Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
White House: Everything’s Fine in Iraq as Ramadi Falls
Monday, May 18, 2015 9:52 PM
JONGSSTRAW
Monday, May 18, 2015 10:52 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Monday, May 18, 2015 11:50 PM
Tuesday, May 19, 2015 5:22 AM
Tuesday, May 19, 2015 7:05 PM
JEWELSTAITEFAN
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: "I am convinced that as the forces are redeployed, and as the days flow in the weeks ahead, that's going to change, as overall [they] have been driven back," Kerry said at a news conference in Seoul, South Korea, where he was meeting with government leaders. "... I am absolutely confident in the days ahead that will be reversed." SecState weasel John Kerry says that Ramadi can be 'reversed'. Wow. How inspiring. Extremely confident. One small problem... the rapes, beheadings and mass executions that are going on now WON'T be 'reversed'. Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts. " AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
Tuesday, May 19, 2015 9:58 PM
Wednesday, May 20, 2015 1:49 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Wednesday, May 20, 2015 4:51 PM
Wednesday, May 20, 2015 5:31 PM
Wednesday, May 20, 2015 6:02 PM
Wednesday, May 20, 2015 6:15 PM
Wednesday, May 20, 2015 8:21 PM
THGRRI
Friday, May 22, 2015 9:47 AM
Friday, May 22, 2015 9:52 AM
Friday, May 22, 2015 5:52 PM
Friday, May 22, 2015 6:15 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: While the world sits by and does nothing to stop the expansion of unspeakable barbarity being committed by ISIS today, how nice for the libtards that they can still reach deep into their own asses and pull out their old Blame Bush Card. It has no expiration date.
Friday, May 22, 2015 7:00 PM
Friday, May 22, 2015 7:57 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: ^ See idiot troll using his shit-stained Blame Bush Card.
Saturday, May 23, 2015 8:36 AM
Saturday, May 23, 2015 9:27 AM
Saturday, May 23, 2015 9:58 AM
Saturday, May 23, 2015 10:32 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: That's rubbish. The "story" is interweaving to completely different matters. WMD was the reason for going into Iraq. That's what Tenent said. It had zero to do w/ 9/11 , and everyone knew it. Hell, many thought OK City was retaliation for Gulf War 1. It wasn't ( Though I'm sure some will tell us exactly what it WAS, and nothing we're told by the officials was real about Timmy McVeigh ... that's another issue )
Saturday, May 23, 2015 10:51 AM
Saturday, May 23, 2015 10:54 AM
Saturday, May 23, 2015 12:18 PM
Saturday, May 23, 2015 3:00 PM
Saturday, May 23, 2015 3:08 PM
Quote: Sat May 23, 2015 (CNN)A suicide bomber detonated himself at a Shiite mosque Friday in the predominantly Sunni kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the country's official press agency said, killing 21 worshippers in an attack that has been claimed by ISIS.
Saturday, May 23, 2015 5:03 PM
Saturday, May 23, 2015 5:05 PM
Saturday, May 23, 2015 8:26 PM
Saturday, May 23, 2015 8:35 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: But hey, go right ahead and distract from events of today with tired old stories from yesteryear. Just because ISIS took Ramadi, that's nothing to fret about, even a little !
Saturday, May 23, 2015 11:10 PM
Quote:Mohamed ElBaradei charged that the U.S. had used faked and erroneous evidence to support the claims that Iraq was importing enriched uranium and other material, notably the aluminum tubes and small magnets for the manufacture of nuclear weapons
Saturday, May 23, 2015 11:30 PM
Quote:I don't know why ISIS hasn't attacked Israel.
Sunday, May 24, 2015 3:30 AM
Quote:From the first sudden, and quite dramatic, appearance of the fanatical Islamic group known as ISIS which was largely unheard of until a year ago, on the world's stage and which promptly replaced the worn out and tired al Qaeda as the world's terrorist bogeyman, we suggested that the "straight to beheading YouTube clip" purpose behind the Saudi Arabia-funded Islamic State was a simple one: use the Jihadists as the vehicle of choice to achieve a political goal: depose of Syria's president Assad, who for years has stood in the way of a critical Qatari natural gas pipeline, one which could dethrone Russia as Europe's dominant - and belligerent - source of energy, reaching an interim climax with the unsuccessful Mediterranean Sea military build up of 2013, which nearly resulted in quasi-world war. The narrative and the plotline were so transparent, even Russia saw right through them. Recall from September of last year: If the West bombs Islamic State militants in Syria without consulting Damascus, LiveLeak reports that the anti-ISIS alliance may use the occasion to launch airstrikes against President Bashar Assad’s forces, according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Clearly comprehending that Obama's new strategy against ISIS in Syria is all about pushing the Qatar pipeline through (as was the impetus behind the 2013 intervention push), Russia is pushing back noting that the it is using ISIS as a pretext for bombing Syrian government forces and warning that "such a development would lead to a huge escalation of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa." But it's one thing to speculate; it's something entirely different to have hard proof. And while speculation was rife that just like the CIA-funded al Qaeda had been used as a facade by the US to achieve its own geopolitical and national interests over the past two decades, so ISIS was nothing more than al Qaeda 2.0, there was no actual evidence of just this. That may all have changed now when a declassified secret US government document obtained by the public interest law firm, Judicial Watch, shows that Western governments deliberately allied with al-Qaeda and other Islamist extremist groups to topple Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad. According to investigative reporter Nafeez Ahmed in Medium, the "leaked document reveals that in coordination with the Gulf states [Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE etc-SIGNY] and Turkey, the West intentionally sponsored violent Islamist groups to destabilize Assad, despite anticipating that doing so could lead to the emergence of an ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). According to the newly declassified US document, the Pentagon foresaw the likely rise of the ‘Islamic State’ as a direct consequence of the strategy, but described this outcome as a strategic opportunity to “isolate the Syrian regime.” ... The newly declassified DIA document from 2012 confirms that the main component of the anti-Assad rebel forces by this time comprised Islamist insurgents affiliated to groups that would lead to the emergence of ISIS. Despite this, these groups were to continue receiving support from Western militaries and their regional allies. Noting that “the Salafist [sic], the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [al-Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria,” the document states that “the West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support the opposition [ie. known terrorists-SIGNY]" ... The formerly secret Pentagon report notes that the “rise of the insurgency in Syria” has increasingly taken a “sectarian direction,” attracting diverse support from Sunni “religious and tribal powers” across the region. In a section titled ‘The Future Assumptions of the Crisis,’ the DIA report predicts that while Assad’s regime will survive, retaining control over Syrian territory, the crisis will continue to escalate “into proxy war.” The document also recommends the creation of “safe havens under international sheltering, similar to what transpired in Libya when Benghazi was chosen as the command centre for the temporary government.” In Libya, anti-Gaddafi rebels, most of whom were al-Qaeda affiliated militias [supported by plane loads of arms from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and assisted by bombing campaigns from the west-SIGNY] were protected by NATO ‘safe havens’ (aka ‘no fly zones’). In a strikingly prescient prediction, the Pentagon document explicitly forecasts the probable declaration of “an Islamic State through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria.” “… there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).” The secret Pentagon document thus provides extraordinary confirmation that the US-led coalition currently fighting ISIS, had three years ago welcomed the emergence of an extremist “Salafist Principality” in the region as a way to undermine Assad, and block off the strategic expansion of Iran. Crucially, Iraq is labeled as an integral part of this “Shia expansion.”
Sunday, May 24, 2015 6:20 AM
Sunday, May 24, 2015 10:13 AM
Sunday, May 24, 2015 11:14 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Sig - bin Laden wasn't in Saudi Arabia, so why attack them ? He was in Afghanistan. As he was in Somalia before. And in Sudan before that... * 1991 -- Bin Laden is expelled from Saudi Arabia by its regime. Eventually he and his followers relocate to Sudan, funded by assets that had grown to as much as $250 million, according to some officials. In that African nation, al Qaeda begins to evolve into a terror network. * December 1992 -- U.S. forces land in Somalia, spearheading a U.N.-authorized humanitarian plan to bring in famine relief supplies. Part of their challenge is disarming the various warlords who controll the country. Prosecutors charge that bin Laden threw himself into the conflict, sending some of his followers to Somalia to train the warlords to fight the U.S. troops Should we have attacked them as well ?
Quote:RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — During the 1980s and ’90s, the historic alliance between the wealthy monarchy of Saudi Arabia and the country’s powerful clerics emerged as the major financier of international jihad, channeling tens of millions of dollars to Muslim fighters in Afghanistan, Bosnia and elsewhere. Among the project’s major patrons was Prince Salman Bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, who last month became Saudi Arabia’s king.
Sunday, May 24, 2015 11:24 AM
Sunday, May 24, 2015 11:43 AM
Sunday, May 24, 2015 11:53 AM
Sunday, May 24, 2015 12:05 PM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Ideology, is "the imaginary relation to the real conditions of existence." It can be described as a set of conscious and unconscious ideas which make up one's goals, expectations, and motivations. Ideology refers to the system of abstracted meaning applied to public matters, thus making this concept central to politics. Implicitly, in societies that distinguish between public and private life, every political or economic tendency entails ideology, whether or not it is propounded as an explicit system of thought. Some can learn new facts and change their opinions, at least shift them a bit.
Sunday, May 24, 2015 12:44 PM
SECOND
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: .... there are basic things which we all can agree on, but for some reason, take another couple of steps down that road, and all hell breaks loose.
Sunday, May 24, 2015 1:03 PM
Sunday, May 24, 2015 1:57 PM
Sunday, May 24, 2015 6:36 PM
Sunday, May 24, 2015 7:00 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: " So what happened to the Iraqi army the West paid for? " I don't know if it was General Schwarzkopf, or some one else, but after the Gulf War, one of our guys said something to the effect of " We could have given them our gear and our guys used theirs, and we'd still would have kicked their ass. " Takes more than hardware to win a war. Takes training, commitment, will, tactics, leadership... all of which the Iraqi army woefully lacked.
Sunday, May 24, 2015 7:26 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Takes more than hardware to win a war. Takes training, commitment, will, tactics, leadership... all of which the Iraqi army woefully lacked.
Monday, May 25, 2015 11:11 AM
Monday, May 25, 2015 12:47 PM
Monday, May 25, 2015 1:03 PM
Quote:Let me throw a hypothetical operation onto the table. The Islamic State has billions [Billions? Like, from their "Saudi friends" and "illegal oil sales thru Turkey" billions?- SIGNY] of dollars in the bank, so they call on their wil?yah in Pakistan to purchase a nuclear device through weapons dealers with links to corrupt officials in the region. The weapon is then transported overland until it makes it to Libya, where the muj?hid?n move it south to Nigeria. Drug shipments from Columbia bound for Europe pass through West Africa, so moving other types of contraband from East to West is just as possible. The nuke and accompanying muj?hid?n arrive on the shorelines of South America and are transported through the porous borders of Central America before arriving in Mexico and up to the border with the United States. From there it’s just a quick hop through a smuggling tunnel and hey presto, they’re mingling with another 12 million “illegal” aliens in America with a nuclear bomb in the trunk of their car. Perhaps such a scenario is far-fetched but it’s the sum of all fears for Western intelligence agencies and it’s infinitely more possible today than it was just one year ago. And if not a nuke, what about a few thousand tons of ammonium nitrate explosive? That’s easy enough to make. The Islamic State make no secret of the fact they have every intention of attacking America on its home soil and they’re not going to mince about with two muj?hid?n taking down a dozen casualties if it originates from the Caliphate. They’ll be looking to do something big, something that would make any past operation look like a squirrel shoot, and the more groups that pledge allegiance the more possible it becomes to pull off something truly epic. Remember, all of this has happened in less than a year. How more dangerous will be the lines of communication and supply a year on from today? If the West completely failed to spot the emergence of the Islamic State and then the allies who so quickly pledged allegiance to it from around the world, what else of massive significance are they going to miss next?
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL