Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Kavanaugh
Sunday, October 7, 2018 6:53 AM
JO753
rezident owtsidr
Sunday, October 7, 2018 9:11 AM
CAPTAINCRUNCH
... stay crunchy...
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: But they're too tough for you to answer... Wrong again - they're TOO EASY to answer. I'm guessing you got an email directive that said: "our new position is:" Blame the Democrats. "They aren't good enough." That's like blaming a women for being assaulted. "She should have known better to wear that." Don't hold the GOP responsible. Don't look at the insurmountable votes available. Don't look at so many things because why would you do that when you can just shift attention elsewhere? What's one of the main reasons women are treated like second class citizens and always will be? Easy! Women like you. You should probably ask second class citizen women in the Middle East. You won't find any here.
Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: But they're too tough for you to answer... Wrong again - they're TOO EASY to answer. I'm guessing you got an email directive that said: "our new position is:" Blame the Democrats. "They aren't good enough." That's like blaming a women for being assaulted. "She should have known better to wear that." Don't hold the GOP responsible. Don't look at the insurmountable votes available. Don't look at so many things because why would you do that when you can just shift attention elsewhere? What's one of the main reasons women are treated like second class citizens and always will be? Easy! Women like you.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: But they're too tough for you to answer...
Sunday, October 7, 2018 9:13 AM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Quote:Originally posted by JO753: Every little crack iz an opportunity to break America into smaller and smaller chunks.
Sunday, October 7, 2018 9:21 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: As a disappointed Democrat ... I expect more of them.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: And BTW, I've laid plenty of blame on Republicans, as you could see from my old posts. So this is an outright lie.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Here's as piece of advice for everyone, including me. Our discussions would be FAR more productive if we would stop arguing with the voices in our heads. It seems like people (like GSTRING, SHIT, and THUGR) spend FAR too much time imputing motives and points of view to others .... motives and points of view which those others don't have. Why not just stick to responding to WHAT POSTED, instead of ranting at something that might not even exist? If we could manage to do that, as well as NOT RESORTING TO PERSONAL ATTACKS WHEN WE HAVE NOTHING RELEVANT TO POST, I'm sure our discussions will be a lot more rational. Unless people here have an interest in being IRRATIONAL, that seems like a better avenue. Right?
Sunday, October 7, 2018 10:25 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Quote:As a disappointed Democrat ... I expect more of them. - SIGNY In terms of....? Undo MATH? They tried with what they had, which should have been enough, but, yanno, there's that whole math thing and the fact that those Republicans clearly did not care who they put on the bench as long as he was a republican. What could they have done? - CC
Sunday, October 7, 2018 10:50 AM
REAVERFAN
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by JO753: Every little crack iz an opportunity to break America into smaller and smaller chunks. What you're referring to here is Authoritarian Left inter-sectional identity politics. If Trump is guilty of anything here it was taking advantage of the damage already done. Do Right, Be Right. :)
Sunday, October 7, 2018 11:00 AM
Quote:Trump haz been destroying & degrading the goverment all along, so Kavenough wuz the perfect choise. Putin iz a master puppeteer. He haz widened the divide between rite & left, now this will divide men & wimin.
Sunday, October 7, 2018 11:31 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: The roots of the Democrats' failure go back decades...
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: At some point, the Dems became corrupted by their campaign contributors ...
Sunday, October 7, 2018 12:11 PM
Quote:They tried hard with what they had".
Quote:trying hard
Sunday, October 7, 2018 1:52 PM
Quote:Originally posted by reaverfan: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by JO753: Every little crack iz an opportunity to break America into smaller and smaller chunks. What you're referring to here is Authoritarian Left inter-sectional identity politics. If Trump is guilty of anything here it was taking advantage of the damage already done. Do Right, Be Right. :)You shouldn't use words you don't understand.
Sunday, October 7, 2018 3:19 PM
Sunday, October 7, 2018 3:22 PM
Sunday, October 7, 2018 3:24 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: I'm not "hiding", it's just that you purposefully misunderstood my statement, and so I have no reason to respond to your purposeful misdirection. I've expected more of the Dems for YEARS.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: The reason why "what they had" was so few votes ... AGAIN ... goes back to what they did over the long run. And in term's of Quote:trying hard what they did was play dirty, and appeal, ONCE AGAIN, to hysterical identity politics. Which is what got them in this pickle to begin with.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: The Dems have STILL not learned their lesson: Instead of dividing America into smaller and smaller slivers of self-identified victims groups (does a nonwhite older civilian female have more rights than a transsexual in the military?) they should get back to representing ALL Americans. Yanno, when Hillary called nearly half of the voting public "deplorables", that was emblematic of everything wrong with the Democratic Party. They paid the price when they lost that election, and if they keep up with that, they'll continue to pay the price.
Sunday, October 7, 2018 3:34 PM
Quote:Originally posted by reaverfan: I use it perfectly. Your lack of education has left you unable to recognize common words and their correct usage.
Sunday, October 7, 2018 3:57 PM
Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch: Oh ok, so what should they have done to keep Kavanaugh from the SC? Undo MATH? They tried with what they had, which should have been enough, but, yanno, there's that whole math thing and the fact that those Republicans clearly did not care who they put on the bench as long as he was a republican. What could they have done? - CC Any time now...
Sunday, October 7, 2018 4:17 PM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Sunday, October 7, 2018 5:03 PM
Quote:I'm not "hiding", it's just that you purposefully misunderstood my statement, and so I have no reason to respond to your purposeful misdirection. I've expected more of the Dems for YEARS.- SIGNY So you blame them for not going back in time? Ok.- GSTRING
Quote:The reason why "what they had" was so few votes ... AGAIN ... goes back to what they did over the long run. And in term's of Quote:trying hard what they did was play dirty, and appeal, ONCE AGAIN, to hysterical identity politics. Which is what got them in this pickle to begin with. - SIGNY AGAIN - So you blame them for not going back in time? Ok ok.- GSTRING
Quote: "Hysterical identity politics?" So that's what you think women who stand up when they are sexually are doing? You sound like a bro again. "Damn those hysterical women! Can't they just take a beating without makin' such a fuss? Is that too much to ask?!?"- GSTRING
Quote: The Dems have STILL not learned their lesson: Instead of dividing America into smaller and smaller slivers of self-identified victims groups (does a nonwhite older civilian female have more rights than a transsexual in the military?) they should get back to representing ALL Americans. Yanno, when Hillary called nearly half of the voting public "deplorables", that was emblematic of everything wrong with the Democratic Party. They paid the price when they lost that election, and if they keep up with that, they'll continue to pay the price. - SIGNY Oh ok, so what should they have done to keep Kavanaugh from the SC? Undo MATH? They tried with what they had, which should have been enough, but, yanno, there's that whole math thing and the fact that those Republicans clearly did not care who they put on the bench as long as he was a republican. What could they have done?- GSTRING
Sunday, October 7, 2018 5:18 PM
Sunday, October 7, 2018 5:20 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Trump haz been destroying & degrading the goverment all along, so Kavenough wuz the perfect choise. Putin iz a master puppeteer. He haz widened the divide between rite & left, now this will divide men & wimin. WHO DID THIS, JO? TRUMP?? Allegations which SHOULD have been brought forward the week that they were received, so that they could get a thorough investigation and measured discussion, instead of sitting in someone's office for months?? Allegations that were whipped into a froth of last-minute hysteria? The party that did this was the Dems. They had no interest in finding out if any of this was true.
Sunday, October 7, 2018 5:48 PM
Quote:Ford only wished to inform the senate and spesificly asked for her story to be kept private. This wuz BEFOR Kav wuz the nominee.- JO
Quote:Grassly & McConnel did their level best to rush Kav thru with no questionz asked.
Sunday, October 7, 2018 6:25 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JO753: Ford only wished to inform the senate and spesificly asked for her story to be kept private. This wuz BEFOR Kav wuz the nominee.
Monday, October 8, 2018 12:47 AM
Monday, October 8, 2018 12:54 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: Just reading this, I gotta' say JO, it makes no sense. Why would Blasey-Ford send a letter about Kavanaugh BEFORE he was nominated? Is she psychic?
Monday, October 8, 2018 2:06 AM
Monday, October 8, 2018 3:07 AM
SHINYGOODGUY
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: Quote:Originally posted by JO753: Ford only wished to inform the senate and spesificly asked for her story to be kept private. This wuz BEFOR Kav wuz the nominee. Just reading this, I gotta' say JO, it makes no sense. Why would Blasey-Ford send a letter about Kavanaugh BEFORE he was nominated? Is she psychic? As for the lack of timeliness, Signy addressed this quite a while ago - laying the blame on Feinstein for not being upfront with Blasey-Ford that this was going to end up a public part of the proceedings. When it comes to Feinsteins claim of confidentiality, it was conditional on Ford's part "As a constituent, I expect that you will maintain this as confidential until we have further opportunity to speak." Of the three women who accused Kavanaugh, neither Blasey-Ford, Ramirez, nor Swetnick had good corroborating evidence. You'd think however, that their claims would merit at least some continuing investigation. But what I blame democrats for is not having a case of merit, or fairness, or justice, to bring to the proceedings. The confirmation hearings began September 4, 2018. Ford's claims were made public September 16, 2018. Did democrats have NOTHING to say in intervening ~2 weeks? To me, that speaks volumes. tic tac
Monday, October 8, 2018 3:32 AM
Monday, October 8, 2018 5:25 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JO753: The offer to interview Ford wuz bogus. Grassleyz interest wuz purely to discredit her. Wut shoud raiz questionz for you, Kiki, iz why Kav wuz not screaming for the FBI to investigate to clear hiz good name. To hell with the committee! MY reputation iz being trashed! Its going to bakfire anyway. Cristine Blasey Ford and the 2 otherz arent going to just fade away. And Avenatti iz going to make az much noize az possible, including digging up more accuzerz, witnessez & evidens. Fair chans I rekon, that Kav will bekum the 1st Supreme Court Justis evr impeached and removed. And ritefully imprizoned if the word 'perjury' meanz anything. ---------------------------- DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early http://www.7532020.com
Monday, October 8, 2018 10:16 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: No, I blame them for not learning lessons from the past.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Is it POSSIBLE, do you suppose, for you not being a complete ass?
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM:The Dems have STILL not learned their lesson: Instead of dividing America into smaller and smaller slivers of self-identified victims groups (does a nonwhite older civilian female have more rights than a transsexual in the military?) they should get back to representing ALL Americans. Yanno, when Hillary called nearly half of the voting public "deplorables", that was emblematic of everything wrong with the Democratic Party. They paid the price when they lost that election, and if they keep up with that, they'll continue to pay the price.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: So, what did they do? Instead of taking a principled stand and focusing on THE ISSUES, they trot out a woman with (phony?) accusations of sexual abuse, so that other women can sympathize with her, and then attempt to use Kavanaugh's inevitable appointment as a wedge issue in November.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: It's like RUSSIA!!RUSSIA!!RUSSIA!! ... completely unverifiable accusations designed to activate people's emotions. A desperate orchestrated attempt to garner votes, the likes of which have, so far, worked oppositely for the DNC.
Monday, October 8, 2018 10:28 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Originally posted by JO753: The offer to interview Ford wuz bogus. Grassleyz interest wuz purely to discredit her. Wut shoud raiz questionz for you, Kiki, iz why Kav wuz not screaming for the FBI to investigate to clear hiz good name. To hell with the committee! MY reputation iz being trashed! Its going to bakfire anyway. Cristine Blasey Ford and the 2 otherz arent going to just fade away. And Avenatti iz going to make az much noize az possible, including digging up more accuzerz, witnessez & evidens. Fair chans I rekon, that Kav will bekum the 1st Supreme Court Justis evr impeached and removed. And ritefully imprizoned if the word 'perjury' meanz anything. ---------------------------- 6IXSTRINGJACK: You seem far to intelligent to go by guilty until proven innocent, J0. What's your deal here?
Monday, October 8, 2018 11:20 AM
Monday, October 8, 2018 11:22 AM
Monday, October 8, 2018 12:39 PM
Quote:No, I blame them for not learning lessons from the past.- SIGNY Learning how to change math? Again you just lob up nothing comments like they mean something.- GSTRING
Quote: Why don't you want to change the Republicans? - GSTRING
Quote: Why don't you mention the lies Kavanaugh told? I agree with Jo and many others who respect the rule of actual Law, that he should be he should be tried for perjury.- GSTRING
Quote: Why don't you mention how he showed himself to be unfit character-wise for being a SC judge, as was noted by judges and ex-SC judge and many law professionals?
Quote:Why don't you mention how he couldn't answer the question about wanting an FBI investigation or not when - if he was innocent - it would have proven he was telling the truth?
Quote:Why don't you mention anything about the limited FBI investigation that didn't even interview the main characters or 20+ other witnesses?
Quote:As even Kiki noted, there was no way the Dems could have done ANYTHING against MATH.
Quote:Is it POSSIBLE, do you suppose, for you not being a complete ass?- SIGNY Is it POSSIBLE, do you suppose, for you not being a complete fabricator? Witness: SIGGY: IF THE DEMOCRATS REALLY HAD A CONCERN THAT KAVANAUGH WAS A SEXUAL ABUSER. THEY WOULD HAVE HANDLED THIS MUCH DIFFERENTLY. Uh-huh. You being legal & political theory scholar you know all about how this should have gone?- GSTRING
Quote:SIGGY: They would have brought up these allegations when then FIRST came to light, not sprung them -literally- at the very last moment. CC: Not even close to "the last moment."
Quote:SIGGY: They would have pressed for a long, thorough investigation. CC: They did and The Republicans shot it down.
Quote: SIGGY: They would have provided the SENATE COMMITTEE with COPIES of the therapy notes and COPIES of the polygraph exam ... as they had been asked THREE TIMES by Grassley ... which might have opened up new avenues of investigation, or allowed Senate delegates to visit Ford in CA as the committee offered instead of stalling and stalling and stalling and obfuscating. CC: They made a point of revealing thse items
Quote: so they weren't hiding them. The Republicans played just as many file withholding tactics.
Quote:SIGGY: Clearly, this was an orchestrated attempt to demean Kavanaugh's reputation with (as far as I can tell) a flurry of last-minute, totally unverifiable accusations. CC: Kavanaugh demeaned his own reputation MANY times.
Quote: SIGGY: You keep asking What else could they have done?, which certainly implies that EVEN YOU recognize that this was a underhanded attempt by the Dems. CC: That's so stupid it's funny It implies that you can't answer a simple question and all you do is dodge and lie.- GSTRING
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM:The Dems have STILL not learned their lesson: Instead of dividing America into smaller and smaller slivers of self-identified victims groups (does a nonwhite older civilian female have more rights than a transsexual in the military?) they should get back to representing ALL Americans. Yanno, when Hillary called nearly half of the voting public "deplorables", that was emblematic of everything wrong with the Democratic Party. They paid the price when they lost that election, and if they keep up with that, they'll continue to pay the price.- SIGNY What does any of that have to do with us having a new SC justice who lies and is unfit to be a Supreme?- GSTRING
Quote:So, what did they do? Instead of taking a principled stand and focusing on THE ISSUES, they trot out a woman with (phony?) accusations of sexual abuse, so that other women can sympathize with her, and then attempt to use Kavanaugh's inevitable appointment as a wedge issue in November. - SIGNY Which THE ISSUES did they not focus on with respect to Kavanaugh?
Quote:It's like RUSSIA!!RUSSIA!!RUSSIA!! ... completely unverifiable accusations designed to activate people's emotions. A desperate orchestrated attempt to garner votes, the likes of which have, so far, worked oppositely for the DNC.- SIGNY 5 people have plead guilty- GSTRING
Monday, October 8, 2018 1:46 PM
Quote:Originally posted by reaverfan: Quote:Originally posted by JO753: The offer to interview Ford wuz bogus. Grassleyz interest wuz purely to discredit her. Wut shoud raiz questionz for you, Kiki, iz why Kav wuz not screaming for the FBI to investigate to clear hiz good name. To hell with the committee! MY reputation iz being trashed! Its going to bakfire anyway. Cristine Blasey Ford and the 2 otherz arent going to just fade away. And Avenatti iz going to make az much noize az possible, including digging up more accuzerz, witnessez & evidens. Fair chans I rekon, that Kav will bekum the 1st Supreme Court Justis evr impeached and removed. And ritefully imprizoned if the word 'perjury' meanz anything. ---------------------------- DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early http://www.7532020.com If I were falsely accused of a crime, I'd calmly answer questions, not lie, not act like a whiny little entitled bitch, and DEMAND a thorough investigation to clear my name.
Monday, October 8, 2018 1:48 PM
Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch: Jo's deal is he is that intelligent. (Followed by a bunch of stuff nobody read)
Monday, October 8, 2018 1:55 PM
Quote:Originally posted by reaverfan: Don't you just love the "both sides are the same" fallacies Russian trolls always use?
Monday, October 8, 2018 1:58 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch: Jo's deal is he is that intelligent. (Followed by a bunch of stuff nobody read) J0 can answer for himself. He certainly doesn't need the likes of you answering for him.
Monday, October 8, 2018 2:06 PM
Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch: Jo's deal is he is that intelligent. (Followed by a bunch of stuff nobody read) J0 can answer for himself. He certainly doesn't need the likes of you answering for him. Of course he can. You had an opinion about Jo and so did I. You want to limit my free speech? Sorry about all those sentences!
Monday, October 8, 2018 2:43 PM
Monday, October 8, 2018 4:12 PM
Monday, October 8, 2018 4:30 PM
Monday, October 8, 2018 5:03 PM
Monday, October 8, 2018 6:43 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Monday, October 8, 2018 6:54 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor:
Monday, October 8, 2018 6:57 PM
Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Monday, October 8, 2018 7:04 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Those 10,000 words that you linked? 90% bullshit.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: I'm not going to pick apart every single line by an author who is determined to find fault with every single word that Kavanaugh spoke.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM:The first line of questioning had to do with whether or not Kavanuagh attacked Ford. He denied that accusation unequivocally, and since there is absolutely no corroborating testimony of the assault ... or even that a party with those attendees ever took place ... this is probably a dead issue.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: The issue of Kavanaugh's drinking, and whether or not he ever blacked out, was approached. He was asked, explicitly, whether he had ever woken up in a place where he didn't know how he got there, or with his clothes in such a condition that he couldn't recall how it happened, and he also denied this unequivocally.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: There was an UNRELATED line of questioning about military tribunals versus civilian jury trials which is directly related to Trump's Executive Order. I'm surprised that you didn't notice it.
Monday, October 8, 2018 7:17 PM
Quote:Those 10,000 words that you linked? 90% bullshit.- SIGNY Those 10,000 posts you made? 99% bullsh*t.-GSTRING
Quote:The first line of questioning had to do with whether or not Kavanuagh attacked Ford. He denied that accusation unequivocally, and since there is absolutely no corroborating testimony of the assault ... or even that a party with those attendees ever took place ... this is probably a dead issue. - SIGNY Why? She's guilty of lying until proven innocent? - GSTRING
Quote:Shame we didn't have an FBI investigation.
Quote:Hey, who was it that limited it so it couldn't find anything? Republicans.
Quote:Also, there's an entry on his calendar that supports that party and those attendees.
Quote:The issue of Kavanaugh's drinking, and whether or not he ever blacked out, was approached. He was asked, explicitly, whether he had ever woken up in a place where he didn't know how he got there, or with his clothes in such a condition that he couldn't recall how it happened, and he also denied this unequivocally.- SIGNY He said sometimes he drank too much. He equivocated actually - that's where he tried to flip it on Klobuchar and he embarrassed himself and his great name (and his family).
Quote:There was an UNRELATED line of questioning about military tribunals versus civilian jury trials which is directly related to Trump's Executive Order. I'm surprised that you didn't notice it.- SIGNY No idea - that reminds me though about other Dem problems with Brewski: It was well established early on that he was a Trump top choice because of his views on basically not being able to legally touch a sitting president, and that's why Trump picked him. Why an innocent man would need a get-out-of-jail free judge on the SC is hard to answer.
Monday, October 8, 2018 9:36 PM
Quote: I believe her!” Really? Why should anyone believe her? Senator Collins of Maine said she believed that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford experienced somethingtraumatic, just not at the hands of Mr. Kavanaugh. I believe Senator Collins said that to placate the #Metoo mob, not because she actually believed it. I believe Christine Blasey Ford was lying, through and through, in her injured little girl voice, like a bad imitation of Truman Capote. I believe that the Christine Blasey Ford gambit was an extension of the sinister activities underway since early 2016 in the Department of Justice and the FBI to un-do the last presidential election, and that the real and truthful story about these seditious monkeyshines is going to blow wide open. It turns out that the Deep State is a small world. Did you know that the lawyer sitting next to Dr. Ford in the Senate hearings, one Michael Bromwich, is also an attorney for Andrew McCabe, the former FBI Deputy Director fired for lying to investigators from his own agency and currently singing to a grand jury? What a coincidence. Out of all the lawyers in the most lawyer-infested corner of the USA, she just happened to hook up with him. It’s a matter of record that Dr. Ford traveled to Rehobeth Beach Delaware on July 26, where her Best Friend Forever and former room-mate, Monica McLean, lives, and that she spent the next four days there before sending a letter July 30 to Senator Diane Feinstein that kicked off the “sexual assault” circus. Did you know that Monica McClean was a retired FBI special agent, and that she worked in the US Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York under Preet Bharara, who had earlier worked for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer? Could Monica McLean have spent those four days in July helping Christine Blasey Ford compose her letter to Mrs. Feinstein? Did you know that Monica McClean’s lawyer, one David Laufman is a former DOJ top lawyer who assisted former FBI counter-intel chief Peter Strozk on both the Clinton and Russia investigations before resigning in February this year — in fact, he sat in on the notorious “unsworn” interview with Hillary in 2016. Wow! What a really small swamp Washington is! Did you know that Ms. Leland Keyser, Dr. Ford’s previous BFF from back in the Holton Arms prep school, told the final round of FBI investigators in the Kavanaugh hearing last week — as reported by the The Wall Street Journal — that she “felt pressured” by Monica McLean and her representatives to change her story — that she knew nothing about the alleged sexual assault, or the alleged party where it allegedly happened, or that she ever knew Mr. Kavanaugh. I think that’s called suborning perjury. None of this is trivial and the matter can’t possibly rest there. Too much of it has been unraveled by what remains of the news media. And meanwhile, of course, there is at least one grand jury listening to testimony from the whole cast-of-characters behind the botched Hillary investigation and Robert Mueller’s ever more dubious-looking Russian collusion inquiry: the aforementioned Strozk, Lisa Page, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Bill Priestap, et. al. I have a feeling that these matters are now approaching critical mass with the parallel unraveling of the Christine Blasey Ford “story.” The Democratic Party has its fingerprints all over this, as it does with the shenanigans over the Russia investigation. Not only do I not believe Dr. Ford’s story; I also don’t believe she acted on her own in this shady business. What’s happening with all these FBI and DOJ associated lawyers is an obvious circling of the wagons. They’ve generated too much animus in the process and they’re going to get nailed. These matters are far from over and a major battle is looming in the countdown to the midterm elections. In fact, op-ed writer Charles M. Blow sounded the trumpet Monday morning in his idiotic column titled: Liberals, This is War. Like I’ve been saying: Civil War Two.
Monday, October 8, 2018 11:28 PM
JEWELSTAITEFAN
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: And now, a word from someone far more hostile than me Quote: I believe her!” Really? Why should anyone believe her? Senator Collins of Maine said she believed that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford experienced somethingtraumatic, just not at the hands of Mr. Kavanaugh. I believe Senator Collins said that to placate the #Metoo mob, not because she actually believed it. I believe Christine Blasey Ford was lying, through and through, in her injured little girl voice, like a bad imitation of Truman Capote. I believe that the Christine Blasey Ford gambit was an extension of the sinister activities underway since early 2016 in the Department of Justice and the FBI to un-do the last presidential election, and that the real and truthful story about these seditious monkeyshines is going to blow wide open. It turns out that the Deep State is a small world. Did you know that the lawyer sitting next to Dr. Ford in the Senate hearings, one Michael Bromwich, is also an attorney for Andrew McCabe, the former FBI Deputy Director fired for lying to investigators from his own agency and currently singing to a grand jury? What a coincidence. Out of all the lawyers in the most lawyer-infested corner of the USA, she just happened to hook up with him. It’s a matter of record that Dr. Ford traveled to Rehobeth Beach Delaware on July 26, where her Best Friend Forever and former room-mate, Monica McLean, lives, and that she spent the next four days there before sending a letter July 30 to Senator Diane Feinstein that kicked off the “sexual assault” circus. Did you know that Monica McClean was a retired FBI special agent, and that she worked in the US Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York under Preet Bharara, who had earlier worked for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer? Could Monica McLean have spent those four days in July helping Christine Blasey Ford compose her letter to Mrs. Feinstein? Did you know that Monica McClean’s lawyer, one David Laufman is a former DOJ top lawyer who assisted former FBI counter-intel chief Peter Strozk on both the Clinton and Russia investigations before resigning in February this year — in fact, he sat in on the notorious “unsworn” interview with Hillary in 2016. Wow! What a really small swamp Washington is! Did you know that Ms. Leland Keyser, Dr. Ford’s previous BFF from back in the Holton Arms prep school, told the final round of FBI investigators in the Kavanaugh hearing last week — as reported by the The Wall Street Journal — that she “felt pressured” by Monica McLean and her representatives to change her story — that she knew nothing about the alleged sexual assault, or the alleged party where it allegedly happened, or that she ever knew Mr. Kavanaugh. I think that’s called suborning perjury. None of this is trivial and the matter can’t possibly rest there. Too much of it has been unraveled by what remains of the news media. And meanwhile, of course, there is at least one grand jury listening to testimony from the whole cast-of-characters behind the botched Hillary investigation and Robert Mueller’s ever more dubious-looking Russian collusion inquiry: the aforementioned Strozk, Lisa Page, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Bill Priestap, et. al. I have a feeling that these matters are now approaching critical mass with the parallel unraveling of the Christine Blasey Ford “story.” The Democratic Party has its fingerprints all over this, as it does with the shenanigans over the Russia investigation. Not only do I not believe Dr. Ford’s story; I also don’t believe she acted on her own in this shady business. What’s happening with all these FBI and DOJ associated lawyers is an obvious circling of the wagons. They’ve generated too much animus in the process and they’re going to get nailed. These matters are far from over and a major battle is looming in the countdown to the midterm elections. In fact, op-ed writer Charles M. Blow sounded the trumpet Monday morning in his idiotic column titled: Liberals, This is War. Like I’ve been saying: Civil War Two.
Monday, October 8, 2018 11:34 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Hope y'all don't think I forgot …
Tuesday, October 9, 2018 4:44 AM
Quote:On this date, December 16, 1773, members of the Sons of Liberty disguised as Mohawk Indians dumped crates of tea into Boston harbor as a PROTEST against the Tea Act and it's provisions for taxation of tea. This act of criminal misconduct would become known as the Boston Tea Party.
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Yeah. Answering "we drank beer" is not an actual answer. I can vouch for that. I'm not going to say that I never drank hard liquor. I know there was a time there where I had tried switching over because my beer intake was making me really fat. I didn't like it though, and I would get drunk far too quickly, so I don't think I did it very long. Most of my drunken posts here back when I was drinking were anywhere from 5 beers in to about 40 beers in. I had a lot more free time than most people do though, so the tail end of my binge sessions could have been up to 36 hours after I started drinking. I think that to most people specifying beer over hard liquor would mean that you're not a serious drinker. In some cases this is just not true. Do Right, Be Right. :)
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL