Why are we moving backwards on civil rights??? Bad enough that Dumbya did it, but now Arizona is going nuts on its own![quote]A sweeping immigration bil..."/>

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Arizona Legislature sends immigration bill to gov

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Saturday, December 11, 2021 23:28
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2861
PAGE 1 of 2

Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:19 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Why are we moving backwards on civil rights??? Bad enough that Dumbya did it, but now Arizona is going nuts on its own!
Quote:

A sweeping immigration bill intended to ramp up law enforcement efforts in Arizona has been approved by state lawmakers.

Passage by the Senate on a 17-11 vote Monday sends the bill to Gov. Jan Brewer, who has not taken a position on the measure championed by her fellow Republicans.

The bill would make it a state crime for illegal immigrants to not have an alien registration document. It also would require police to question people about their immigration status if there's reason to suspect they're in the country illegally.

Other provisions allow citizen lawsuits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of immigration laws, and make it illegal for people to hire illegal immigrants for day labor or knowingly transport them.

http://www.accessnorthga.com/detail.php?n=228771

You do realize that "reason to suspect they're in the country illegally" gives the police power to stop ANYONE they can show they had "reason" to question? How far does/could that extend, I wonder...

Not only that, but:
Quote:

Now that Arizona lawmakers have passed what's considered some of the toughest immigration legislation in the country, other states are watching to see whether they should follow in the state's footsteps or stand back.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/21/arizona.immigration.bill/index.
html?hpt=T2

Say it isn't true!!!


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:12 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Bump 'cuz I can't believe nobody cares...for all we rant and rave and debate about things, to me crapping on civil liberties is worth talking about. Maybe that's just me tho'...


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:23 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


I'm sure PN is just torn to shreds on this one. On the one hand, it targets hispanics, so he loves that part of it. On the other hand, it's basically an update of the Nazi-era "Your papers, please" kind of laws that he rails against.

He probably can't tell if he just shit his pants or pissed himself. He's all twisted up!

Just remember, folks, this latest piece of totalitarianism is being brought to you by the Republicans and the Tea Party people.

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:27 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


How is this in ANY way 'moving backwards' on civil rights ?

Seriously.

The worst part about all this is that the border states are having to do all the heavy lifting on what has become a national crisis.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:36 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Niki, I think it's cause most folk who care at all about this issue are pretty sure the Arizona state government is quite, quite insane.

Come on, these are the folk who keep a nutter like Sheriff Joe Arpaio in power, which is about all the evidence one needs to prove it.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:44 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

Niki, I think it's cause most folk who care at all about this issue are pretty sure the Arizona state government is quite, quite insane.

Come on, these are the folk who keep a nutter like Sheriff Joe Arpaio in power, which is about all the evidence one needs to prove it.

-F



So, if you AGREE that there should be open borders, and rapists, thugs, drug runners, criminals and the like should all be granted equal access, and be lumped in with law abiding, hard working, honest and productive people, wanting to become full fledged citizens, then you " care " about the issue ?

Really?








Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:49 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


You may be right, Frem. But I think it's definitely something to rise up against, given it's unequivocally racial profiling and "papers, please" and would affect not only the police department's ability to go after REAL criminals, but surely require the expense of hiring additional cops, and the ways it could be abused by racist policemen is beyond MY imagination!

Just to have proposed it shows how insane Arizona is--added to their legislation that any candidate for Prez. has to show a birth certificate! We'll have to shove them down the map with Texas if they decide to secede, eh?

Of course, "Non-Maverick" McCain is right in there pushing it, yazzah... But then, who takes HIM seriously these days, either?


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:52 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

So, if you AGREE that there should be open borders, and rapists, thugs, drug runners, criminals and the like should all be granted equal access, and be lumped in with law abiding, hard working, honest and productive people, wanting to become full fledged citizens, then you " care " about the issue ?


They are, of course, all just what you described... yes, siree...Watch out, Craps, your racism is showing!

Exactly WHAT parallel universe DOES Crappy live in?


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:52 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

...it's unequivocally racial profiling


Ahhh yes... the standard " IT'S RACISM " cry.








Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:10 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


You're not worth responding to, but what the hell: "rapists, thugs, drug runners, criminals and the like" as describing who comes across the border is rather obviously illustrative of your racist bent.


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:12 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
So, if you AGREE that there should be open borders, and rapists, thugs, drug runners, criminals and the like should all be granted equal access, and be lumped in with law abiding, hard working, honest and productive people..


We already have those.

They're called Republicans.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:15 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:You're not worth responding to, but what the hell: "rapists, thugs, drug runners, criminals and the like" as describing who comes across the border is rather obviously illustrative of your racist bent.




So, does this selective reading slant ALL your views ? That would explain much.

What do you call the immigrants who come to our country who are " law abiding, hard working, honest and productive people, wanting to become full fledged citizens " ???

Or do you blanketly imply that anyone who crosses the border IS a rapist, a thug, a criminal, and that NO ONE could possibly come here who was law abiding, hard working, honest and productive... ??

Clearly, if anyone here is a bigot and a racist, it's YOU.

Why not try at being less of a coward and stop cherry picking my comments. Try dealing w/ the totality of my remarks, for a change.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:18 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Frem: Good one!

Crapper: Nice try, but it failed.


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:22 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:

Crapper: Nice try, but it failed.



The only one who failed is you. Too stupid to reply, too much a coward to try. All you have are your juvenile emoticons to speak for you. Sad.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:25 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
We already have those.

They're called Republicans.

-F



Ahh yes. Democrats. Model citizens.


















Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:22 AM

FREMDFIRMA


"AHHHH, YEEEESSS! FEED ME YOUR HOSTILITY, PIERCE ME WITH YOUR HATRED!!"


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:43 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
How is this in ANY way 'moving backwards' on civil rights ?

Seriously.

The worst part about all this is that the border states are having to do all the heavy lifting on what has become a national crisis.




Who SHOULD be doing the "heavy lifting" on this issue? The federal government? Isn't that a catch-22 situation? If they hire more border patrol agents at the federal level, you'll whinge and whine about the big government pushing the little bitty states around.

Should this be a states' rights issue? Or should it be a federal issue? And are you willing to stand behind the federal government if you say it IS a federal issue?

I don't see this as a "national crisis", but I'm not as fearful, paranoid, or easily manipulated as you are, either.

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:55 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

...it's unequivocally racial profiling


Ahhh yes... the standard " IT'S RACISM " cry.





Wait - are you trying to tell us that this will be applied to white people at the same rate it's used to hassle brown people? Care to put money on that?

Niki called it "racism" because it's using a law to target one race over another. That's pretty much a textbook case of racism, when you get right down to it.

Rappy, do you have YOUR immigration papers in order, in case you ever find yourself in Arizona? How can you PROVE that you're a U.S. citizen, with just the stuff you carry in your wallet?

Or do you naturally assume that YOU would never be asked such questions? And THAT is the racist part of it.

Just for the record, you know you're overreacting when your standard response is "Round 'em all up!" when it comes to certain races or groups of people.

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:59 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


"I'm not as fearful, paranoid, RACIST or easily manipulated as you are", crappy wind...there never WAS an "issue" where you're concerned. From the very first reply to me, all you've done is made racist, stupid, derogatory and assumptive cracks about what others have posted. That requires no response.



p.s. thank you Mike, but I doubt he'll make the connection even with you explaining it. Being racist often means you don't THINK you're racist, even tho' it blatantly obvious to everyone around you...sound familiar?

Or, how about, just before I leave for the day to get something actually CONSTRUCTIVE done:
Quote:

you blanketly imply that anyone who crosses the border IS a rapist, a thug, a criminal
No, crappy wind, that's what YOU did, remember?



Gotcha! Bye....


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 5:20 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

So, if you AGREE that there should be open borders, and rapists, thugs, drug runners, criminals and the like should all be granted equal access, and be lumped in with law abiding, hard working, honest and productive people, wanting to become full fledged citizens, then you " care " about the issue ?

Really?



So that's the dichotomy you see? If you're not with us, you're against us, eh? If you don't support draconian laws, concentration camps, and round-ups of suspected illegals, then you support open borders, rapists, drug runners, and thugs. Is that it? That's how you see it? Either or? No in between?

Huh.

In your own words,

Quote:


...simple minds want to deduce such things to, well, the most simple of terms.



Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 6:02 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Of course he does, Mike, you should know that by now.

Personality traits of high RWAs:

1) a high degree of submission to the established, legitimate authorities in their society;
2) high levels of aggression in the name of their authorities; and
3) a high level of conventionalism

The aggression is always there, the belief in established authorities, and the conventionalism.

And remember the fear thing?
Quote:

High RWAs tend to feel more endangered in a potentially threatening situation than most people do, and often respond aggressively.
He FEARS them, so that's what he sees, rapists, drug dealers, thugs, criminals AND THE LIKE. I guess all the "and the like" represents all those who don't fit those categories; but they're ALL out to get him, in his world. (I couldn't find the really relevant passage about "fear", which extends beyond "potentially threatening" to a much wider mindset; I know it's there, but don't want to search further as it's in pdf.)

Also,
Quote:

Why do high RWAs want to censor, for example, a racist when they themselves are
prejudiced? Because they don’t know they are, so a racist is a socially condemnable
outsider to them. Furthermore, experiments show authoritarian followers are turned
off by blatantly racist appeals. A skilled demagogue knows you play the “race card”
best by disguising it as something else, like law and order.

So you see, he can't see that his thinking reflects bigotry, he's been told to see it as "protecting" us by "law and order".

Put the two together, and voila; you could have predicted Crappy's response to this topic easily. I think most of us did.


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 6:11 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


I'm still awaiting PN's take on this issue. It might prove... enlightening, to say the least.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 7:14 AM

FREMDFIRMA


The really sad part is that it might well be more illuminating than Rappy's, and PN will prolly put more thought (such as it is with him) into it than Rappy does.

Makes me wonder sometimes who's crazier.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 8:00 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Oh, I've no doubt PN's the crazier of the two. He's also orders of magnitude more intelligent than Rappy. Crazy and smart often seem to be close acquaintances.

Rappy is nothing but a brainwashed mouthpiece for whatever talking point the right wants him to vomit forth today. PN serves a far more valuable purpose, often serving as the check valve on the stuff the MSM *DON'T* want us talking about.

Seriously, which one do you think would provide a more interesting dinner guest?


ETA: And yeah, Frem, that's why I've been waiting for PN's take on this. I knew before he even responded that Rappy would be down with the jackboots on this one. Anywhere the Republicans tell him to go, he goes. It's funny how he doesn't want this giant, big, bad government all up in everyone's business - until he DOES want them up in everyone's business. Well, everyone's business, so long as they're something other than lily white, that is.

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 8:29 AM

STORYMARK


Gotta love that the people bitching about Government interference will cheer on a step towards becoming a full-on police state.

As long as it's brown folks who have to show their papers, they're just fine with a bit of fascism.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 8:31 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

...it's unequivocally racial profiling


Ahhh yes... the standard " IT'S RACISM " cry.








Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."



A very appropo reply to fucking racism, you tool.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 9:25 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Frem,

Message received, and I couldn't agree more. I had the same thought!

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 10:38 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Well, it's not like I can help it, Authoritarians and their whole gig with extremist rationality at the expense of their own humanity sets off a strong desire to crush them utterly by drowing them in something they cannot comprehend, much less analyse, raw humanity unburdened by reason, kinda like Albedo here - the dude takes creepy to a whole new level.
(WARNING: Even though it's from a game, the entire clip is like oh-so-seriously disturbing!)



For those better read, that is also exactly how and why Johann Karlsen could consistently beat the Berserkers at every turn and corner, because by their nature the machines were fundamentally incapable of understanding that which makes us truly human.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berserker_%28Saberhagen%29

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 2:28 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Gotta love that the people bitching about Government interference will cheer on a step towards becoming a full-on police state.




I know; it's surreal, isn't it? It's as silly as the gunbunnies gathering in the national parks to scream that Obama's going to take their guns away - when he was the one who signed the legislation ensuring their right to take their guns into the national parks!

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 23, 2010 5:12 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signs US's toughest immigration law; Obama says you ain't arresting me bitch!

"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," Brewer said after signing the law. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a dangerous and unacceptable situation."

www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/04/23/2010-04-23_president_bara
ck_obama_slams_arizona_immigration_law_as_misguided_and_a_threat_t.html#ixzz0lz9Hy55H



I say bring the US military back to USA, put em on the border, and shoot to kill.

US troops killed 2.7-million Iraqis who never set foot on USA, so it's only fair to kill 2.7-million Mexicans. Not like we haven't done it before.

If any liberal Commies want to get in the way, so be it. Kill em all, let Gaia sort em out.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:30 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by piratenews:
Quote:

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signs US's toughest immigration law; Obama says you ain't arresting me bitch!

"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," Brewer said after signing the law. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a dangerous and unacceptable situation."

www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/04/23/2010-04-23_president_bara
ck_obama_slams_arizona_immigration_law_as_misguided_and_a_threat_t.html#ixzz0lz9Hy55H



I say bring the US military back to USA, put em on the border, and shoot to kill.

US troops killed 2.7-million Iraqis who never set foot on USA, so it's only fair to kill 2.7-million Mexicans. Not like we haven't done it before.

If any liberal Commies want to get in the way, so be it. Kill em all, let Gaia sort em out.




So it's not genocide or murder ("...it's only fair to kill 2.7 million Mexicans.") that you're worried about, and you don't mind the murder of American citizens ("If any liberal Commies want to get in the way... kill 'em all.") without any due process. So what's your problem with abortion, again?

I may have misspoken when I asserted that you were smarter than Rappy. Seems you don't really care about life, humanity, or anything else, just as long as there's a big body count you can jack off to.

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:33 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

I don't see this as a "national crisis", but I'm not as fearful, paranoid, or easily manipulated as you are, either.





That you don't see this as a national crisis only shows you're not as informed as me either.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:37 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Dammit PN -

That Gatlin Guns Blazin' video is about the coolest thing I've seen here ( even though most of the clips are just recycled and looped, over and over )


You suck.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:50 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

I don't see this as a "national crisis", but I'm not as fearful, paranoid, or easily manipulated as you are, either.





That you don't see this as a national crisis only shows you're not as informed as me either.



You said "informed" where you meant "brainwashed".

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 4:04 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

You said "informed" where you meant "brainwashed".



And that's the sum total of your argument. You can't offer up any substantive, reasonable reply, other than dole out insults and dismissive, personal comments.


The body of Rancher Rob Krentz and his dog were found shot to death on his ranch. Krentz, who always was good-natured and willing to help people, had called in that he had found an illegal alien at one of his watering holes and was assisting him. That was the last that was heard from him before his body was discovered.
Rob Krentz was a lifelong rancher in Southeastern Arizona, 12 miles north of the U.S./Mexico border and 25 miles northeast of the city of Douglas. He was the father of three children. The ranch has been in his family for three generations, more than 100 years - since 1907, and sits on about 35,000 acres with 1,000 head of cattle. Running a ranch is hard work and with the influx of illegal aliens increasing, Rob was at ground zero of the stampede that is destroying the fragile desert landscape.

The Krentz family has received numerous threats in the past by illegal aliens trespassing on their property. In 2002, the family was physically threatened when one of them stumbled upon a group of 39 illegal aliens. They were told to get off the land and they made threats. The Border Patrol did catch the illegal aliens after they were called, but we all know that illegal aliens, if deported, come right back across.

In 1999, Krentz and his wife Susan did an interview with PBS when they came around asking about the issue of illegal immigration and its impacts on the local ranchers.

http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/003355.html]

Violence Surges Along U.S.-Mexico Border
by JOHN BURNETT

February 12, 2006
John Burnett reports one the recent surge of violence along the U.S.-Mexico border. In the past weeks, gunmen have fired on U.S. Border Patrol agents, Mexican drug traffickers have attacked Texas lawmen, and last week, gunmen stormed the offices of a newspaper in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5203014


Thu Apr 1, 11:11 pm ET
MEXICO CITY – Mexican officials are responding to the decision of New Mexico's governor to send more National Guard troops to the border by calling for more cooperation with the U.S. on border violence.
The Foreign Relations Department says Mexico respects the right of U.S. authorities to determine how to provide security along their side of the border, but adds that increased cooperation is the answer.
The department's Thursday statement says U.S. officials should step up efforts to curb smuggling of weapons and cash into Mexico.
New Mexico ordered more National Guardsmen to the border this week to beef up surveillance after an Arizona rancher was shot to death. Investigators believe he was killed by an illegal immigrant who fled to Mexico. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100402/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_mexico_us_bor
der_violence


You ( hopefully ) get the idea. There'a a serious issue here, as was made plain back in '06, when Bush tried to address the issue, with what amounted to blanket amnesty. America stood up and didn't WANT that as the solution.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:12 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

And that's the sum total of your argument. You can't offer up any substantive, reasonable reply, other than dole out insults and dismissive, personal comments.
Wonderful; that's one I'm going to keep and throw back at you, because you do that more than anyone else here.

As for what you cited (thank you for specifics!), nobody is arguing that there isn't a major problem on the border; there is and we all know it.

The argument is against MAKING policemen accost anyone who LOOKS like they might be an illegal alien. It's totally absurd on the face of it; those actual criminals with the money will probably change their mode of dress, etc., and it'll be harder to recognize them...which means perfectly legal citizens will be accosted.

The ONLY possible good that will come of this is it will push the administration to get serious about the issue. We'll see.

But this is no solution. For one thing, anyone coming in from another state who doesn't know about the law (and there will be many; most people don't pay attention to, or remember, such things) runs the risk of being jailed because who in other states walks around with their "papers"? The guy on TV last night who said there are many ways to recognize illegals, by their dress, even their SHOES??? So, now warned, criminals can go out and buy different shoes, and only poor immigrants will wear "recognizably Hispanic" shoes. Great solution.

I assume you're one of those who wants every illegal alien in America hunted down and deported. It's just not possible, it's ludicrous to think it could ever be achieved. So some kind of immunity has to be established, some kind of "back-of-the-line" thing and work program. It's not that "America" doesn't want something done, it's that those who want immigrants deported don't want it, and those who have no problem with immigrants don't want to deal with it.

By lumping all illegal immigrants into the categories of "rapists, drug lords", etc., "and the like", you are omitting the VAST majorit of illegal immigrants and focusing only on the unsavory element, addressing the issue as if all illegal immigrants fall into that category. That is as racist as saying any cateory of people are all one thing or another. That IS racism, pure and simple. I know you can't see it, I imagine most racists can't see their own racism, but that is a perfect example of how it comes out.

This is going to pull cops off their protective duties, require money to hire more cops, destroy the trust between the cops and their community (which is where they get a LOT of cooperation in getting the actual criminals among them), give bad and/or racist cops freedom to abuse their power, harrass actual citizens who don't carry papers because they don't know about it, forget about it, or whatever, and cause a further rift between both illegal and legal-citizen Hispanics and the rest of the citizenry. Who WOULDN'T feel persecuted if only their own race were targeted?

This is not a good way to deal with the problem. It will cause more trouble than it solves, wait and see.


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:13 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

That you don't see this as a national crisis only shows you're not as informed as me either.



And that's the sum total of your argument. You can't offer up any substantive, reasonable reply, other than dole out insults and dismissive, personal comments.


Hey, that's pretty handy!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:19 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Numerous law enforcement agencies, by the way, are against the new law:
Quote:

The bill raises concerns by some in law enforcement because it is unfunded and may lead to racial profiling. It also allows individuals to sue local police departments if they believe they are not fully enforcing the law. Municipalities could be fined between $1,000 to $5,000 per day in such instances.

Arizona Association of Police Chiefs oppose the measure. It contends that it would hinder the investigation of more serious crimes and erode the trust between police and immigrant communities.

“We’ve opposed the law from the beginning,” said John Thomas, a lobbyist for the group.

Even the day before Brewer signed the bill, Mesa’s elected officials worried about the cost of jailing those arrested under the law. Mesa police told the City Council to expect more arrests and substantially higher jail costs.

“This is an unfunded mandate,” Mesa Mayor Scott Smith said. “There’s no money, just demands.”

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/153028
Quote:

AACOP STATEMENT ON SENATE BILL 1070

The Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police (AACOP) remains in opposition to Senate Bill (SB) 1070. The provisions of the bill remain problematic and will negatively affect the ability of law enforcement agencies across the state to fulfill their many responsibilities in a timely manner.

While AACOP recognizes immigration as a significant issue in Arizona, we remain strong in our belief that it is an issue most appropriately addressed at the federal level. AACOP strongly urges the U. S. Congress to immediately initiate the necessary steps to begin the process of comprehensively addressing the immigration issue to provide solutions that are fair, logical, and equitable.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/04/21/arizona-immigration-police/
Quote:

Arizona Sen. Russell Pearce (R) defended a wasteful new anti-immigrant bill with the claim: "The greatest threat we have to some of our neighborhoods is the illegal alien invasion." Maybe Pearce is lucky enough that the only "threat" to his neighborhood is undocumented immigrants trying to eke out a living there, but the state's police think some other threats are a bit bigger -- such as murderers and rapists, to name a couple

Under the proposed legislation, any nativist Tom, Dick, or Harry who thinks their city or county police department isn't doing enough to hunt down undocumented immigrants can sue over it. Never mind that, as Rep. Daniel Patterson (D) pointed out, this is an unconstitutional requirement: "The U.S. Constitution specifically gives the enforcement of our nation's borders and immigration to the federal government." Sure, everybody's all "law and order" until it comes to legislatures (or our favorite sheriff, Joe Arpaio) respecting federal jurisdiction.

Never mind that this is an unfunded mandate, which Pearce ludicrously claims will have "no cost." Local cops don't currently receive extensive training in understanding and enforcing complicated federal immigration law (you know, because it's not supposed to be their jurisdiction), so that will have to be paid for. And as Jennifer Allen of Border Action Network points out, skimping on the training is liable to open police departments up to racial profiling and wrongful arrest suits, when untaught cops are forced to enforce laws as best they can without official know-how.

http://immigration.change.org/blog/view/police_oppose_immigration_enfo
rcement_policies_in_arizona_and_texas
Quote:

San Francisco Police Chief George Gascon told CBS 5 that there are several consequences of the new law.

“For police officers it’s a severely unfounded mandate. They’re going to have to start aggressively seeking the immigration status of people that may not necessarily be committing any other violations,” said Gascon.

Chief Gascon also says the law is likely to give rise to lawsuits against police departments which will be costly and take focus away from other police work.

http://www.kcbs.com/pages/6882797.php?contentType=4&contentId=5982337


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:46 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:And that's the sum total of your argument. You can't offer up any substantive, reasonable reply, other than dole out insults and dismissive, personal comments.
Wonderful; that's one I'm going to keep and throw back at you, because you do that more than anyone else here.

You keep saying that, but it simply isn't true. Not even remotely.

Quote:

As for what you cited (thank you for specifics!), nobody is arguing that there isn't a major problem on the border; there is and we all know it.



Well, no one except Kwickie. To which those remarks I made were directed. But fret not, I'll not lay HIS idiocy at the feet of others.

Quote:


The argument is against MAKING policemen accost anyone who LOOKS like they might be an illegal alien. It's totally absurd on the face of it; those actual criminals with the money will probably change their mode of dress, etc., and it'll be harder to recognize them...which means perfectly legal citizens will be accosted.

But that's not what this law does. So, while you DO have a valid claim, it's really not applicable here on this matter.

Quote:



The ONLY possible good that will come of this is it will push the administration to get serious about the issue. We'll see.

Hey, we agree - sorta. The LAST administration sure as hell didn't have a reasonable plan, and the country sure let them know about it.

Quote:


But this is no solution. For one thing, anyone coming in from another state who doesn't know about the law (and there will be many; most people don't pay attention to, or remember, such things) runs the risk of being jailed because who in other states walks around with their "papers"? The guy on TV last night who said there are many ways to recognize illegals, by their dress, even their SHOES??? So, now warned, criminals can go out and buy different shoes, and only poor immigrants will wear "recognizably Hispanic" shoes. Great solution.

Well,if the guy on t.v. said it, then I guess that settles it.

Quote:


I assume you're one of those who wants every illegal alien in America hunted down and deported.

Hell yeah! Roll out all those unused school buses Nagin had down in N'awlins, slap some bars on the windows and drive them illegals the HELL out of dodge! WOOOOO HOOOo!!!
:Sarcasm:

Quote:

It's just not possible, it's ludicrous to think it could ever be achieved. So some kind of immunity has to be established, some kind of "back-of-the-line" thing and work program. It's not that "America" doesn't want something done, it's that those who want immigrants deported don't want it, and those who have no problem with immigrants don't want to deal with it.
Doesn't HAVE to be possible. All we need to do is
- control the border, and make it LESS inviting for folks to try to come in here ILLEGALLY.
- crack down on companies who employ illegals, there by making it NOT worth their while to risk paying pennies on the $$.

Quote:


By lumping all illegal immigrants into the categories of "rapists, drug lords", etc., "and the like", you are omitting the VAST majorit of illegal immigrants and focusing only on the unsavory element, addressing the issue as if all illegal immigrants fall into that category. That is as racist as saying any cateory of people are all one thing or another. That IS racism, pure and simple. I know you can't see it, I imagine most racists can't see their own racism, but that is a perfect example of how it comes out.

There's not a god damn thing "racist " about it. The flow of illegals contains its share of dirt bags. You cut off (or realistically, slow down ) that flow, you cut down the # of dirt bags IN that flow, and it makes them easier to spot. Hate to break it to ya sweetie, but those " unsavory types " are slipping in through the cracks, and causing all manner of chaos. All I'm saying is , plug those cracks, direct the legit immigrants through more regulated channels, while creating a more open, honest and coherent system.

Quote:


This is going to pull cops off their protective duties, require money to hire more cops, destroy the trust between the cops and their community (which is where they get a LOT of cooperation in getting the actual criminals among them), give bad and/or racist cops freedom to abuse their power, harrass actual citizens who don't carry papers because they don't know about it, forget about it, or whatever, and cause a further rift between both illegal and legal-citizen Hispanics and the rest of the citizenry. Who WOULDN'T feel persecuted if only their own race were targeted?

No it won't. They'll be doing what they already do. And there's no persecution going on here, what so ever. The only thing which separates illegals and anyone else is the law, not their skin color.
Quote:


This is not a good way to deal with the problem. It will cause more trouble than it solves, wait and see.

There already IS trouble, and this is the response. Is it the absolute BEST solution ? No, but in lieu of the Federal Gov't doing its job, it's the best thing yet.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:03 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Obviously you didn't bother to read the cites FROM POLICE AGENCIES saying it's a bad idea.

As to not MAKING police do what the new law mandates, yes, it is true:
Quote:

Further, the law allows for private citizens to “sue” a police department if they believe that they are not enforcing the law to their satisfaction.
http://www.hispanicvista.com/HVC/Columnist/HVC/Opinion/Commentary/0415
10_HVC_Editorial.htm


It is a MANDATE.

The guy on TV saying it is just an INDICATION of the mentality which will cause police to accost anyone who "looks" illegal. That mentality exists everywhere, and you know it. It also gives rise to racist police making an extra effort to harrass people they see as Hispanic, illegal or otherwise...which goes on already and this will make it legal.

As to cutting down the flow helping to cut down the "bad guys"...that's not what this will do. The bad guys will find ways to get around it, never doubt it, while everyone else who looks Hispanic risks jail time if they don't have their "papers".

As to the police themselves, as many of their agencies have said, it's an UNFUNDED mandate, as well. It WILL cost, that's been calculated.
Quote:

The only thing which separates illegals and anyone else is the law, not their skin color.
Oh, give me a break! They're going to pull over blondes, and tourists in t-shirts and shorts? Leave us not be redic!

It's not worth debating with you; your refutation of the facts I have presented shows you're unwilling to look at the realities of this law. I'll leave you to believe what you choose to believe; the FACTS speak for themselves.


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:39 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Posted by Rappy:

Quote:


As for what you cited (thank you for specifics!), nobody is arguing that there isn't a major problem on the border; there is and we all know it.




Well, no one except Kwickie. To which those remarks I made were directed. But fret not, I'll not lay HIS idiocy at the feet of others.




You seem to have some real problems with basic English comprehension, boyo. Please show me exactly where I said there isn't a problem on the border. I said there isn't a "NATIONAL CRISIS" - your words - in illegal immigration. As usual, you see bogeymen everywhere, and want to hide your head in the sand. Or in your ass, more commonly. It isn't a *national* crisis - it's a problem that border states have.

The idiocy here is entirely laid at YOUR feet.


Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:44 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Well,if the guy on t.v. said it, then I guess that settles it.



Well, in truth, that "guy on TV" IS a Republican representative in Arizona, so I'd say it can safely be assumed he's lying if his lips are moving...

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:54 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:


The argument is against MAKING policemen accost anyone who LOOKS like they might be an illegal alien. It's totally absurd on the face of it; those actual criminals with the money will probably change their mode of dress, etc., and it'll be harder to recognize them...which means perfectly legal citizens will be accosted.



But that's not what this law does. So, while you DO have a valid claim, it's really not applicable here on this matter.




Actually, that's exactly what this law does. From the text of Arizona S.B. 1070:

Quote:



A. NO OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY ADOPT A POLICY THAT LIMITS OR RESTRICTS THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS TO LESS THAN THE FULL EXTENT PERMITTED BY FEDERAL LAW.

B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).



ANY "lawful contact", an attempt "SHALL BE MADE", etc. This is legalese for saying that police MUST hassle anyone they suspect of being illegal. Not "MAY be made", but "SHALL be made". There's a difference, not that I expect you'll be able to figure it out.

As usual, you're lying, making shit up where you really have no idea what you're talking about. You really should stop; you're embarrassing yourself. Not that this is a new condition for you...


Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:07 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

ANY "lawful contact", an attempt "SHALL BE MADE", etc. This is legalese for saying that police MUST hassle anyone they suspect of being illegal. Not "MAY be made", but "SHALL be made". There's a difference, not that I expect you'll be able to figure it out.

As usual, you're lying, making shit up where you really have no idea what you're talking about. You really should stop; you're embarrassing yourself. Not that this is a new condition for you...




Doesn't say or mean anything of the sort. You're the one lying here, making shit up about what the law says when it plainly states nothing remotely what you claim it does.

" That's legalese for saying cops can come into your house, make a sandwich and take as many cheeze its as they like "

You're such a dumb ass. Because YOU blatantly misinterpret what something says doesn't make your case. Not by a long shot.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:04 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Wow. Just wow.

I knew you couldn't really comprehend English. I guess I never realized before that you can't even READ it.

Next you'll be telling me all about the 95% of people who pay no taxes.



Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:37 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Crappy, damn it, did you even READ where anyone who thinks the cops AREN'T stopping (or stopping enough) potential illegal aliens can be SUED?!?!

It is a MANDATE: "an authoritative command; especially: a formal order from a superior court or official to an inferior one". Can you grasp that? They bloody-well BETTER do as the law mandates, or they can be involved in a lawsuit, get it??

Not that there won't be tons of lawsuits anyway, if they already haven't begun. Because it's going to wreak havoc with law-enforcement agencies statewide.

Do you understand "unfunded mandate"? It means they're REQUIRED to do something, but they're not given any funds to hire extra cops to do it; ergo, the cops they have will HAVE TO spend a certain amount of time checking out "potential illegals" on any given day, time they would otherwise be using for real crimes, BECAUSE THAT'S THE LAW.

Try, Crappy, try to understand.


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:10 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


The current law in 49 states says:

Quote:

"That's legalese for saying illegal aliens can come into your house, make a sandwich and take as many cheeze its as they like"


After all, borders are bad, including your front door.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:02 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Crappy, damn it, did you even READ where anyone who thinks the cops AREN'T stopping (or stopping enough) potential illegal aliens can be SUED?!?!

It is a MANDATE: "an authoritative command; especially: a formal order from a superior court or official to an inferior one". Can you grasp that? They bloody-well BETTER do as the law mandates, or they can be involved in a lawsuit, get it??

Not that there won't be tons of lawsuits anyway, if they already haven't begun. Because it's going to wreak havoc with law-enforcement agencies statewide.

Do you understand "unfunded mandate"? It means they're REQUIRED to do something, but they're not given any funds to hire extra cops to do it; ergo, the cops they have will HAVE TO spend a certain amount of time checking out "potential illegals" on any given day, time they would otherwise be using for real crimes, BECAUSE THAT'S THE LAW.

Try, Crappy, try to understand.




I know Rappy is incapable of understanding the difference, but there really IS a difference between the words "SHALL" and "MAY" when they're written into bills. I know; I've run into that difference when it comes to concealed-carry permits. Some states have laws that say the Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO - usually the country sheriff or the chief of police) "MAY" issue such a permit upon completion of qualification and training, while other states say that the CLEO "SHALL" issue such a permit.

What's the difference? There are some counties and municipalities where it's LEGAL to have a concealed-carry permit, but no one has such a permit, because the CLEO *MAY* issue such a permit, but the law doesn't say he *SHALL* issue same. In other words, it's left completely to the CLEO's discretion, and if he happens to think that no private citizen is qualified to carry a concealed weapon, no matter what the law, the qualifications, and the training say, he simply won't sign off on ANY permits. It's also not discrimination, because he's not singling out any specific person or group; he just refuses to sign ANYONE's paperwork.

And that if the difference between "SHALL" and "MAY". One says you CAN do something, and the other says you MUST do it.

Again, I don't expect Rappy to admit he's wrong; he never has before; why break a perfect streak of being wrong and refusing to admit it?

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:33 AM

MAL4PREZ


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Try, Crappy, try to understand.

Oh, I think he understands. But he's here to piss people off, and stubborn misunderstanding works better for that.

When do we get that "ignore" feature on fff 2.0? It's the only cure for Rappy.

-----------------------------------------------
hmm-burble-blah, blah-blah-blah, take a left

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:11 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by mal4prez:
Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Try, Crappy, try to understand.

Oh, I think he understands. But he's here to piss people off, and stubborn misunderstanding works better for that.

When do we get that "ignore" feature on fff 2.0? It's the only cure for Rappy.



More and more, I think he's just here to make us laugh. His latest schtick is WAY beyond hilarious, and there's nobody on the planet who is actually stupid enough to believe any of it!

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Punishing Russia With Sanctions
Tue, April 16, 2024 02:04 - 504 posts
Dow Nearing 30K. Time For You To Jump Off?
Mon, April 15, 2024 21:24 - 106 posts
Elections; 2024
Mon, April 15, 2024 21:19 - 2245 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Mon, April 15, 2024 18:39 - 738 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Mon, April 15, 2024 17:54 - 366 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Mon, April 15, 2024 17:23 - 3519 posts
The Thread of Court Cases Trump Is Winning
Mon, April 15, 2024 15:32 - 18 posts
Have you guys been paying attention to the squatter situation in NYC? It's just escelated.
Mon, April 15, 2024 15:24 - 5 posts
As Palestinians pushes for statehood, Israel finds itself more isolated
Mon, April 15, 2024 13:44 - 284 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Mon, April 15, 2024 11:45 - 6234 posts
I agree with everything you said, but don't tell anyone I said that
Mon, April 15, 2024 11:37 - 12 posts
"Feminism" really means more Femtacular than you at EVERYTHING.
Sun, April 14, 2024 18:05 - 64 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL