Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Ultra Libtard super psycho bimbo Chief Justice gets unseated.
Friday, May 1, 2015 3:57 PM
JEWELSTAITEFAN
Friday, May 1, 2015 6:18 PM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Saturday, May 2, 2015 4:32 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/politics/2015/04/30/emails-patience-roggensack-cast-key-vote-to-become-wisconsin-chief-justice/26639197/ MADISON — Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Patience Roggensack cast the deciding vote in her favor to replace longtime Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson in the first-of-its kind action, emails released Thursday to The Associated Press show. Because vote-rigging is the republican way!
Saturday, May 2, 2015 4:49 PM
Saturday, May 2, 2015 5:37 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: Not at all. If you read my post (you CAN read - can't you?) the issue I have is someone being able to decide a vote by voting in favor their own personal interest.
Quote: In this case it was by Roggensack voting
Quote: for herself. In normal, honest dealings having a personal stake in the outcome of a vote
Quote: The honest and legal thing for Roggensack to have done was
Quote: recuse herself. But honesty isn't a Democrat virtue. Despite all of the Justices being nonpartisan, in accordance with the Democrat shenanigans following the Hatch Act.
Saturday, May 2, 2015 7:01 PM
Saturday, May 2, 2015 9:39 PM
JONGSSTRAW
Saturday, May 2, 2015 10:22 PM
Sunday, May 3, 2015 4:07 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: The caveat - which is always true, even if not explicitly stated - is that conflict of interest is excepted. DoJ Conflicts Financial Conflicts An employee is prohibited from participating in any matter in which he has a financial interest. In addition to an employee's own financial interest, certain interests are considered his (“imputed” to him), such as those of his spouse, minor children and business partners. Personal Conflicts Generally, an employee should seek advice from an ethics official before participating in any matter in which her impartiality could be questioned.
Quote: US Courts CANON 2: A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL ACTIVITIES (A) Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at ALL times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
Quote: American Bas Association Client-Lawyer Relationship Rule 1.7 Conflict Of Interest: Current Clients (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client ...
Quote: SCR CHAPTER 60 CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (Wisconsin) Because it is not possible to address every conceivable conduct of a judge that might erode public confidence in the integrity, independence and impartiality of the judiciary, some of the binding rules of the Code are cast in general terms setting forth the principles their specific provisions are intended to foster. (4) "De minimis" means an insignificant interest that does not raise reasonable question as to a judge's impartiality or use of the prestige of the office. (7) "Impartiality" means the absence of bias or prejudice in favor of, or against, particular parties, or classes of parties, as well as maintaining an open mind in considering issues that may come before the judge. SCR 60.03 A judge SHALL avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in ALL of the judge's activities. (1) A judge shall respect and comply with the law and SHALL act at ALL times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and IMPARTIALITY of the judiciary.
Sunday, May 3, 2015 4:12 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: If you read my post (you CAN read - can't you?) the issue I have is someone being able to decide a vote by voting in favor their own personal interests. In normal, honest dealings having a personal stake in the outcome of a vote is called 'conflict of interest' and there are rules to prevent that from happening.
Sunday, May 3, 2015 4:26 PM
Sunday, May 3, 2015 4:38 PM
Monday, May 4, 2015 6:08 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: The elections would be far more honest when every person employed by the government, receiving a paycheck from the government, or subsistence check from the government were excluded from voting. Even Heinlein suggested that the right to vote should be reserved for those who served in the Armed Forces. But whiny libtards are adamantly opposed to such reasonable ethical, honest, patriotic ideas. You seem to disagree with the Constitutional Amendments.
Monday, May 4, 2015 6:16 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: So, back to the topic. Julie here seems to think that Roggensack is exempt from the Wisconsin CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT, SCR CHAPTER 60, which is written into the state code of law. Those laws require: SCR 60.03 A judge SHALL avoid impropriety and the APPEARANCE of impropriety in ALL of the judge's activities . What say you, julie? Do state laws apply to Roggensack?
Monday, May 4, 2015 7:04 PM
Monday, May 4, 2015 7:26 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/ http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/scr SCR are laws of the state of Wisconsin. What say you, julie? Do state laws apply to Roggensack?
Monday, May 4, 2015 7:51 PM
Tuesday, May 5, 2015 8:50 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: ikookoo still fails to address the problem of having her version of disregarding Constitutionally obligated duties resulting in the same election outcome.
Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:43 PM
Wednesday, May 6, 2015 7:40 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: ikookoo still fails to address the problem of having her version of disregarding Constitutionally obligated duties resulting in the same election outcome.
Saturday, May 9, 2015 2:47 PM
Monday, May 18, 2015 7:49 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: ikookoo still fails to address the problem of having her version of disregarding Constitutionally obligated duties resulting in the same election outcome. ?? crickets.
Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:11 PM
Thursday, May 28, 2015 1:44 AM
Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:53 AM
SHINYGOODGUY
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Yes, I am aware that across the fruited plain, many States have renamed their most delusional insane asylums as their State Supreme Courts. In Wisconsin, voters a month ago enacted a Constitutional Amendment, and the State Supreme Court performed one of it's finest acts in decades, and voted our new Chief Justice Roggensack. But the ultra libtard delusional super psycho Shirley Abrahamson is refusing to relinquish her chair. As Libtard Entitled Elite, she feels she is above the Laws of the State, or it's Constitution. Obeying the Laws of the State is only for the little people, the unwashed masses, the unliberated non-libtards.
Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:14 AM
SECOND
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Yes, delusional Libtards (but I repeat myself) consider honest unadulterated elections in full accordance with the Constitutional Law to be "vote-rigging" while fraudulent illegal corrupt ballot-rigging and election-rigging intentionally violating every facet of Law is the "Democrat Way" to them. As a very wise man keeps saying: you can't make this stuff up, folks!
Thursday, May 28, 2015 1:47 PM
Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:39 PM
Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:54 PM
Thursday, June 4, 2015 8:08 PM
Friday, June 5, 2015 11:05 PM
Wednesday, June 10, 2015 7:16 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: ikookoo still fails to address the problem of having her version of disregarding Constitutionally obligated duties resulting in the same election outcome. ?? crickets. It would seem 1kookoo has conceded my point, offering no argument to follow it. Only offering a claim to precede it.
Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:19 PM
Monday, June 15, 2015 7:51 PM
Monday, June 15, 2015 11:38 PM
Thursday, June 18, 2015 7:40 PM
Thursday, June 18, 2015 11:29 PM
Monday, August 3, 2015 7:33 PM
Monday, August 3, 2015 8:52 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: Constitutionally obligated duties
Tuesday, August 4, 2015 9:58 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: ikookoo still fails to address the problem of having her version of disregarding Constitutionally obligated duties resulting in the same election outcome. ?? crickets. It would seem 1kookoo has conceded my point, offering no argument to follow it. Only offering a claim to precede it. Still conceded. Even her concession speech has no point, just repeating her lack of point.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL