Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Ann Coulter, right wing goddess
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 4:34 AM
CHRISISALL
Quote:Originally posted by piratenews: www.scifilm.org/reviews3/americanwerewolf.html
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 4:37 AM
Quote:Originally posted by arclight: Ann Coulter is a GOD. Put that in your PC pipes and toke the rest of your brains out.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 5:54 AM
MALBADINLATIN
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: Sorry, but I think you're totally wrong about that meaning....she was obviously using "that f-t word" in the context of a mama's boy, or girly-man, etc....she knows he's NOT gay for lord's sake..didnt he run for VP back a spell?..can't even kool-aid comotosed liberals recognize sarcasm when they hear it...or is that another rehab qualifier?
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 8:02 AM
FUTUREMRSFILLION
Quote:Originally posted by arclight: FMF wrote: "My psyche Prof told us that we most loudly decry that which we fear in ourselves." So does that mean you are actually a right wing conservative? Psycho-babble horsesh*t. Ann Coulter is a GOD. Put that in your PC pipes and toke the rest of your brains out.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 2:01 PM
BIGDAMNNOBODY
Quote: Originally posted by Malbadinlatin: Ann Coulter is a liar, her book Slander is riddled with innacuracies and poison for the mind. It's a collection of all the delusions that Republicans love to relax in. But check this out it's Hi-larious http://blogs.salon.com/0002874/stories/2003/11/22/annCoultersBeautySecret.html
Quote: Originally posted by yinyang: http://ifuckedanncoulterintheasshard.blogspot.com
Quote: Originally posted by Eric: Coulter is: 1. A man 2. A type of horse 3. Irrelevant in the extreme and whoring for attention I say ignore him.
Quote: Originally posted by IlGreven: Meanwhile, I personally think that there is no one on the left like Ann Coulter is on the right...and the scarier proposition is that she's not the worst of the right-wing loonies...
Quote: Originally posted by SoupCatcher: I guess the bigger question is, "Would Ann Coulter still sell books if she was not propped up by the Regnery/RW welfare machine?" Probably not. The takeaway message is that the wingnuts will take care of their own.
Quote: Originally posted by EmpireX: To me, the most irritating thing about her... well, the second-most irritating thing about her is how FUNNY she thinks she is. There's nothing lamer than someone who thinks they're brilliantly funny when, in reality, they're just pathetic. That, and she makes it embarassing to be white. Seriously. If I could change into a gay-Arab-socialist-illegal immigrant, I totally would, just to spite her.
Quote: Originally posted by rue: "Ann Coulter, right wing goddess" Would that be the one with snakes for hair?
Quote: Originally posted by NewOldBrownCoat: I think she might be Sappho of Lesbos, reincarnated. Maybe her real problem is that she's a closet bull dyke, and really wants to do it with Rosie O'Donnell on network TV. And my apologies to closeted bull dykes everywhere.
Quote: Originally posted by Mavourneen: What is with her hands??? They look vaguely alien...and this picture isn't 'shopped. It is also readily available on her website. almost more disturbing than her words are her hands...
Quote: Originally posted by FutureMrsFIllion: Well she should know a homosexual when she sees one, what with the adams apple and all.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 2:07 PM
Quote:Originally posted by BigDamnNobody: [B Why attack the message when it is more fun to attack the messenger. I heard somewhere that those tactics are only found on the right, guess not. Posting to stir stuff up.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 2:22 PM
SOUPCATCHER
Quote:Originally posted by BigDamnNobody: Why attack the message when it is more fun to attack the messenger. I heard somewhere that those tactics are only found on the right, guess not.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 2:35 PM
RUE
I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 3:05 PM
JKIDDO
Quote:Why attack the message when it is more fun to attack the messenger. I heard somewhere that those tactics are only found on the right, guess not.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 3:32 PM
JONGSSTRAW
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 3:40 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: All you brainless, one-word or phrase bashers of Ann & Republicans & Conservatives....ponder this a spell....I and the vast majority of normal traditional American, hard-working family folk think ALL you liberals are faggots....in addition to generally being godless, vile libertines & traitors...but I go off topic & apologize.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 3:49 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: All you brainless, one-word or phrase bashers of Ann & Republicans & Conservatives....ponder this a spell....I and the vast majority of normal traditional American, hard-working family folk think ALL you liberals are faggots....in addition to generally being godless, vile libertines & traitors...but I go off topic & apologize. Now, do we all think you're all gay????? Probably not...but in the eyes & hearts & souls & time-tested belief-systems of clear-thinking people who are NOT ashamed & embarrassed by the history of their country, etc etc....you're all a sad lot of malcontents, losers, freaks, naive idiots,& faggots...ooooops I said it again...whoops...off to another PC liberal idiot rehab clinic.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 4:27 PM
GEEZER
Keep the Shiny side up
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 4:29 PM
Quote: Originally posted by SoupCatcher: A couple of directions to take this. I think if you look back you will find that the statement made was that those tactics are found on the right being used by people in positions of power. So if you were to accurately remember rather than (purposefully?) misremember then you would have to say that all the people you have quoted have the same power and influence and audience as Ann Coulter/Rush Limbaugh/Michael Savage/etc. Which I think we both agree is just hilariously wrong.
Quote: Originally posted by SoupCatcher: Thursday, February 22, 2007 - 17:13 For the authoritarian followers it will always be about personalities. A key tell is that they will often bring up other personalities that they think you are devoted to with the same fervor of their own. It's almost a given that whenever you bring up a negative about one of the right wing authorian followers beloved personalities they will bring up Clinton. It's a tactic that they use - go after personality - because it's what works on them.
Quote: However, I do agree that it is counterproductive to try and outCoulter Coulter. For one thing, she gets paid to do it.
Quote: * addendum: To be very clear. You are conflating two claims into one. The first claim was that, for right-wing authoritarian followers, it will always be about the personality. Notice that there is nothing in that claim about people who are not right-wing authoritarian followers. It does not say that, for people who are not right-wing authoritarian followers, it will never be about personality.
Quote: The second claim was that there are no equivalent prominent people on the left who attack their opponents the way that many prominent people on the right do. Notice that there is nothing in this claim about everyone on the right or the left, only people in positions of prominence/influence.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 4:33 PM
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 4:46 PM
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 5:59 PM
Quote: Originally posted by rue: In case you didn't recognize what my post was, it was A JOKE ! You know, b/c most people think of goddesses as luscious things and forget there are the ones with snakes for hair. DUH !
Quote: But what is your point? That Coulter should be forgiven for slandering Edwards? For pandering to to right-wing-nuts who love to hear that kind of thing said 'cause they're too chicken-shit to say it themselves?
Quote: OR FOR USING FAGGOT AS A DERAGATORY TERM like there is something wrong with being gay?
Quote: eenie, meenie, minee, moh catch a nig ... I mean TIGER by the toe ...
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 6:10 PM
YINYANG
You were busy trying to get yourself lit on fire. It happens.
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 6:25 PM
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 7:19 PM
Quote: Originally posted by rue: Rue "OR FOR USING FAGGOT AS A DERAGATORY TERM" BDN "There is nothing wrong with being gay" Rue See below Rue "catch a nig ... I mean TIGER by the toe ..." BDN "or were your intentions more nefarious" Rue You recognized nigger as slander, but discounted faggot. Why did you do that?
Quote: Originally posted by rue: OR FOR USING FAGGOT AS A DERAGATORY TERM like there is something wrong with being gay?
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 8:05 PM
Quote:Originally posted by BigDamnNobody: I think you were refering to this forum and not people in positions of power with that quote. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Quote: But one should aspire to rise above the petty personal attacks and stick to the politics.
Quote: http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003548043 Would you consider any of the people named in this article as being in positions of prominence?
Wednesday, March 7, 2007 9:44 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Let's see... For Ann Coulter to suggest that John Edwards shares attributes commonly (if erroneously) attributed to homosexuals is slander, a lie, a fraud, and should not be accepted by anyone. For multiple posters to suggest that Ann Coulter bathes in virgins' blood, enjoys taking it up the a** while listening to liberal viewpoints, is a transvestite, has had a sex change, etc., is just good fun. Do I detect a slight case of double standard here? Not expecting a reasonable answer Geezer.
Thursday, March 8, 2007 12:08 AM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Quote:Originally posted by Hero: John Edwards, gay or not, sees dead people, talks to dead people, and unlike most Democrats, cannot get them to vote for him.
Thursday, March 8, 2007 12:43 AM
Quote:Originally posted by FMF: When someone gets paid big bucks to stand up in front of the Democrtic Party machine and officially say these things, you'll have a point. Until then, you're just off-message, as ususal.
Thursday, March 8, 2007 4:10 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: I've tried not to post much, but I do see an overwhelming Liberal bias in here, as usual, and I just think that the playing field needs to be leveled a bit.
Thursday, March 8, 2007 5:02 AM
Quote: Originally posted by SoupCatcher: Quote:Originally posted by BigDamnNobody: http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003548043 Would you consider any of the people named in this article as being in positions of prominence? Okay, so you're using an example of the campaign staff of two Democratic politicians going back and forth at each other as a counter to prominent conservative/Republicans smearing millions of people? Just wanted to make sure that's the equivalence that you're trying to set-up here.
Quote:Originally posted by BigDamnNobody: http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003548043 Would you consider any of the people named in this article as being in positions of prominence?
Quote: Originally posted by SoupCatcher: The second claim was that there are no equivalent prominent people on the left who attack their opponents the way that many prominent people on the right do. Notice that there is nothing in this claim about everyone on the right or the left, only people in positions of prominence/influence.
Thursday, March 8, 2007 7:07 AM
Thursday, March 8, 2007 7:21 AM
Thursday, March 8, 2007 7:59 AM
Thursday, March 8, 2007 10:08 AM
Quote:Originally posted by BigDamnNobody: Quote: Originally posted by SoupCatcher: The second claim was that there are no equivalent prominent people on the left who attack their opponents the way that many prominent people on the right do. Notice that there is nothing in this claim about everyone on the right or the left, only people in positions of prominence/influence. IMHO, Hilary Clinton and Barak Obama are responsible for the actions of their respective staffs. I would consider both of them to presently be in positions of prominence. David Geffen raised a boat load of money for Obama at his 'Giant Hollywood Fundraiser' and his most recent attack against the Clintons made every national entertainment show. I would consider him to be in a position of prominence. South Carolina State Senator Robert Ford is certainley in a position of prominence in South Carolina. James Carville is a nationally known pundit who regularly appears on television and movies. I would consider him in a position of prominence.
Thursday, March 8, 2007 10:21 AM
NEWOLDBROWNCOAT
Quote:Originally posted by Malbadinlatin: Quote: I go to church, and from what I remember, Jesus teaches tolerance.
Quote: I go to church, and from what I remember, Jesus teaches tolerance.
Thursday, March 8, 2007 6:08 PM
Quote:By House Speaker Nancy Pelosi 11/17/2006 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-nancy-pelosi/bringing-the-war-to-an-en_b_34393.html "Bringing the War to an End is my Highest Priority as Speaker" "This unnecessary pre-emptive war has come at great cost. Nearly 2,900 of our brave troops have lost their lives and more than 21,000 more have suffered lasting wounds. Since the war began, Congress has appropriated more than $350 billion, and the United States has suffered devastating damage to our reputation in the eyes of the world." "We will honor the trust of the American people; we will not disappoint."
Quote:By House Speaker Nancy Pelosi 12/05/2006 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16057734/ “We will not cut off funding for the troops,” Pelosi said. “Absolutely not,” she said.
Quote:“Let me remove all doubt in anyone’s mind; as long as our troops are in harm’s way, Democrats will be there to support them, but… we will have oversight over that funding,” she said.
Quote:Incoming Demoncrat Majority Leader Steny Hoyer: “None of us want to fail; none of us want to see Iraq as a failure,” said incoming Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland.
Quote:“We better find another way to get this done other than cutting off funds,” said Nancy Boyda, a newly elected Democratic congresswoman from Kansas.
Quote:Newly-elected House member Tim Walz from Minnesota said, “In my district I wasn’t hearing (during the campaign) an overall cry that the troops have to out by midnight tomorrow.” Instead he said voters want to see some plan on how to succeed in stabilizing Iraq.
Quote:By Demoncratic Pollster Jeremy Rosner: “Despite the war’s initial bipartisan authorization, Iraq belongs to George Bush.”
Quote:By Demoncratic Pollster Jeremy Rosner: “Democrats need to avoid pushing for funding cut-offs that could be cast as undermining the troops (and which would in any event merely be veto bait).”
Thursday, March 8, 2007 8:24 PM
Thursday, March 8, 2007 9:53 PM
Thursday, March 8, 2007 10:09 PM
Quote:excerpted from nytimes article ... Of course, not all buzz is good buzz. The commercial for Snickers — created by TBWA/Chiat/Day, part of the TBWA Worldwide division of Omnicom — drew intense criticism as well as some praise. In addition to complaining that the Snickers commercial itself was homophobic, organizations like the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation and the Human Rights Campaign, also complained about video clips that went up after the game on the special Web site, which showed the two men committing additional violent acts against themselves and each other. There were also interviews with members of the Chicago Bears and Indianapolis Colts in which they offered disgusted reactions to the accidental kiss. “As with all of our Snickers advertising, our goal was to capture the attention of our core Snickers consumer, primarily 18-to-24-year-old adult males,” said a spokeswoman for Masterfoods, Alice Nathanson. “Feedback from our target consumers has been positive, and many media and Web site commentators on this year’s Super Bowl lineup ranked the commercial among this year’s best.” “We know that humor is highly subjective and we understand that some consumers have found the commercial offensive,” Ms. Nathanson said, adding: “Clearly that was not our intent. We do not plan to continue the ad on television or on our Web site.” ...
Quote:from AMERICAblog Ad 4: "Wrench" (these are the actual names Snickers gave the ads). The two guys accidentally kiss, they say to each other again "quick, do something manly," and one guy proceeds to pick up a huge oversized wrench and violently attack the other guy, while the second takes the first and throws him under the hood of the car, slamming it down on his head. Yes, the appropriate reaction to a guy kissing you is to beat the crap out of the guy who kissed you. Maybe Snickers should rename this ad "Matthew Shepard."
Thursday, March 8, 2007 11:23 PM
Thursday, March 8, 2007 11:57 PM
Quote:As far as the NFL player's reactions though, what did they really expect? What John doesn't seem to understand is that there is still a majority of the people in the nation, and especially the world, who think that homosexuality is wrong.
Quote:I think right now that the gay community should be happy with the fact that gay kids can come out in school and not be found a week later swinging from a tree in the middle of the woods. I say, as long as there's no violence against gays anymore then they've already won. What is there to gain from grossing out people with homosexual ads who find homosexuality disgusting?
Quote:I just think it was a dirty trick and bad form for them to blatently display a homosexual act on the one night of the year that garners the most consolidated viewership in America, ensuring that the maximum amount of people in the country were going to see it at the same time.
Friday, March 9, 2007 12:45 AM
Friday, March 9, 2007 7:30 AM
Friday, March 9, 2007 7:51 AM
Quote:For Ann Coulter to suggest that John Edwards shares attributes commonly (if erroneously) attributed to homosexuals is slander, a lie, a fraud, and should not be accepted by anyone. For multiple posters to suggest that Ann Coulter bathes in virgins' blood, enjoys taking it up the a** while listening to liberal viewpoints, is a transvestite, has had a sex change, etc., is just good fun. Do I detect a slight case of double standard here?
Friday, March 9, 2007 9:49 PM
Friday, March 9, 2007 11:28 PM
Sunday, March 11, 2007 10:28 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SoupCatcher: Ann Coulter is hired to speak and write books precisely because she expresses the sentiments she does. Who hires her to write books? Who hires her to come and talk? On what end of the political spectrum lies her target audience? Ann Coulter has the explicit support of the Republican Party. Her comments have the explicit support of the Republican Party. By this point in time, when you hire her to come and talk, you know exactly what you're getting. The crowd reaction to her faggot comment was quite positive. They got exactly what they wanted and expected. She has explicitly advocated violence against those who do not share her views. If you look at her vector it ends in lynch mobs.
Sunday, March 11, 2007 11:04 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: So she's the right's Michael Moore, except she doesn't make films, and makes up a bit less of her facts? No. She's an entertainer. She went the opposite direction of, say, Al Franken. He went from comic to commentator - she went from commentator to entertainer. I'd put her in the bracket with John Stewart and Stephen Colbert.
Sunday, March 11, 2007 11:06 AM
Sunday, March 11, 2007 11:11 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JKiddo: Quote:For Ann Coulter to suggest that John Edwards shares attributes commonly (if erroneously) attributed to homosexuals is slander, a lie, a fraud, and should not be accepted by anyone. For multiple posters to suggest that Ann Coulter bathes in virgins' blood, enjoys taking it up the a** while listening to liberal viewpoints, is a transvestite, has had a sex change, etc., is just good fun. Do I detect a slight case of double standard here? I plead the Ann Coulter defense again... It's a JOKE, man! If Ann couldn't take it, I'm sure she wouldn't be dishing it out.
Sunday, March 11, 2007 12:06 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SoupCatcher: It's going to be kind of hard for you to defend the Republican Party's official embrace of Ann Coulter, Geezer, if she continues to make statements like this, "Those few abortionists were shot, or, depending on your point of view, had a procedure with a rifle performed on them. I'm not justifying it, but I do understand how it happened..." [which she said at the Reclaiming America for Christ conference just a day after she verbally attacked Edwards]....If you support Ann Coulter then you support violently repressing dissent.
Sunday, March 11, 2007 12:15 PM
Quote:Originally posted by rue: Slick, "No. She's an entertainer." Then why did Richards (Kramer) get slammed for called someone a nigger? In fact he was working at a COMEDY club when he said that, not at a figgin' CPAC.
Quote:Oh, and just so you know who some of the OTHER speakers were at the CPAC: Vice President Dick Cheney, Mitt Romney, Rudy Guiliani, Senator Jim DeMint, Senator Sam Brownback, Represenative Tom Tancredo, and Newt Gingrich.
Quote:Yeah, it was a mere comedy act at a comedy club. Sheesh.
Quote:You are stupid, pointless and wrong, as usual. Oh, and a propagandist.
Sunday, March 11, 2007 1:09 PM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL