REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

War Never Changes - 'Ukraine’s counter-offensive is failing, with no easy fixes'

POSTED BY: JAYNEZTOWN
UPDATED: Saturday, July 22, 2023 05:40
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 130
PAGE 1 of 1

Saturday, July 22, 2023 5:40 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


Ukraine’s counter-offensive is failing, with no easy fixes
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/07/21/ukraines-counter-offensive
-is-failing-with-no-easy-fixes
/

I could post this int he 'Ukraine Bloodiest Day Yet to Come Thread' but maybe people will carve it up and end the endless bloody fight before it gets worse
Just as other nations Demilitarized Zone and parallel north split former countries into separate parts? Ukraine has taken back most of the lands it lost. Yet the Map changed a tiny bit in recent months, they said there would be gains in summer but over all has changed little. Most of the big movements and wins and loss and counter attacks and more winning came in the early part of the war.



The West, the USA, Europe NATO, got to test their toys, new shells, new bombs, New Flying Drone Boat High tech satellite stuff that destroys Russian equipment, superior weapons but as we seen in this war 'equipment' only goes so far an old rusty gun from WW1 can still be cleaned up and made kill, a weapon or explosive can be improvised. The USA tech was better than Russians during the ColdWar and modern US militray equipment its better again today.



So Putin perhaps got to flex some sort of 'might' with his Imperialism got to display he with his military is able to destroy cities.

Yet it has de-evolved into trench warfare, a Stalemate in the East?

I believe in the long run Putin looks weaker and more crazy

'Ukraine’s counter-offensive is failing, with no easy fixes'
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/07/21/ukraines-counter-offensive
-is-failing-with-no-easy-fixes
/
Quote:

With no significant breakthrough after six weeks, it is worth asking whether Ukraine’s counter-offensive can ever succeed, for it certainly doesn’t look to be succeeding now.



The question to be asked is: are the Ukrainians prepared – militarily, politically, financially – to carry out months and potentially years of these (frontal assault) attacks to penetrate 1914-18 style defensive belts of tank traps, barbed wire, minefields, bunkers and trench lines? The UK Ministry of Defence has described these Russian fortifications as “some of the most extensive systems of military defensive works seen anywhere in the world”.



Ukraine is already outnumbered in every military capability. Its dire shortage of armoured vehicles means that Kyiv is approaching this counter-offensive with immense caution. Many Nato-supplied tanks and infantry fighting vehicles were knocked out during early probing attacks and they are consequently holding most of the rest of these assets back to avoid too many more losses. That is understandable – yet only a bold, concerted assault with massed armour is likely to overcome the Russians.



From the Prediction thread

Quote:

Originally posted by K2PO:

- The war won't end this year.
- Russia peaked last summer in terms of its strength in this war relative to Ukraine. Despite their mobilisations they will fight more defensively than offensively this year. They will lose more territory than they gain, but Ukrainian victories won't be as stunning as last year as Russia has more manpower and a shorter front line to defend. Bakhmut will hold. More mobilisations and replacements of top Russian generals wouldn't surprise me - this year, or next.



Cluster Bombs will be used by both sides, anywhere between 1% to 5% or more will be unexploded, they will leave behind these little 'toy' looking objects to injure and kill civilians, including children.

The cluster munition weapon is a form of air-dropped or ground-launched explosive weapon that releases or ejects smaller submunitions. Commonly, this is a cluster bomb that ejects explosive bomblets that are designed to kill personnel and destroy vehicles. Other cluster munitions are designed to destroy runways or electric power transmission lines. The failure rate ranges from 2 percent to 40 percent or more. Because of the weapon's broad area of effect, they have often been documented as striking both civilian and military objects in the target area. This characteristic of the weapon is particularly problematic for civilians when cluster munitions are used in or near populated areas and has been documented by research reports from groups such as HRW,
https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20060624201843/http://hrw.org/repor
ts/2003/usa1203/usa1203.pdf

The other serious problem, also common to explosive weapons is unexploded ordnance (UXO) of cluster bomblets left behind after a strike. These bomblets may be duds or in some cases the weapons are designed to detonate at a later stage. In both cases, the surviving bomblets are live and can explode when handled, making them a serious threat to civilians and military personnel entering the area. In effect, the UXOs can function like land mines.

According to BankTrack, an international network of NGOs specializing in control of financial institutions, many major banks and other financial corporations either directly financed, or provided financial services to companies producing cluster munition in 2005–2012. Among other, BankTrack 2012 report names ABN AMRO, Bank of America, Bank of China, Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, Barclays, BBVA, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Commerzbank AG, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Crédit Agricole, Credit Suisse Group, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, Industrial Bank of China, ING Group, JPMorgan Chase, Korea Development Bank, Lloyds TSB, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Canada, Royal Bank of Scotland, Sberbank, Société Générale, UBS, Wells Fargo.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120825134655/http://www.banktrack.org/ma
nage/ajax/ems_dodgydeals/createPDF/cluster_munitions_producers

Many of these financial companies are connected to such producers of cluster munitions as Alliant Techsystems, China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, Hanwha, Norinco, Singapore Technologies Engineering, Textron, and others.


The impetus for the Cluster Munitions treaty, like that of the 1997 Ottawa Treaty to limit landmines, has been concern over the severe damage and risks to civilians from explosive weapons during and long after attacks. The Mines Advisory Group (MAG) is a non-governmental organization that assists people affected by landmines, unexploded ordnance, and small arms and light weapons. MAG takes a humanitarian approach to landmine action. They focus on the impact of their work on local communities. As part of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, MAG was co-laureate of the 1997 Nobel Peace Prize.

when video games tell you more about reality than your news?


War Never Changes

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, April 28, 2024 21:15 - 6324 posts
Another Putin Disaster
Sun, April 28, 2024 21:09 - 1514 posts
Elections; 2024
Sun, April 28, 2024 21:08 - 2315 posts
Russia, Jeff Sessions
Sun, April 28, 2024 21:07 - 128 posts
Scientific American Claims It Is "Misinformation" That There Are Just Two Sexes
Sun, April 28, 2024 21:06 - 25 posts
Dangerous Rhetoric coming from our so-called President
Sun, April 28, 2024 18:10 - 2 posts
You can't take the sky from me, a tribute to Firefly
Sun, April 28, 2024 18:06 - 294 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, April 28, 2024 15:47 - 3576 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Sun, April 28, 2024 02:03 - 1016 posts
The Thread of Court Cases Trump Is Winning
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:37 - 20 posts
Case against Sidney Powell, 2020 case lawyer, is dismissed
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:29 - 13 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:28 - 745 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL