GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Your "Oscar" picks

POSTED BY: WHOZIT
UPDATED: Friday, March 1, 2013 15:29
SHORT URL: http://bit.ly/123xBwG
VIEWED: 4047
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, February 17, 2013 2:00 PM

WHOZIT





http://oscar.go.com/nominees

Best Picture: Lincoln

Best Director: Steven Spielberg

Best Actor: Daniel Day-Lewis

Best Actress: Jessica Chastain

Best Sup, Actor: Christoph Waltz

Best Sup, Actress: Anne Hathaway


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 17, 2013 2:30 PM

ECGORDON

There's no place I can be since I found Serenity.


I don't care. As if there ever could be a "Best" in any particular category. Favorite maybe. Anyway, I haven't seen any of the nominated films yet.






NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 17, 2013 3:23 PM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by ecgordon:
I don't care. As if there ever could be a "Best" in any particular category. Favorite maybe. Anyway, I haven't seen any of the nominated films yet.








The veiwership for the show should be large, most of the flicks nominated did great box office.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 17, 2013 3:43 PM

ECGORDON

There's no place I can be since I found Serenity.


I won't be watching.



NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 22, 2013 12:59 PM

WHOZIT


"Oscar" bump

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 22, 2013 3:34 PM

SHINYGOODGUY


I'm gonna make my picks between who will and should win:

Best Picture: Will/Should Win

Lincoln will; ARGO should

Best Director

Spielberg will; Affleck should

Best Actor:

Day-Lewis will; Day-Lewis should

Best Actress

Jessica Chastain on both counts

Best Supporting Actor

Christoph Waltz on both counts

Best Supporting Actress

Anne Hathaway on both counts


Best Runner Up

Picture: Silver Linings Playbook (personal favorite)

Director: David O. Russell

Actor: Bradley Cooper

Actress: Jennifer Lawrence

Support Actor: DeNiro

Support Actress: Sally Field

Yeah, I know, I'm hedging my bets. Actually it should be interesting watching. Unlike EC and others I will be watching (doing so since I was a kid, in both good years and bad). Good films these days are hard to come by, someone from People magazine said that the political films are the best since the 70s and I agree.

In the interest of full disclosure; I have yet to see Lincoln, 0Dark30, Django, Les Mis among others.

I have seen however; Argo (FU), Life of Pi, Silver Linings. I am aware that Hollywood and the Academy play at politics within the industry's structure, but I love film and make my own judgments. Yes, I'm one of those - a crazy fan.


SGG



Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:



http://oscar.go.com/nominees

Best Picture: Lincoln

Best Director: Steven Spielberg

Best Actor: Daniel Day-Lewis

Best Actress: Jessica Chastain

Best Sup, Actor: Christoph Waltz

Best Sup, Actress: Anne Hathaway



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 23, 2013 3:52 AM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
I'm gonna make my picks between who will and should win:

Best Picture: Will/Should Win

Lincoln will; ARGO should

Best Director

Spielberg will; Affleck should

Best Actor:

Day-Lewis will; Day-Lewis should

Best Actress

Jessica Chastain on both counts

Best Supporting Actor

Christoph Waltz on both counts

Best Supporting Actress

Anne Hathaway on both counts


Best Runner Up

Picture: Silver Linings Playbook (personal favorite)

Director: David O. Russell

Actor: Bradley Cooper

Actress: Jennifer Lawrence

Support Actor: DeNiro

Support Actress: Sally Field

Yeah, I know, I'm hedging my bets. Actually it should be interesting watching. Unlike EC and others I will be watching (doing so since I was a kid, in both good years and bad). Good films these days are hard to come by, someone from People magazine said that the political films are the best since the 70s and I agree.

In the interest of full disclosure; I have yet to see Lincoln, 0Dark30, Django, Les Mis among others.

I have seen however; Argo (FU), Life of Pi, Silver Linings. I am aware that Hollywood and the Academy play at politics within the industry's structure, but I love film and make my own judgments. Yes, I'm one of those - a crazy fan.


SGG



Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:



http://oscar.go.com/nominees

Best Picture: Lincoln

Best Director: Steven Spielberg

Best Actor: Daniel Day-Lewis

Best Actress: Jessica Chastain

Best Sup, Actor: Christoph Waltz

Best Sup, Actress: Anne Hathaway





I wish "Life of Pi" would sweep but the fix is in, "Lincoln" will sweep and "Argo" will be the upset. The old fart academy voters will play it safe, all those awards "Argo" won over the last few weeks must be shown to be a mistake.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 23, 2013 4:40 AM

ECGORDON

There's no place I can be since I found Serenity.


I love film too, and although I never had any film appreciation classes I have read quite a few books written by directors, producers, editors, etc., and I used to subscribe to several film magazines (Film Comment and American Cinematographer being the best). Plus I have seen a ton of movies over the years; staying up on Fridays and Saturdays for the late movies when I was younger, working as a video operator at Cablevision in the early '70s when we had our own movie channels (before our system added HBO, Showtime, etc.), then as a film projectionist for over twelve years ('78-'91).

It is because I love film so much, and consider it an art form (even when it is just for entertainment), that I detest the Academy Awards. It is politics and favoritism for the most part. When they allow all Academy members to vote in all categories, many of whom don't have a clue about the process of some categories, you get people voting for things simply because they know someone in the production of the film, or from things they've read about the film. The guild awards are usually a better indicator of quality, not that politics and favoritism doesn't enter those areas too.

Besides, I'm going to like what I like whether it wins an award or not. I still say Hugo should have won Best Picture last year over The Artist, and I will never accept the notion that Shakespeare in Love was a better film than Saving Private Ryan.



NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 23, 2013 3:37 PM

SHINYGOODGUY


Never mind, found it here.

Talk to you later.


SGG

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 23, 2013 4:02 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



I'm zero for everything when it comes to Oscar movies.

Haven't seen anything remotely close to being nominated.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 24, 2013 8:07 AM

WHOZIT


Last "Oscar" bump, get your predictions in. I still think "Lincoln" will sweep but there may be a few suprises.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 25, 2013 1:54 AM

ECGORDON

There's no place I can be since I found Serenity.


Instead of watching the award ceremony to see what would win Best Picture, I watched the Best Picture.



NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 25, 2013 3:44 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


I watched last night, it was strange because it started out slow and rather plastic, then it warmed up, but got sloppy (the Bond Tribute was bleh until, Dame Shirley Bassey belted out Goldfinger. Wow she has not lost anything on her voice (best moment of the night).

There were few memorable moments or speeches but, Daniel Day-Lewis got the best laugh of the night. Poor Jennifer Lawrence tripped and fell on her way to the podium, but she handled it with grace.

I think the biggest ass was Quentin Taratino, normally I like his approach but last night he acted a little bit like an ass during his acceptance speech, the second half of his speech almost saved him when he said that the writing from all the nominees was fantastic. Ang Lee totally had diarrhea of the mouth only thing that saved him was putting his foot in it.
He was rambling so much that he actually said mentioning certain people in his speech was a waste of time (I know what he meant but it came out wrong).

Seth McFarlane was only ok, luke warm as a host, although he had some funny zingers, but they were few and far in between. The show overall had fits and starts and never quite hit a good stride, their timing was off. And OMG! the music was way too loud couldn't hardly here the singers, as the Oscars devoted the night to music in the movies. In that regard, Shirley Bassey kicked ass, and the Les Mis ensemble cast was fantastic as they sang a medley of songs from the movie, and Jennifer Hudson was amazing, but, by the end, she was out of breath because she had to sing so loud over the orchestra. Now get this, they had them housed in a different building and piped the music in. Thank God Adele had her own band on stage or she too would have been subject to the overly loud music.

Affleck was the opposite of Tarantino, as he was humble and gracious in accepting Best Picture award. The one surprise that caught me off guard was when Christoph Waltz won Best Supporting Actor, I thought Tommy Lee or Alan Arkin would win (although I think he deserves it).

There was one really funny skit at the beginning of the show when they presented a scene from the movie Flight, instead of a clip they did it with sock puppets; Hi-larious! What I found strange (I know I'm hopping all over the place) was they had Seth McFarlane reading the upcoming promos, instead of an off-camera announcer. You know, who and what was coming on next as they broke for a commercial - that was weird!

It wasn't a total disaster, but it didn't have any real chemistry. No rhythm. As Ruby Rhod would say, "It had no fire, no energy, no nothing! It has to pop, pop, pop!"

It was not supergreen.


SGG


Quote:

Originally posted by ecgordon:
Instead of watching the award ceremony to see what would win Best Picture, I watched the Best Picture.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 25, 2013 7:54 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

As Ruby Rhod would say, "It had no fire, no energy, no nothing! It has to pop, pop, pop!"


Well, Ruby would know. He's in a class by himself. I didn't watch any of the award show, instead watched The Walking Dead and Talking Dead for three hours. Last night Andrea showed us how to make a "safe" walker. Yikes!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 25, 2013 2:11 PM

WHOZIT


I thought "Lincoln" would sweep, I was wrong....and I'm OK with that

I was rooting for "Life of Pi" and was happy it won 4 Oscars, I'm OK with "Argo" winnig for best picture because I'm sure that pissed off a lot of the old fart academy voters.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:59 PM

SHINYGOODGUY


My guess is that it was a backlash to Ben's snub in the Best Director category. Academy members voted, I think, in protest, for Ang Lee (although I think he did a masterful job in Life of Pi - which I predicted would get Academy recognition).

I agree, but it was a good year for well-made and constructed movies.


SGG

Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:
I thought "Lincoln" would sweep, I was wrong....and I'm OK with that

I was rooting for "Life of Pi" and was happy it won 4 Oscars, I'm OK with "Argo" winnig for best picture because I'm sure that pissed off a lot of the old fart academy voters.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, March 1, 2013 3:29 PM

SHINYGOODGUY


Hey EC,

I'm finally getting a chance to answer your post, I was waiting to have time to properly respond and do justice to your post. So here it is; such as it is:

I was happy to read your post and your expression "I love film too" and don't worry my friend, whether you formally studied or are a lover of film - it's all good. (I've heard of American Cinematographer, but it's the first I've heard of Film Comment, thanks buddy).

I too remember Friday and Saturdays in front of my tube watching the classics and, in particular, Million Dollar Movie, The Late Show and PBS.
I was always touched by the good and great movies of the Golden Era, that made me appreciate the movement in the 70s of quality films. Later in my life (in my 30s) I worked for Blockbuster video and truly got a kick out of helping customers find those self-same films that I grew up with and those new ones that touched upon our love for the art form.

I'm with you: "because I love film so much, and consider it an art form (even when it is just for entertainment)." I love it so much, that I can see past the Academy's feebleness and political debauchery to see the art form in it's pure sense. It has become more and more commercial of late, but every once in a while the art form presents the truth. Although I understand your point of view, I can't help myself, for me it is a tradition, that even my son does not fully comprehend. It is good to know that there are others, like me, that feel that way about film. You, Sleepy and a handful here inspire me. For that, thank you.

I normally don't allow the Academy's selections influence me, but I get your point about Hugo (which I thoroughly enjoyed), but I must say that The Artist caught me off guard and entertained me to no end. Who'd of thunk it, a silent movie in this day and age could have so much to offer. As for Saving Private Ryan, that indeed was a surprise. The Weinsteins are well known for their campaigning prowess. I have to admit I enjoyed Shakespeare in Love as well. For me, I like to pit my film acumen against that of the Academy (most times I win; ha, ha)

Once again, this has been good to know.


SGG

Quote:

Originally posted by ecgordon:
I love film too, and although I never had any film appreciation classes I have read quite a few books written by directors, producers, editors, etc., and I used to subscribe to several film magazines (Film Comment and American Cinematographer being the best). Plus I have seen a ton of movies over the years; staying up on Fridays and Saturdays for the late movies when I was younger, working as a video operator at Cablevision in the early '70s when we had our own movie channels (before our system added HBO, Showtime, etc.), then as a film projectionist for over twelve years ('78-'91).

It is because I love film so much, and consider it an art form (even when it is just for entertainment), that I detest the Academy Awards. It is politics and favoritism for the most part. When they allow all Academy members to vote in all categories, many of whom don't have a clue about the process of some categories, you get people voting for things simply because they know someone in the production of the film, or from things they've read about the film. The guild awards are usually a better indicator of quality, not that politics and favoritism doesn't enter those areas too.

Besides, I'm going to like what I like whether it wins an award or not. I still say Hugo should have won Best Picture last year over The Artist, and I will never accept the notion that Shakespeare in Love was a better film than Saving Private Ryan.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL