Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"
Tuesday, February 14, 2017 12:49 PM
THGRRI
Tuesday, February 14, 2017 12:57 PM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Tuesday, February 14, 2017 1:46 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Hey. If you're right, enjoy President Pence. Maybe the church will be indistinguishable from the state 4 years from now. lol Do Right, Be Right. :)
Tuesday, February 14, 2017 2:33 PM
Tuesday, February 14, 2017 3:05 PM
Quote:Originally posted by G: My only question is: how much bigger will the crowds be at his impeachment than at his inauguration?
Tuesday, February 21, 2017 11:21 PM
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 12:45 AM
Quote:Mr. Artemenko, a little-known politician who has tried to brand himself as a Trump-style populist, has not been arrested or formally charged with a crime.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 3:50 AM
JO753
rezident owtsidr
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 7:39 AM
SECOND
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Get back to me when there is some actual news. Do Right, Be Right. :)
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 10:19 AM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Get back to me when there is some actual news. Do Right, Be Right. :)How about this old news? Trump’s tragic mistake was choosing a competent Vice President. The contrast between Pence and Trump is Trump's biggest problem. Congressional Republicans can get everything they want from V.P. Mike Pence without any of the incompetence that comes with Trump. Bill Clinton came close to be removed from the White House over the Monica Lewinsky affair, but was only saved by Republicans being a minority: The perjury charge was defeated with 55 "not guilty" votes and 45 "guilty" votes. On the obstruction-of-justice article, the chamber was evenly split, 50-50. Well, Republicans aren't in the minority any more. And Pence is really appealing compared to Trump. It does not matter what the trivial criminal charge is against Trump, every Democratic Senator would vote against him. Most Republican Senators would vote to remove Trump, too, if he screws up to the level of the Monica Lewinsky affair. The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:03 AM
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:10 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Second comes in and says "how's my opinion for news"? THGRRI likes that "news". Yep. It must be Wednesday morning in the RWED.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:13 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: THGRRI posts yet another Commie Crazy editorial hit piece on Trump trying to link him with "Ukraine Lawmaker Who Aided Trump Associates Faces Treason "... I point out that the story, half-way down, says that he has not been arrested or charged with anything and ask for him to get back to me when there is actual, yanno, news..... Second comes in and says "how's my opinion for news"? THGRRI likes that "news". Yep. It must be Wednesday morning in the RWED. Do Right, Be Right. :)
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:30 AM
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:43 AM
SOCKPUPPET
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Second comes in and says "how's my opinion for news"? THGRRI likes that "news". Yep. It must be Wednesday morning in the RWED. Sumptin' else.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:48 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: This story was taking the art of making Russian ties to Trump to the extreme, and is based off of nothing when you actually read it. Read it again. There's nothing there. You can do better.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 2:23 PM
DREAMTROVE
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 2:38 PM
Quote:Originally posted by DREAMTROVE: 2nd, No, they won't. Trump's enemies aren't attacking him because of Russia or because they have a point. They're doing it because they're not in power.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 3:48 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: The title of your article says he's facing treason. Doesn't say "treason charges". It says facing treason, as if he's already guilty. Do Right, Be Right. :)
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 3:53 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by DREAMTROVE: 2nd, No, they won't. Trump's enemies aren't attacking him because of Russia or because they have a point. They're doing it because they're not in power. It is not about them; it's about Trump. Trump held a press conference to lash the media for its coverage of his presidency. It is worth establishing a basic fact about Trump: He has received mostly negative media coverage because he is running a chaotic, leaky, and ineffective administration. The press corps would breathe a great sigh of relief if they felt able to cover Trump more normally — an impulse you can see in the overwhelmingly positive coverage that Trump gets when he reads a clear speech off a teleprompter or names a qualified candidate like Gen. Jim Mattis to his Cabinet or Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster his new national security adviser. Trump is a fuck-up and he needs to get more control of himself and his loud mouth. When he does, most of his problems go away. When he acts like a jack-ass, his problems multiply. The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 4:00 PM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Don't bother me with stupid shit.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 4:01 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Don't bother me with stupid shit. lol... That's exactly what I was already telling you. I was just using my Big Words. Do Right, Be Right. :)
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 4:04 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Trump: He has received mostly negative media coverage because he is running a chaotic, leaky, and ineffective administration.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 5:12 PM
Quote:Originally posted by DREAMTROVE: Quote:Originally posted by second: Trump: He has received mostly negative media coverage because he is running a chaotic, leaky, and ineffective administration. Not drinking that. They were already the most negative they had been before he was even elected. Enough operative. I'm not a Trump supporter, but no way am I going to dwell on this. Election over. Moving on. Go ahead, impeach him, let's have a civil war. Install the unaccountable deep state coup and have Chuck Schumer create an intelligence panel to control CIA, NSA and JSOC, and go to war, and watch him put Hillary in charge of this new shadow govt. Sure, let's have a military police state. These are great ideas. They work well for Kim Jong Un. They're doing okay for ISIS. Make it happen. Just let me move first. My plan? run a better candidate in four years. Maybe start some sort of media group before then that doesn't insult the president so that it has some influence. But enough with the crazy and the Clintonista. Edit, Second. I've only been back a week and already I'm not reading THGRRI's posts, like, at all. This is what is happening to the left protests, it's what's happening to the left media. It's what will happen to everyone who keeps on in this vain. Complaining does not lead to a solution. It leads to you silencing yourself. Sure, there are complaints to be made, and will be, but who will ever hear those complaints in this din of negativity? Not Trump. Not me. No one, that's who. No one will hear it, because they will have tuned it out long ago, much like you, I and everyone not on the far right tuned out Rush Limbaugh, and everyone not on the far left tuned out Bill Maher. People who have an audience only of people who agree with them have no advantage outside of the ability to sell corporate products, and that's what they do, whether it's koolaid or candidates.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 5:28 PM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Big problem with your post DREAMTROVE.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 5:31 PM
Quote:Originally posted by DREAMTROVE: I'm not a Trump supporter, but no way am I going to dwell on this. Election over. Moving on. Go ahead, impeach him, let's have a civil war. Install the unaccountable deep state coup and have Chuck Schumer create an intelligence panel to control CIA, NSA and JSOC, and go to war, and watch him put Hillary in charge of this new shadow govt. Sure, let's have a military police state. These are great ideas. They work well for Kim Jong Un. They're doing okay for ISIS. Make it happen. Just let me move first. My plan? run a better candidate in four years. Maybe start some sort of media group before then that doesn't insult the president so that it has some influence. But enough with the crazy and the Clintonista. Edit, Second. I've only been back a week and already I'm not reading THGRRI's posts, like, at all. This is what is happening to the left protests, it's what's happening to the left media. It's what will happen to everyone who keeps on in this vain. Complaining does not lead to a solution. It leads to you silencing yourself. Sure, there are complaints to be made, and will be, but who will ever hear those complaints in this din of negativity? Not Trump. Not me. No one, that's who. No one will hear it, because they will have tuned it out long ago, much like you, I and everyone not on the far right tuned out Rush Limbaugh, and everyone not on the far left tuned out Bill Maher. People who have an audience only of people who agree with them have no advantage outside of the ability to sell corporate products, and that's what they do, whether it's koolaid or candidates.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 5:38 PM
Quote:Originally posted by DREAMTROVE: Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Big problem with your post DREAMTROVE. Yeah, I read stuff that is addressed to me. I don't read people talking to hear themselves or collect followers who sound like campaign posters. MSM already dishes out tons of it, and I don't read that either. There's three positions THGRRI. Left, Right and Open-minded.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 6:10 PM
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 6:13 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: lol. See what I mean DT. THGRRI has already told us how he is completely non-partisan and he simply holds a monopoly on the truth. I think I'm going to take back my defense of his character when Sigs called him a troll and start ignoring him like you do. Do Right, Be Right. :)
Wednesday, February 22, 2017 6:20 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Ever heard the phrase “When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout”? I’m seeing more people all the time running in circles. They can’t move in a straight line toward a goal. It is as if they’ve got one shoe nailed to the ground. Life for those circling the drain is one frustration after another and they’re unaware of how silly they look, with only one leg propelling them. I see similar behavior from Trump. People close to him are aware of it, but not Trump. He feels frustration and anger that he is not getting what he wants. He expresses that on twitter and in unscripted speeches: The key to keeping Trump’s Twitter habit under control, according to six former campaign officials, is to ensure that his personal media consumption includes a steady stream of praise. And when no such praise was to be found, staff would turn to friendly outlets to drum some up — and make sure it made its way to Trump’s desk....A former senior campaign official said Nunberg and his successor, former communications director Jason Miller, were particularly skilled at using alternative media like Breitbart, Washington Examiner, Fox News, Infowars and the Daily Caller to show Trump positive coverage. www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/02/heres-primer-how-keep-donald-trump-under-control The people who run in circles want Trump to guide them straight. I don’t think he can do it, even from the White House. The argument that government competence is necessary for Trump to make things better is an argument made by people who have tried do good things in government without destroying institutions. Those people are deeply impressed by how difficult it is to improve the world through government. But they haven’t had the experience of just trying to destroy things or ratchet up tension. Their lived experience may not apply to the things Trump wants to do. Trump’s wants do not really require competence. Lucky for Trump. Next terror incident (we’re only into day 32 of Trump) he’ll do a Trump Smash. It’s like a Hulk Smash, but not as carefully planned as the Hulk’s. On that day I do hope Mike Pence is around to talk sense into Trump. www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/2/22/14658062/donald-trump-illiberalism-losing Quote:Originally posted by DREAMTROVE: I'm not a Trump supporter, but no way am I going to dwell on this. Election over. Moving on. Go ahead, impeach him, let's have a civil war. Install the unaccountable deep state coup and have Chuck Schumer create an intelligence panel to control CIA, NSA and JSOC, and go to war, and watch him put Hillary in charge of this new shadow govt. Sure, let's have a military police state. These are great ideas. They work well for Kim Jong Un. They're doing okay for ISIS. Make it happen. Just let me move first. My plan? run a better candidate in four years. Maybe start some sort of media group before then that doesn't insult the president so that it has some influence. But enough with the crazy and the Clintonista. Edit, Second. I've only been back a week and already I'm not reading THGRRI's posts, like, at all. This is what is happening to the left protests, it's what's happening to the left media. It's what will happen to everyone who keeps on in this vain. Complaining does not lead to a solution. It leads to you silencing yourself. Sure, there are complaints to be made, and will be, but who will ever hear those complaints in this din of negativity? Not Trump. Not me. No one, that's who. No one will hear it, because they will have tuned it out long ago, much like you, I and everyone not on the far right tuned out Rush Limbaugh, and everyone not on the far left tuned out Bill Maher. People who have an audience only of people who agree with them have no advantage outside of the ability to sell corporate products, and that's what they do, whether it's koolaid or candidates. The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Thursday, February 23, 2017 11:06 AM
Quote: Sockpuppet Okay, I'll bite. Trump is watching TV and all a-twitter. If so, then who's in the drivers seat?
Thursday, February 23, 2017 11:43 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SOCKPUPPET: Second, Okay, I'll bite. Trump is watching TV and all a-twitter. If so, then who's in the drivers seat?
Thursday, February 23, 2017 3:24 PM
Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:38 PM
Quote:Originally posted by DREAMTROVE: The conventional wisdom here is that it's a tug of war between Pence, Bannon, and Ivanka, unless you want the antisemitic redux, and then it's Israel, Breitbart and Kushner. I think if Breitbart had that much power, Milo wouldn't have just gotten the ax. Ivanka has his ear, and Pence has everyone else's. Still, I suspect he trusts his daughter more. I think Bannon will get the propaganda end, to pull the strings and make the Donald say unimaginably stupid drivel, and Pence will make all the energy deals for industry at the expense of everyone, and Ivanka will end up in charge of everything else. Unless there's a deep state coup. Here's what to look for: If control over JSOC, et al., is transferred away from Trump & Mattis, that's a coup.
Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:43 PM
Thursday, February 23, 2017 10:25 PM
Friday, February 24, 2017 9:56 AM
Friday, February 24, 2017 10:24 AM
Friday, February 24, 2017 11:36 AM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: If someone thinks a picture of a few hundred or even a thousand protesters implies a good chance Milo will be redeemed in the eyes of the public, someone is kidding themselves. Every time he has an event where he speaks his detractors are going to chant pedophile. Besides, there's no story of who is protesting and why. Are you sure that's not a crowd at an anti Trump rally? Cites please... Also, Bill Maher is guilty of saying the same thing as Milo and is having to answer for that now. The difference is that it is very conceivable that Milo acted out himself with minors. ---------------------
Friday, February 24, 2017 12:27 PM
Quote:Originally posted by DREAMTROVE: Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: If someone thinks a picture of a few hundred or even a thousand protesters implies a good chance Milo will be redeemed in the eyes of the public, someone is kidding themselves. Every time he has an event where he speaks his detractors are going to chant pedophile. Besides, there's no story of who is protesting and why. Are you sure that's not a crowd at an anti Trump rally? Cites please... Also, Bill Maher is guilty of saying the same thing as Milo and is having to answer for that now. The difference is that it is very conceivable that Milo acted out himself with minors. --------------------- It's actually the anti-Milo protest. I meant, look, millions of people want to overthrow democracy just because Trump won. Oh well, so much for the "they would never do that theory." CPAC dug up the Maher footage to doom Milo, that's openly known, as is the Milo-Pence feud. That it splashes back and hit's Maher, that's life. Will it doom Milo? I doubt it. Look back at my rant threads against Milo to see where I stand on that.
Friday, February 24, 2017 1:39 PM
Saturday, February 25, 2017 4:20 AM
Saturday, February 25, 2017 7:49 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Nope... Vox isn't News either.
Saturday, February 25, 2017 8:10 AM
Quote:Originally posted by G: It's not unreasonable to think if he continues on this path it will get even worse. It's early - but I believe he will hang himself eventually. I think it's up to how much the traditional conservatives hate him.
Saturday, February 25, 2017 8:23 AM
Saturday, February 25, 2017 9:12 AM
Quote:Originally posted by G: Millions of people don't want to overthrow democracy. They want Trump impeached. I believe that is part of democracy. He was not a popular vote election winner.
Saturday, February 25, 2017 9:21 AM
Quote:Originally posted by DREAMTROVE: Quote:Originally posted by G: Millions of people don't want to overthrow democracy. They want Trump impeached. I believe that is part of democracy. He was not a popular vote election winner. Unfortunately for them, he is. Because Wikileaks. Smartmatic. Sanders. Venezuela. Chavez. China. Lord Mark Malloch-Brown. Soros. Use the google. That's far too much information to ask someone source just because some reader doesn't know. Everyone knows how to use the internet. Because of cheating Bernie, she became our candidate, tried to cheat Trump, did cheat, but lost. We lost that election 59:41, because we had a traitor as a candidate. If people love democracy, why weren't they up in arms over Sanders' defeat? It was a known fraud long before the election. Not, mind you, that I love Sanders. Look at my years on the board decrying the evils of socialism, National Socialism, Soviet Socialism, Maoist Socialism, and all of their little spinoffs. In like 100 threads. But I voted for him anyway, because I think he told the truth. 2nd, 6, Ivanka is married to a Russian. That's all the connection you need. Okay, he's a pro-Russian president, like GHW Bush, FDR, and most of the people before him.
Saturday, February 25, 2017 10:03 AM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Whoa. Too much. Makes no sense. Wrong. Partially wrong. Totally wrong. Ya fired! People rose a stink about Sanders. It was yuge! I heard it. Second heard it. Discussed all over the press. All the time. @failing NYT
Saturday, February 25, 2017 10:18 AM
Quote:Originally posted by DREAMTROVE: 2nd, He made it there without my vote. There's a simpler answer: we had a terrible candidate. Si Shen, ?? A protest would have been more to the point. Karmically, it cost us the election. Not the fact that I didn't vote for HRC, because that would have been a disaster. But why even protest so you can get HRC? I didn't vote for Trump, but even I can see that he's closer to Sanders than Clinton is. But we can do better. And should. Which means try harder, and don't let someone steal your nomination, and don't for the love of God, blame Russia for what's clearly our own damned fault. Also, nice way to Snopes my post "not true," "partly true." Ya pick that one up from Trump in the debates? Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Whoa. Too much. Makes no sense. Wrong. Partially wrong. Totally wrong. Ya fired! People rose a stink about Sanders. It was yuge! I heard it. Second heard it. Discussed all over the press. All the time. @failing NYT There, fixed that for ya
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL