Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
The democrats hold the winning cards. I expect they'll play the hand out.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

The democrats hold the winning cards. I expect they'll play the hand out.

T

---

I don't think the game is played the way you think. Let’s have a thought experiment like Einstein might do. Trump and Vice President Mike Pence go hunting. Vice President Dick Cheney went hunting, once, so let’s assume that Pence is no more careful with a shotgun than Cheney and shoots Trump in the face. Bam! Bam! with both barrels. Pence is instantly promoted to President without an impeachment. What changes for the Democrats if they are rid of Trump so easily? Nothing, really. Maybe even gets worse because Pence is more pleasant & electable and far less stupid than Trump.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney_hunting_accident

I'm thinking the Democrats need a plan that sinks the entire GOP, not just Trump. Best way is to make Trump the anchor chain that wraps around the GOP and pulls the entire party to bottom where they can all drown together.

---

Right now Trump says one thing and the democrats say the report says otherwise. That falls right into Trump and the republicans hands. The dems need to stop telling the American people to read a report that is very technical, and almost 5 hundred pages long. Instead they need to show the movie.

They need to show the people the movie based on the report. That means calling witnesses and letting the people watch the Mueller report play out on TV. As of now, Trump only has to spin what is written in a report no one is reading; easy. It will be next to impossible for Trump and the republicans to spin what goes down that the people see with their own eyes.

At that point, even if the republicans don't convict in the senate the people will still know Trump is guilty. That the democrats were justified in attempting to bring him to justice. Then come the elections with all republicans coming off as aiding in his coverup. Of being guilty of obstruction themselves.

It is also important to start getting Trump to say he is not a criminal. This can be done by the dems calling all the investigations criminal investigations. Trump always having to say he is not a criminal would be a great visual on the nightly news.

tick tock
T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Right now Trump says one thing and the democrats say the report says otherwise. That falls right into Trump and the republicans hands. The dems need to stop telling the American people to read a report that is very technical, and almost 5 hundred pages long. Instead they need to show the movie.

They need to show the people the movie based on the report. That means calling witnesses and letting the people watch the Mueller report play out on TV. As of now, Trump only has to spin what is written in a report no one is reading; easy. It will be next to impossible for Trump and the republicans to spin what goes down that the people see with their own eyes.

At that point, even if the republicans don't convict in the senate the people will still know Trump is guilty. That the democrats were justified in attempting to bring him to justice. Then come the elections with all republicans coming off as aiding in his coverup. Of being guilty of obstruction themselves.

It is also important to start getting Trump to say he is not a criminal. This can be done by the dems calling all the investigations criminal investigations. Trump always having to say he is not a criminal would be a great visual on the nightly news.

tick tock
T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Right now Trump says one thing and the democrats say the report says otherwise. That falls right into Trump and the republicans hands. The dems need to stop telling the American people to read a report that is very technical, and almost 5 hundred pages long. Instead they need to show the movie.

They need to show the people the movie based on the report. That means calling witnesses and letting the people watch the Mueller report play out on TV. As of now, Trump only has to spin what is written in a report no one is reading; easy. It will be next to impossible for Trump and the republicans to spin what goes down that the people see with their own eyes.

At that point, even if the republicans don't convict in the senate the people will still know Trump is guilty. That the democrats were justified in attempting to bring him to justice. Then come the elections with all republicans coming off as aiding in his coverup. Of being guilty of obstruction themselves.

It is also important to start getting Trump to say he is not a criminal. This can be done by the dems calling all the investigations criminal investigations. Trump always having to say he is not a criminal would be a great visual on the nightly news.

tick tock
T

---

You are right. Voters need to see it on TV because they won't read, for example, In Terrifying Interview, William Barr Goes Full MAGA
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/05/william-barr-interview-cbs-muel
ler-coup-trump.html

Barr grossly contradicts Mueller’s findings with regard to Trump’s ties to Russia. “Mueller has spent two and half years, and the fact is, there is no evidence of a conspiracy,” he says. “So it was bogus, this whole idea that the Trump was in cahoots with the Russians is bogus.”

This is just a wild lie. Mueller was unable to establish a criminal conspiracy between Trump and Russia. He was unable to establish this, in part, because “some individuals invoked their Fifth Amendment right,” or “provided information that was false or incomplete,” or “deleted relevant communications.” Indeed, the two Trump campaign officials most closely linked to Russian cutouts, Paul Manafort and Roger Stone, refused to cooperate with prosecutors. A failure to establish a criminal conspiracy is not the same thing as finding “no evidence of a conspiracy.” Nowhere does the Mueller report say there’s no evidence of a conspiracy. Some of the potential conspiracy elements were unprovable — Mueller never figured out why Manafort gave 75 pages of polling data to a Russian agent.

Barr, amazingly, goes even farther to say the report proved “this whole idea that the Trump was in cahoots with the Russians is bogus.” In fact, the Mueller report notes that it did not even try to establish whether the campaign was “in cahoots” with Russia. The report states that it “applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of ‘collusion.’”

The report in fact finds extensive evidence that Trump was in cahoots with Russia. His top campaign officials took a meeting with a Russian agent promising them help from the Russian government. Trump asked Russia on camera to hack his opponent’s emails, and they carried out a hacking attempt that day. Trump was pursuing a lucrative, no-risk business deal requiring Russian government approval during the campaign and lying about it, making him vulnerable to blackmail by Russia. Sharing an explosive secret that could destroy your campaign in order to potentially collect a massive payoff from a party that you know is doing illegal things to help you is the definition of being in cahoots.

---

Yep, all you say and much much more will be exposed if live hearings are held. The news will also show selected pieces that will help expose Trump and the republicans as corrupt. Every time Trump tweets live testimony will immediately follow in the news showing he is lying.

tick tock

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
And yet, after all of this, the Democrats can't manage to get 50 people on board with impeachment.

Are we ever going to impeach or what?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
And yet, after all of this, the Democrats can't manage to get 50 people on board with impeachment.

Are we ever going to impeach or what?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

You would think GOP Congressmen would impeach him for what he has cost:
"U.S. stock market forgoes $5 trillion in returns thanks to Trump's trade war"
www.marketwatch.com/story/trade-wars-cost-us-stock-market-5-trillion-s
o-far-estimates-deutsche-bank-2019-05-31

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
And yet, after all of this, the Democrats can't manage to get 50 people on board with impeachment.

Are we ever going to impeach or what?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

You would think GOP Congressmen would impeach him for what he has cost:
"U.S. stock market forgoes $5 trillion in returns thanks to Trump's trade war"
www.marketwatch.com/story/trade-wars-cost-us-stock-market-5-trillion-s
o-far-estimates-deutsche-bank-2019-05-31

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Yeah. You'd think so, huh.

I seriously don't know what everybody is waiting for. It's been 2 1/2 years of Trump and we can't even get 50 people on board for impeachment in a Democrat lead house.

What gives?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Why do you always talk about murder.

I mean you do. Always. Talk about murder.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
One person out of nearly 7 billion is a drop in the bucket, this is true. No tears would be shed by me, cause like I said before, he ain't my Daddy.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Did I miss something? Isn't the Mueller investagation (sic) still over?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Did I miss something? Isn't the Mueller investagation (sic) still over?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Did I miss something? Isn't the Mueller investagation (sic) still over?

---

Let me answer myself since SECOND doesn't seem to be clued in to reality - That thing called the Mueller investigation? Yup, still over.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Did I miss something? Isn't the Mueller investagation (sic) still over?

---

Let me answer myself since SECOND doesn't seem to be clued in to reality - That thing called the Mueller investigation? Yup, still over.

---

4 Disturbing Details You May Have Missed in the Mueller Report

Some troubling-to-outright-damning episodes have been lost in the noise around its release.

After two years of silence, the special counsel Robert Mueller recently made his first public remarks — to complain, it seemed, that no one had read his report. “We chose those words carefully,” Mr. Mueller said, “and the work speaks for itself.”

But at a dense 440-plus pages, if the report speaks for itself, it takes a great deal of time and focus to listen to what it has to say. Mr. Mueller tells a complicated story of “multiple, systematic” efforts at Russian election interference from which the Trump campaign was eager to benefit. And he describes a president eager to shut down an investigation into his own abusive conduct. This is far from, as the president put it, “no collusion, no obstruction.”

The document is packed with even more details, ranging from the troubling to the outright damning. Yet these have been lost in the flurry of discussion around the report’s release.

Even the most attentive reader could have trouble keeping track of the report’s loose ends and dropped subplots. Here are four of the most surprising details that you might have missed — and none of them are favorable to the president.

1) Coordinating with WikiLeaks? (Volume I, pp. 52-54)

How much did Mr. Trump personally know about Russian efforts to assist his campaign, and when did he know it? A great deal.

2) Looking for Clinton’s “missing” emails (Volume I, pp. 49, 62-63)

If the term “Collusion” means working behind the scenes with Russian actors to obtain hacked information damaging to Mrs. Clinton, then this section of the report describes just that — collusion that took place at Mr. Trump’s request.

3) Sharing polling data (Volume I, pp. 130-131, 140)

While managing the campaign, Mr. Manafort told Mr. Gates to share “internal polling data” private to the campaign with Mr. Kilimnik, so he could share it with Ukrainian oligarchs and a Russian oligarch. Mr. Gates sent Mr. Kilimnik the data regularly, deleting the WhatsApp messages after he did so. In an in-person meeting with Mr. Kilimnik, Mr. Manafort shared more information about the campaign’s election plans and polling, including information about “battleground states” that would be key to Mr. Trump’s election.

Mr Gates goes on trial in November. Mr. Manafort is in jail.

4) Obstructing justice (Volume II, pp. 90-93)

Attorney General Bill Barr’s view that the president did not obstruct justice is informed by his argument that presidential conduct authorized by the Constitution cannot constitute obstruction. But this does not address conduct that took place outside the scope of the Constitution.

One of many examples outside the scope of the Constitution: “Substantial evidence,” Mr. Mueller writes, “indicates that the president’s effort to have Sessions limit the scope of the special counsel’s investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the president’s and his campaign’s previous conduct.”

More at www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/opinion/mueller-report-trump-impeachment.ht
ml

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
When the report is dug thru in its essentials, it will turn into dust and blow away because there was nothing there to begin with - just rumor, innuendo, and careful editing.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
One person out of nearly 7 billion is a drop in the bucket, this is true. No tears would be shed by me, cause like I said before, he ain't my Daddy.

I'm just wondering how many times you want to add to the trail of breadcrumbs leading back to your IP address your desire to see one human being in particular meet his maker prematurely either by your own blade or the blade of somebody else.


Maybe you think that this forum is obscure enough that nobody would notice, or maybe you use a VPN and believe the advertisement hype that you're safe from ever being discovered while you type away your death wishes and death threats from atop your ivory tower.

I can assure you that neither is the case.



Do me a favor...

Type the following line between the brackets (not including the brackets themselves, but include the quotation marks) into Google's search bar and tell me what pops up.


[site:fireflyfans.net "The Watergate scandal indicted 69 people, "]



I can also assure you, that this little trick works for any single line of dialogue that you've ever posted here. Even if you were to go back and delete your posts, there's a lot that have been quoted by others after you've posted them.

And all I'm saying is that something were to happen even remotely along any of the lines and scenarios your dark, unfiltered mind decides to defecate on these forums, well... let's just say I hope you have some very powerful friends on your side if that day ever comes to pass.


Just a friendly little tip to somebody who doesn't know how the internet works... :)

Pleasant dreams.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
At least two "damning details" in the Mueller report have been discovered to have been deceptively edited

1) A phone call from Trumps lawyer (Dowd) to Flynn's lawyer was edited to appear as if Dowd was requesting sensitive information or seeking to obstruct justice, but does not match the actual transcript.

2) A person represented as a "Russian" intel source with links to the Kremlin was actually a UKRAINIAN informant with multiple contacts per day to our embassy in Ukraine, providing reliable information about the UKRAINIAN government to our State Department.

Mueller chose those words carefully indeed! When the report is dug thru in its essentials, it will turn into dust and blow away because there was nothing there to begin with - just rumor, innuendo, and careful editing.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Did I miss something? Isn't the Mueller investagation (sic) still over?

---

Let me answer myself since SECOND doesn't seem to be clued in to reality - That thing called the Mueller investigation? Yup, still over.

---

4 Disturbing Details You May Have Missed in the Mueller Report

Some troubling-to-outright-damning episodes have been lost in the noise around its release.

After two years of silence, the special counsel Robert Mueller recently made his first public remarks — to complain, it seemed, that no one had read his report. “We chose those words carefully,” Mr. Mueller said, “and the work speaks for itself.”

But at a dense 440-plus pages, if the report speaks for itself, it takes a great deal of time and focus to listen to what it has to say. Mr. Mueller tells a complicated story of “multiple, systematic” efforts at Russian election interference from which the Trump campaign was eager to benefit. And he describes a president eager to shut down an investigation into his own abusive conduct. This is far from, as the president put it, “no collusion, no obstruction.”

The document is packed with even more details, ranging from the troubling to the outright damning. Yet these have been lost in the flurry of discussion around the report’s release.

Even the most attentive reader could have trouble keeping track of the report’s loose ends and dropped subplots. Here are four of the most surprising details that you might have missed — and none of them are favorable to the president.

1) Coordinating with WikiLeaks? (Volume I, pp. 52-54)

How much did Mr. Trump personally know about Russian efforts to assist his campaign, and when did he know it? A great deal.

2) Looking for Clinton’s “missing” emails (Volume I, pp. 49, 62-63)

If the term “Collusion” means working behind the scenes with Russian actors to obtain hacked information damaging to Mrs. Clinton, then this section of the report describes just that — collusion that took place at Mr. Trump’s request.

3) Sharing polling data (Volume I, pp. 130-131, 140)

While managing the campaign, Mr. Manafort told Mr. Gates to share “internal polling data” private to the campaign with Mr. Kilimnik, so he could share it with Ukrainian oligarchs and a Russian oligarch. Mr. Gates sent Mr. Kilimnik the data regularly, deleting the WhatsApp messages after he did so. In an in-person meeting with Mr. Kilimnik, Mr. Manafort shared more information about the campaign’s election plans and polling, including information about “battleground states” that would be key to Mr. Trump’s election.

Mr Gates goes on trial in November. Mr. Manafort is in jail.

4) Obstructing justice (Volume II, pp. 90-93)

Attorney General Bill Barr’s view that the president did not obstruct justice is informed by his argument that presidential conduct authorized by the Constitution cannot constitute obstruction. But this does not address conduct that took place outside the scope of the Constitution.

One of many examples outside the scope of the Constitution: “Substantial evidence,” Mr. Mueller writes, “indicates that the president’s effort to have Sessions limit the scope of the special counsel’s investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the president’s and his campaign’s previous conduct.”

More at www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/opinion/mueller-report-trump-impeachment.ht
ml

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
One person out of nearly 7 billion is a drop in the bucket, this is true. No tears would be shed by me, cause like I said before, he ain't my Daddy.

I'm just wondering how many times you want to add to the trail of breadcrumbs leading back to your IP address your desire to see one human being in particular meet his maker prematurely either by your own blade or the blade of somebody else.


Maybe you think that this forum is obscure enough that nobody would notice, or maybe you use a VPN and believe the advertisement hype that you're safe from ever being discovered while you type away your death wishes and death threats from atop your ivory tower.

I can assure you that neither is the case.



Do me a favor...

Type the following line between the brackets (not including the brackets themselves, but include the quotation marks) into Google's search bar and tell me what pops up.


[site:fireflyfans.net "The Watergate scandal indicted 69 people, "]



I can also assure you, that this little trick works for any single line of dialogue that you've ever posted here. Even if you were to go back and delete your posts, there's a lot that have been quoted by others after you've posted them.

And all I'm saying is that something were to happen even remotely along any of the lines and scenarios your dark, unfiltered mind decides to defecate on these forums, well... let's just say I hope you have some very powerful friends on your side if that day ever comes to pass.


Just a friendly little tip to somebody who doesn't know how the internet works... :)

Pleasant dreams.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Did you also look at his posts under "two" yet?

---

Quote:

---

When the report is dug thru in its essentials, it will turn into dust and blow away because there was nothing there to begin with - just rumor, innuendo, and careful editing. SIGNY

"Rumor, innuendo, and careful editing" is an election strategy. That is also how prosecutors sway juries in criminal trials, not with logic, because your average juror is not a professor of philosophy. It is constitutionally complicated to indict a sitting President, but the calculation would be different if Trump were not President. And, as it happens, there is an election next year, which could lead, fairly quickly, to his exit from the White House. In other words, the way to hold Trump to account criminally is to first hold him to account electorally. Then use the same tactics ("rumor, innuendo, and careful editing") to convince a jury to vote for his conviction.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
One person out of nearly 7 billion is a drop in the bucket, this is true. No tears would be shed by me, cause like I said before, he ain't my Daddy.

I'm just wondering how many times you want to add to the trail of breadcrumbs leading back to your IP address your desire to see one human being in particular meet his maker prematurely either by your own blade or the blade of somebody else.


Maybe you think that this forum is obscure enough that nobody would notice, or maybe you use a VPN and believe the advertisement hype that you're safe from ever being discovered while you type away your death wishes and death threats from atop your ivory tower.

I can assure you that neither is the case.



Do me a favor...

Type the following line between the brackets (not including the brackets themselves, but include the quotation marks) into Google's search bar and tell me what pops up.


[site:fireflyfans.net "The Watergate scandal indicted 69 people, "]



I can also assure you, that this little trick works for any single line of dialogue that you've ever posted here. Even if you were to go back and delete your posts, there's a lot that have been quoted by others after you've posted them.

And all I'm saying is that something were to happen even remotely along any of the lines and scenarios your dark, unfiltered mind decides to defecate on these forums, well... let's just say I hope you have some very powerful friends on your side if that day ever comes to pass.


Just a friendly little tip to somebody who doesn't know how the internet works... :)

Pleasant dreams.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Did you also look at his posts under "two" yet?

---

Could you rephrase the question?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Did you also look at his posts under "two" yet?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Did I miss something? Isn't the Mueller investagation (sic) still over?

---

Let me answer myself since SECOND doesn't seem to be clued in to reality - That thing called the Mueller investigation? Yup, still over.

---

4 Disturbing Details You May Have Missed in the Mueller Report

Some troubling-to-outright-damning episodes have been lost in the noise around its release.

After two years of silence, the special counsel Robert Mueller recently made his first public remarks — to complain, it seemed, that no one had read his report. “We chose those words carefully,” Mr. Mueller said, “and the work speaks for itself.”

But at a dense 440-plus pages, if the report speaks for itself, it takes a great deal of time and focus to listen to what it has to say. Mr. Mueller tells a complicated story of “multiple, systematic” efforts at Russian election interference from which the Trump campaign was eager to benefit. And he describes a president eager to shut down an investigation into his own abusive conduct. This is far from, as the president put it, “no collusion, no obstruction.”

The document is packed with even more details, ranging from the troubling to the outright damning. Yet these have been lost in the flurry of discussion around the report’s release.

Even the most attentive reader could have trouble keeping track of the report’s loose ends and dropped subplots. Here are four of the most surprising details that you might have missed — and none of them are favorable to the president.

1) Coordinating with WikiLeaks? (Volume I, pp. 52-54)

How much did Mr. Trump personally know about Russian efforts to assist his campaign, and when did he know it? A great deal.

2) Looking for Clinton’s “missing” emails (Volume I, pp. 49, 62-63)

If the term “Collusion” means working behind the scenes with Russian actors to obtain hacked information damaging to Mrs. Clinton, then this section of the report describes just that — collusion that took place at Mr. Trump’s request.

3) Sharing polling data (Volume I, pp. 130-131, 140)

While managing the campaign, Mr. Manafort told Mr. Gates to share “internal polling data” private to the campaign with Mr. Kilimnik, so he could share it with Ukrainian oligarchs and a Russian oligarch. Mr. Gates sent Mr. Kilimnik the data regularly, deleting the WhatsApp messages after he did so. In an in-person meeting with Mr. Kilimnik, Mr. Manafort shared more information about the campaign’s election plans and polling, including information about “battleground states” that would be key to Mr. Trump’s election.

Mr Gates goes on trial in November. Mr. Manafort is in jail.

4) Obstructing justice (Volume II, pp. 90-93)

Attorney General Bill Barr’s view that the president did not obstruct justice is informed by his argument that presidential conduct authorized by the Constitution cannot constitute obstruction. But this does not address conduct that took place outside the scope of the Constitution.

One of many examples outside the scope of the Constitution: “Substantial evidence,” Mr. Mueller writes, “indicates that the president’s effort to have Sessions limit the scope of the special counsel’s investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the president’s and his campaign’s previous conduct.”

More at www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/opinion/mueller-report-trump-impeachment.ht
ml

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

At this point in time, Trump's guilt and Barr's complicity are the proverbial low hanging fruit. Bushels of low hanging fruit. Low enough even Nadler can safely reach them. But there are the Dems, standing 50 feet away, starving, considering their options. "I dunno... let's wait until they get even lower, like on the ground..." Feckless Dems will get what they deserve - Trump in 2020 and more voters turning their backs, disappointed in their lack of simple courage. They may not run into GOP voters, they may just not vote. And that's a vote for Trump and the GOP.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Hillary took dirt about Trump from a foreigner, and he got it from another foreigner (Russian, he says, but probably Ukrainian).

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Hillary took dirt about Trump from a foreigner, and he got it from another foreigner (Russian, he says, but probably Ukrainian).

---

Judge Napolitano: Trump is prepared to commit a felony to get re-elected

Reacting to President Trump saying he would accept foreign intel on a political opponent if offered, and that he doesn’t feel it’s necessary to contact the FBI, Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano on Thursday said he worries the president is “prepared to commit a felony.”

Napolitano was asked by Fox News anchor Shep Smith if there was any “gray area” or “wiggle room” when it comes to campaigns legally receiving “dirt from a foreign entity on a political opponent.”

“There’s no wiggle room with respect to dirt,” the judge responded. “With respect to opposition research. The Federal Election Commission decided in other cases that that is a thing of value.”

This prompted Smith to wonder if what the president described he was willing to do during his interview with ABC News constituted a felony.

“Correct,” Napolitano confidently declared. “Meaning he would be committing a felony and the person giving it to him, if the person was here, would be committing a felony as well.”

www.thedailybeast.com/foxs-judge-napolitano-seems-trump-is-prepared-to
-commit-a-felony-to-get-re-elected

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

WTF was the Steele Dossier?

Oh... that's right.

Ignorance of the law being no excuse only applies to proles.

But Hillary and the DNC had no idea that Fusion GPS subcontracted the work out to Steele's firm, and Steele had no idea that the research he was doing was for Hillary.

That's rather convenient for all parties involved.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---