Quote:

---

The "Magnitsky Trio" Pushes For War With Russia With New Sanctions
Tom Luongo,

If half of what I have come to understand about the Curious Case of Bill Browder is true, then the “Magnitsky Trio” of Senators John McCain, Lindsay Graham and Ben Cardin are guilty of espionage, at a minimum.

Why? Because they know that Browder’s story about Sergei Magnitsky is a lie. And that means that when you tie in the Trump Dossier, Christopher Steele, Fusion GPS, the Skripal poisoning and the rest of this mess, these men are consorting with foreign governments and agencies against the sitting President.

As Lee Stranahan pointed out recently on Fault Lines, Cardin invited Browder to testify to Congress in 2017 to push through last year’s sanctions bill, a more stringent version of the expiring Magnitsky Act of 2011, which has since been used to ratchet up pressure on Russia.

Cardin knew there were problems with Browder’s story about Magnitsky’s death and yet brought him into Congress to testify to secure the vote.

That’s suborning perjury, as Lee points out.

Just the holes in Browder’s story about Magnitsky’s death are alone enough to warrant a perjury charge on him. If you haven’t read Luck Komisar’s detailed breakdown of Browder’s dealings then you owe it to yourself to do so. www.thekomisarscoop.com/2017/11/the-man-behind-the-magnitsky-act-did-b
ill-browders-tax-troubles-in-russia-color-push-for-sanctions/

I’d read it a few times, because it’s about as murky as The Swamp gets. And, still my eyes glaze over.

The Magnitsky Act and its sequel have been used to support aggressive policy actions by the U.S. against Russia and destroy the relationship between the world’s most prominent militaries and nuclear powers.

The new bill is said to want to put ‘crushing sanctions’ on Russia to make ‘Putin feel the heat.’ In effect, what this bill wants to do is force President Trump to enforce sanctions against the entire Russian state for attempting to do business anywhere in the world.

The new financial penalties would target political figures, oligarchs, family members and others that “facilitate illicit and corrupt activities” on behalf of Putin.

It would also impose new sanctions on transactions tied to investments in state-owned energy projects, transactions tied to new Russian debt, and people with the capacity or ability to support or carry out a “malicious” cyber act.

In addition, if it wasn’t clear enough already, that he’s no friend of the President, Graham is trying to tie the President’s hands on NATO withdrawal, requiring a two-thirds majority.

Now, why would Graham be worried about that, unless it was something the President was seriously considering? This is similar to last year’s sanctions bill requiring a similar majority for the President to end the original sanctions placed on Russia in 2014 over the reunification with Crimea.

And behind it all stands Bill Browder.

Because it has been Browder’s one-man campaign to influence members of Congress, the EU and public opinion the world over against Putin and Russia for the past 10 years over Magnitsky’s death.

Browder’s story is the only one we see in the news. And it’s never questioned, even though it has. He continually moves to block films and articles critical of him from seeing distribution.

Browder is the epicenter around which the insane push for war with Russia revolves as everyone involved in the attempt to take over Russia in 1999 continues to try and cover their collective posteriors posterities.

And it is Browder, along with Republic National Bank chief Edmond Safra, who were involved together in the pillaging of Russia in the 1990’s. Browder’s firm hired Magintsky as an accountant (because that’s what he was) to assist in the money laundering Heritage Capital was involved in.

The attempted take over of Russia failed because Yeltsin saw the setup which led him to appoint Putin as his Deputy Prime Minister.

Martin Armstrong talked about this recently and it is featured prominently in the film about him, The Forecaster, which I also recommend you watch.

There was $7 billion that was wired through Bank of New York which involved money stolen from the IMF loans to Russia. The attempt to takeover Russia by blackmail was set in motion. As soon as that wire was done, that is when Republic National Bank ran to the Department of Justice to say it was money-laundering. I believe this started the crisis and Yeltsin was blackmailed to step down and appoint Boris A. Berezovsky as the head of Russia.

Clearly, Republic National Bank was involved with the US government for they were sending also skids of $100 bills to Russia. It was written up and called the Money Plane. Yeltsin then turned to Putin realizing that he had been set up. This is how Putin became the First Deputy Prime Minister of Russia on August 9th, 1999 until August 16th, 1999 when he became the 33rd Prime Minister and heir apparent of Yeltsin.

So, now why, all of a sudden, do we need even stronger sanctions on Russia, ones that would create untold dislocation in financial markets around the world?

Look at the timeline today and see what’s happening.

Earlier this year Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicts 13 people associated with Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian troll farm, for influencing the 2016 election.

Then Mueller indicts twelve members of Russian intelligence to sabotage the upcoming summit between Trump and Putin while the Russia Hacked Muh Election narrative was flagging.

Three days later President Trump met with Vladimir Putin in Helsinki. There a Putin let the world know that he would assist Robert Mueller’s investigation if in return the U.S. would assist Russia in returning Bill Browder, who was tried and convicted in absentia for tax evasion.

All of a sudden Browder’s story is all over the alternative press. Browder is all over U.S. television.

Earlier this week Facebook comes out, after horrific earnings, to tell everyone that IRA was still at it, though being ever so sneaky, trying to influence the mid-terms by engaging Democrats and anti-Trumpers to organize... In that release, Facebook let it be known it was working with the political arm of NATO, The Atlantic Council, to ferret out these dastardly Russian agents.

And now we have a brand-new shiny sanctions bill intended to keep any rapprochement between the U.S. and Russia from occurring.

Why is that? What’s got them so scared of relations with Russia improving?

Maybe, just maybe, because Putin has all of these people dead to rights and he’s informed Trump of what the real story behind all of this is.

That at its core is a group of very bad people who attempted to steal trillions but only got away with billions and still have their sights set on destroying Russia for their own needs.

And Lindsay Graham is their mouthpiece. (all puns intended)

That all of U.S. foreign policy is built on a lie.

That our relationship with Russia was purposefully trashed for the most venal of reasons, for people like Bill Browder to not only steal billions but then have the chutzpah to steal the $230 million he would have paid in taxes on those stolen billions.

And the only way to ensure none of those lies are exposed is for Trump to be unable to change any of it by forcing him to openly side with the Russian President over members of his own political party.

The proposed sanctions by the Graham bill are so insane that even the Treasury department thinks they are a bad idea. But, at this point there is nothing Graham won’t do for his owners.

Because they are desperate they will push for open warfare with Russia to push Putin from power, which is not possible. All of this is nothing more than a sad attempt to hold onto power long enough to oust Trump from the White House and keep things as horrible as they currently are.

Because no one gives up power willingly. And the more they are proven to be frauds the more they will scream for war.

---

Quote:

---

Anti-fascist activists, or “antifa,” increasingly mobilized in the wake of President Trump’s election, are unapologetic about what they describe as the necessary use of violence to combat authoritarianism.

---

Quote:

---

While both experts on the movement and activists within it emphasize that not everyone who participates in anti-fascist activism engages in violence, they say the use of force is intrinsic to their political philosophy.

“The justification [of the use of violence] is that Nazi ideology at its very core is founded on violence and on wielding power by any means,” said Mike Isaacson, one of the founders of Smash Racism D.C., an antifa organization in Washington.

Isaacson is unequivocal in his defense of violence as a legitimate tool to combat the creeping threat of what he deems authoritarianism ...

On Sunday, antifa protesters hurled glass bottles and bricks at police officers monitoring a far-right march in Portland, Ore.

---

Quote:

---

Black-clad antifa members attack peaceful right-wing demonstrators in Berkeley

---

Quote:

---

“There is the question of whether these people should feel safe organizing as Nazis in public, and I don’t think they should,” said Isaacson.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Here's my contribution:

America's biggest problem, humanity's biggest problem, and the world's biggest problem is nuclear war. We could end up at 'game over' in minutes. We need to solve that.

It's second biggest problem is nuclear power. We have two festering sores that will leak radiation to the end of human history unless we figure out what to do with them, and apparently, we don't care if we get more. Along with that, we haven't figured out what to do with the waste from any of the 460 existing power plants and 60 under construction. Not that this is all under our control, but the consequences visit us nevertheless.

I have others I would like to mention, but that'll have to be later.

---

Quote:

---

The fallacy of relative privation sig is an informal fallacy by which one compares the subject under discussion to something else in an effort to “suggest that the opponent’s argument should be ignored.”

---

Quote:

---

There's plenty more. And if you want to see a justification for "beating the fuck out of" people just look at SHINY"GOOD"GUY's post.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
ANTIFA on the use of violence

2017

Quote:

---

Anti-fascist activists, or “antifa,” increasingly mobilized in the wake of President Trump’s election, are unapologetic about what they describe as the necessary use of violence to combat authoritarianism.

---

Yeah. Combating violence with violence.

Quote:

---

While both experts on the movement and activists within it emphasize that not everyone who participates in anti-fascist activism engages in violence, they say the use of force is intrinsic to their political philosophy.

“The justification [of the use of violence] is that Nazi ideology at its very core is founded on violence and on wielding power by any means,” said Mike Isaacson, one of the founders of Smash Racism D.C., an antifa organization in Washington.

Isaacson is unequivocal in his defense of violence as a legitimate tool to combat the creeping threat of what he deems authoritarianism ...

On Sunday, antifa protesters hurled glass bottles and bricks at police officers monitoring a far-right march in Portland, Ore.

---

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/350524-antifa-activists-sa
y-violence-is-necessary

Quote:

---

Black-clad antifa members attack peaceful right-wing demonstrators in Berkeley

---

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/08/28/black-cl
ad-antifa-attack-right-wing-demonstrators-in-berkeley/?utm_term=.89d654d0a52d

Quote:

---

“There is the question of whether these people should feel safe organizing as Nazis in public, and I don’t think they should,” said Isaacson.

---

In other words, ANTIFA wants to deny other groups free speech rights.

There's plenty more. And if you want to see a justification for "beating the fuck out of" people just look at SHINY"GOOD"GUY's post.




-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

There is the question of whether these people should feel safe organizing as Nazis in public, and I don’t think they should,” said Isaacson.

---

In other words, ANTIFA wants to deny other groups free speech rights. - SIGNY

Quote:

---

There's plenty more. And if you want to see a justification for "beating the fuck out of" people just look at SHINY"GOOD"GUY's post.

---

Yes, please take a look at my post, it's very illuminating.

---

Quote:

---

I say, "kick them right in the balls, then ask questions." It's rather ironic isn't it? Fighting fascism with fascism,

---

Quote:

---

what a concept. They wouldn't last a second in my old neighborhood, too many VFWs. The Irish and the Italians would "beat the fuck" out of them, literally. Well, it's coming to a head. So thank you Trump, you brought them out of the woodwork. GO ANTIFA!

---

Quote:

---

(one strange thing though. People have often called "liberals" a bunch of wusses, and yet here we have a rather radical response on the level of Vikings and Norsemen. Really strange)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

There is the question of whether these people should feel safe organizing as Nazis in public, and I don’t think they should,” said Isaacson.

---

In other words, ANTIFA wants to deny other groups free speech rights. - SIGNY

Quote:

---

There's plenty more. And if you want to see a justification for "beating the fuck out of" people just look at SHINY"GOOD"GUY's post.

---

Yes, please take a look at my post, it's very illuminating.

---

It is, but not in the way you think. It's more like SECOND admitting that he wants Americans to be squabbling with each other so he can rake in as much dough as he wants.... THAT kind of illuminating.

Quote:

---

I say, "kick them right in the balls, then ask questions." It's rather ironic isn't it? Fighting fascism with fascism,

---

"Ironic" isn't the term I would use. "Hypocritical", maybe. Or "stupid" or "anti-American".

Quote:

---

what a concept. They wouldn't last a second in my old neighborhood, too many VFWs. The Irish and the Italians would "beat the fuck" out of them, literally. Well, it's coming to a head. So thank you Trump, you brought them out of the woodwork. GO ANTIFA!

---

SHINY"GOOD"GUY ... IF all the so-called "fascists" do is talk (Oh and BTW, we only have YOUR opinion that they're "fascists", but considering how ignorant you've been about everything else, I wouldn't trust your characterization any farther than I could throw a piano ...) then all YOU should be doing is talking. You should be fighting ideas with ideas, not punches.

The fact that you think that you have to fight words with violence tells me that you think that you're too stupid to fight ideas with ideas. Are you really stupider than the average white supremacist? It seems so! You certainly appear to have a problem here!

Quote:

---

(one strange thing though. People have often called "liberals" a bunch of wusses, and yet here we have a rather radical response on the level of Vikings and Norsemen. Really strange)

---

Liberals used to believe in things like tolerance and open-mindedness, freedom and free speech. It seems that some portion of liberals have decided that intolerance and closed-mindedness and authoritarianism is the way to go.

I think you really need to think about what you're really "fighting" for, because as far as I can tell this is just a tribal fight where both sides use the same tactics, and at that point your "side" is no better than the "other side".



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Let's take a moment to praise the life saving heroes of Antifa.

May all anti-fascist activity thrive until every Nazi is dead.

Nazis don't deserve to live. It should be legal to shoot anyone carrying a Nazi flag in the head. The shooter should get a medal. Like we did in WWII.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Nobody should be scared of Antifa. They're a bunch of mask wearing clowns who are afraid to show their faces while they're lighting garbage cans on fire. They're made up mostly of middle to upper class white college kids who are "saving the world". They want Socialism, even though they've gotten everything for free from their parents so far that wouldn't have been provided to them if we were living in a Socialist country. They're idiots, and they're pussies.


BAMN, on the other hand, isn't an organization I would want to get into a tussle with. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BAMN

By Any Means Necessary.

There are some truly scary people involved in that movement.




At any rate, my advice to anybody is the same as it ever has been. Don't put up any political signs on your yard and don't put political bumper stickers on your car and you've really got nothing to worry about. I can't even imagine why anybody in this current political climate would want to do so unless they wanted their homes or cars vandalized or they were looking for a fight.

Just remember... only a very small minority of people in the world are crazy. Most everybody you ever meet is going to be at least tolerable.

All the rioting I've ever seen on TV and to this day at nearly 40 years old I've never once witnessed anything close to even a small riot in my life.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
History speaks volumes........

For a long time the US did not concern itself with the rise of fascism in Europe. it started in 1939, and it wasn't until the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, that the US became "involved."

Now, there's much to be said about America's involvement and the attack on Pearl Harbor. Much in the way in conspiracy. Be that as it may, America was
in and the rhetoric was no longer valid, real bullets started flying. To me,
a student of conflict, real or imagined, I see it this way: there comes a
time where words must be set aside and unmitigated violence must come to the
fore.

This is because sometimes words does nothing but alert your enemy where to aim. Fuck that, if I'm going to die, give me a gun - I'll go down fighting thank you very much. Fascism only knows one thing, a punch in the face.
They think they're right, ok. I think not. Don't want to listen to reason?
Okay, I'm going to exercise my right to live free....take that! You think
that liberals should be labeled by your standards, go right ahead, do your
worst. Meanwhile, as far as I'm concerned, liberals will be punching people
in the face. Times change! Fighting fascism and right wing nut jobs, well
that calls for a different breed of "liberals," ones that will fight for
what is right.

You may think that's wrong, again okay. Think that way. "Liberals" have learned a valuable lesson: blood in the streets is the only language some
folk understand. Keep going the way you're going...keep thinking you're
right. Me, I'm thinking as a free man. I have no choice but to refuse the
kool-aid. Me, I'm going down swinging. This is what President Putin wants.
For America to destroy itself, blood in the streets, cities in shambles, democracy destroyed. If you believe in that future, stand over there. I've chosen my side. That's my choice, you don't like it...tough!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
I'm really surprised Reaverfan, not to find all members of VFWs (especially those that served in WWII) out there protesting the very existence within
our democratic society these white supremecists/Nazis.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
A couple of points:

1- your colleagues say that "Antifa" are violent, well which is it?
violent or cowards? Why bring them up if they are mask-wearing clowns?

---

Quote:

---

So, you think liberals are justified in initiating violence simply to silence people they don't agree with?

---

Quote:

---

So, you think liberals are justified in initiating violence simply to silence people they don't agree with? - KIKI

Hey Kiki, your ideology is showing. At no point in my post do I even mention the word "initiate." Notice how I carefully laid out my argument regarding the US involvement into WWII. Now, if we are to believe the history books, "we" got involved only after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. I could say that is being provoked into combating the bullies of fascist regimes: Germany, Italy and Japan.

Like I always tell my nephew, never start a fight, but if someone bullies you; you have the right to defend yourself. Antifa shows up whenever fascists come a-calling.

---

Quote:

---

And I don't care about someone disagreeing with me; I often respond by chuckling to myself, but then stating my argument. I chose my words carefully. Well, with one exception...here. Sometimes I just burst out with something crazy (mainly in response to something crazy hurled at me). But no, everyone is entitled, at least it used to be a norm here in this country, to speak freely. Again, it used to be a norm, that if you disagreed with someone you argued your side.

---

Quote:

---

I once posted "I love football" while others were protesting and complaining about the Kapernick kneeling issue, just to see what would be the reaction. I was soundly ridiculed and cursed at. So much for experimentation. I knew exactly the reaction I would get. I was prepared. So I deleted my post. (By the way, I really do love football).

---

Quote:

---

For the record, I knew that I would get that "response" (the comments that were being posted were truly unhinged and decidedly "pro-Trump"). Still though, I was prepared for the worst hateful reactions. People go in expecting a reaction, while others respond thusly... I think that those who march chanting 'Blood and Soil' must do so expecting a violent response.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, you think liberals are justified in initiating violence simply to silence people they don't agree with?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Hey Kiki, your ideology is showing. At no point in my post do I even mention
the word "initiate."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
You think that liberals should be labeled by your standards, go right ahead, do your
worst. Meanwhile, as far as I'm concerned, liberals will be punching people
in the face.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Like I always tell my nephew, never start a fight, but if someone bullies you;
you have the right to defend yourself. Antifa shows up whenever fascists
come a-calling.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
And I don't care about someone disagreeing with me; I often respond by chuckling to myself, but then stating my argument. I chose my words
carefully. Well, with one exception...here. Sometimes I just burst out
with something crazy (mainly in response to something crazy hurled at me).
But no, everyone is entitled, at least it used to be a norm here in this
country, to speak freely. Again, it used to be a norm, that if you disagreed
with someone you argued your side.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
I think that those who MARCH CHANTING 'Blood and Soil' must do so expecting a violent response.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

*Unless it's libel and causes damage to reputation and, presumably, material damages. In which case it is no longer protected free speech. Also, directly threatening somebody is not protected. The limits of free speech have been tested over and over and over; "blood and soil" is definitely protected.

"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, you think liberals are justified in initiating violence simply to silence people they don't agree with?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Hey Kiki, your ideology is showing. At no point in my post do I even mention
the word "initiate."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
You think that liberals should be labeled by your standards, go right ahead, do your
worst. Meanwhile, as far as I'm concerned, liberals will be punching people
in the face.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Like I always tell my nephew, never start a fight, but if someone bullies you;
you have the right to defend yourself. Antifa shows up whenever fascists
come a-calling.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
And I don't care about someone disagreeing with me; I often respond by chuckling to myself, but then stating my argument. I chose my words
carefully. Well, with one exception...here. Sometimes I just burst out
with something crazy (mainly in response to something crazy hurled at me).
But no, everyone is entitled, at least it used to be a norm here in this
country, to speak freely. Again, it used to be a norm, that if you disagreed
with someone you argued your side.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
I think that those who MARCH CHANTING 'Blood and Soil' must do so expecting a violent response.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Hey, what happened to your sig line? Are you posting from a different account?

---

Quote:

---

PLEASE file a libel lawsuit. That would be so fun to watch it backfire. Since Trump will not sue, the whole world can take it as evidence that Trump was not libeled in Bob Woodward's book on his presidency.
EVERY. WORD. WAS. TRUE.

---

Quote:

---

In this era of fake news, criminal accusations, and allegations of misconduct made toward politicians, some people may wonder why they don’t sue to set the record straight. The main reason may be that, because the First Amendment protects freedom of speech and of the press, any action based on the content of statements must satisfy narrowly defined requirements, and politicians, as public figures, must also meet significantly higher burdens of proof than an ordinary person...

In a defamation case, a court will categorize a plaintiff as either a general public figure, a limited public figure, or a private citizen. To prove defamation, an ordinary person must prove that the defendant made the false statement, at least, negligently. However, if the court concludes that a plaintiff is either a limited or general public figure, the plaintiff must prove “clearly and convincingly” that the alleged defamatory statement was made with ‘actual malice’—that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
The already discredited Woodward book, so many lies and phony sources

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Random headlines:

Secretary Mattis fires back at claims in Woodward's book

Kelly Denies Woodward Book 'Fear' Claim He Called Trump Idiot

Ex-Trump lawyer John Dowd disputes details in Bob Woodward book


"Former George W. Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer ... added: "Anonymous sources have looser lips and may take liberties. But Woodward always plays it straight. Someone told it to him.""

So quoting anonymous sources who make things up makes it 'true', eh Ari?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, you think liberals are justified in initiating violence simply to silence people they don't agree with?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Hey Kiki, your ideology is showing. At no point in my post do I even mention
the word "initiate."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
You think that liberals should be labeled by your standards, go right ahead, do your
worst. Meanwhile, as far as I'm concerned, liberals will be punching people
in the face.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Like I always tell my nephew, never start a fight, but if someone bullies you;
you have the right to defend yourself. Antifa shows up whenever fascists
come a-calling.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
And I don't care about someone disagreeing with me; I often respond by chuckling to myself, but then stating my argument. I chose my words
carefully. Well, with one exception...here. Sometimes I just burst out
with something crazy (mainly in response to something crazy hurled at me).
But no, everyone is entitled, at least it used to be a norm here in this
country, to speak freely. Again, it used to be a norm, that if you disagreed
with someone you argued your side.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
I think that those who MARCH CHANTING 'Blood and Soil' must do so expecting a violent response.

---

Quote:

---

MEANWHILE. so this doesn't get lost in SECOND's garbage


SHINNY
Where do you REALLY stand regarding people who NON-VIOLENTLY espouse ideas you disagree with?

---

Quote:

---

You're right, you never use the word 'initiate'. What you DO espouse is violence, in regard to nothing at all.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
MEANWHILE 1kiki is crazier than Trump, and less successful covering it up. THUGGER admits it's not about RUSSIA !!! and is, in fact, a witch hunt. "Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

PLEASE file a libel lawsuit. That would be so fun to watch it backfire. Since Trump will not sue, the whole world can take it as evidence that Trump was not libeled in Bob Woodward's book on his presidency.
EVERY. WORD. WAS. TRUE.

---

OMFG! The reason why Presidents (and other politicians) don't sue for defamation is because they are PUBLIC FIGURES. My god, even I knew that! And if you think I'm more ignorant than you ... what does that make you???

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

MEANWHILE. so this doesn't get lost in SECOND's garbage

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

MEANWHILE. so this doesn't get lost in SECOND's garbage

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

MEANWHILE. so this doesn't get lost in SECOND's garbage

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Two men beat a homeless man with a metal bar and urinate on him screaming, “Donald Trump was right, all these illegals need to be deported,” When asked for a comment about the incident Trump defends them saying, "My supporters are very passionate. They love this country and they want this country to be great again."

---

Quote:

---

More than 400 migrant children remain separated from their parents and under the federal government’s care, according to court documents filed this week.

In late July — the deadline set by a federal judge for the U.S.to reunite more than 2,500 migrant families separated at the southwest border — federal agents had successfully reunited more than half of affected children with their parents. Now, the number of children that remain separated as a result of the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy hovers at 416, dozens fewer than reported in last week’s status update.

---

Quote:

---

There is NO doubt, nor can there be ANY debate, that Trump supporters are overwhelmingly violent, murderous, and traitorous, when compared to the lifesaving heroes of Antifa, and their fellow peace-loving, informed thinkers on the left.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

There is NO doubt, nor can there be ANY debate, that Trump supporters are overwhelmingly violent, murderous, and traitorous, when compared to the lifesaving heroes of Antifa, and their fellow peace-loving, informed thinkers on the left.

---

OMFG!!! I don't know if you did that on purpose, but you owe me a new keyboard. Thanks for the laff!

---

Quote:

---

The problem is much bigger than the few dozen incidents listed. As of today, Trump has 40% of Americans approving of his performance. So we've got like 120,000,000 Americans approving of him, despite everything they could know about Trump. One hundred twenty million is a large number of scumbags following the ultimate scumbag.

---

Quote:

---

Most presidents would seek to calm the roiling waters of their White House.- SECOND

Most Presidents would promise their constituents anything to get elected, and then quickly revert to doing whatever the establishment/deep state wanted them to do.- SIGNY

Trump is not most presidents.-SECOND

WHICH IS WHY SO MANY PEOPLE VOTED FOR HIM. Your extreme anti-GOP bias prevents you from seeing the obvious, SECOND ... the middle class has been sucked dry for decades and people are ANGRY. They don't want "more of the same", they've HAD "more of the same" and yanno what? It's just not working for them. They want results, not a flim-flam man (or woman) tossing out empty promises. - SIGNY

---

Quote:

---

A typical example of aggressive scum-bagging being ignored by 120,000,000 Trump scumbags:

Quote:

---

More than 400 migrant children remain separated from their parents and under the federal government’s care, according to court documents filed this week.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

There is NO doubt, nor can there be ANY debate, that Trump supporters are overwhelmingly violent, murderous, and traitorous, when compared to the lifesaving heroes of Antifa, and their fellow peace-loving, informed thinkers on the left.

---

OMFG!!! I don't know if you did that on purpose, but you owe me a new keyboard. Thanks for the laff!

---

Denial of obvious facts is your most well-known trait. You are the quintessential Russian troll.

Someone there should buy you a shot of vodka for your bullshitting.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
It's all about Ratings my friend.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
There is NO doubt, nor can there be ANY debate, that Trump supporters are overwhelmingly violent, murderous, and traitorous, when compared to the lifesaving heroes of Antifa, and their fellow peace-loving, informed thinkers on the left.

My grandfather was awarded medals for killing fascists. If he were here to see these little spoiled white boys marching around with Nazi flags and shouting racial slurs, and murdering and beating people, he'd have killed a bunch more.

And he would deserve another medal. He loved America.

Nazis and Russian trolls do not.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
There is NO doubt, nor can there be ANY debate, that Trump supporters are overwhelmingly violent, murderous, and traitorous, when compared to the lifesaving heroes of Antifa, and their fellow peace-loving, informed thinkers on the left.

My grandfather was awarded medals for killing fascists. If he were here to see these little spoiled white boys marching around with Nazi flags and shouting racial slurs, and murdering and beating people, he'd have killed a bunch more.

And he would deserve another medal. He loved America.

Nazis and Russian trolls do not.

---

lol

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---