REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Column: Stop playing politics with women’s access to contraception

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 09:36
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 359
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:36 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Bang on:
Quote:

Column: Stop playing politics with women’s access to contraception

Editor's Note: Rev. Debra Haffner is an ordained Unitarian Universalist minister, and is the co-founder and Executive Director of The Religious Institute, a multifaith organization advocating for sexuality education, sexual health, and sexual justice in America’s faith communities and society.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ decision to reject the White House compromise on birth control access in health insurance is further evidence that their concern is not religious liberty, but playing politics with women’s lives. Under the White House plan, Catholic institutions do not have to financially support contraceptive care; no woman has to use it. The Bishops’ cloaking their anti-women’s sexuality view in religious liberty arguments is nothing more than their trying to do with health insurance reform what they have not been able to do from the pulpit: deny women access to modern contraceptives.

Secular leaders on the right, like Penny Nance from Concerned Women for America, distort the debate, incorrectly stating that women have access to birth control without insurance, or that some birth control methods work by causing abortions. Many women are unable to pay for contraceptive care out of pocket and many do without; this is part of the reason why half of all pregnancies in the U.S. are unintended. And no modern method of birth control works by causing women to spontaneously miscarry a pregnancy.

The Roman Catholic Bishops do not speak for religion on contraception; they do not even speak for American Catholics who by in large ignore their teaching on sexuality issues, from premarital sex to contraception to LGBT equality. As of today, twenty-nine major national mainstream religious leaders have endorsed a statement supporting the White House decision that contraceptive services must be covered by insurance policies without deductibles or co-pays, and only purely sectarian organizations – churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples – will be exempt from this requirement. The signers of this letter come from 27 national organizations that represent millions of religious leaders and people of faith across the country.

There is nothing new about religious organizations supporting the provision of contraception and women’s moral agency to decide when, whether, and if to use birth control. More than 20 denominations have policies affirming birth control, passed as early as 1959. More than 4000 religious leaders have endorsed the Religious Declaration, including a faith-based commitment to voluntary contraception.

There is an authentic, historically ground religious Jewish and Christian perspective that supports access to birth control. It is precisely because of the religious belief that life is sacred, that mainstream religious leaders for decades have been committed to assuring access to contraceptive services so that all pregnancies are intended. Religious leaders from distinct traditions affirm that individuals’ must have the moral agency to make decisions about their sexuality and reproductive health without governmental interference or legal restrictions.

Our belief in religious liberty and the separation of church and state means that we understand that no single religious voice should speak for all faith traditions on contraception or any other sexuality issues, and that the government should never take sides on religious differences. Just as Jehovah Witnesses who run secular institutions must cover blood transfusions for their employees, and Christian Scientists who run secular institutions must offer health insurance for their employees, there is no religious conflict for Roman Catholic affiliated hospitals and universities to allow their employees access to health insurance that includes contraception.

So if those other faiths have to provide services which go against their "religious beliefs", why should the organizations in question get special dispensation to NOT do so?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Maybe us Libertarians should vote for Bush?
Mon, June 23, 2025 06:26 - 28 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Mon, June 23, 2025 05:44 - 5576 posts
REUTERS: Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
Mon, June 23, 2025 04:25 - 14 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Mon, June 23, 2025 00:04 - 2387 posts
IRAN: Trump's war?
Sun, June 22, 2025 22:54 - 294 posts
War is peace
Sun, June 22, 2025 20:17 - 73 posts
Dmitry Medvedev admits the REAL problem
Sun, June 22, 2025 20:09 - 8 posts
From the Desk of Donald J Trump
Sun, June 22, 2025 19:50 - 283 posts
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Sun, June 22, 2025 14:56 - 320 posts
The Honeymoon is Over
Sun, June 22, 2025 14:54 - 391 posts
The predictions thread
Sun, June 22, 2025 14:45 - 1230 posts
Game Companies are Morons.
Sun, June 22, 2025 14:40 - 237 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL