Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Still not seeing Colbert's full throated apology.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Let's get in the way-back machine and go to Clinton's impeachment.

Ken Starr hands in his voluminous report after a long wait. The AG, Janet Reno, takes the report, and writes a short summary of it saying the president did no wrong.

Settled. Nothing to see here. Move along...

---

I see that the fact that the Mueller report and whats in it is only being discussed by Trumps hand picked attorney general is lost to some. Not to worry reaver, the truth will be revealed when the democrats get their hands on it.

tick tock

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Let's get in the way-back machine and go to Clinton's impeachment.

Ken Starr hands in his voluminous report after a long wait. The AG, Janet Reno, takes the report, and writes a short summary of it saying the president did no wrong.

Settled. Nothing to see here. Move along...

---

I see that the fact that the Mueller report and whats in it is only being discussed by Trumps hand picked attorney general is lost to some. Not to worry reaver, the truth will be revealed when the democrats get their hands on it.

tick tock

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Let's get in the way-back machine and go to Clinton's impeachment.

Ken Starr hands in his voluminous report after a long wait. The AG, Janet Reno, takes the report, and writes a short summary of it saying the president did no wrong.

Settled. Nothing to see here. Move along...

---

I see that the fact that the Mueller report and whats in it is only being discussed by Trumps hand picked attorney general is lost to some. Not to worry reaver, the truth will be revealed when the democrats get their hands on it.

tick tock

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted:

Quote:

---

Originally posted:
Let's get in the way-back machine and go to Clinton's impeachment.

Ken Starr hands in his voluminous report after a long wait. The AG, Janet Reno, takes the report, and writes a short summary of it saying the president did no wrong.

Settled. Nothing to see here. Move along...

---

I see that the fact that the Mueller report and whats in it is only being discussed by Trumps hand picked attorney general is lost to some. Not to worry reaver, the truth will be revealed when the democrats get their hands on it.

tick tock

T

---

There's supposed to be an apostrophe in what's. It's called a contraction.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Question I have: does Mueller keep a copy of his report? An unredacted one so there's a way to compare and see what Barr and his people redact? I'm not sure about Maddow's contention that Mueller would have sent Barr the report already redacted for the instances that Barr cited, as if that was suspicious on Barr to claim it needed further blackouts. That doesn't sound accurate - I would imagine Mueller would send Barr a clean one.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
It makes no difference to Trump voters what is inside the unredacted report. The top Republican on the House Intelligence panel called Mueller’s investigation “fraudulent” and “partisan”.

If you know even one Trump voter who will change their mind after seeing the report, aren't you lucky. Where I live, they already made up their minds from last week, after being told by Trump what to believe, until the end of time or until Trump changes his mind, whichever comes first.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
It makes no difference to Trump voters what is inside the unredacted report. The top Republican on the House Intelligence panel called Mueller’s investigation “fraudulent” and “partisan”.

If you know even one Trump voter who will change their mind after seeing the report, aren't you lucky. Where I live, they already made up their minds from last week, after being told by Trump what to believe, until the end of time or until Trump changes his mind, whichever comes first.

---

I don't really care about Trump voters. As you say, their minds are made up. As Trump said before he was even the nominee, "I could shoot someone in broad daylight on 5th avenue and I get away with it."

I don't really care what Trump says either, for that matter. After 2 years of him lying relentlessly or being mental, it's, "Tell us something we don't know."

I do care about the 45% of Undecideds. Mueller's report - unredacted - could be persuasive.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

I do care about the 45% of Undecideds. Mueller's report - unredacted - could be persuasive.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Take note, everyone. When Leftists are called out for being wrong, or making completely false claims, in their attempt to mock, ridicule and besmirch someone else, are proven wrong, they never, ever apologize.

They are cowards. Immature and utterly w/ out honor.

They double down and repeat the lie, mock more, and ridicule again.

Colbert did it , and is a coward for not coming forth and manning up to his false characterization of Trump.

Smollett did it , claiming his 100% fictional story being attacked, by MAGA supporters, was accurate. Even after the 2 ' attackers ' have fessed up to the staged crime.

Now Schiff-for-brains, who laughably is the chair of the Dem led Intel. Committee, is story telling again. Claims he and he alone has evidence that no one else has seen, that Mueller apparently didn't know about, that 40 FBI agents never got around to reviewing, after 2 + years ... yet this sniveling quim has the goods ?

Schiff-for-brains displays delusion and narcissism on a truly grand scale. He's a small peckered man longing for status and fame in compensation for his lack of ' substance '.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
Mueller Investagation (sic) Is Over

Yep - it's all over but for the weeping, wailing, and gnashing of teeth ... and the severe grinding of mental gears.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
It makes no difference to Trump voters what is inside the unredacted report. The top Republican on the House Intelligence panel called Mueller’s investigation “fraudulent” and “partisan”.

If you know even one Trump voter who will change their mind after seeing the report, aren't you lucky. Where I live, they already made up their minds from last week, after being told by Trump what to believe, until the end of time or until Trump changes his mind, whichever comes first.

---

I don't really care about Trump voters. As you say, their minds are made up.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Says the Troll who had his tiny mind made up 2 years ago, along with all of the other Trolls and Fake News consumers.

How ironic and sad.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Let's get in the way-back machine and go to Clinton's impeachment.

Ken Starr hands in his voluminous report after a long wait. The AG, Janet Reno, takes the report, and writes a short summary of it saying the president did no wrong.

Settled. Nothing to see here. Move along...

---

I see that the fact that the Mueller report and whats in it is only being discussed by Trumps hand picked attorney general is lost to some. Not to worry reaver, the truth will be revealed when the democrats get their hands on it.

tick tock

---

Question I have: does Mueller keep a copy of his report? An unredacted one so there's a way to compare and see what Barr and his people redact? I'm not sure about Maddow's contention that Mueller would have sent Barr the report already redacted for the instances that Barr cited, as if that was suspicious on Barr to claim it needed further blackouts. That doesn't sound accurate - I would imagine Mueller would send Barr a clean one.

---

Short answer G, definitely, 100% yes. There will always be an unredacted copy. Whether or not Mueller keeps one with him I doubt it.

Grand jury testimony has to be cleared for release by a judge before it can be released to the public. Not sure about congress getting it.

tick tock

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
What's funny is that people expected Mueller, who has a long history of being a fascistic motherfucker, to suddenly be a good guy.

Mueller was a man who spread fatal myths about Iraqi WMDs, targeted and infiltrated radical environmental groups, concocted elaborate plots to entrap Muslims in fake terrorism cases and ran roughshod over basic constitutional rights while he was a top federal prosecutor and FBI director.

The fix was in. The Dems will investigate, but they're so bad at being effective.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
It makes no difference to Trump voters what is inside the unredacted report. The top Republican on the House Intelligence panel called Mueller’s investigation “fraudulent” and “partisan”.

If you know even one Trump voter who will change their mind after seeing the report, aren't you lucky. Where I live, they already made up their minds from last week, after being told by Trump what to believe, until the end of time or until Trump changes his mind, whichever comes first.

---

I don't really care about Trump voters. As you say, their minds are made up. As Trump said before he was even the nominee, "I could shoot someone in broad daylight on 5th avenue and I get away with it."

I don't really care what Trump says either, for that matter. After 2 years of him lying relentlessly or being mental, it's, "Tell us something we don't know."

I do care about the 45% of Undecideds. Mueller's report - unredacted - could be persuasive.

---

Good luck with that. Mueller's report, unredacted, would drop thousands of names of people who were investigated but not indicted with anything. It would be a huge breech of privacy that would open them and their families to the hate of the extreme left, both online and in the real world.

You're never going to see an unredacted Mueller report.

You'd best go back to begging Trump for his tax returns. That's a much more plausible scenario.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
It makes no difference to Trump voters what is inside the unredacted report. The top Republican on the House Intelligence panel called Mueller’s investigation “fraudulent” and “partisan”.

If you know even one Trump voter who will change their mind after seeing the report, aren't you lucky. Where I live, they already made up their minds from last week, after being told by Trump what to believe, until the end of time or until Trump changes his mind, whichever comes first.

---

I don't really care about Trump voters. As you say, their minds are made up. As Trump said before he was even the nominee, "I could shoot someone in broad daylight on 5th avenue and I get away with it."

I don't really care what Trump says either, for that matter. After 2 years of him lying relentlessly or being mental, it's, "Tell us something we don't know."

I do care about the 45% of Undecideds. Mueller's report - unredacted - could be persuasive.

---

Good luck with that. Mueller's report, unredacted, would drop thousands of names of people who were investigated but not indicted with anything. It would be a huge breech of privacy that would open them and their families to the hate of the extreme left, both online and in the real world.

You're never going to see an unredacted Mueller report.

You'd best go back to begging Trump for his tax returns. That's a much more plausible scenario.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Also, maybe you can get Tom Arnold to release those taped conversations he's been saying he has of Trump saying a whole bunch of racist shit too.

That's also a much more plausible scenario than an unredacted Mueller report.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
It makes no difference to Trump voters what is inside the unredacted report. The top Republican on the House Intelligence panel called Mueller’s investigation “fraudulent” and “partisan”.

If you know even one Trump voter who will change their mind after seeing the report, aren't you lucky. Where I live, they already made up their minds from last week, after being told by Trump what to believe, until the end of time or until Trump changes his mind, whichever comes first.

---

I don't really care about Trump voters. As you say, their minds are made up. As Trump said before he was even the nominee, "I could shoot someone in broad daylight on 5th avenue and I get away with it."

I don't really care what Trump says either, for that matter. After 2 years of him lying relentlessly or being mental, it's, "Tell us something we don't know."

I do care about the 45% of Undecideds. Mueller's report - unredacted - could be persuasive.

---

Good luck with that. Mueller's report, unredacted, would drop thousands of names of people who were investigated but not indicted with anything. It would be a huge breech of privacy that would open them and their families to the hate of the extreme left, both online and in the real world.

You're never going to see an unredacted Mueller report.

You'd best go back to begging Trump for his tax returns. That's a much more plausible scenario.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Also, maybe you can get Tom Arnold to release those taped conversations he's been saying he has of Trump saying a whole bunch of racist shit too.

That's also a much more plausible scenario than an unredacted Mueller report.

---

Unredacted to congress, dolt.

I think you should just stay focused on helping pedophiles get their message out, Mr. Censorship is Censorship. Don't overheat that little brain of yours with too many challenges.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I don't really care about Trump voters. As you say, their minds are made up. As Trump said before he was even the nominee, "I could shoot someone in broad daylight on 5th avenue and I get away with it."

I don't really care what Trump says either, for that matter. After 2 years of him lying relentlessly or being mental, it's, "Tell us something we don't know."

I do care about the 45% of Undecideds. Mueller's report - unredacted - could be persuasive.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

What's funny is that people expected Mueller, who has a long history of being a fascistic motherfucker, to suddenly be a good guy.

Mueller was a man who spread fatal myths about Iraqi WMDs, targeted and infiltrated radical environmental groups, concocted elaborate plots to entrap Muslims in fake terrorism cases and ran roughshod over basic constitutional rights while he was a top federal prosecutor and FBI director.

The fix was in. The Dems will investigate, but they're so bad at being effective.

---

Wow reaver, the perspective you have is not workable. Wait for it, it's coming. Fighting Trump with the same tactics that he employs destroys the rule of law and other institutions needed to have a successful democracy.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Wow reaver, the perspective you have is not workable. Wait for it, it's coming. Fighting Trump with the same tactics that he employs destroys the rule of law and other institutions needed to have a successful democracy.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
I see a battle between two forces here and both misrepresent the ideals this country is building upon. And yes, the progress is substantial .

Both are wrong. If either side got what they wanted, we too would live in a totalitarianism state like the Russians. No fucking thank you...

tick tock

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
I see a battle between two forces here and both misrepresent the ideals this country is building upon. And yes, the progress is substantial .

Both are wrong. If either side got what they wanted, we too would live in a totalitarianism state like the Russians. No fucking thank you...

tick tock

---

Remember the Iraq War? Huge number of dead Iraqi civilians? No WMD? No investigation into Bush and Cheney for lying America into that war? Don't lose focus on those half million dead women and children. And yet there are very few Americans that want justice for Bush and Cheney. Trump is not worse than Bush or Cheney and Trump is not going to be punished. The vast majority of Americans don't care enough to punish Bush/Cheney and they won't care to punish Trump.
https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/iraqi

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
I see a battle between two forces here and both misrepresent the ideals this country is building upon. And yes, the progress is substantial .

Both are wrong. If either side got what they wanted, we too would live in a totalitarianism state like the Russians. No fucking thank you...

tick tock

---

Remember the Iraq War? Huge number of dead Iraqi civilians? No WMD? No investigation into Bush and Cheney for lying America into that war? Don't lose focus on those half million dead women and children. And yet there are very few Americans that want justice for Bush and Cheney. Trump is not worse than Bush or Cheney and Trump is not going to be punished. The vast majority of Americans don't care enough to punish Bush/Cheney and they won't care to punish Trump.
https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/iraqi

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

And a few hundred years ago we had a civil war that resulted in the freeing of the slaves. In the 60's blacks were still being hosed in the streets. America is a work in progress, emphasis on progress. Try and realize the times you live in and work towards a better future. Let's not relitigate the past over and over so much we're stuck there. At this point I still believe America is the worlds first best hope.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

And a few hundred years ago we had a civil war that resulted in the freeing of the slaves. In the 60's blacks were still being hosed in the streets. America is a work in progress, emphasis on progress. Try and realize the times you live in and work towards a better future. Let's not relitigate the past over and over so much we're stuck there. At this point I still believe America is the worlds first best hope.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
It makes no difference to Trump voters what is inside the unredacted report. The top Republican on the House Intelligence panel called Mueller’s investigation “fraudulent” and “partisan”.

If you know even one Trump voter who will change their mind after seeing the report, aren't you lucky. Where I live, they already made up their minds from last week, after being told by Trump what to believe, until the end of time or until Trump changes his mind, whichever comes first.

---

I don't really care about Trump voters. As you say, their minds are made up. As Trump said before he was even the nominee, "I could shoot someone in broad daylight on 5th avenue and I get away with it."

I don't really care what Trump says either, for that matter. After 2 years of him lying relentlessly or being mental, it's, "Tell us something we don't know."

I do care about the 45% of Undecideds. Mueller's report - unredacted - could be persuasive.

---

Good luck with that. Mueller's report, unredacted, would drop thousands of names of people who were investigated but not indicted with anything. It would be a huge breech of privacy that would open them and their families to the hate of the extreme left, both online and in the real world.

You're never going to see an unredacted Mueller report.

You'd best go back to begging Trump for his tax returns. That's a much more plausible scenario.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Also, maybe you can get Tom Arnold to release those taped conversations he's been saying he has of Trump saying a whole bunch of racist shit too.

That's also a much more plausible scenario than an unredacted Mueller report.

---

Unredacted to congress, dolt.

I think you should just stay focused on helping pedophiles get their message out, Mr. Censorship is Censorship. Don't overheat that little brain of yours with too many challenges.

---

What the fuck are you talking about?

Here's your post. Show me where it says unredacted to Congress.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I don't really care about Trump voters. As you say, their minds are made up. As Trump said before he was even the nominee, "I could shoot someone in broad daylight on 5th avenue and I get away with it."

I don't really care what Trump says either, for that matter. After 2 years of him lying relentlessly or being mental, it's, "Tell us something we don't know."

I do care about the 45% of Undecideds. Mueller's report - unredacted - could be persuasive.

---

That reads as if an unredacted report that the Undecideds could read would be persuasive. I don't give two shits if that's not what you meant.

Learn how to write.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

And a few hundred years ago we had a civil war that resulted in the freeing of the slaves. In the 60's blacks were still being hosed in the streets. America is a work in progress, emphasis on progress. Try and realize the times you live in and work towards a better future. Let's not relitigate the past over and over so much we're stuck there. At this point I still believe America is the worlds first best hope.

---

Jefferson Davis, Confederate President, was not executed for treason. Nor were 24 other U.S. Senators from the Confederate States executed. Among the not executed traitors were thousands of U.S. Army men such as Confederate General Robert E. Lee. If anybody in American history deserved death, those guys did. But nothing happened because the majority of Americans couldn't imagine it. If those treasonous monsters didn't get the justice they deserved, then Americans will forgive Trump for lesser crimes than murdering hundreds of thousands of loyal American citizens during a Civil War.

www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/expulsion_cases/CivilWar_E
xpulsion.htm#senate_action

There were more than 4300 documented lynchings of African Americans between 1877 and 1950 concentrated in 12 Southern states, but several other states are now covered. How many lynchers were brought to justice? None. Trump wanted to execute The Central Park Five. No jail time for Trump on that one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_National_Memorial_for_Peace_and_Just
ice
www.cnn.com/2016/10/06/politics/reality-check-donald-trump-central-par
k-5/index.html

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

You've made my point. All that's left to say is let it go, move on and learn to look for the good. It's to easy to sit on a pious throne when anonymous. We get enough of that from the russian trolls here.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
All that's left to say is let it go, move on ... russian trolls ...
T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

You've made my point. All that's left to say is let it go, move on and learn to look for the good. It's to easy to sit on a pious throne when anonymous. We get enough of that from the russian trolls here.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
"Denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance."

You seem to be moving towards anger.

Well, that's progress, I guess!!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
"Denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance."

You seem to be moving towards anger.

Well, that's progress, I guess!!


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
G: "I think you should just stay focused on helping pedophiles get their message out, Mr. Censorship is Censorship. Don't overheat that little brain of yours with too many challenges."

What the fuck are you talking about?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Here's your post. Show me where it says unredacted to Congress.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
That reads as if an unredacted report that the Undecideds could read would be persuasive. I don't give two shits if that's not what you meant.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Learn how to write.

---

I know I posted the video here. It's also why I say wait for it. It's all in the report and then some. When Congress gets people to testify in public hearing, hearings where they need to explain all this shit, heads will roll.

tick tock
T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Trump investigation: Russia collusion evidence detailed by Schiff in damning address in Congress
House intelligence committee chair responds to letter by Republicans calling for his resignation
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-ru
ssia-collusion-mueller-report-adam-schiff-speech-congress-a8844136.html?utm_source=reddit.com&utm_source=reddit.com

My colleagues may think it's ok that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what was described as the Russian government's effort to help the Trump campaign. You may think that's ok.

My colleagues may think it's ok that when that was offered to the son of the President, who had a pivotal role in that campaign, that the son did not call the FBI, that he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help. No; instead that son said that he would love the help of the Russians. You might think it's ok that he took that meeting.

You might think it's okay that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience in running campaigns, also took that meeting.

You might think it's ok that the President's son in law also took that meeting.

You might think it's ok that they concealed it from the public.

You might think it's ok that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn't better. You might think that's ok.

You might think it's ok that when it was discovered a year later that they lied about that meeting and said it was about adoptions. You might think it's ok that the President is reported to have helped dictate that lie. You might think that's ok.

I don't.

You might think it's ok that the campaign chairman of a presidential campaign would offer information about that campaign to a Russian oligarch in exchange for money or debt forgiveness. You might that that's ok.

I don't.

You might think it's ok that that campaign chairman offered polling data, campaign polling data, to someone linked to Russian intelligence.

I don't think that's ok!

You might think it's ok that the President himself called on Russia to hack his opponent's emails if they were listening.

You might think it's ok that later that day in fact the Russians attempted to hack a server affiliated with that campaign.

I don't think that's ok.

You might think it's ok that the President's son in law sought to establish a secret back-channel of communications to the Russians through a Russian diplomatic facility.

I don't think that's ok.

ou might think it's ok that an associate of the President made direct contact with the GRU through Guccifer 2 and wikileaks, which is considered a hostile intelligence agency.

You might think it's ok that a senior campaign official was instructed to reach that associate and find out what that hostile intelligence agency had to say in terms of dirt on his opponent.

You might think it's ok that the National Security Advisor designate secretly conferred with the Russian ambassador about undermining US sanctions, and you might think it's ok that he lied about it to the FBI.

You might think that's all ok! You might think that's just what you need to do to win!

But I don't think it's ok.

I think it's immoral,

I think it's unethical,

I think it's unpatriotic, and yes,

I think it's corrupt and evidence of collusion.

Now I have always said that whether this amounts to proof of conspiracy was another matter. Whether the special counsel can prove beyond a reasonable doubt, the proof of that crime would be up to the Special Counsel and I would accept his decision, and I do. He is a good and honorable man and a good prosecutor. But I do not think that conduct, criminal or not, is ok. And the day we do think that's ok is the day we will look back and say America lost its way.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

School the traitors, Adam!

---

Agreed buddy, agreed...

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

School the traitors, Adam!

---

Agreed buddy, agreed...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
"Denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance."

You seem to be moving towards anger.

Well, that's progress, I guess!!

---