REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Ethics Reforms

POSTED BY: WULFENSTAR
UPDATED: Thursday, August 12, 2010 05:15
SHORT URL: http://goo.gl/K0rFa
VIEWED: 489
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, August 12, 2010 5:06 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Dick Morris's latest article includes suggestions for ethics reform in Congress. Some of these could also apply to states as well. What do you think about the list?



The reforms should include:

• The establishment of an office of special prosecutor for Congress, with its head appointed by the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court for a fixed term. The office should have subpoena power, a well-funded staff and the right to convene grand juries and issue indictments. Self-policing by ethics committees obviously does not work.

• All earmarking should be banned. Congress cannot be trusted with this power.

• A ban on spouses of members of Congress serving on boards or accepting employment by any company or organization that receives federal funds. In cases like Mrs. Chris Dodd and Mrs. Evan Bayh, corporate board employment was a way for special interests to influence their husbands and pad the family checkbook.

• A ban on families of members of Congress serving as lobbyists.

• No free travel, whether sponsored by foundations or lobbyists. Only government trips on official business — real business — should be allowed.

• Full disclosure of the precise amounts of members' net worth, debts, investments and holdings, including home mortgages.

•Full publication, online, of all committee votes.

• No student loan repayments for congressional staffers.

• A five-year ban on lobbying for members of Congress or their staffs after leaving office. The ban should also apply to employment by a company that performs lobbying services.

• If a senator or congressman is absent more than 10 percent of the time for reasons other than illness — including running for president — his pay should be docked proportionately.

• Term limits for congressional staffers. No staff member of Congress should be permitted to serve in a job that pays above $100,000 a year for more than eight years. If we can't get term limits for Congress, let's at least clean out the professional staffers!



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 12, 2010 5:15 AM

THENEWIMPROVEDKANEMAN


Sure but will Waters or Rangle follow any rules?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, May 17, 2024 04:11 - 3701 posts
Nancy Pelosi destroyed by Oxford student
Fri, May 17, 2024 04:07 - 3 posts
FLEE CALIFORNIA!
Thu, May 16, 2024 23:27 - 130 posts
Punishing Russia With Sanctions
Thu, May 16, 2024 21:29 - 510 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, May 16, 2024 21:08 - 2490 posts
Dow Nearing 30K. Time For You To Jump Off?
Thu, May 16, 2024 21:02 - 110 posts
Electoral College, ReSteal 2024 Edition
Thu, May 16, 2024 20:59 - 7 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Thu, May 16, 2024 20:29 - 369 posts
China
Thu, May 16, 2024 14:21 - 459 posts
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Thu, May 16, 2024 08:12 - 151 posts
End of the world Peter Zeihan
Thu, May 16, 2024 08:00 - 36 posts
Mid-Term 2026 US Elections
Thu, May 16, 2024 07:56 - 20 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL