Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Ann Coulter, right wing goddess
Sunday, March 11, 2007 2:24 PM
GEEZER
Keep the Shiny side up
Quote:Originally posted by SoupCatcher: So for all those principled conservatives out there, she's representing you and representing you often.
Sunday, March 11, 2007 2:28 PM
RUE
I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!
Sunday, March 11, 2007 3:05 PM
SOUPCATCHER
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: If I were actually agreeing with what she says, I'd understand the reaction I'm getting, but getting insulted for basically noting that two wrongs don't make a right leads me to think that some folk are back in that old "anything other than total agreement is opposition" rut.
Sunday, March 11, 2007 4:31 PM
Quote:Originally posted by rue: Richards snapped v Coulter aforethought and malice. The only apparent difference (by your own post) is that Coulter spoke on purpose and Richards snapped. So in your mind Coulter should be excused because she said it on purpose. Stellar logic, that.
Sunday, March 11, 2007 4:47 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SoupCatcher: Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: If I were actually agreeing with what she says, I'd understand the reaction I'm getting, but getting insulted for basically noting that two wrongs don't make a right leads me to think that some folk are back in that old "anything other than total agreement is opposition" rut. What it sounded to me like you were saying was, "Both sides do it." Which I think I have shown is not the case.
Quote:"Two wrongs don't make a right." But what if the two wrongs are apples and oranges when it comes to comparison? If you are trying to minimize the negativity of one wrong by comparing it to a categorically different wrong then I'd say you've got a dog in the hunt.
Sunday, March 11, 2007 5:15 PM
Sunday, March 11, 2007 5:34 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: "Negativity" is the key word here. If you oppose Ms. Coulter's negative approach, try something other than emulating her by doing the same thing. If the only way we can disagree is by negative attacks, we're all lost, no matter our position.
Monday, March 12, 2007 4:21 AM
BIGDAMNNOBODY
Quote: Originally posted by Geezer: "Negativity" is the key word here. If you oppose Ms. Coulter's negative approach, try something other than emulating her by doing the same thing. If the only way we can disagree is by negative attacks, we're all lost, no matter our position.
Monday, March 12, 2007 4:23 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SoupCatcher: Any emulation here in this thread is only a pale imitation with no official sanction. I see no one in this thread who makes tons of money from conservative organizations. I see no one in this thread who sells tons of books. I see no one in this thread who is invited on numerous cable news shows as a conservative commentator. I see no one in this thread who calls on their followers to violently attack those who disagree with them.
Monday, March 12, 2007 4:43 AM
KHYRON
Monday, March 12, 2007 5:36 AM
Monday, March 12, 2007 10:27 AM
Quote:Originally posted by rue: When someone tries to demean another person by invoking a shared bias - nigger, faggot, kike - it goes beyond personal and into prejudice. And when they indeed try to incite violence it goes beyond prejudice and into hate speech. And when that person is paid millions to present that hate speech to large audiences it goes beyond hate speech into a concerted hate campaign. You little boys got it now?
Monday, March 12, 2007 10:54 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: So why the need for the kinky sex, blood bathing, transvestite, funny hands shtick? Someone put a good bit of effort into the sites that folks here linked to. What's the point? Just to look clever?
Monday, March 12, 2007 7:15 PM
NEWOLDBROWNCOAT
Quote:Originally posted by SoupCatcher: closet bull-dyke
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 5:52 AM
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 5:57 AM
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 6:56 AM
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7:42 AM
Quote:Originally posted by rue: You still don't get it. There's a difference between making a PERSONAL remark about the SPECIFICS of an INDIVIDUAL, versus demeaning a whole group by using words like FAGGOT.
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 11:28 AM
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 11:32 AM
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:58 PM
Quote:Originally posted by rue: Slick, There ARE transexuals who feel demeaned by being compared to Coulter. Is that what you mean?
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 1:45 PM
JKIDDO
Quote:You said: "When someone tries to demean another person by invoking a shared bias - nigger, faggot, kike - it goes beyond personal and into prejudice." So apparently you think calling a person a nigger, faggot, or kike to demean them goes beyond personal insult and into prejudice against Blacks, homosexuals and Jews. I agree. How about demeaning a person by calling them a transsexual, or a bull dyke, or sexually outside the norm? Is it all right to express prejudice against these three groups, but not against the N/F/K-word troika?
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:04 PM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 6:46 AM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 7:44 AM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 7:50 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JKiddo: I guess Geezer has no explanation for his selective disappointment in the quality of FFF.net postings.
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:04 AM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:05 AM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:09 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Sure, you got the right to insult Ms. Coulter by making demeaning comparisons with transexuals. Does sort of undercut your complaints about her actions if you do the same thing. Which has been my point from the beginning.
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:15 AM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:24 AM
SHINYED
Quote:Originally posted by JKiddo: if you think that FFF.net folks wouldn't sink to that level, what about "Shiny"Ed, whose posts are replete with such gems as ... pompous & hypocrite pretty-boy retarded pretty-boy pretty-boy vile bloodsucking tort-lawyer pimps juman beans (an insult to juman beans everywhere...) Silky Pony (Auraptor) and... hey if it takes maniacal & demented religious sub-humans from Islam to shake up Hollywood degenerates which was immediately followed by YOUR post... In a later update, Tehran has moved to sever all diplomatic relations with Sparta in response to their attack on peace-loving Persian invaders 2,487 years ago. Where's the outrage, man? Where's the disappointment about sinking so low? Oh yeah, that's right.. it was all meant in fun. So was mine.
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:33 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SoupCatcher: But is the point to focus in on only one aspect of the problem? The one aspect that allows us to not discuss the more pressing issue concerning one political party's institutional support and encouragement of hate speech and what it says about a subset of it's members that this tactic works?
Quote:Ann Coulter is paid by conservatives to preach hate and intolerance. Her message reaches millions.
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:41 AM
Quote:Originally posted by rue: Slick, So I checked out it out. The VERY FIRST mention of Coulter being a trans-X (-sexual, -gender, -vestite or whatnot) was PirateNews Tuesday, March 06, 2007 - 19:20. The NEXT post on the topic was from you Slick, March 08, 2007 - 02:27 asking why 'multiple posters' call her a trans-X; and again Monday, March 12, 2007 - 14:23 asking about the trans-X 'schtick'. In fact, the only person who keeps doing that schtick would be you.
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:45 AM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:49 AM
Quote:But using hate speech against Ms. Coulter in complaining about her hate speech seems to show a double standard, which is what I originally pointed out.
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:48 AM
Quote:Originally posted by rue: Slick, Nope, not taking it out of context. You are the only one using the trans-X schtick. Not to criticize Coulter but to portray her a martyr. No one else here is doing trans-X. Just you. Why is that?
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 12:00 PM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 2:35 PM
Quote:Anyone who takes the time to actually read my first post will note you're pretty selective in taking things out of context to avoid the issue. Typical.
Quote:John Edwards is a bunch of sticks? Well, he always did seem a little stiff...
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:04 PM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:29 PM
Quote:Originally posted by rue: Your first post? Would that be this one?Quote:John Edwards is a bunch of sticks? Well, he always did seem a little stiff...
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:36 PM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:46 PM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:53 PM
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 4:01 PM
Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:02 AM
Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:15 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JKiddo: Apparently Geezer you have your sights locked on Rue and you're ignoring me...
Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:26 AM
Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:29 AM
Quote:Originally posted by rue: If you're at the point of killing, murder is a more effective solution to the problem.
Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:04 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Khyron: I sometimes get the feeling Geezer and Rue are an old couple that are on here bickering for a laugh. Every now and again I could swear they're married or something.
Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:54 AM
PIRATENEWS
John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!
Quote: Hannity's "Great Americans" A Former Gay Porn Star And Male Prostitute www.jonesreport.com/articles/080307_hannity_gay_porn.html News Hounds March 8, 2007 No, not Jeff Gannon/Guckert but Cpl. Matt Sanchez who appeared on Hannity & Colmes to talk about an alleged incident of being called a baby killer by members of Columbia University's International Socialist Organization. So eager was Sean Hannity to embrace this "victim" of liberal hate (which Columbia, though it investigated the incident, never confirmed) that nobody at FOX News seems to have bothered to do any kind of background check. Or maybe they did and nobody cared. Had they done the same kind of research Hannity always blames Dan Rather for not doing, "America's Newsroom" FOX News would have discovered this, courtesy of Max Blumenthal, at the Huffington Post: Quote: As several gay blogs revealed late yesterday, Corporal Sanchez was known during his halcyon days as Rod Majors, a majorly well-endowed gay porn star. (Photos of Corp. Sanchez aka Rod Majors in action can be viewed here. I warn you, this link is NOT to be clicked on if you have minors around or if you're in a crowded workplace). According to Tom Bacchus, Sanchez was also a $200-an-hour male prostitute who advertised himself (here) as an "excellent top." You can read more and follow Blumenthal's links at HuffPo. www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/cpacs-gay-porn-star-hono_b_42842.html Mann Coulter with Log Cabin Jew Matt Drudge at Gay Pride parade Hormone replacement therapy (trans) Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for transgender and transsexual people replaces the hormones naturally occurring in their bodies with those of the other sex. Its purpose is to cause the development of the secondary sex characteristics of the desired gender. It can not undo the changes produced by the first natural occurring puberty of transgender people, this is done by sexual reassignment surgery and for transwomen by epilation. Some intersex people also receive HRT, either starting in childhood to confirm the gender they were assigned, or later, if this assigment has proven to be incorrect. Some individuals choose to self-administer their medication ("do-it-yourself"), often because available doctors have too little experience in this matter, or no doctor is available in the first place. Sometimes, trans persons choose to self-administer because their doctor will not prescribe hormones without a letter from the patient's therapist stating that the patient meets the diagnostic criteria for GID and is making an informed decision to transition. A number of skeletal and cartilaginous changes take place after the onset of puberty at various rates and times. Sometime in the late teen years epiphyseal clusure (in other words, the ends of bones are fused closed) takes place and the length of bones is fixed for life. Consequently total height and the length of arms, legs, hands, and feet are not affected by HRT. However, details of bone shape change throughout life, bones becoming heavier and more deeply sculptured under the influence of testosterone. Many of these differences are described in the Desmond Morris book Manwatching. Pelvis: The pelvis in females tends to be wider than in males and tilted forward; the pelvis is males tends to be more circular and tilted upwards. Larynx: At puberty, the bones and cartilage of the voicebox tend to enlarge less in females than males. In some males, the larynx becomes visible as a bony "adam's apple." Hands: Male hands and feet tend to be larger than female hands and feet in persons of equal height. HRT male-to-female For transwomen, taking estrogens causes among other changes: the growth of breasts, with concomitant enlargement of the nipples Breast, nipple, and areolar development takes 4-6 years to complete depending upon genetics, and sometimes as long as 10 years. Mann Coulter with Shaun Vannity Neurological/Psychiatric Mood changes can occur - including the development of depression Recent studies have indicated that cross-hormone therapy in transwomen may result in a reduction in brain volume towards female proportions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormone_replacement_therapy_(trans) Horrors of Hormone Replacement Therapy
Quote: As several gay blogs revealed late yesterday, Corporal Sanchez was known during his halcyon days as Rod Majors, a majorly well-endowed gay porn star. (Photos of Corp. Sanchez aka Rod Majors in action can be viewed here. I warn you, this link is NOT to be clicked on if you have minors around or if you're in a crowded workplace). According to Tom Bacchus, Sanchez was also a $200-an-hour male prostitute who advertised himself (here) as an "excellent top." You can read more and follow Blumenthal's links at HuffPo. www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/cpacs-gay-porn-star-hono_b_42842.html
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL