REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Nobel Prize winner too "stupid" in school

POSTED BY: CANTTAKESKY
UPDATED: Thursday, October 11, 2012 13:55
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 805
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:07 AM

CANTTAKESKY


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9594351/Sir-John-Gurdo
n-Nobel-Prize-winner-was-too-stupid-for-science-at-school.html


Quote:

At the age of 15, Prof Sir John Gurdon ranked last out of the 250 boys in his Eton year group at biology, and was in the bottom set in every other science subject.

Sixty-four years later he has been recognised as one of the finest minds of his generation after being awarded the £750,000 annual prize, which he shares with Japanese stem cell researcher Shinya Yamanaka.

Speaking after learning of his award in London on Monday, Sir John revealed that his school report still sits above his desk at the Gurdon Institute in Cambridge, which is named in his honour.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:30 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Of course, this presumes most school systems have anything to do with education....
*scoff*
Beyond the very basics, rote learning, memorization and obedience aren't conductive to critical thought, cross examination and exploration of ideas, learning, above all... to THINK, to CREATE, to QUESTION.
Those are dangerous things, since they threaten the disastrous status quo of a stagnated and failing society.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:55 PM

OONJERAH



Without public schools, I believe most of us would be illiterate.
Too many are, anyway.

If most of what we know was learned in PS, we tend to assume that's
the only place to get real knowledge.

This guy was an artist from age 4. An amazing talent.
People sometimes told him, "You didn't draw that. You couldn't." or
"You can't paint that way without training. You wouldn't know how."

Mathematicians don't amaze me so much: They just take the next step.
But folks who make intuitive breakthroughs in physics, I don't get it.
How could they just know that stuff? But at least I don't say, "You'll never
be a real physicist unless you stick to what's known." I say, "WOW!"

In the mists of prehistory, I cannot comprehed how the hobby, practice,
then science of metallurgy began.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Tue, August 5, 2025 23:03 - 2790 posts
Sydney Sweeny has Great Fucking Jeans
Tue, August 5, 2025 22:01 - 7 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Tue, August 5, 2025 20:35 - 835 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Tue, August 5, 2025 18:12 - 5727 posts
Orange you glad he's not Speaker?
Tue, August 5, 2025 17:28 - 18 posts
An analysis of the illusion of freedom
Tue, August 5, 2025 17:13 - 89 posts
Rachel Maddow found Wulfie
Tue, August 5, 2025 17:11 - 15 posts
Hillary Clinton
Tue, August 5, 2025 17:10 - 25 posts
How did Western Art Architecture get so ugly?
Tue, August 5, 2025 17:05 - 5 posts
Trump Is Destroying Everything He Touches
Tue, August 5, 2025 16:34 - 503 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Tue, August 5, 2025 16:29 - 8698 posts
70 Years Since Hiroshima
Tue, August 5, 2025 14:56 - 157 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL