REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

IRAN: Trump's war?

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 21:04
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 13643
PAGE 5 of 6

Tuesday, October 24, 2023 8:24 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


Biden faces ultimate test as Iran, which backs Hamas, warns of deadly consequences

https://www.foxnews.com/shows/media-buzz/bidens-ultimate-test-iran-bac
ks-hamas-warns-deadly-consequences


War Has Smashed Assumptions About Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/23/world/europe/israeli-hamas-middle-e
ast-implications.html


Iran's president Ebrahim Raisi and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman hold their first ever phone call

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12624039/Iran-MBS-Saudi-Hamas
-Isreal-call.html


Waltz Warns Iran Is Still Threat Even if Hamas Destroyed

https://floridianpress.com/2023/10/waltz-warns-ran-still-threat-even-h
amas-destroyed
/

Iran played Biden, and the world lost... again

https://www.yahoo.com/news/iran-played-biden-world-lost-093217973.html

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 24, 2023 9:09 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Iran is not the troublemaker in the Mideast, it's us (the USA).

If you want to examine why I say that, just look at what Iran is doing: It's sending its fighters into Syria TO DEFEND AGAINST REGIME-CHANGE operatives (USA troops illegally occupy NE Syria) who want to topple the SECULAR democratically-elected government of Syria.

It funds Hezbollah, which defends Lebanon against Israel and defends Syria against our continued regime-change operations.

It helps the Houthis in Yemen defend themselves from Saudi attacks, funded and aided by the USA.

And if you look at the arms used by Hamas, they're AMETICAN. And last I checked, thanks to sanctions, Iran doesn't have access to AMERICAN arms. So if we want to blame anybody for backing Hamas, we need to figure out how OUR weapons got into Hamas' hands.

*****

Unlike Saudi and USA-funded extremists, Iran does not fund head-chopping terrorists.

You really should get a better understanding of who we fund and what we're doing in the ME, JAYNZE.

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger

Loving America is like loving an addicted spouse - SIGNYM



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 12, 2024 9:52 AM

JAYNEZTOWN

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 14, 2024 6:11 AM

JAYNEZTOWN

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 16, 2024 12:06 PM

JAYNEZTOWN


Iran Launches Missile Strikes in Iraq and Syria, Citing Terrorist Attacks
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/15/world/middleeast/iran-iraq-syria-at
tack.html


WION



Red Sea attacks: Greek vessel hit by missile
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/15/world/middleeast/iran-iraq-syria-at
tack.html


Iran claims strikes on ‘Israeli espionage HQ’ close to US consulate in Erbil
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/iran-claims-strikes-israeli-espionage-234438
896.html

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 16, 2024 12:11 PM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

I think Trump was told that there was an imminent attack planned, and that it would be like another Benghazi or another Iranian hostage crisis and that he'd get the blame. And then he was told he could prevent it by killing this guy.

Who told him that?

That was the deep state once again faking "intelligence" to stampede Trump. Like the (false) pictures of dead ducks and sick children in Salisbury (Skripal event) which never happened, which caused Trump to expel a bunch of Russian diplomats, or the "gas attack" in Douma (revealed as staged by internal OPCW documents leaked by whistleblowers) which caused Trump to launch missiles on Syria.

Don't pretend that the deep state and neocon Repubs AND Dems haven't been jonesing for war ever since Trump was elected. They have been hounding Trump as "Putin's puppet" ever since then.

The thing that pisses me off is that this is the THIRD time that Trump would have been fooled. Doesn't he know by now that the deep state and the warhawks are looking for any excuse to plant their knives in his back, above and beyond concocting the Russiagate and Ukrainegate hoaxes?

C'mon Mr Trump, you can't afford to be THAT brain-dead about foreign affairs, if only for your own political survival!






Calling you stupid is an insult to stupid people; like Jack.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 14, 2024 4:56 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


old Joe Biden blamed Trump?



the channel is called 'The New World Order' a conspiracy type name, if it gets banned maybe vids can be found on another platform like Rumble or Bitchute?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 11, 2024 4:48 PM

JAYNEZTOWN


Trump campaign says its internal messages hacked by Iran

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4ge30ze4dpo

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 15, 2024 6:28 AM

JAYNEZTOWN

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, December 17, 2024 1:40 PM

JAYNEZTOWN


Jeffrey Sachs and 'Tucker'


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, March 10, 2025 1:46 PM

JAYNEZTOWN

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 11, 2025 8:14 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


Why Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, and why he wants to renegotiate now

https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-global/trump-ira
n-nuclear-deal-9876030
/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 18, 2025 12:31 PM

JAYNEZTOWN


‘Iran will suffer the consequences’ - Trump raises prospect of war with Iran as US attacks on Houthis continue

https://www.lbc.co.uk/world-news/iran-suffer-consequences-trump-prospe
ct-war-iran
/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 8, 2025 11:49 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


Trump says he'll be 'leading the pack' to war with Iran if deal prospects whither away

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-says-hell-leading-pack-war-iran
-deal-prospects-whither-away

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 19, 2025 9:18 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


The High Human Cost of Syria Sanction
https://dissidentvoice.org/2025/05/the-high-human-cost-of-syria-sancti
ons
/

and a list included Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Lebanon, Syria, Iran.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 19, 2025 11:03 AM

THG



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 19, 2025 11:03 AM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
PNAC: Project for the New American Century, a neoconservative think tank which advocated total world dominance by the USA military. GWB appointed quite a number of PNAC signatories.
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/pnac.htm

"Javanka": The combined influence of Jared and Ivanka Kushner. Jared is an avid pro-Zionist. It seems to me that, for him, Israel's interests come to mind first, before the USA's.

"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .





The Pontifical North American College is a bunch of religious nuts. Iran is run by a bunch of religious nuts. Trump wanted to nuke Iran in his first term. It was because he surrounded himself with professionals to head each government agency that he did not. They stopped him. You'll remember our top general put out orders that specifically said he was to be notified before any missiles were launched. This is why! Shit, Trump wanted to start lobing Nukes at hurricanes.

Trump has no such professionals surrounding him now. He is not well suited to handle the worlds' troubles.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 12, 2025 4:12 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


its on?

Palestine bombed to dust, blood and ash, Hezbollah and Hamas' military terror militia jihad military are decimated, weapons intended for Ukraine are now in the “Middle East”.

the crazy Israel claims everyone is trying to holocaust them and cannot go back to "normal" because there is no "normal" to go back to.
98% of Congress and Senate to stand up and cheer Benjamin Netanyahu

Israel is poised to launch operation on Iran, sources say
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/israel-is-poised-to-launch-operation-
on-iran-sources-say
/

What Can Pizza Tell Us About Ourselves?
https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/07/the-pizza-meter-was-a-staple-
of-1990s-pop-pseudoscience-we-should-revive-it.html
#
Probably nothing. But delivery-based data sure was amusing.

Quote:

“Bottom line for journalists: Always monitor the pizzas.”


The U.S. has ordered all embassies within strike range of Iran, including ones located in Europe and North Africa, to convene emergency action meetings and communicate back measures they are taking mitigate risks, per the Washington Post.
https://x.com/Osinttechnical/status/1932914482428236141


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 12, 2025 8:35 PM

JAYNEZTOWN


How many Iranians will be arriving at the US-Mexico and US-Canada border?

“7 countries in 5 years.”
https://x.com/Kanthan2030/status/1933034253610316165

Sounds of explosions (possibly secondary) in #Tehran tonight.
https://x.com/ThomasVLinge/status/1933321085862490459#m

Trump Acknowledges Israel Could Attack Iran Soon
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/12/us/politics/trump-israel-iran.html

Explosions ring out across Iran’s capital as Israel claims it is attacking the country
https://apnews.com/article/iran-explosions-israel-tehran-00234a06e5128
a8aceb406b140297299


Oil up 5%

Gold up $30

Smoke can be seen rising from Tehran, the capital of Iran,
https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1933315687738741184

Israeli air force carries out strike on Iran - reports
https://news.sky.com/story/israeli-air-force-carries-out-strike-on-ira
n-reports-13382967


Israel confirms it's launching strikes against targets in Iran.
https://x.com/TheIntelFrog/status/1933316598502183364

BREAKING: Israel’s airspace has been closed until further notice
https://x.com/Worldsource24/status/1933318185320616370

Explosions heard northeast of Iran's Tehran, state-run Nour News says
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/explosions-heard-northeast-i
rans-tehran-state-run-nour-news-says-2025-06-13
/

Israel is prepared to attack Iran as soon as Sunday if Tehran rejects a U.S. proposal that would place tough limits on its nuclear program, according to multiple US and Israeli officials.
https://x.com/Osinttechnical/status/1933277399275143267

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2025 9:36 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


so they also bombed civilian areas of the city and not those Nuke Sites?



The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed Iran’s nuclear sites in Isfahan, Fordow, and Bushehr were not impacted by Israeli airstrikes.
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1933423340695212429
Communication with Iranian officials established that the facilities

Quote:

Originally posted by THG:

Trump wanted to nuke Iran in his first term.



who said this code-pinko, the creepy gay Zeihan??

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2025 2:05 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.



Quote:

Trump Knew of Israel’s Planned Attack on Iran All Along
Edith Olmsted
Fri, June 13, 2025 at 6:45 AM PDT


Israeli officials say that their country’s deadly military strike on Iran was rubber-stamped by Donald Trump, despite his claims to have had nothing to do with it.

Just hours before Israel’s massive operation Thursday targeting Iran’s ballistic missile and nuclear facilities, military officials, and nuclear scientists, Trump claimed he was against an attack because it would “blow” ongoing diplomatic talks, which were set to continue this weekend.

Two Israeli officials told Axios, however, that Trump was lying and the president had only pretended to publicly oppose Israel’s military operation to “eliminate” ballistic missile and nuclear facilities, which was reportedly eight months in the making.

“We had a clear U.S. green light,” one Israeli official told Axios.



This is the same as Trump saying he "didn't know" that the Zelensky regime was going to attack Russian nuclear assets. The only difference is that Zelensky kept his mouth shut, but Bibi had to brag.

Now, who is going to negotiate with a President who uses negotiations merely to get the opposing side to let their guard down?

Nobody, that's who.

You can forget any kind of nuclear agreement with Russia, and probably Iran.

Quote:

In a phone call with Netanyahu Monday, Trump reportedly urged the Israeli prime minister to stop chatter about a potential strike on Iran. But Israeli officials told Axios that the call had really been about coordination ahead of the attack, and Netanyahu’s aides had lied to reporters.

The New York Times reported in April that Israel, which is not a participant in the ongoing nuclear talks, had made plans to attack Iranian nuclear sites that were waved off by Trump, who wanted to continue negotiating with Tehran. The White House made it clear, at least publicly, that if Israel wanted to strike it would do so alone.

On Wednesday, some U.S. personnel were evacuated from the region, including from Baghdad and Bahrain, citing security concerns. When asked what Israeli officials had told him that prompted the evacuations, Trump said, “They didn’t tell me anything, but I said look, there’s a chance of massive conflict.”

For a guy who says he had nothing to do with the attack, Trump has been quick to use the strike as leverage.

“Iran should have listened to me when I said—you know I gave them, I don’t know if you know but I gave them a 60-day warning and today is day 61. They should now come to the table to make a deal before it’s too late. It will be too late for them,” the president told CNN.

He also said that the strike had killed some of the people who’d been part of nuclear talks. “You know the people I was dealing with are dead, the hard-liners,” Trump added. Iran’s top negotiator in the nuclear talks, Ali Shamkhani, has been confirmed dead.

When asked by The Wall Street Journal Friday what kind of heads-up Israel had given the U.S. about the impending strike, Trump replied, “Heads-up? It wasn’t a heads-up. It was, we know what’s going on.”



In other words, Trump was "in the loop" all along.

Just to clarify: Most analysts in alt media think this has NOTHING to do with Iranian nuclear weapons, and everything to do with REGIME CHANGE in Iran. (Just like attacking Russian nuclear assets and deliberately killing civilians on a passenger train has nothing to do with winning the war in Ukraine and everything to do with regime change in Russia.)

The only person in alt media who thinks that Iran has a nuclear weapons program is Scott Ritter, former Marine and USA and UN* nuclear weapons inspector. (He was part of a team that enforced the SALT treaty with Russia, and part of Hans Blix's UN team inspecting Iraq for WMD, BEFORE we invaded Iraq.)

I tend to agree, but also disagree. In his view, Iran has all the important pieces for a nuclear missile: 60% enriched uranium* (one step away from weapons grade), and hypersonic ballistic missiles that can reenter without frying their control systems, or potential nuclear warheads. The only remaining steps are to enrich to 90% and to build an actual nuclear warhead.

* There's no reason to enrich uranium to 60% except for weapons, since only 3-4% is needed for civilian power generation.

What I see is that Iran is continuing with its weapons program, however reluctantly, not because it wants to build nuclear bombs, but because it's trying to create bargaining chips. It won't give away its capability for free, and (being stubborn) doesn't want to be beaten into submission.

The "sticking point" in the negotiations... whether Iran could enrich to 3.7%, enough for civilian power generation, was entirely artificial. There was NO critical reason to insist on 0% enrichment, and Iran sees nuclear power as important for its future.

Also, altho Natanz was struck, the actual nuclear facility is deep underground, and can't be reached by conventional weapons, Scott Ritter says.

So this attack was, in reality, a decapitation strike for "regime change".


On the one hand, Iran is suffering economically from sanctions. Hard to get a good "read" on popular opinion, but I imagine that there is some discontent with official policy, especially the focus on military spending and support for Hezbollah and Syria, both of which failed. (Ansarallah, i.e. Houthis, seem to be pretty self sufficient. ) I imagine- and this is just my guess- that Iranians could reasonably be saying "We wouldn't be so poor if our government stopped hemorrhaging money into foreign entities. It's nice to feel morally superior, but they're sacrificing our development for somebody else". They DID vote for a moderate, pro-negotiation president after all.

Israel's strikes on Iran may have caused the populace to wilt further. OTOH, the people of Iran may be coming to the realization that Israel, and by extension the USA, are firmly committed to Iran's destruction, no matter WHAT Iran does or doesn't do. Negotiations are just a charade.

And Iran has a lot of missiles, most of them likely still intact, and powerful friends in China and Russia. Russia and Iran have SOME sort of security agreement, nobody in the west knows exactly what. Iran also has the straits of Hormuz, thru which most ME oil and gas flows, under its control. Saudi Arabia has a lot at stake with what happens next.

Trump burned A LOT of bridges with this move. A LOT.

What next?

*****


Fuck Israel.
Fuck Trump.

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2025 3:32 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Nobody cares.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2025 11:04 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Nobody cares.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

People will when gas goes to $10/ gal and American bodies start coming home. We, Trump's base, didn't vote for him to keep us in one forever war, and then get us into another.

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2025 12:38 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Nobody cares.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

People will when gas goes to $10/ gal and American bodies start coming home. We, Trump's base, didn't vote for him to keep us in one forever war, and then get us into another.

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA





Sure. Okay.

I'm just asking why there's any reason I should believe anything anybody is saying about what's going on today any more than I should have believed what they've been saying about Ukraine since 2014. Or WMD's. Or whatever the fuck they get people terrified about.

You're usually Mrs. Skeptical, but for whatever reason this one has you as spooked as they got you with Covid. I haven't thought about it all day.

I've been hearing this shit all my life, and a quadruple dose of it every day for the last 12 years of it.

Don't give a shit.

If the end of the world is coming, it's coming.

What does that have to do with me?

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2025 2:03 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Oh, I'm skeptical about the "reasons" for the war.

This time, someone convinced Trump that striking Iran with missiles and drones will give him "leverage" in "negotiations" about Iranian "nuclear weapons". Very similar to him being convinced that attacking Russia'snuclear assets would force Russia to agree cease fire.

Like somebody convinced brain-dead Bush that Iraq had WMD.

Like Biden and Ukraine. Biden would draw red line after red line for his admin, only to cave a few months later.

Different President.

Same shit.

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2025 2:04 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Oh, I'm skeptical about the "reasons" for the war.

This time, someone convinced Trump that striking Iran with missiles and drones will give him "leverage" in "negotiations" about Iranian "nuclear weapons". Very similar to him being convinced that attacking Russia's nuclear assets would force Russia to agree cease fire.

Like somebody convinced brain-dead Bush that Iraq had WMD.

Like Biden and Ukraine. Biden would draw red line after red line for his admin, only to cave a few months later.

Different Presidents.

Same shit.

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 15, 2025 8:53 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

The Zionists are Crying, “Uncle Sam”

14 June 2025 by Larry C. Johnson 414 Comments

Israel’s initial euphoria over its Friday morning strikes on Iranian targets is fading as Israeli inhabitants get a taste of their own medicine. Israel’s much touted Iron Dome is a total bust. I have posted a couple of videos below that show the Iranian missiles arriving unimpeded.

In his latest video, BORZZIKMAN reports that the Iranian strike yesterday on the IDF version of the Pentagon destroyed a THAAD air defense system that was deployed to “protect” the building.



Pepe Escobar was interviewed earlier today by Nima and provided some important news from his impeccable Russian sources. Israel, with help from the West, hit Iran with a cyberattack early Friday morning (Tehran time) that disabled Iran’s air-defense system. Israel and the West anticipated this would disable Iran’s ability to track and attack inbound missiles for several days. According to Pepe, Iranian technicians got the system up and running in 10 hours.

The Potemkin Village propaganda generated by Israel and spread by Western media is coming apart at the seams. While many in the West still believe that Israel has struck a fatal blow on Iran and that Iran is just days away from a collapse, the Iranian missile force is alive and well and bombing the shit out of Israel. I suspect that Iran is employing Houthi tactics with their ballistic missiles that are fired from mobile launchers — i.e., instead of relying on fixed sites, Iran is deploying its missiles around the country on mobile launchers, which are virtually impossible to detect and destroy in a timely manner. As I write this, Iran reportedly has launched an eighth-wave of missiles. Iran is going to engage Israel in a tit-for-tat battle until Israel ceases its attacks on Iran.

The following report from AXIOS is indicative of Israeli panic:



The following videos highlight the problem confronting Israel… it can’t stop Iranian missiles.

[The videos aren't available in YouTube. You'll have to go here to see them:
https://sonar21.com/the-zionists-are-crying-uncle-sam/ ]

Another reality confronting Israel is that the United States does not have unlimited supplies of air defense missiles, and other weapons, to send to Israel. For example, consider the limitations of the THAAD and SM-3 antiballistic missile systems… the US can only manufacture 50-75 THAAD and 60-84 SM-3 interceptors per year! I read another report today — can’t find it now — that the US is sending weapons intended for Ukraine to Israel. I’m sure Zelensky will be thrilled with that news. If this report is true, Ukraine’s days are numbered. Without sustained US military and intelligence support, Ukraine cannot sustain its military operations through the summer.

I want to remind you of the Strategic Partnership Agreement that Russia and Iran signed on January 17. Here are the critical sections pertaining to the current war with Israel:

Article 3

3. In the event that either Contracting Party is subject to aggression, the other Contracting Party shall not provide any military or other assistance to the aggressor which would contribute to the continued aggression, and shall help to ensure that the differences that have arisen are settled on the basis of the United Nations Charter and other applicable rules of international law.


So, what does this mean? The right to self-defense is recognized in Article 51 of the UN Charter, which allows countries to defend themselves if an armed attack occurs. This self-defense must be:

In response to an actual armed attack
Immediate and necessary
Proportional to the threat

Israel’s attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, under the terms of this agreement, means that Iran, with Russian support, will be fully entitled to respond militarily. Russia sent Israel and the United States a clear warning… Russia has Iran’s back.

Article 4 is particularly revealing because it admits that Russia and Iran have separate agreements governing cooperation between their respective intelligence and security agencies:

Article 4

2. The intelligence and security agencies of the Contracting Parties shall cooperate within the framework of separate agreements.


Article 5 reveals that Russia and Iran have agreed to a comprehensive level of military cooperation that covers everything from training to military exercises to responding to attacks:

Article 5

1. In order to develop military cooperation between their relevant agencies, the Contracting Parties shall conduct the preparation and implementation of respective agreements within the Working Group on Military Cooperation.

2. The military cooperation between the Contracting Parties shall cover a wide range of issues, including the exchange of military and expert delegations, port calls by military ships and vessels of the Contracting Parties, training of military personnel, exchange of cadets and instructors, participation – upon the agreement between the Contracting Parties – in international defence exhibitions hosted by the Contracting Parties, conduct of joint sports competitions, cultural and other events, joint maritime relief and rescue operations as well as combating piracy and armed robbery at sea.

3. The Contracting Parties shall interact closely in holding joint military exercises in the territory of both Contracting Parties and beyond by mutual consent and taking into account the applicable generally recognized rules of international law.

4. The Contracting Parties shall consult and cooperate in countering common military and security threats of a bilateral and regional nature.


Donald Trump came into office with the backing of millions of voters who believed his promise not to embroil the US in needless foreign wars. Looks like he is breaking that promise. He apparently learned nothing from George HW Bush, who promised, “no new taxes,” and then broke that promise. Voters did not forgive him. If Trump intervenes on behalf of Israel, he will likely suffer a similar political fate; only instead of not being re-elected, he will see his political support among a key segment of his base crumble



-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 15, 2025 8:58 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Oh, I'm skeptical about the "reasons" for the war.

This time, someone convinced Trump that striking Iran with missiles and drones will give him "leverage" in "negotiations" about Iranian "nuclear weapons". Very similar to him being convinced that attacking Russia's nuclear assets would force Russia to agree cease fire.



I don't think anybody convinced him about anything.

Whether or not Trump knew that Israel was going to do this beforehand, this DID give him leverage with negotiations with Iran on nuclear weapons. I'd say it's given him leverage with any negotiations with them on any topic. The only question is, is this now taking advantage of a fortunate opportunity, or was Trump behind it?

That's really not a question I want to know the answer to because if it comes out that Trump was behind it and Iran finds out about it that's bad news for everyone. Better for everyone not to know.

Quote:

Like somebody convinced brain-dead Bush that Iraq had WMD.


Not like that at all, for the reason stated above.

Quote:

Like Biden and Ukraine. Biden would draw red line after red line for his admin, only to cave a few months later.

Different Presidents.

Same shit.



I don't think so in this case.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 15, 2025 11:03 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Israel's attack on Iran won't give Trump leverage, unless we manage to overturn the Iranian government completely.

And I smell a lot of "if" coming off that plan.

*****

Did you notice the close parallel between Israel's actions and Ukraine's? Both are USA proxies. Both are in negotiations, and both attacked while negotiating and literally a day before the next scheduled negotiation.

So, when it was widely thought that Israel engineered a lightning victory, Trump was happy to claim credit. After a phone call from Putin, Trump is reduced to diasvowing, whining, and threatening.

Somebody, take his access to Truth Social away from him! He's his own worst enemy, and he would help his Presidency immensely if he'd just STFU.



-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 12:25 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


I think you may be looking at all of this through a far too conventional lens.



--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 3:11 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I think neocons keep working the same playbook over and over.

Here's part of the problem

Quote:

Senate unanimously adopts resolution stating support for Israel


Here's the other part of the problem:

Trump, 4 days before Ukraine attacked Russian nuclear assets and launched a terror attack on a passenger train
Quote:

What Vladimir Putin doesn’t realize is that if it weren’t for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD. He’s playing with fire!
May 27, 2025, 8:44 AM


Trump, after he thought the Ukrainian attack was a success
Quote:

Trump has hailed Ukraine's daring "Operation Spiderweb" attack as "strong and badass".
The US president heaped praise on Volodymyr Zelensky for his calculated drone assault plan - but warned it has only made a raging Vladimir Putin even crazier.



Trump, when he thought Israel had a lightning victory:

And
Quote:

"We knew everything, and I tried to save Iran humiliation and death. I tried to save them very hard because I would have loved to have seen a deal worked out,"


Trump, after a phone call with Putin
Quote:

Trump says US 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran' as nuclear talks are called off


Who does he think he's fooling? His problem is, he'll climb onboard whichever side if an argument he thinks is winning that moment. He hates to be SEEN AS losing. So instead of actually coming up with a winning plan, he threatens and pretends to negotiate. In reality, he's just along for the ride.

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 8:35 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Who does he think he's fooling? His problem is, he'll climb onboard whichever side if an argument he thinks is winning that moment. He hates to be SEEN AS losing. So instead of actually coming up with a winning plan, he threatens and pretends to negotiate. In reality, he's just along for the ride.

There’s a bitter clash on the right. It could determine whether Trump takes us to war.

The America Firsters hoped to push Trump away from the hawks. The Israel-Iran conflict shows that isn’t so easy.

By Andrew Prokop | Jun 16, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT

https://www.vox.com/politics/416742/trump-iran-israel-war-america-firs
t-tucker-carlson-china


For months, leading up to Israel’s attacks on Iran last week, an intense and bitter battle has been underway on the American right — a battle for influence over President Donald Trump’s foreign policy.

The core assumptions that have guided Washington’s approach to the world for 80 years are suddenly up for debate. The global balance of power, the outcome of life-and-death conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, and more momentous future questions of war and peace all hang in the balance.

GOP foreign policy has long been steered by hawks, who see the US as locked in a struggle for global dominance against hostile and dangerous foreign powers. They’re willing to threaten — and, in some cases, use — military force to achieve American ends. During his first presidential campaign, Trump broke with the hawks on some key issues, but his first-term governance was largely hawkish in practice.

In the past few years, though, an “America First” faction came together to try and push Trump’s second term in a different direction. Deeply skeptical of “neocons,” foreign entanglements, and “forever wars,” they’ve competed with the hawks over administration jobs, tried to swing the MAGA base to their side, and worked to win Trump over in private.

Leading their fight was an unlikely foreign policy power trio: Tucker Carlson, Donald Trump Jr., and Vice President JD Vance. The three are like-minded in their loathing for the establishment and are also personal friends. It is not uncommon, in Washington, to hear talk of a “JD-Tucker-Don Jr.” axis of American foreign policy. Their increased influence meant Washington’s hawkish consensus was facing perhaps its most serious challenge in decades.

At times since January, it has seemed the America Firsters were winning. In April, when Israeli officials presented Trump with a plan to strike Iran, he rejected it in favor of pursuing negotiations over their nuclear program instead. Pro-Israel hawks were deeply worried about the concessions Trump’s team might make.

But as talks stretched on without success and Israel became more determined to strike, Trump decided not to stand in their way. The Israeli operation began Thursday night, killing many top Iranian military leaders and targeting nuclear sites. The hawks were overjoyed. Trump officials initially characterized the attack as a unilateral Israeli decision. But soon, the president began taking some credit for it, though he insisted a deal with Iran was still possible.

Carlson had spent months urging Trump not to get involved. “The greatest win would be avoiding what would be the true disaster of a war with Iran, which would not stay in Iran, of course,” he told me in an interview at the beginning of this month. He’d warned that US participation in a strike would be “suicidal” and that “we’d lose the war that follows.”

The US is not at war with Iran yet. But the chances we’ll be drawn into one are rising. So though Democrats generally despise the America Firsters’ domestic politics, dismiss them as bigots and xenophobes, and are appalled by their calls to abandon Ukraine — it’s worth noting that they’re the leading GOP figures opposing war with Iran.

The America Firsters have also called for rethinking the US’s approach to the world more broadly. That not only includes questioning our involvement in NATO, but also questioning the logic that could lead the US into a major war with China over Taiwan. Generally, they doubt that trying to run the world helps Americans.

The hawks dismiss them as dangerously naive, arguing that pulling back US involvement abroad would actually make war more likely — our enemies will run rampant, they say, if we don’t check their influence.

The America Firsters argue just the opposite: that it’s our meddling attempts to run the world as if we’re still the sole superpower that court disaster. “We’re not going back to a unipolar world,” Carlson told me. “It’s not going to happen. But I guess we could have a nuclear war over it — and we may.”

Inside this story

How JD Vance, Tucker Carlson, and Donald Trump Jr. came together to oppose aiding Ukraine — and then gained influence over Trump’s second term
The leaks, firings, and factional knife-fighting roiling Trump’s foreign policy appointments
The right’s tense debate over whether to seek a deal with Iran or back an Israeli attack
The qualms some on the right have over US military strategy to check China in Asia
Have the hawks now gained the upper hand in influencing Trump?

The power of the hawks

In many ways, this is just the latest flare-up of a long-running tension inside the American right — one that’s existed since the US emerged as a major global power at the start of the 20th century.

Back then, hawkish interventionists pushed for the US to join both world wars and protect the peace afterward. But the isolationists didn’t want to get bogged down in intractable foreign conflicts or send their sons to die in foreign lands. They supported, they said, America First. World War II gave the interventionist hawks the upper hand, and in the Cold War, the hawks held sway again, arguing the US had to intervene abroad to prevent communism from overrunning the world.

The ’90s brought a brief revival of isolationism championed by figures like Pat Buchanan, who questioned why, with communism defeated, the US needed such extensive overseas involvement. But 9/11 cemented the hawks’ dominance again, confirming to many that the US had to fight foreign enemies over there, or they’d fight us over here. Buchanan criticized President George W. Bush’s Iraq War as the work of a “cabal” that included “neocons,” but few on the right cared.

Keywords of the right’s foreign policy debate

Neoconservatives: Critics of the hawks frequently call them “neocons,” which is nowadays mainly a pejorative meant to disparage them as plotting to embroil the US in foolish wars. Back during President George W. Bush’s administration, the neoconservatives were a subgroup of hawkish intellectuals who argued that war to depose the Iraqi government could help spread democracy across the Middle East. (Typical hawks don’t necessarily share this rosy view of spreading democracy.)

America First: Many skeptics of intervention abroad have long used the phrase “America First” to describe their views. President Woodrow Wilson used the slogan in his 1916 reelection campaign — though, after winning, he entered World War I. Later, as World War II raged, the America First Committee argued vociferously against US involvement. Its most prominent member was the famous aviator Charles Lindbergh, who said in a speech that “the Jewish” were among those pushing the US toward war. Trump revived the “America First” term during his first presidential campaign to signal a break with the GOP establishment.

Carlson, then the co-host of CNN’s Crossfire, had supported the war. But on a December 2003 trip to Iraq, in which he spent time outside the Green Zone, he soured on it: “I saw the opposite of what I expected to see, chaos and confusion and disorder and violence,” he told me. The following year, he was quoted in the New York Times voicing regret: “I supported the war and I now feel foolish.” The pushback from the right, he says now, was furious: “I was absolutely hated for that by people I knew well and worked with and was friends with.”

Indeed, the adamant pro-war consensus among GOP elites and rank-and-file Republicans persisted even as conditions in Iraq worsened. And hawkishness continued to reign supreme on the right: Republicans criticized President Barack Obama for showing weakness toward Iran and Russia or for withdrawing from Iraq too soon. The only foreign policy critique they could imagine was a hawkish one, and the only solution was more hawkishness.

Saying the Iraq War was a mistake or failure was unthinkable. Until, that is, Trump said it.

During his first presidential bid, in 2015, he trashed the war as a debacle and a “tremendous disservice to humanity” — suddenly giving the isolationists in the party, long an irrelevant fringe, a new life. In this, he was voicing what an increasing number of Republican voters had come to believe — that the war had failed.

Trump’s heresies went further. He wanted to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan and Syria. He had friendly things to say about Russian President Vladimir Putin — which was so unusual for a mainstream politician that many wondered whether he was being blackmailed or bribed. He disdained NATO, widely viewed as the protector of peace in Europe, as an expensive waste. Yet he also had some more typical hawkish instincts, calling for more confrontation of China and Iran and promising to “bomb the shit out of” ISIS.

Yet while Trump embraced the “America First” label in practice, much of his first-term policy was steered by the hawkish establishment — sometimes to Trump’s enthusiasm, sometimes to his frustration.

His “maximum pressure” sanctions on Iran escalated a tit-for-tat shadow war; eventually, Trump had top Iranian general Qasem Soleimani assassinated and a full war seemed quite possible. He waged a trade war with China and deepened ties to Taiwan with arms sales and military activity. His efforts to withdraw troops from Afghanistan and Syria kept getting slow-walked by top advisers. And his friendly words for Putin had little substantive impact; tough sanctions on Russia remained in place, and the US kept arming Ukraine and stayed in NATO.

How Carlson, Trump Jr., and Vance helped turn the right against Ukraine – and rose to greater influence

Tucker Carlson and VP nominee JD Vance joined Trump at the Republican National Convention, July 15, 2024 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

The most important challenge to the hawks during Trump’s first term played out at 8 pm Eastern, every weeknight.

This was when Tucker Carlson held the airwaves, using some of the most valuable airtime in conservative media — really, all media — to try to shape and articulate a distinct ideology that would appeal to the MAGA base. To this end, he indulged Americans’ bigoted and xenophobic impulses, promoted conspiracy theories, and became loathed by liberals. But he also directed much of his ire at the GOP’s establishment — and reserved particular scorn for the foreign policy hawks.

Carlson often used his airtime to poke holes in hawkish arguments and warn against war. After Soleimani’s killing in 2020, he said that the “neocon objective” was war with Iran and regime change but asked, “Is Iran really the greatest threat we face? And who’s actually benefiting from this?”

He was, essentially, waging a war of ideas for the future of the Republican Party — and trying to give the MAGA faithful a different, non-hawkish way to think about these issues.

The hawks’ lonely critics on the right were grateful. “Tucker’s the mothership,” Curt Mills, executive director of the American Conservative — a magazine Buchanan co-founded — told me. Carlson was a skilled entertainer and clever debater who could go highbrow and lowbrow.

He could also be very persuasive — in public and in private. A prolific texter, he cultivated ties to key MAGA-world figures — including, crucially, Donald Trump Jr. In 2020, Politico reported Carlson had “established a friendship” with the president’s eldest son.

Don Jr., at that point, had not been known for his foreign policy views, and he had limited influence on policy or personnel for most of his father’s first term. But unlike his sister Ivanka and brother-in-law Jared Kushner, Don Jr. was drawn to the MAGA base — and to a worldview that was a lot like Carlson’s. By 2020, Don Jr. had become an outspoken critic of “forever wars” and the “neocons” who he said were undercutting and sabotaging his father.

After January 6 and Trump’s ignominious departure from office, Jared and Ivanka stepped back and Don Jr. stepped forward, becoming an increasingly important adviser in his father’s comeback plans. He believed a second Trump administration had to be filled with MAGA loyalists rather than establishment-tied saboteurs. Trumpworld’s distrust of neocons continued to deepen, particularly once the Cheney family turned hard against Trump after January 6.

Around the same time, JD Vance began running for Senate in Ohio. Carlson already knew him and began openly championing his primary candidacy on his Fox show. Then, after Vance had the good judgment to hire one of Don Jr.’s top advisers for his campaign, he got connected with the president’s son — who was very impressed by him. They, too, became friends.

The first test of their ability to influence the right on foreign policy came as Russia invaded Ukraine in early 2022. Amid warnings of a full-scale invasion, Carlson ran segments questioning how Americans have been “told” to hate Putin and Russia. Vance said he didn’t “really care what happens to Ukraine one way or the other,” and that “the foreign policy establishment gets rich when American children die for dumb ideas.” Don Jr. asserted that “there is no American interest that justifies our intervention in Ukraine.”

Yet to many, the Russian invasion seemed to prove the hawks right. Putin, it turned out, did have malign intentions, and now here he was ending decades of peace in Europe. Supporting Ukraine to try to stop him, most believed, was both the moral and the strategically correct move.

The trio stuck to their guns, though, arguing that moralistic war fever was setting in — and that the hawks, in their zeal to clash with a nuclear power, could get a lot more people, maybe all of us, killed.

Trailing in polls in a crowded primary, Vance took heat from his more traditionally hawkish rivals in attack ads, but this eventually spurred Don Jr. to speak out publicly to defend him. After private lobbying from Carlson and Don Jr., an endorsement from Trump himself soon followed and carried Vance to a narrow victory.

As the Ukraine war stretched into 2023, its support on the right grew shakier. Carlson hammered home his skeptical arguments nightly. He claimed that aid money to Ukraine was wasted when we have so many problems at home, that escalation of the war was dangerous, and even that the US was partly responsible for provoking the war by expanding NATO. In his narrative, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was, if not the villain, a villain — and certainly no hero. Democrats and traditionally minded Republicans watched in horror, believing this was a Bizarro World inversion of reality.

But the GOP base — particularly its most engaged and pro-MAGA elements — was gradually won over. In part, this was due to negative polarization against a cause championed by President Joe Biden (whose son Hunter’s past highly compensated work in the country further suggested that something was rotten here). Others, like Elon Musk, characterized Ukraine support as the latest in a series of foolish and annoying progressive fads. In the mainstream, criticizing Ukraine aid made you anathema; on the online right, it made you cool.

In March 2023, with the Republican presidential primary kicking off, Carlson sent a questionnaire asking every prospective candidate about their Ukraine views; Ron DeSantis, courting the base, flip-flopped to back Carlson’s position. Soon afterward, Carlson was suddenly fired from Fox amid internal controversies and launched a new show on Musk’s X. But the party kept moving toward him: Conservatives in the GOP-held House held up Ukraine aid for months. By summer 2024, 47 percent of Republicans said the US was doing “too much” to help Ukraine, and just 30 percent said the US was doing the right amount or not enough.

For the first time, the America Firsters had successfully mobilized and won an intra-party argument on a foreign policy issue. Carlson and his allies changed the default GOP position away from hawkishness and toward skepticism of supporting Ukraine — and, along the way, launched Vance’s political career.

In 2024, Don Jr. and Carlson again successfully lobbied Trump to endorse Vance — as his VP nominee. (Carlson reportedly told Trump that if he picked a “neocon” instead, the “deep state” might have him assassinated.)

Once in office, Vance delivered — smacking down Zelenskyy in a public Oval Office meeting, and rebutting hawkish critics in lengthy, biting X posts.

From left, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President Donald Trump, and Vice President JD Vance during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 28.

Yet Trump still seems hesitant to truly cut Ukraine loose. Rather than simply washing his hands of the situation, he wants to help end the war, and he’s grown increasingly frustrated that Putin doesn’t seem to share that desire. He’s recently attacked the Russian president (“he’s gone absolutely CRAZY”) and threatened new sanctions on Russia. He has no love for Ukraine, but he still seems to fear being blamed for a Ukrainian defeat.

The new divide on the right over Israel and Iran

With Vice President Vance, the America Firsters had one of their own in a top administration post. But in the days after the presidential election, it briefly seemed as if he’d be the only one.

Rumors suggested that Trump would name the conventionally hawkish Marco Rubio, Mike Waltz, and Elise Stefanik to top foreign policy positions, while Mike Pompeo — his hawkish first-term secretary of state — seemed in line for secretary of defense.

Quickly, Carlson and Don Jr. staged an intervention, warning the president-elect that he was repeating his past mistakes. When one X poster urged Don Jr. to keep “all neocons and war hawks out” of the administration, Don Jr. replied, “I’m on it.” Soon, Trump announced that Pompeo would not be chosen (he’d eventually go so far as to yank Pompeo’s government security detail). And he made unconventional picks that shocked Washington: Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence and Pete Hegseth for defense secretary.

The drama over lower-level appointments soon grew even more intense. And a major sticking point, it quickly emerged, was policy toward Israel and Iran.

GOP hawks had long championed Israel and vowed to stand with it against its enemies, such as Iran. But many on the isolationist or populist right have long been less keen on this idea — suspicious of foreign entanglements, worried about advancing Israel’s interest rather than America’s, and dubious about more Middle Eastern wars. (For some, these concerns were paired with arguable or explicit antisemitism).

After Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attacks, Carlson, for instance, urged caution and restraint, worried about the US being drawn into war with Iran, questioned why Americans were so worked up about this rather than our problems at home, and argued the Israeli government mistreated Christians. “How is this helping America, exactly? I don’t see a huge upside for the United States in paying for this,” he told me, referring to Israel’s Gaza war.

But many others, including some in the America First camp, pushed back: “There is no analogy between the situation in Ukraine and Israel,” Stephen Miller wrote in 2023, saying Israel was “fighting a jihadist death squad” and that its war was “a necessary action to ensure the survival of the sole Jewish state.”

Don Jr. felt similarly: “You don’t negotiate with this,” he wrote. “There’s only one way to handle this.” And in a May 2024 speech, weeks before his selection as the VP nominee, Vance contrasted Ukraine’s war and Israel’s, saying he was fully supportive of the latter.

But by the end of last year, Israel was making plans to strike Iran’s nuclear program — and seeking US assistance in doing so. Many traditional GOP hawks were on board, arguing that since Iran’s proxies Hamas and Hezbollah had been badly weakened, now was the perfect time to attack. More broadly, they believed Iran could never be allowed to go nuclear — it was simply too dangerous to Israel and the world. What was truly necessary, they thought, was regime change. The America Firsters, however, were not sold. They did not want war with Iran and saw another neocon plot taking shape.

The Trump administration staffed up while this debate was unfolding, and hawkish Israel supporters responded to some of its hires with alarm. Critical articles appeared in publications like the New York Post, Jewish Insider, and Tablet, arguing certain midlevel appointees were worryingly soft on Iran. Elbridge Colby, who’d said containing a nuclear Iran was “eminently plausible” and was nominated for the Defense Department’s top policymaking job, became a particular flashpoint. Hawks in the Senate threatened to spike his nomination, but Vance vocally backed him and he made it through.

Most alarming of all to hawks was Steve Witkoff, the real estate investor and foreign policy neophyte who surprisingly became Trump’s negotiator in chief, and who they feared was giving away the store to Hamas and Iran. “Our main worry is Witkoff, really,” a plugged-in hawk told me last month. “You can boil it down to that.”

President Donald Trump delivers remarks as Vice President JD Vance, right, and Steve Witkoff, center, stand by on May 6.

Meanwhile, many hawks who sought administration jobs hit a wall. Here, Don Jr.’s influence was crucial — a friend and business partner of his, Sergio Gor, was named director of the Presidential Personnel Office, and took on the job of screening out neocons.

A source with knowledge of administration dynamics told me that Gor “made a decision that he wasn’t going to hire from the traditional places” — the hawkish institutions that had long fed into GOP foreign policy jobs.

The exception was Mike Waltz’s National Security Council. Waltz, the source told me, initially had more freedom to do his own hiring, and he made the NSC staff a beachhead for hawks.

But Waltz quickly became a beleaguered figure. As Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pushed for attacking Iran, Waltz appeared to be closely coordinating with him in a way that raised the America Firsters’ suspicions. Back in March, the Israeli attack proposal faced skepticism inside the administration from Vance and other top officials.

While this debate was ongoing, Trump’s advisers also debated whether to strike the Houthis, the Iran-backed Yemeni militia that was endangering shipping in the region. Waltz and Hegseth were on board, but Vance was one of the few urging caution. “I think we are making a mistake,” he wrote in a group chat with other advisers, worrying about the economic impact and a lack of public buy-in. “I am willing to support the consensus of the team and keep these concerns to myself,” he continued, but he urged delaying the strikes at least a month.

The hawks won that argument but soon faced several setbacks. Waltz had inadvertently invited the editor of the Atlantic to that group chat, which put an unwelcome spotlight on him. Soon afterward, the far-right activist Laura Loomer convinced Trump to fire six NSC staffers she disparaged as “neocons.” It didn’t take long for Waltz himself, and dozens more NSC staffers, to be shown the door. (The NSC was handed to Rubio, who was initially deemed a hawk, but now seemed to have accommodated himself to Trump’s priorities rather than trying to impose his own agenda.) On top of all that, the Houthi strikes were incredibly expensive and ultimately deemed ineffective; Trump has since called them off.

In April, Trump rejected the planned Israeli strike on Iran and began pursuing negotiations with the Iranians led by Witkoff — to the hawks’ deep dismay. And during a trip to the Middle East last month, Trump seemed to side with the America Firsters in a speech that criticized “neocons” and “interventionists.” In the speech, Trump insisted he wanted a deal with Iran — though he added that, if Iran rejected his overtures, he’d return to maximum pressure.

President Donald Trump, right, speaks alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with a model of Air Force One on the table, during a meeting in the Oval Office on April 7.

But as Trump tried to deal, he was also facing pressure. The hawks soon united around the demand that any deal could not allow any Iranian nuclear enrichment — something Iran was insisting on. Every Senate Republican except Rand Paul, plus most of the House GOP, signed a letter urging Trump not to allow any Iranian nuclear enrichment, and soon he and Witkoff were saying that was their position, too. Compromises intended to let both sides claim victory were privately floated, but none stuck.

In early June, hawkish talk radio host Mark Levin visited Trump at the White House, insisted that Iran was days away from completing a nuclear weapon, and urged Trump to “allow the Israeli government to strike Iranian nuclear sites,” Politico reported. Carlson revealed Levin’s visit in a lengthy post on X, writing, “These are scary people. Pray that Donald Trump ignores them.”

He did not ignore them. It is not yet known what exactly Trump privately told Netanyahu, but it is highly unlikely that Israel’s extensive attack on Iran took place without his tacit blessing. At the very least, Trump stopped affirmatively standing in the way of an Israeli strike.

The question now is whether the nightmare scenario Carlson and others warned of — in which the US gets drawn into the war and it goes disastrously — ensues. Since the strikes began, Carlson has argued that allowing them wasn’t “America First” policy. Asked about that by the Atlantic’s Michael Scherer on Saturday, Trump answered: “I’m the one that decides that.”

Does Trump want a new Cold War with China — or a big, beautiful deal?

China’s President Xi Jinping (R) shakes hands with US President Donald Trump on June 28, 2019 before a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Osaka.

Bombs are already falling in Ukraine and Iran. But all that could, in the end, be a sideshow compared to the question of what happens between the US and its premier global rival: China. A potential war in Asia — perhaps started by China as an effort to reclaim the island of Taiwan — is the biggest fear keeping many US policymakers up at night.

Elbridge Colby, the Defense Department’s top policy official, is in an alliance of convenience with the America Firsters: he supports reducing US involvement in Ukraine and in the Middle East. But unlike them, he does so because he wants to better focus resources on what he believes is a far more important goal. The “cardinal objective of US grand strategy,” Colby wrote in a 2021 book, should be to deny China “hegemony” over Asia.

In Colby’s conception, hegemony is overwhelming predominance and authority without direct control — the US has it in North and Central America. China, he argues, is trying to achieve hegemony in Asia, by pushing the US out.

Colby acknowledges hegemony over Asia would give nuclear-armed China little added ability to threaten the US homeland. The “more plausible” danger, he says, is that China could “set up a commercial trading bloc” that could exclude and disfavor the US from trade in Asia, which he calls the world’s most important economic region.

Preventing this, Colby writes, requires “firm and focused action”; namely, the US must form and lead an “anti-hegemonic coalition” of other states in the region. But there’s a huge risk: If China forcibly seized a US “ally or quasi-ally,” like Taiwan, US authority in the region would unravel. Therefore, the US should work to ensure that doesn’t happen. And though hopefully the result will be peace through deterrence, we must accept “the distinct possibility of war with China.”

This is a realist version of the traditional hawkish argument, accepted by the national security establishments of both parties, that the US must prevent China from getting too much power in Asia. (Other, more moralizing versions tout the superiority of US values or a US-led world order.) And to most in the foreign policy sphere, this is common sense. Great powers compete and seek advantage, often at the risk of war, because if you don’t risk war, you lose. The idea that we could just, well, not do this — that we could stand aside and let China dominate Asia — seems preposterous.

The America Firsters have no love for China and tend to be all for a trade war. But some are more skeptical about this military competition logic — fearing, again, entangling alliances that risk getting Americans killed far from home. In Vance’s May 2024 foreign policy speech, he criticized “neoconservatives” who he deemed eager for war, saying: “Put me firmly in the category of, I don’t want to go to war with China, and I want to make more of our own stuff. Okay?”

“We’re in a rivalry with China, no one would debate that,” Carlson told me. “But are we hoping to revert to or maintain a unipolar world, where the United States makes all decisions unchallenged — where we get to make decisions about the borders in Asia? Where do we get the authority to make those decisions? And do we have the strength to make those decisions?”

“I guess we could have a war over Taiwan. I’m pretty certain we’d lose! But what would be the point of the war?” he went on. “Because we need to get all the semiconductors? Because China doesn’t like to sell us stuff?”

The hawks argue, in contrast, that military counter-balancing is the best way to avoid war. “You don’t want to get to a Chinese invasion of Taiwan given what that would mean for Japan, the Philippines, etc.,” Matthew Continetti, of the American Enterprise Institute, told me. “You need to deter it.” That, he said, can be done by “making Taiwan as prickly and as frightening to Chinese military planners as possible.”

The second Trump administration is filled with China hawks, and in keeping with his longtime China-bashing rhetoric and love of economic warfare, he’s pursued a confrontational course. He ramped up his trade war with China, and talk of “decoupling” the two economies has intensified. He’s acting aggressively to keep technologies, such as advanced semiconductors, away from China. And in keeping with the hawks’ weapons, he’s arming Taiwan.

Yet Trump does seem to share the America First skepticism about war to defend Taiwan or another Asian country. Unlike Biden — who repeatedly said the US would defend Taiwan — Trump has been more vague on what he’d do. He’s complained that Taiwan “took our chip business” and stressed how far away and small it is compared to China. His skepticism extends to US troop commitments in other Asian countries, such as Japan and South Korea, too. “This administration’s China policy is objectively more dovish than Biden’s,” the source with knowledge of administration internal dynamics argued, adding that Trump “views the economic side fundamentally as different than the military side.”

It may not be so easy to separate the two. In April, in response to Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, China restricted exports of “rare earth” materials that are crucial to US military technology as well as some civilian manufacturing. This move, the Washington Post reported, caused “deep consternation at high levels of the administration.” It apparently spurred Trump to seek a truce in May. But Trump officials soon rolled out new “tough on China” policies, and the truce fell apart.

So what is Trump’s endgame? Many speculate that he intends all his tough talk and actions to be a prelude to a big, beautiful deal with China — something far less disruptive than a lengthy, painful “decoupling” would be, and something quite different than what the hawks envision.

Would such a deal just be about trade, or might it also encompass the US’s involvement in Asia? The New York Times’ Edward Wong recently argued that Trump could be inclined toward an idea of “spheres of influence” — basically, the US gets the Americas, and China gets Asia. This would horrify the hawks — much of Colby’s positioning in recent years can be seen as an effort to convince Trump and MAGA not to do this. But there’s little sign that this is the administration’s actual policy so far.

In early June, Trump tried to revive the trade war truce in a call with China’s Xi Jinping. The Chinese president reportedly warned Trump that hawks in his administration were jeopardizing their relationship with provocative policies. After further negotiations with top officials, Trump claimed Wednesday morning that the truce was back on. He posted on Truth Social: “RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT.”

Why Trump says he wants deals – but gets tempted toward hawkishness

Trump shares many instincts with the America Firsters: He dislikes long wars. He wants to avoid pesky foreign entanglements. He’s skeptical of our allies. But one complication is that, unlike the isolationists of old, he does not actually want to withdraw the US from the global stage. Instead, he wants to make deals.

The complication is that, in such deals, Trump desperately wants to be perceived as a “winner” and not a “loser” or “sucker.” And if he feels like there’s a risk of that latter outcome, he starts to favor aggression to shake things up. Often this involves empty threats, but sometimes — as we saw in Iran last week — it entails actual military force. Sometimes, Trump grows concerned that too many people believe he typically bluffs or backs down and tries to restore his reputation for dangerous unpredictability.

It remains to be seen whether Trump can actually clinch big, consequential deals with foreign adversaries. Talks with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un in his first term resulted in nothing. The recent talks with Iran have now been derailed by Israel’s attack. If talks with Russia and China also fail, Trump will likely find himself tempted back toward typical hawkish policies again. (He’s already threatening sanctions on Putin.)

New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd infamously called Trump “Donald the dove” during the 2016 campaign. But Trump has never been anything like a peacenik. He dislikes wars that go poorly — but if he’s persuaded a military action will go well and make him look strong and successful, he’s happy to support it.

The America Firsters have made a play toward challenging the hawks’ dominance on the right, and Trump is often sympathetic to their critique. But his support of Israel’s Iran attack is a major setback for their project.

As global tensions rise and bombs fall, can Trump manage to return to the path of diplomacy? Or is it already too late?

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 10:03 AM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

I think you may be looking at all of this through a far too conventional lens.








Hey, isn't this when you are supposed to call Trump a war monger?

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 10:18 AM

THG


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Israel's attack on Iran won't give Trump leverage, unless we manage to overturn the Iranian government completely.

And I smell a lot of "if" coming off that plan.

*****

Did you notice the close parallel between Israel's actions and Ukraine's? Both are USA proxies. Both are in negotiations, and both attacked while negotiating and literally a day before the next scheduled negotiation.

So, when it was widely thought that Israel engineered a lightning victory, Trump was happy to claim credit. After a phone call from Putin, Trump is reduced to diasvowing, whining, and threatening.

Somebody, take his access to Truth Social away from him! He's his own worst enemy, and he would help his Presidency immensely if he'd just STFU.






You were warned about Trump. He is in way over his head and because of that the world could burn. If not because of Iran, then because of something else.

He and his staff claim this and that because he can’t own whatever it is he is responsible for. As President he is only capable of reacting, not acting. And that’s very dangerous.

You were warned comrade. Your logic picked him for the job.

T


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 12:37 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


If Harris had been elected, illegals would STILL be pouring over the border.

And Trump, no matter how akwardly, sent a warning shot across the bows of several nations that dump their products into the USA market.

I knew Trump's middle east policy would be all fucked up.

BUT SO WAS BIDEN'S. The Palestinian genocide (55,000 Palestinians killed or starved to death in the world's largest open air concentration camp, so far) and attack on Lebanon started on BIDEN'S watch, not Trump's. Did Biden do anything to halt it, like stopping aid, arms, and intelligence to Israel?

The arming up of Ukraine after sanctions failure, urging Kiev to fight to the last Ukrainian, occurred on BIDEN'S watch, not Trump's.

These policies are FULLY BIPARTISAN. AIPAC and the neocons seem to have Congress in lock step.

If Trump manages to slow down spending on these wars (that we started) despite Lindsay Graham and Chuck Schumer, that will be an accomplishment.

Maybe Trump is blathering to keep Congress off balance and confused as to what he REALLY is doing, but then he comes up with stupid ideas like the Gaza Strip resort and the mineral deal with Zelensky. And he's confounding the nations that he says he's negotiating with.

I'm on board with most of his stated goals:
Reindustrialization
Halt illegal immigration and start deportations
Reach detente with Russia.
Reduce waste and fraud in government .... and Congress (which the source of a lot of that)

NOT on board with supporting Israel, attacking Iran, or any sort of military action v China.

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 1:32 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by THG:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

I think you may be looking at all of this through a far too conventional lens.








Hey, isn't this when you are supposed to call Trump a war monger?

T




Warmonger is one word, stupid.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 1:37 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Oh, I'm skeptical about the "reasons" for the war.

This time, someone convinced Trump that striking Iran with missiles and drones will give him "leverage" in "negotiations" about Iranian "nuclear weapons". Very similar to him being convinced that attacking Russia's nuclear assets would force Russia to agree cease fire.



I don't think anybody convinced him about anything.

Whether or not Trump knew that Israel was going to do this beforehand, this DID give him leverage with negotiations with Iran on nuclear weapons. I'd say it's given him leverage with any negotiations with them on any topic. The only question is, is this now taking advantage of a fortunate opportunity, or was Trump behind it?

That's really not a question I want to know the answer to because if it comes out that Trump was behind it and Iran finds out about it that's bad news for everyone. Better for everyone not to know.

Quote:

Like somebody convinced brain-dead Bush that Iraq had WMD.


Not like that at all, for the reason stated above.

Quote:

Like Biden and Ukraine. Biden would draw red line after red line for his admin, only to cave a few months later.

Different Presidents.

Same shit.



I don't think so in this case.



Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
I think you may be looking at all of this through a far too conventional lens.





A Battered Iran Signals It Wants to De-Escalate Hostilities With Israel and Negotiate

Messages passed by Tehran through intermediaries seek a return to talks if the U.S. stays out of the fight

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/a-battered-iran-signals-it-wants
-to-de-escalate-hostilities-with-israel-and-negotiate-9feab4ae


Archive to avoid paywall: https://archive.ph/lp6sN




--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 8:55 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Ali Khamenei: ruthless defender of Iran’s revolution with few good options left

The Iranian supreme leader is backed into a corner, a situation he has spent his life doing his best to avoid

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/16/ali-khamenei-ruthless-de
fender-of-iran-revolution-with-few-good-options-left




--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 8:57 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Well, Trump probably can't resist butting in on Israel's behalf.

Interesting observation: Tehran struck Israel's refinery in Haifa, which supplies 60% of Israel's gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel. Israel is primarily using aircraft, not long-range missiles like Iran, and they need to be refueled partway to Iran. With the majority of its jet fuel gone, Trump is redeploying a lot of tanker aircraft to Europe, where they'll be available for Israel.

Israel is actually pretty vulnerable. It's a small, highly concentrated nation. Hit its fuel supplies, ports, and desalination plants, and it WILL become unliveable. And Iran has the capability to do it.

If Iran is sitting down to talk, it's probably at Russia's urging. Russia stalled for time for almost a decade before addressing the security threat that Ukraine posed.

"Run away, or talk yourself out of it. If you can't do either, fight to kill"

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 9:21 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Like I said before, I think the conventional "wisdom" needs to be thrown out the window right now.

We've learned over time that the "intellectual" class is full of shit and nothing they say will happen ever does happen. That and despite the fact the world kept getting shittier we just kept following their words right off the fucking cliff like Lemmings for the last 40 years.

They hate Trump because he doesn't follow their rules or their plan. They hate us because we stopped listening to them and we reject the shit world they have constructed for us.



As for US... We need to stop reading headlines and falling for their clickbait and daily freakouts.

Take a look at the news in the last 6 months and see just how wrong their predictions about everything have been so far. You can literally take any headline or clickbait video that Ted has posted here since inauguration day and shut them down with how events have actually played out long after that clickbait ad revenue stopped flowing to those older videos.


--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 11:29 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Trump isn't playing 5D chess, he's being blown by whatever forces kiss his ass better.

Trump SHOULD stay the fuck out of the ME.

But, but ...

He likes Jews. He thinks Israeli Zionists are like his buddy, Steve Witkoff.

His son in law is a Jew, as is his daughter (she coverted).

Miriam Adelson, widow of billionaire Sheldon Adelson, and Zionist in her own right, gave him a fuckton of money.

Almost 100% of Congress "supports Israel" (just like they supported Ukraine.)

Most of his low-information base thinks all Jews are victims and all Muslims are terrorists.

Trump's big mouth and his even bigger ego are tied to Israel.

*****

SOME of his base ... Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene ... me ... understand what a corner Trump is backing into. The only thing saving Trump from himself is probably Putin, who is likely advising Trump to stay out of it, and Iran to negotiate. Iran has the capacity to destroy Israel. According to the following video, Israel has only two big power generating stations (one was bombed already) and most of its population depends on 8 desalination plants on the Mediterranean. Since (according to the reporter) Israel was stupid enough to bomb Tehran's water supply ...

I'll post the link later.

The only thing that could save Israel is USA's all-out war on Iran. Do we really want to go there?



-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 11:44 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


You don't know what Trump is thinking anymore than Ted does.

Why do you think that Trump likes Jews, just because his son-in-law was a Jew? I've had plenty of family schisms over the generations in my own family just because of who people have chosen to marry. Some people tolerate things they can't agree with while others blow things up about it.

All I'm saying is that pretty much everyone who has said anything about Trump or his motives or his words or even his actions have ultimately been wrong once everything has played out.

And claim that Trump is all about his own Ego all you want, but at the end of the day America is already 1,000% better off right now than it was 6 months ago, and I don't see any reason to believe that's going to stop tomorrow, regardless of whatever headlines are being written or whatever fearmongering the media from any side says about anything.

Things ARE working out for the better right now. And people like Ted and Second HATE this because their party has never been weaker in their entire lifetime than it is right now, and if things continue to get better then the Democrats will just continue to lose power and relevance.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 11:46 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


It the IRAN IS PREPARING FOR A LONG WAR video

https://substack.com/@rachelblevins

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2025 11:51 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


And at the end of the day, who cares?

Not this guy.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 17, 2025 2:41 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You don't know what Trump is thinking anymore than Ted does.

Why do you think that Trump likes Jews, just because his son-in-law was a Jew? I've had plenty of family schisms over the generations in my own family just because of who people have chosen to marry. Some people tolerate things they can't agree with while others blow things up about it.

All I'm saying is that pretty much everyone who has said anything about Trump or his motives or his words or even his actions have ultimately been wrong once everything has played out.

And claim that Trump is all about his own Ego all you want, but at the end of the day America is already 1,000% better off right now than it was 6 months ago, and I don't see any reason to believe that's going to stop tomorrow, regardless of whatever headlines are being written or whatever fearmongering the media from any side says about anything.

Things ARE working out for the better right now. And people like Ted and Second HATE this because their party has never been weaker in their entire lifetime than it is right now, and if things continue to get better then the Democrats will just continue to lose power and relevance.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon



I think Trump likes ISRAEL bc he's committed himself over and over, thru two admins so far, that he supports Israel. It's a constant with him.

In some ways things are better

The flood of illegals is stopped
The DEI/LGBTQ+ nonsense seems to be slowing down
Inflation is down
We DO seem to be edging out of Ukraine.

1000% better? Hardly



-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 17, 2025 1:27 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:



Sonar21

A Son of the New American Revolution
Donald Trump Doubles Down on Crazy

16 June 2025 by Larry C. Johnson 282 Comments

Clean up in aisle five. Someone needs to tackle Donald Trump and confiscate his phone. He should not be allowed to post on Truth Social until some adult with a measure of common sense has a chance to review prospective Trump posts. Roughly sixteen million people live in the Tehran metropolitan area. Where would they go? This post by Trump has caused many around the world to take a hard gulp and wonder if Trump is serious. Telegram channels are spinning frantically with claims, non-verified, that the US is going to attack Iran, but the White House has issued a denial. Take that with a hefty grain of salt.

The White House tried to downplay Trump’s remark by claiming that Trump’s post calling for the immediate evacuation of Tehran reflects his desire to urgently bring Iran back to the negotiating table. I’m not sure there is enough lipstick in Washington to cover this pig and make it look beautiful. However, Trump reportedly wants J.D. Vance and Steve Witkoff to meet later this week with Iranian officials… just one more example of the schizoid behavior of Trump. I don’t know about you, but I am growing weary of his clownish behavior.

The chaos in the Trump White House is not confined to the Iran/Israel war. Maria Zakharova, the spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, made the following announcement around 4 pm Moscow time:

Today, the next meeting within the framework of bilateral consultations on eliminating irritants in order to normalize the activities of diplomatic missions of both countries has been canceled at the initiative of American negotiators. We hope that the pause they took will not be too long.

I think Putin and his foreign policy team understand that Trump is a flake and are responding calmly, at least in public, to Donald’s contradictory words and actions. Russia is still ready to intercede with Iran and Israel in hopes of securing a ceasefire, but the Kremlin first has to figure out what Donald Trump’s policy is — i.e., war or peace.

The irrationality of the West with respect to Iran is illustrated by the following facts:

* Iran:
Does not possess nuclear weapons.
Is a party to the NPT (Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons).
Allows IAEA inspections.
Reports on the movement of enriched uranium.
Under constant international pressure and sanctions.
Declared a threat – only for the potential possibility of creating nuclear weapons.

* Israel:
De facto possesses a nuclear arsenal (estimates: ~80-200 warheads).Did not sign the NPT.
Does not allow international inspectors.
Completely classifies the nuclear program.
Receives support and military assistance from the West.
Declared a “stronghold of democracy” and allegedly a victim.

In other words, Iran, the one country that does not have a nuke and is abiding by international law governing nuclear weapons, is the villain, while Israel, who is flouting those laws, is being treated as the victim. Yeah, that makes sense.

Speaking of making sense, Tucker Carlson had the audacity to point out that Trump’s support of Israel’s war on Iran borders is political suicide for Trump. Instead of thanking Tucker for the warning, Trump attacked Carlson:



Yeah, Tucker should give up his internet platform, which attracts millions of views, and get back on some irrelevant network that only attracts less than a million viewers. Gotta give Trump credit… he has a knack for posting some really stupid tweets.



https://sonar21.com/donald-trump-doubles-down-on-crazy/

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 17, 2025 2:23 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You don't know what Trump is thinking anymore than Ted does.

Why do you think that Trump likes Jews, just because his son-in-law was a Jew? I've had plenty of family schisms over the generations in my own family just because of who people have chosen to marry. Some people tolerate things they can't agree with while others blow things up about it.

All I'm saying is that pretty much everyone who has said anything about Trump or his motives or his words or even his actions have ultimately been wrong once everything has played out.

And claim that Trump is all about his own Ego all you want, but at the end of the day America is already 1,000% better off right now than it was 6 months ago, and I don't see any reason to believe that's going to stop tomorrow, regardless of whatever headlines are being written or whatever fearmongering the media from any side says about anything.

Things ARE working out for the better right now. And people like Ted and Second HATE this because their party has never been weaker in their entire lifetime than it is right now, and if things continue to get better then the Democrats will just continue to lose power and relevance.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon



I think Trump likes ISRAEL bc he's committed himself over and over, thru two admins so far, that he supports Israel. It's a constant with him.

In some ways things are better

The flood of illegals is stopped
The DEI/LGBTQ+ nonsense seems to be slowing down
Inflation is down
We DO seem to be edging out of Ukraine.

1000% better? Hardly



That is 1000% better. More than that.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 17, 2025 2:36 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.






Rev Tulsi Gabbard's assessment that Iran isn't building a nuclear weapon

Quote:

"I don't care what she says"


-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 17, 2025 2:39 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You don't know what Trump is thinking anymore than Ted does.

Why do you think that Trump likes Jews, just because his son-in-law was a Jew? I've had plenty of family schisms over the generations in my own family just because of who people have chosen to marry. Some people tolerate things they can't agree with while others blow things up about it.

All I'm saying is that pretty much everyone who has said anything about Trump or his motives or his words or even his actions have ultimately been wrong once everything has played out.

And claim that Trump is all about his own Ego all you want, but at the end of the day America is already 1,000% better off right now than it was 6 months ago, and I don't see any reason to believe that's going to stop tomorrow, regardless of whatever headlines are being written or whatever fearmongering the media from any side says about anything.

Things ARE working out for the better right now. And people like Ted and Second HATE this because their party has never been weaker in their entire lifetime than it is right now, and if things continue to get better then the Democrats will just continue to lose power and relevance.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon



I think Trump likes ISRAEL bc he's committed himself over and over, thru two admins so far, that he supports Israel. It's a constant with him.

In some ways things are better

The flood of illegals is stopped
The DEI/LGBTQ+ nonsense seems to be slowing down
Inflation is down
We DO seem to be edging out of Ukraine.

1000% better? Hardly



That is 1000% better. More than that.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon



By what metric? How has YOUR life changed for the better? Besides feeling righteous and vindicated, and with a great oppty to pound on Dems and exercise your anger? Stop coddling your feelings. Numbers don't back you up.

SOME things better, yes. Some things (yet another war eating up our budget) worse.

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger

AMERICANS SUPPORT AMERICA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, June 17, 2025 5:51 PM

THG



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, June 18, 2025 13:34 - 5556 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Wed, June 18, 2025 08:54 - 8535 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Wed, June 18, 2025 08:53 - 7050 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Wed, June 18, 2025 08:52 - 2358 posts
Cuomo should thank Mamdani for making him look like the safe, stable choice for NYC mayor
Wed, June 18, 2025 02:54 - 1 posts
TRUMP AND HIS SUPPORTERS ARE NAZI PEDOPHILES
Wed, June 18, 2025 02:51 - 464 posts
No Kings protests flop?
Tue, June 17, 2025 23:41 - 67 posts
IRAN: Trump's war?
Tue, June 17, 2025 21:04 - 254 posts
L.A. Riots: Just One More Symptom Of Far-Left California’s Sad Decline
Tue, June 17, 2025 14:29 - 1 posts
S Korea makes bird flu 100% deadly to all mammals (That includes us)
Tue, June 17, 2025 13:08 - 2 posts
China Caught Playing With Bioweapons Again
Tue, June 17, 2025 11:28 - 1 posts
As Deportations Rise, The U.S. Is On Track For The Lowest Murder Rate On Record
Tue, June 17, 2025 11:26 - 1 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL