REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Nobel Prize winner too "stupid" in school

POSTED BY: CANTTAKESKY
UPDATED: Thursday, October 11, 2012 13:55
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 829
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:07 AM

CANTTAKESKY


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9594351/Sir-John-Gurdo
n-Nobel-Prize-winner-was-too-stupid-for-science-at-school.html


Quote:

At the age of 15, Prof Sir John Gurdon ranked last out of the 250 boys in his Eton year group at biology, and was in the bottom set in every other science subject.

Sixty-four years later he has been recognised as one of the finest minds of his generation after being awarded the £750,000 annual prize, which he shares with Japanese stem cell researcher Shinya Yamanaka.

Speaking after learning of his award in London on Monday, Sir John revealed that his school report still sits above his desk at the Gurdon Institute in Cambridge, which is named in his honour.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:30 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Of course, this presumes most school systems have anything to do with education....
*scoff*
Beyond the very basics, rote learning, memorization and obedience aren't conductive to critical thought, cross examination and exploration of ideas, learning, above all... to THINK, to CREATE, to QUESTION.
Those are dangerous things, since they threaten the disastrous status quo of a stagnated and failing society.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:55 PM

OONJERAH



Without public schools, I believe most of us would be illiterate.
Too many are, anyway.

If most of what we know was learned in PS, we tend to assume that's
the only place to get real knowledge.

This guy was an artist from age 4. An amazing talent.
People sometimes told him, "You didn't draw that. You couldn't." or
"You can't paint that way without training. You wouldn't know how."

Mathematicians don't amaze me so much: They just take the next step.
But folks who make intuitive breakthroughs in physics, I don't get it.
How could they just know that stuff? But at least I don't say, "You'll never
be a real physicist unless you stick to what's known." I say, "WOW!"

In the mists of prehistory, I cannot comprehed how the hobby, practice,
then science of metallurgy began.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Wed, October 8, 2025 08:02 - 3537 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Wed, October 8, 2025 07:35 - 9042 posts
Trump Is Destroying Everything He Touches
Wed, October 8, 2025 07:31 - 745 posts
Celebrating Shumer Shutdown
Wed, October 8, 2025 07:13 - 10 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, October 8, 2025 05:00 - 6071 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Wed, October 8, 2025 02:31 - 1037 posts
Who Are The Superstars of Trump 2.0?
Wed, October 8, 2025 02:24 - 1 posts
White Liberal News: Jeffries Doesn't Have A Sombrero
Wed, October 8, 2025 02:06 - 13 posts
The Thread of Court Cases Trump Is Winning
Wed, October 8, 2025 01:46 - 75 posts
Trunp loses again in Court
Tue, October 7, 2025 20:42 - 830 posts
TRUMP AND HIS SUPPORTERS
Tue, October 7, 2025 10:55 - 567 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Tue, October 7, 2025 07:41 - 7116 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL