REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Health co-ops, created to foster competition and lower insurance costs, are in danger

POSTED BY: GEEZER
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:11
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 779
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:51 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:


When the new health-care law was being cobbled together, Congress decided to establish a network of nonprofit insurance companies aimed at bringing competition to the marketplace, long dominated by major insurers.

But these co-ops, started as a great hope for lowering insurance costs, are already in danger.

While the debut of the Affordable Care Act this month has been marred by widespread computer problems, the difficulties the co-ops face have been less obvious to consumers. One co-op, however, has closed, another is struggling, and at least nine more have been projected to have financial problems, according to internal government reviews and a federal audit.

Their failure would leave taxpayers potentially on the hook for nearly $1 billion in defaulted loans and rob the marketplace of the kind of competition they were supposed to create. And if they become insolvent, policyholders in at least half the states where the co-ops operate could be stuck with medical bills.

Although the co-op plan originated in the Senate, resistance to the initial proposal quickly materialized on Capitol Hill, in part because of pressure from insurance industry lobbyists.

So Congress saddled its new creations with onerous restrictions that, experts say, doomed many co-ops to failure. Federal grants for the co-ops were converted to loans with tight repayment schedules; they were barred from using federal money for crucial marketing; and they were severely limited from selling insurance to large employers, which represent the most lucrative market.

And even as the Obama administration was setting up the program, White House officials, who had no pride of authorship and feared it would be risky, repeatedly suggested that funding for the co-ops be reduced, according to more than half a dozen people familiar with budget negotiations and the legislative debate. The funding was cut to a small fraction of what experts told Congress would be needed for the ventures to be viable.

Brian Cook, a spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the federal agency overseeing the co-ops, said it is closely monitoring their progress and is “confident that co-ops will be an important option available to millions of consumers.”

But while the program was meant to be nationwide, only two dozen co-ops have begun selling insurance on the new health-care exchanges. The difficulties the co-ops are confronting pose a challenge to the new law that is largely separate from the troubled rollout of the exchanges this month. But the problems, in particular the malfunctioning federal Web site, are hitting the co-ops hard because they depend on the exchanges for business.

The co-ops differ from traditional insurers in their nonprofit status, consumer focus and organizational structure; they will be governed by boards controlled by policyholders.

Those co-ops that have opened their doors are scrambling to prevail against the odds, sending their small staffs door to door to educate people about what they do without violating a ban on explicit marketing. To get around what she called the “really difficult” restriction, Julia Hutchins, chief executive of the Colorado Health Insurance Cooperative, was reduced to dispatching scantily clad models into the streets of Denver to urge people to “get covered.’’



More at http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/health-co-ops-created-to-foster
-competition-and-lower-insurance-costs-are-facing-danger/2013/10/22/e1c961fe-3809-11e3-ae46-e4248e75c8ea_story.html


Looks like the "Pass it and then read it" philosophy of the ACA may end up with it having as many glitches as the healthcare.gov site. Seems like folks saw potential problems like this, but no one had the will to get them fixed in the rush to passage.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:11 AM

BYTEMITE


That's a shame. Co-ops would be a worlds better system than the predatory and uncaring insurance companies we have. Who pushed for restrictions to make the new co-ops unable to compete with them.

This should be disgusting to anyone who values the principles of a competitive free-market, as well as to people who care about the health and welfare of citizens.

At least Utah still has IHC.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Scott Bessent is a stupid asshole
Mon, November 24, 2025 04:36 - 2 posts
You can either be an American or a Democrat. You can't be both anymore.
Sun, November 23, 2025 22:36 - 24 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, November 23, 2025 20:56 - 9389 posts
"28 pages" of classified 911 report released
Sun, November 23, 2025 17:34 - 22 posts
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Sun, November 23, 2025 17:13 - 390 posts
"Feminism" really means more Femtacular than you at EVERYTHING.
Sun, November 23, 2025 17:00 - 148 posts
The Shameful Case of Kids for Cash
Sun, November 23, 2025 16:52 - 1 posts
Chicago is Bankrupting! Chicago-metropolitan area Illinois $679 billion Economy is now Bankrupt!!
Sun, November 23, 2025 16:51 - 51 posts
On the Epstien Situation: The best comment I've seen after any article since the beginning...
Sun, November 23, 2025 15:16 - 15 posts
No, Dearborn, Michigan Is Not Under Sharia Law
Sun, November 23, 2025 15:12 - 26 posts
Dick Cheney is Dead
Sun, November 23, 2025 15:11 - 5 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Sun, November 23, 2025 15:10 - 3955 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL