Cheney & Rummy on trial for 9/11 False Flag attack by piratenews

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Cheney & Rummy on trial for 9/11 False Flag attack

POSTED BY: PIRATENEWS
UPDATED: Saturday, April 9, 2011 12:12
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1676
PAGE 1 of 1

Saturday, April 9, 2011 9:25 AM

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

Pentagon soldier April Gallop testifis she saw no aircraft parts, no airline bodies, smelled no jet fuel, but did smell cordite explosive while climbing out the unburning hole in the Pentagon on 9/11/2001...

Funny how the "brave" Pentagon "heros" were too scared to help a mother find her newborn baby, and just wanted to save themselves while trampling little babies to death...

Pentagon soldier April Gallop sues Cheney, Rummy and General Myers for False Flag attack on 9/11
http://911blogger.com/node/18858
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/911_survivor_blasts_Rumsfeld_Cheney_No_1
217.html

April Gallop in 9/11 Ripple Effect
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3969310749489496889
www.911RippleEffect.com

http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/pentalawn.html

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, April 9, 2011 12:12 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

Just like the dozens missing Obama birth certificate cases, "men" in black dresses banned all discovery of evidence in this case... In lawsuits against Gangsta Govt, successful litigants investigate their own discovery before trial, and submit all evidence as exhibits, before a motion for summary judgment can decide the case without a judge or jury.

Extraordinary Conflict of Interest: Bush Cousin John Walker Presides Over Federal Court Case Against Former Bush Administration Officials

NEW YORK, April 7, 2011 -- /PRNewswire/ -- Confounding lawyers and legal scholars all over the world, Judge John Walker, first cousin of former President George W. Bush, was one of three judges of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals to hear argument Tuesday in Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld and Myers.

The lawsuit was brought by a soldier injured during the attack on the Pentagon and accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Richard Myers, of conspiring to facilitate the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

The attacks killed 3000 Americans, plus many who have died from the toxic clean-up conditions at Ground Zero.

Attorney William Veale, acting for April Gallop, learned of the assignment the usual 5 days before the argument, and filed a motion to disqualify Judge Walker.
http://lawyersfor911truth.blogspot.com

There was no prior decision regarding the motion, and when Veale asked about it in court the motion was denied by Judge Winter. Veale then requested a continuance to seek appellate review of the court's ruling but that was denied as well.

Argument followed but Walker, and fellow judges Cabranes and Winter diverted attention to whether Veale, former Chief Assistant Public Defender, and lecturer in Criminal Trial Practice at the University of California, Boalt Hall, was properly licensed to practice before the court.

The Tuesday appeal followed a ruling by then District Court Judge Denny Chin, dismissing Ms. Gallop's lawsuit with prejudice, writing that the allegations are "implausible" and the product of "cynical delusion and fantasy."

The judges were apparently unaware of growing world doubts about the official story of 9/11, including a recent poll by Germany's prestigious Emnid Institute, reporting 89.5% of Germans in doubt.

Gallop's appeal brief stated that Judge Chin's summary misrepresented important allegations in the case, and failed to consider virtually half of the factual assertions contained in the Complaint. Chin also failed to mention the words, actions, and locations of the three defendants at the time of the crime.

Veale, amidst frequent interruptions from the three judges, managed to point out Cheney's direct involvement in tracking and dealing with the airplane that was heading for the Pentagon, as reported to the 9/11 Commission by then Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, a winner of the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Judge Cabranes gave no sign of being familiar with the allegations in the Complaint concerning conflicts about the flight path of AA 77 (which allegedly hit the Pentagon) between the National Transportation Safety Board and the 9/11 Commission.

Nor did he show any sign of being aware of the scrubbing of the radar tracks in the area at the time of the attacks, nor of the counter-intuitive strategy of the suicidal hijacker who chose not to kill 20,000 occupants of the Pentagon, including Secretary Rumsfeld, by flying into the roof of the Pentagon.

Instead this novice pilot allegedly executed a spiraling descent, beyond the capacity of the plane and certainly the capability of the pilot, to accomplish an incredible horizontal ground level entry into a sparsely occupied and recently reinforced section of the building, causing 125 deaths.

Veale asked what offense to justice could come from allowing the case to go forward, when the possibility of sanctions awaits purveyors of frivolous accusations. Gallop's lawyer's final lament acknowledged the existence of evil in the world, its attraction to power and its disregard for citizenship, but Walker interrupted that sentence before it could be completed as well.

Media contact: William Veale, centerfor911justice@gmail.com, 292929@msn.com, 510-845-5675, 925-212-3678

SOURCE Center for 9/11 Justice
http://www.centerfor911justice.org

www.heraldonline.com/2011/04/07/2970608/extraordinary-conflict-of-inte
rest.html

Read the Federal Complaint:
http://911blogger.com/node/18858
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/911_survivor_blasts_Rumsfeld_Cheney_No_1
217.html

April Gallop’s attorney on The Dr Kevin Barrett Show April 5, 2011
http://noliesradio.org/archives/32320

“THE KEVIN BARRETT SHOW”
EXCLUSIVE LIVE–April Gallop’s attorney William Veale immediately after court appearance

Email your questions or comments now.

“On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.”

April Gallop, a Pentagon employee injured (along with her baby son) in the 9/11/2001 false-flag bombing, is suing three of the suspected perpetrators – Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Richard Meyers. She and/or her attorney, William Veale, will be interviewed on the Kevin Barrett show immediately after the hearing. Here is William Veale’s press release:

Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23917

89.5% of German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11.

NEW YORK, March 23, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — A December 2010 poll conducted by the prestigious Emnid Institute, and reported in the German magazine “Welt der Wunder,” revealed that 89.5% of German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11.

The issue is heating up in America as well, and will soon be heard in court.

Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old son Elisha at day care.

Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance upon arrival.

The instant Gallop turned on her computer an enormous explosion blew her out of her chair, knocking her momentarily unconscious.

Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs of an aircraft – no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains. Her watch (and other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the Pentagon was allegedly struck at 9:38 a.m.

The 9/11 Commission reported that “by no later than 9:18 a.m., FAA centers in Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Washington were aware that Flight 77 was missing and that two aircraft had struck the World Trade Center.”

Why then were there no anti-aircraft defenses, Gallop asks, or alarm warnings inside the Pentagon?

Gallop was briefed by officials not to tell her story in public; she also received an email from a Fox News reporter who had been told by the Pentagon not to interview her.

Gallop now believes that officials within the Bush Administration conspired to destroy the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and WTC 7 – the third building brought down at 5:20 p.m. that day – with pre-placed explosives detonated after the planes hit.

On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.

Gallop’s case relies on virtually all forms of evidence admissible in court, but significantly, on published scientific evidence that residues of these explosives were found in the rubble after the attacks. In its totality the proffered case establishes that the government hypothesis – that the buildings collapsed due to fire in combination with the airplane impacts – is scientifically untenable.

In addition, Ms. Gallop will, through photographic and other physical evidence, as well as the testimony of a multitude of military and civilian survivors, demonstrate the impossibility of her having lived through the attack on the Pentagon if it had taken place as the government and the defendants claim.

German Federal Judge, Deiter Dieseroth, stated in December 2009 that:

“No independent court has applied legal procedures to review the available evidence on who was responsible for the attacks.”

Also, that “it is not acceptable for a constitutional state…to declare war, bomb a foreign country, and place it under military occupation,” without first identifying suspects.

Dieseroth also said the U.S. “was under burden of proof” that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yet the FBI admits it has no evidence presentable in court to back this up.

The stakes in this case are epic, including the possibility of an overwhelming transformation of the world’s understanding of history, not to mention American citizens’ relationship with their government.

Check out Kevin’s new book: Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters.
http://www.questioningthewaronterror.com

The Kevin Barrett Show is independently produced and hosted by Kevin Barrett and these shows are externally produced content. All externally produced content broadcast on No Lies Radio is the sole responsibility of the program-content producer and is not the responsibility of www.NoLiesRadio.org. Any questions or concerns should be directed to the content producer.

9/11 The Road to Tyranny
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-320772511810269109&hl=undefin
ed

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE