leverage their position or win points unopposed, they've failed.

--Anthony

_______________________________________________

"In every war, the state enacts a tax of freedom upon the citizenry. The unspoken promise is that the tax shall be revoked at war's end. Endless war holds no such promise. Hence, Eternal War is Eternal Slavery." --Admiral Robert J. Henner


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 17, 2012 9:27 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I fear you're wrong, Anthony, unfortunately. They've already WON points with their base, and will keep right on in this vein for as long as they can milk it. FauxNews viewers aren't hearing about this, or if they are, they're hearing a distorted version which makes it look like women didn't NEED to be heard from, that it IS purely about religious freedom. Mysoginistic



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 18, 2012 12:51 PM

FREMDFIRMA



You know, I'd Allllllllllmost vote for that wackjob Hillary just to wind these bastards up good and put PAID to them - cause you know damn well they'd be unable to resist engaging in conduct for which her press corps would endlessly excoriate and humiliate them for.

Me, I've been waiting for them to bend the rules so they can run Ah-nold (who, admittedly has grown as a man and a politician somewhat) because the instant they do so it ALSO opens the door for Jenny Granholm, provided we could convince her.

And she would completely own them bastards, believe it.

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 19, 2012 7:57 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


Both sides of the debate should have women speaking in the committee, otherwise it looks silly, since its an issue that directly pertains to women.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 20, 2012 7:34 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


There's also the fact that, if I recall, up to three religious authorities were on that first panel (I know at least one rabbi and one priest were mentioned...). They want to MAKE it about religious rights, so of course they stacked the panel with priests and rabbis and had no women, but that doesn't MAKE it about religion, especially as laws similar to it are already in existence AND the vast majority of Catholics already accept and use contraceptives. It's all a farce to further a political football, and everyone knows it (even them), but they'll die before they admit it!



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, April 28, 2024 21:15 - 6324 posts
Another Putin Disaster
Sun, April 28, 2024 21:09 - 1514 posts
Elections; 2024
Sun, April 28, 2024 21:08 - 2315 posts
Russia, Jeff Sessions
Sun, April 28, 2024 21:07 - 128 posts
Scientific American Claims It Is "Misinformation" That There Are Just Two Sexes
Sun, April 28, 2024 21:06 - 25 posts
Dangerous Rhetoric coming from our so-called President
Sun, April 28, 2024 18:10 - 2 posts
You can't take the sky from me, a tribute to Firefly
Sun, April 28, 2024 18:06 - 294 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, April 28, 2024 15:47 - 3576 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Sun, April 28, 2024 02:03 - 1016 posts
The Thread of Court Cases Trump Is Winning
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:37 - 20 posts
Case against Sidney Powell, 2020 case lawyer, is dismissed
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:29 - 13 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:28 - 745 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL