Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
The risk of nuclear war under Trump
Monday, February 12, 2018 3:45 PM
THGRRI
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: The propaganda exits, in large amounts, I might add. I can show it, and you know it's true. The government wouldn't bother if it didn't think it was necessary - to give us subjects the required push in attitude.
Monday, February 12, 2018 4:20 PM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 8:57 AM
SECOND
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: SECOND I agree about this: Americans don't care if a Shiite government kills its Sunni citizens - or the other way around. They don't care if Russia has a free press. They don't care if non-ethnic Russians kill ethnic Russians in Ukraine. They don't care about starving children in Somalia. They don't care about cartels run amok in Mexico. They don't care who kills, or who dies, or how, if it's over there. They. Don't. Care. They care if AMERICANS die. So, the question becomes - how do you convince Americans to willingly fight elsewhere? That's how you end up with the Lusitania. the Gulf of Tonkin, maybe even Pearl Harbor, and 9/11 being used to attack Iraq. That's how you end up with massive campaigns to mobilize the public to go to war, support war and censorship, and pay for it all. That's why you endlessly propagandize that Russians are 'doing things' to us. To get Americans to fight over there, somewhere, the government needs to deploy its campaigns of attitude adjustment.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:43 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Quote: Signym. If Americans do NOT know today how nukes burn children to death, can that be blamed on the MSM, as you are trying to do? Is the media really misleading Americans into believing nukes do NOT kill women, as Signym is insinuating? Or will the majority of Americans never know? I think the majority of Americans don't want to know because knowing would mean not nuking whoever the President feels deserving.
Quote:I'm thinking a majority of Americans in 1945 wanted all the Japs, including women and children, dead dead dead and a victory wasn't enough to cool the overheated Americans. Even until today, victory on the battlefield isn't enough. A majority of Americans also want women and children dead dead dead. This is a very helpful attitude for a Pentagon and Congress who both want nukes for their President.
Quote:Since at least WWII, the majority of the American public would easily accept Washington DC killing everyone (old men, women, children) connected to any kind of enemy. Those Americans were born that way; they didn't need any propaganda from Washington DC.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 12:55 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: So, where does this slavish devotion to the US President come from? Is it inborn (as you imply later)? Genetic? Are Americans uniquely vulnerable to hive-mind behavior? Or is this the result of never-ending Hollywood romanticization. of series like "24" in which a rough, tough Jack Bauer - who has faced down nuclear terrorism and survived relentless Chinese torture- wets his pants and drops to his knees in abject devotion when "THE PRESIDENT!!" comes into view?
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 12:57 PM
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:00 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: So, where does this slavish devotion to the US President come from? Is it inborn (as you imply later)? Genetic? Are Americans uniquely vulnerable to hive-mind behavior? Or is this the result of never-ending Hollywood romanticization. of series like "24" in which a rough, tough Jack Bauer - who has faced down nuclear terrorism and survived relentless Chinese torture- wets his pants and drops to his knees in abject devotion when "THE PRESIDENT!!" comes into view? You gave a really long answer. My short answer is that Americans are the most ostentatiously religious in the world. They really crave a power greater than themselves, even the ones not religious, to throw the responsibility for what happens onto God or the President, which leaves them with more time for their smaller pursuits, whether it is a quest for a place in heaven, more money, or the next pleasure. It is God's and the President's decision on who dies, who to nuke, not the decision of small, irresponsible Americans busy with their daily lives. The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:21 PM
Quote:You gave a really long answer. My short answer is that Americans are the most ostentatiously religious in the world. They really crave a power greater than themselves, even the ones not religious, to throw the responsibility for what happens onto God or the President, which leaves them with more time for their smaller pursuits, whether it is a quest for a place in heaven, more money, or the next pleasure. It is God's and the President's decision on who dies, who to nuke, not the decision of small, irresponsible Americans busy with their daily lives. - SECOND
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:22 PM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: SECOND, your and sigs attempt to pigeon hole Americans is week tea. We are more than 310 million strong, come from all the different continents and are as ethnically diverse as can be. Yet you speak of us as if we are all made from the same cloth. Like I said, weak tea. Time to watch an episode of firefly I think.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:24 PM
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:37 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: From my POV, SECOND, you're as guilty of religious-thinking as the people you disdain. YOUR religion isn't god tho, and it isn't militarism; it's partisanship. YOUR magical thinking revolves around the Democratic Party. You focus all of your ire on THE GOP!! TEXAS REPUBLICANS! TRUMP!!! ... with an occasional (and misdirected) shout-out to RUSSIA!! as if they are the source of all of our problems and if we only got rid of "them" all would be well! And we BOTH know that that isn't true.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:40 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: SECOND, your and sigs attempt to pigeon hole Americans is week tea. We are more than 310 million strong, come from all the different continents and are as ethnically diverse as can be. Yet you speak of us as if we are all made from the same cloth. Like I said, weak tea. Time to watch an episode of firefly I think. I'm not doing an explanation for every last American. I only need to explain the largest group. It isn't even the majority, but their numbers are large enough to push the whole U.S.A. in the direction it is going.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:50 PM
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 1:57 PM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: I'm a white male. In all my years I have been amazed at all the different opinions we have about this and that. Sorry, weak tea.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 4:54 PM
Quote: From my POV, American government kills foreigners because Americans are who they are. You might want to claim they have been sheltered from the consequences of drone killings and firebombings in WWII, but I know it is not sheltering; Americans actively don't want to know. It would force them to change, and why would they want to do that when they are so busy with being entertained?
Quote:The governments we get at all levels are exactly what you'd expect from politicians much like other Americans with small, selfish minds who dislike every other American who is dissimilar to them. Woe to the foreigner who is very unlike the politician. The foreigner will be nuked.
Quote:I would expect Obama to be less likely to nuke a foreigner. He was aware of being considered not an American. To Trump, Obama is a foreigner and I clearly remember what Trump and Texas Republicans said about Obama being no American citizen they would recognize.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018 6:52 PM
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:11 AM
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:46 AM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:51 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: eta: to expand a little bit on the idea - if this was a parliamentary system we could vote Trump out at any time during his term on a vote of 'no confidence'. It would keep the system somewhat more honest. As it is, it's a system running without negative feedback controls. And this system creates a dysfunctional dynamic that degrades both the political process, and the people participating in it. By experience, people have become very cynical, disenfranchised, and mentally lazy, about their presidential votes. Maybe they haven't linked it up to the political system we have now, but they know that presidential campaigns are nothing more than hot air, empty promises, and circus sideshows. They trusted in 'hope and change', and were bitterly disappointed by what didn't happen. (And if republicans had run anyone with a credible message of change, they would have won.) They trusted Trump to not be more of the same. But when that doesn't work out, the only option they - we - have is to roll the dice again. I guess 'The Framers' wanted democracy, but not too much of it.
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 9:44 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Hmmmmmmm..... I love your anti-American quote about the home of the chickens, Second. That doesn't look to be a part of either of your articles. I'm assuming you came up with that one all by yourself then?
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 12:03 PM
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 12:31 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Regale us with all of the tales of the great fights you've gotten to in your lifetime as one of the (lol) 1%'ers. You're a clown.
Quote:Donald Trump has made this the most difficult election to assess since 1984. We have never before seen a candidate like Donald Trump, and Donald Trump may well break patterns of history that have held since 1860. We've never before seen a candidate who's spent his life enriching himself at the expense of others. He's the first candidate in our history to be a serial fabricator, making up things as he goes along. Even when he tells the truth, such as, "Barack Obama really was born in the U.S.," he adds two lines, that Hillary Clinton started the birther movement, and that he finished it, even though when Barack Obama put out his birth certificate, he didn't believe it. We've never had a candidate before who not just once, but twice in a thinly disguised way, has incited violence against an opponent. We've never had a candidate before who's invited a hostile foreign power to meddle in American elections. We've never had a candidate before who's threatened to start a war by blowing ships out of the water in the Persian Gulf if they come too close to us. We've never had a candidate before who has embraced as a role model a murderous, hostile foreign dictator. Given all of these exceptions that Donald Trump represents, he may well shatter patterns of history that have held for more than 150 years, lose this election even if the historical circumstances favor it.
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 1:07 PM
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 1:29 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: In the minds of Americans, the US needs thousands of bombs because the world might someday take its revenge for what the US had done and for what it would do if the Japs did not surrender.
Quote: Press Office Poll Results: Nuclear Weapons by Peter Moore in HuffingtonPost, Politics & current affairs on August 11, 2016, 7:07 a.m. These are the topline results of a YouGov/Huffington Post survey of 1000 US adults interviewed August 4-7, 2016 on nuclear weapons. The margin of error is 4.8%. Click here to see full tables and demographic crossbreaks Do you approve or disapprove of cutting the number of nuclear weapons the United States has? Strongly approve . . . . . . . ..22% Somewhat approve . . . . . . . ..23% Somewhat disapprove . . . . . . .23% Strongly disapprove . . . . . . .17% Not sure . . . . . . . . . . . ..16% Which comes closest to your view? The US should never use nuclear weapons under any circumstances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17% The US should only use nuclear weapons in response to a nuclear attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50% In certain circumstances, the US should use nuclear weapons even if it has not suffered a nuclear attack . . . . . . . . .18% Not sure . . . . . . . . . . . . .16% If Hillary Clinton were elected president, would you trust her or not trust her to make the right decisions about the use of nuclear weapons? Trust her . . . . . . . . . . . . .38% Not trust her . . . . . . . . . . .46% Not sure . . . . . . . . . . . . ..16% If Donald Trump were elected president, would you trust him or not trust him to make the right decisions about the use of nuclear weapons? Trust him . . . . . . . . . . . . ..27% Not trust him . . . . . . . . . . ..57% Not sure . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16%
Quote:Originally posted by second: You are partially right. The Constitution makes Washington less responsive than, say, one of the better designed Parliamentary systems. But the big flaw is Americans. Their memories don't extend very far into the past.
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 1:37 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: lol... and your complete inability to talk to people is a huge indicator that you are not who you say you are. You'd run the company into the ground before it ever took off.
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 1:39 PM
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 1:49 PM
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 3:53 PM
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 4:56 PM
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 6:35 PM
OONJERAH
Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:16 PM
Thursday, February 15, 2018 6:29 AM
Quote: Why do you think the 1% can bully the other 99%? It certainly is not because the 1% are belligerent.
Quote: With 1kiki and Signym, I don't believe they are who they pretend to be: American citizens. If they are Russian trolls or spambots, they are doing their jobs well and nobly serving their country. Congratulations to them both! But if they actually live in America, they've both had a very odd upbringing. Still I can say Congratulations to them both for writing well and from their hearts.
Thursday, February 15, 2018 6:43 AM
CAPTAINCRUNCH
... stay crunchy...
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Ordinary Americans aren't deciding what to put on the news, what to show on TV, what religion to preach, the amount and content of advertising.
Thursday, February 15, 2018 7:08 AM
Quote:Actually, in fact, they do. Maybe your *world view* such as it is, would be better informed if you didn't take cues from illegal Guatemalan house keepers?
Thursday, February 15, 2018 8:41 AM
Thursday, February 15, 2018 10:18 AM
Quote:Originally posted by captaincrunch: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Ordinary Americans aren't deciding what to put on the news, what to show on TV, what religion to preach, the amount and content of advertising. Actually, in fact, they do. Maybe your *world view* such as it is, would be better informed if you didn't take cues from illegal Guatemalan house keepers?
Friday, February 16, 2018 10:02 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Actually, in fact, they do. Maybe your *world view* such as it is, would be better informed if you didn't take cues from illegal Guatemalan house keepers? UNLIKE YOU (the deliberately uninformed GSTRING) I make it a POINT to talk to people from other nations: The Syrian Xtian programmer-intern; the Tunisian who sells condiments at the farmer's market, the professor's housekeeper. They tell me things you would never read in our MSM.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: If there wasn't actual EVIDENCE to back up USA support/ complicity with Russia, or if the main players involved didn't have such an abundant history of graft and murder that is plainly obvious for even the dullest to see, I'd have put the story in the vast "interesting if true" warehouse, but the reality is that there is far too much supporting evidence to dismiss this story out-or-hand, as I was so anxious to do.
Friday, February 16, 2018 11:11 AM
Quote:Remember that story I related about the Ukrainian Uber driver?- GSTRING
Friday, February 16, 2018 4:21 PM
Saturday, February 17, 2018 7:43 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: SECOND, if you think Americans are stupid, lazy, and unaware, listen to this. This man is awake, aware, and angry. For anyone who cares to get a different perspective, listen to this from 0:00 to 24:45 and from 59:26 to the end. (The segment in between is about Yugoslavia, which was topical at the time this was recorded in 1999, but not relevant in such detail now). The thing that amazes me ... this was recorded 19 years ago, before the GWB reign and before Obama. And nothing has changed. All of the criticisms leveled then against Bush I, Bill, and early Bush II apply just as much to Bush II's presidency, and Obama's.
Saturday, February 17, 2018 8:21 AM
Saturday, February 17, 2018 8:36 AM
Quote: The cold-blooded and ruthless way to get the country to move in a particular direction is to find a particular neuron in the nematode-size-brain of America and zap it to get the behavior you want.
Saturday, February 17, 2018 8:41 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: You were very upset that people were not FIGHTING but the first thing Americans should do is figure our who their real enemy is, otherwise its a wasted fight.
Saturday, February 17, 2018 6:15 PM
Sunday, February 18, 2018 9:17 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: You were very upset that people were not FIGHTING but the first thing Americans should do is figure our who their real enemy is, otherwise its a wasted fight. It's also dangerous, and a lot of innocent people get hurt for no reason as well. Instead of looking at guns as the problem as we ALWAYS do when something like the school shooting the other day happens, why aren't we looking into the actual problems that drive kids these days to doing something like this. Stuff is broke right now. A lot of it. Trying to take away guns is like putting a Band Aid on a tumor, especially since it won't happen anyhow.
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Why are our school systems failing our children? Not just the shooters. All of them. A lot of kids today are just miserable, let alone useless.
Sunday, February 18, 2018 10:10 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote: Why do you think the 1% can bully the other 99%? It certainly is not because the 1% are belligerent. You're kidding, right? I once heard a story from an (illegal Guatemalan) housekeeper who told me about a time, during a great agitation for labor rights, of a union meeting that was called at their village church. All in all, about 400 villagers showed up. And then a Gutemalan right-wing death squad gunned them all down. What have we been posting about all along? The belligerance of the elite's army, right? And as for our internal policies ... did you know that we have the highest incarceration rate in the world? Quote: With 1kiki and Signym, I don't believe they are who they pretend to be: American citizens. If they are Russian trolls or spambots, they are doing their jobs well and nobly serving their country. Congratulations to them both! But if they actually live in America, they've both had a very odd upbringing. Still I can say Congratulations to them both for writing well and from their hearts. I have to agree with KIKI- you should get out more. Are you so fixated on Americans being purposefully stupid and chicken that when some show up who aren't, you can;t imagine that they're American? This guy, he's American: So is this guy And this guy ... But, aside from THEM, there is ..... YOU. YOU seem to be decrying the same things that they are: the rape of the world by the elite. Aren't you American? And then there is ME: You and I seem to be saying the same thing. So why are fighting me? Are you one of those people who can't take "yes" for an answer? Well, in any case, your thinking stops at ordinary Americans. But you seem to forget that ordinary Americans aren't really driving this bus. Ordinary Americans aren't deciding what to put on the news, what to show on TV, what religion to preach, the amount and content of advertising. If you're going to blame somebody for the shape the world is in, why don't you go one step farther and at least share some of the blame with the people who are in charge: the sociopathic elite? ----------- Pity would be no more, If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876] The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Sunday, February 18, 2018 11:50 AM
Sunday, February 18, 2018 12:35 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Why have the person who has the problem solve it? I think 6ixStringJack could name many reasons, but the best explanations involve admitting that Americans don’t care for other Americans and their problems. It costs money and inconvenience to care. Who cares to do that when you are busy solving your own problems?
Sunday, February 18, 2018 1:27 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by second: Why have the person who has the problem solve it? I think 6ixStringJack could name many reasons, but the best explanations involve admitting that Americans don’t care for other Americans and their problems. It costs money and inconvenience to care. Who cares to do that when you are busy solving your own problems? I think I've said on quite a few occasions that this is the case. Although I've also said that it's not an American trait, but a human trait. That being said, no, I don't think this is the problem that needs to be solved. Glad you learned how to read.
Saturday, July 8, 2023 8:45 AM
JAYNEZTOWN
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL