REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Alaskan "island" drilling under scrutiny

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 3, 2010 17:39
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1110
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 8:48 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Good! It's BP gaming the system again; here's hoping they don't get away with it this time!
Quote:

Three miles into the Beaufort Sea from the North Slope of Alaska sits a 32-acre, man-made gravel island with a gigantic blue drilling rig atop it.

It is BP's Liberty Island, a nearly $1 billion project. As planned, the rig would drill two miles down into the seabed, then sideways up to eight miles across it, to find an enormous reservoir of oil.

BP had been scheduled to begin drilling later this year. But since the environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, when a BP-owned well blew out off Louisiana and spewed crude oil into the ocean for nearly three months, federal and state regulators are taking a new look at the Liberty project.

By dumping tons of gravel into the sea, only 22 feet (7 meters) deep at that point, environmentalists say BP has managed to game the federal permit system by getting the Liberty project classified as an onshore installation. That means its subject to less rigorous rules than offshore projects.

"If anything were to go wrong, if there were an oil spill, that oil is going into the ocean," said Rebecca Noblin, an attorney for the advocacy group Center for Biological Diversity. "It's not on land. So this is drilling in the water."

Interior Department spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff told CNN, "In light of the BP oil spill in the Gulf and new safety requirements, we will be reviewing the adequacy of the current version of the Liberty project's spill plan."

On Liberty Island, BP is attempting to drill down and sideways -- a method known as "extended reach" -- to an extent never tried in the United States. BP touts it as "one of the oil and gas industry's most significant technological advances."

But oil experts say drilling sideways has some risks, including the threat of so-called "gas kicks" that can erupt when methane bubbles rush through the sideways pipe -- and of course, the inability to control a huge oil spill in an already fragile environment.

"Industry's most significant technological advances"--they're real proud of that, but if it blows? Well, hell, "we didn't do no technological advances in cleanup...:


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 1:47 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I keep putting up real things in hopes of the sane among us having a discussion. Unfortunately, all I get are the sickos among us who want to spurt venom. Wish someone would come along who wants to actually converse...sigh...


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 4:39 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Problem with that, Niki, is my reluctance to discuss issues I know jack shit about, cause I honestly do not know enough about the tech in question to comment intelligently.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 5:04 PM

IREMISST


I second that, and what's there to discuss? We all agree someone needs to fly a fleet of planes into every single BP office.

I think we've proven the American public is pretty much impotent -pun intended- when it comes to doing anything about BP... I don't buy their gas. What more you want me to do about it?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 5:39 PM

L1GHTBR1NGER


Quote:

Originally posted by Iremisst:
I second that, and what's there to discuss? We all agree someone needs to fly a fleet of planes into every single BP office.

I think we've proven the American public is pretty much impotent -pun intended- when it comes to doing anything about BP... I don't buy their gas. What more you want me to do about it?




bout time it were said out loud.

problem ain't 9.11. problem is, that they flew there planes into teh wrong buildings. should of been exxon, bp, goldman sacks, and city bank.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Did I just watch some seriously low-key anti-immigration messaging?
Wed, June 24, 2026 03:06 - 2 posts
AI has Ruined Everyting
Wed, June 24, 2026 02:18 - 3 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, June 24, 2026 01:06 - 7562 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Tue, June 23, 2026 23:46 - 10497 posts
Khamenei, One of Most Evil People in History, is Dead
Tue, June 23, 2026 20:32 - 541 posts
Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Britain’s Rape Gangs and the Failure of Feminism
Tue, June 23, 2026 06:09 - 3 posts
Music II
Tue, June 23, 2026 05:19 - 653 posts
Race Preferences Are Falling Nationwide
Tue, June 23, 2026 04:53 - 2 posts
The Sorrows Of Empire by Chalmers Johnson
Tue, June 23, 2026 04:30 - 111 posts
Space, the final frontier
Tue, June 23, 2026 04:12 - 43 posts
Man hunt in Canada
Tue, June 23, 2026 04:04 - 31 posts
This kinda puts a kink into Obama's Muslim outreach initiative for NASA
Tue, June 23, 2026 04:02 - 10 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL