GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Uncle Cecil Explains the Nielsens

POSTED BY: RADEGUND
UPDATED: Friday, February 21, 2003 09:21
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1282
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, February 21, 2003 6:42 AM

RADEGUND


Today's "Straight Dope" entry explains Nielsen ratings:

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/030221.html

Radegund

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 21, 2003 6:54 AM

LOSTANGEL


Quote:

The sample size isn't a few hundred thousand people, though--for daily ratings, called "overnights," it's just 25,000 homes (5,000 for national programming, 20,000 for local stations), which collectively are supposed to reflect the viewing habits of 106 million U.S. households in 210 markets. That leaves a pretty wide margin for error, you might think, and you wouldn't be the only one.


Ack! To me this is not logical. That sample size is not nearly enough to project the viewing habits of the entire US.

Also, the part of the TV execs not signing up for the improved rating system because it told them what they didn't want to hear is PROOF that these people are ostrichs and short-sighted insecure people that don't have the courage or the desire to say,"Well, we're not as popular as we thought we were, how do we change it?"

TV executive

______________________
Lost Angel

WASH: Psychic, though? That sounds like something out of science fiction.
ZOE: We live in a space ship, dear.
WASH: So?


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 21, 2003 6:57 AM

BRTICK


Quote:

Nielsen Media Research, an offspring of the firm founded in 1923 by market research pioneer Arthur Nielsen, recently began introducing new sampling technology that it hopes will depict local TV viewership with much greater accuracy. Early results have been controversial, mainly because, in highly simplified terms, they consist of the following:

Q: Do people actually watch all this crap?

A: No."



glad I'm not the only one that thought that.


Keep Flying!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 21, 2003 9:21 AM

BROWNCOAT1

May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.


I have always had trouble believing the Nielsen rating system could accurately depict the viewing habits of so many households w/ such a small sampling. A couple of people at the official board swear that the Nielsen system is sound and more accurate than any method. Personally, I think that is wishful thinking.

If this article is to be believed, it is a half hearted effort at getting a sampling of what people are watching. Personally it would be easier to contact cable providers and devise a system that would allow mass monitoring of what is being watched by viewers so they can get something a lot more accurate than Nielsen can provide.

"May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one."


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
A dead series?
Fri, December 19, 2025 13:29 - 17 posts
MERRY CHRISTMAS
Thu, December 18, 2025 12:41 - 8 posts
Where are the Extraterrestrial Civilizations
Thu, December 18, 2025 06:11 - 122 posts
Merry Christmas
Wed, December 17, 2025 17:46 - 8 posts
Best Movie Director
Mon, December 15, 2025 07:45 - 16 posts
The weird...offensive...plain odd side of the Internet?
Mon, December 15, 2025 06:58 - 6 posts
Best movie that only a few people know about
Sun, December 14, 2025 23:58 - 122 posts
Who would win in a war?
Sun, December 14, 2025 14:57 - 32 posts
Music Scores - the best suited to the Film/TV.
Sun, December 14, 2025 11:58 - 7 posts
Firefly and Marijuana
Sun, December 14, 2025 11:51 - 71 posts
Tarantino, and Joss Whedon. What if they made a movie together?
Sat, December 13, 2025 06:36 - 11 posts
Recommend me some shows
Thu, December 11, 2025 18:21 - 26 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL