REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

For the record

POSTED BY: KANEMAN
UPDATED: Saturday, April 16, 2011 18:55
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 933
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, April 15, 2011 5:38 PM

KANEMAN


Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?
Do you think Dennis Kucinich would spend trillions on war?
Do you think our congress could argue over 38 BILLION without war?
Do you think kaneman would mind giving niggers, gays, women billions...if we did not spend TRILLIONS on war?


38 billion...lol...Really? hilarious

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 15, 2011 5:54 PM

DREAMTROVE


Noted.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 9:00 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:
Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?



Yes.

Quote:


Do you think Dennis Kucinich would spend trillions on war?



Probably not, but you teabaggers would never vote for him, so what's your point?

Quote:


Do you think our congress could argue over 38 BILLION without war?



You mean $350 million. The "budget cuts" that the GOP-baggers "won" actually turn out to be a touch over $350 million. With an "m", not a "b". But that will never stop you from voting for whomever runs with the (R) next to their name (but you're really not a Republican. Really. )

Quote:


Do you think kaneman would mind giving niggers, gays, women billions...if we did not spend TRILLIONS on war?



Yes. You and the party you support 100% of the time have already proven that. You had the chance to cut the defense budget and cut military (war) spending, and you instead decided that it was far better to gut spending on social programs that help the poor and elderly, that take away from the working class and middle class and give to the rich, who are already increasing their wealth (and not creating any jobs) at record levels.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 9:39 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I do not think Ron Paul would spend anything on war. Part of his central platform is an isolationist stance with zero foreign adventurism. "Trade with all, War with no one" sums up his policy.

Plus no war unless Congress declares war. The old fashioned way. With a declaration.

--Anthony


Assured by friends that the signal-to-noise ratio has improved on this forum, I have disabled web filtering.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 4:57 PM

DREAMTROVE



Quote:

Originally posted by kwicko:

Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:

Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?



Yes.



Mike,

I will give you the opportunity to retract that statement. Perhaps you thought Kane said Rand. I'm unsure that this would be a sound or accurate statement, but at least I would know where it was coming from.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 6:55 PM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by dreamtrove:

Quote:

Originally posted by kwicko:

Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:

Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?



Yes.



Mike,

I will give you the opportunity to retract that statement. Perhaps you thought Kane said Rand. I'm unsure that this would be a sound or accurate statement, but at least I would know where it was coming from.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.




Part of his central platform is an isolationist stance with zero foreign adventurism. "Trade with all, War with no one" sums up his policy.



help me on that DT....isolatisionist...





NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Legitimate gripes about Trump
Sun, July 5, 2026 08:42 - 181 posts
Asia has defeated the USA using 'Soft Power' ???
Sun, July 5, 2026 08:38 - 116 posts
Music II
Sun, July 5, 2026 08:34 - 681 posts
"Feminism" really means more Femtacular than you at EVERYTHING.
Sun, July 5, 2026 06:52 - 169 posts
PREDICTIONS THREAD (v.2)
Sun, July 5, 2026 06:49 - 202 posts
The Boomer politics vs Gen-X vs Gen Y Melenials vs Generation Z
Sun, July 5, 2026 06:46 - 76 posts
Scotland secedes from British Empire!!!
Sun, July 5, 2026 06:44 - 40 posts
What would YOU do to fix the mess?
Sun, July 5, 2026 06:44 - 14 posts
Racist Activist Hustlers for Pay upset pay is absent
Sun, July 5, 2026 06:37 - 4 posts
Amy Walter: Gen Z Gender Divide Goes Beyond Politics, Young Men Are Using Podcasts "As A Way To Build Community"
Sun, July 5, 2026 06:29 - 7 posts
When Buddhists Go Bad
Sun, July 5, 2026 06:28 - 24 posts
Amerika Sucks
Sun, July 5, 2026 06:28 - 7 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL