REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

More Lies from the BBC... It's an article about Greenland, but the lie comes in at the last paragraph...

POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 17:31
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 40
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, August 27, 2025 5:31 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0j9l08902eo

Quote:

"This hostile attitude towards Denmark from the Trump administration is shocking," he told the BBC. "As a pro-American country we're asking why are you doing this."

One of Denmark's biggest companies has already been caught in the crosshairs of the US government in recent days, following an order to stop the construction of a big wind farm off the coast of Rhode Island.

The Revolution Wind project, already 80% complete, is being run by Danish multinational wind farm developer Orsted, which is 50.1% owned by the Danish state.

It is the latest wind power initiative to be targeted by President Donald Trump, who said last week "we're not doing the wind".

Shares in Orsted plummeted 16% on Monday in response to the so-called stop-work order, although they have since clawed back some of the losses.

The company says it has already installed 45 out of 65 turbines in the project aimed at providing power for 350,000 homes.



You're going to power 350,000 homes with 65 wind turbines, huh?

Well these must be magic wind turbines. Or maybe it's just more "Democrat Math"?


Hey Google A.I.? How many homes can a wind turbine allegedly power?

Quote:

A modern, large-scale wind turbine can power anywhere from a few hundred to over 900 U.S. homes on average annually, with the exact number varying significantly based on the turbine's size, location, wind conditions, and its energy production capacity. For instance, an average U.S. turbine installed in 2020 generated enough electricity in less than an hour to power an average home for a month, and a 2.75 MW turbine could power over 940 homes annually.


Thank you Google A.I. You've been very helpful.


940 homes MAX per turbine. That's the ABSOLUTE BEST CASE scenario, which everyone knows full well is not even close to what these things actually generate in a real world application. Hence why Google said "anywhere from a few hundred to 900 US homes", before showing the one extreme example they had where they supposedly got a turbine to power 940 homes in the absolute best case scenario (Yanno... because Google is driven purely by agenda).




Let's not behave like Democrats and the Lying Legacy Media does, and give them the benefit of the doubt and use their best case scenario here...

940 * 65 = 61,100

That's a far fucking cry short of 350,000 homes, isn't it BBC?

You fucking liars.

Why should anybody trust anything else you wrote in this article, or any other article you write, when you lie so blatantly behind numbers you don't bother doing any math for?



Stick to ruining Dr. Who with your gay black doctors and leave math and graphs to people with bigger brains and/or without an agenda.

The age of agenda is dead. You killed it.

You fucked up when you woke the normies up and opened their eyes. That's why the Democratic Party is DEAD in the US and Liberalism is dying across the globe.

Europeans are seeing America clean up its streets and remove all the invaders and they want a piece of that too. We want our countries back and we're going to take them back.

And fuck anybody like Barack Obama who said it wasn't possible. The entire world is watching how easy Trump is making it look and they're not going to take it anymore either. We are about to witness a huge global change here. Trump wasn't just a win for America, but he was a win for the entire Western world.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL