REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Nobel Prize winner too "stupid" in school

POSTED BY: CANTTAKESKY
UPDATED: Thursday, October 11, 2012 13:55
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 862
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:07 AM

CANTTAKESKY


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9594351/Sir-John-Gurdo
n-Nobel-Prize-winner-was-too-stupid-for-science-at-school.html


Quote:

At the age of 15, Prof Sir John Gurdon ranked last out of the 250 boys in his Eton year group at biology, and was in the bottom set in every other science subject.

Sixty-four years later he has been recognised as one of the finest minds of his generation after being awarded the £750,000 annual prize, which he shares with Japanese stem cell researcher Shinya Yamanaka.

Speaking after learning of his award in London on Monday, Sir John revealed that his school report still sits above his desk at the Gurdon Institute in Cambridge, which is named in his honour.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:30 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Of course, this presumes most school systems have anything to do with education....
*scoff*
Beyond the very basics, rote learning, memorization and obedience aren't conductive to critical thought, cross examination and exploration of ideas, learning, above all... to THINK, to CREATE, to QUESTION.
Those are dangerous things, since they threaten the disastrous status quo of a stagnated and failing society.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:55 PM

OONJERAH



Without public schools, I believe most of us would be illiterate.
Too many are, anyway.

If most of what we know was learned in PS, we tend to assume that's
the only place to get real knowledge.

This guy was an artist from age 4. An amazing talent.
People sometimes told him, "You didn't draw that. You couldn't." or
"You can't paint that way without training. You wouldn't know how."

Mathematicians don't amaze me so much: They just take the next step.
But folks who make intuitive breakthroughs in physics, I don't get it.
How could they just know that stuff? But at least I don't say, "You'll never
be a real physicist unless you stick to what's known." I say, "WOW!"

In the mists of prehistory, I cannot comprehed how the hobby, practice,
then science of metallurgy began.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Fri, February 20, 2026 00:42 - 4299 posts
Today in the Tags
Fri, February 20, 2026 00:38 - 5 posts
Metal Standings from Italy
Fri, February 20, 2026 00:20 - 25 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, February 19, 2026 20:14 - 6679 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Thu, February 19, 2026 20:08 - 1222 posts
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Thu, February 19, 2026 20:07 - 404 posts
The Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein FULL INTERVIEW - BBC Newsnight
Thu, February 19, 2026 16:42 - 9 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, February 19, 2026 14:39 - 9773 posts
Putin's Legacy
Thu, February 19, 2026 12:58 - 166 posts
Midterms 2026
Thu, February 19, 2026 12:50 - 361 posts
What are America's interests?
Thu, February 19, 2026 10:13 - 159 posts
The Guardian: The US is dragging Europe back to the days of white supremacism. Our leaders are playing along
Thu, February 19, 2026 10:09 - 3 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL