Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Special Counsel Robert Mueller
Monday, May 22, 2017 8:14 PM
JEWELSTAITEFAN
Monday, May 22, 2017 8:32 PM
SECOND
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: If it includes conspiracy to commit murder, then Obama and Hilliary are in deep doo-doo.
Quote:Trump made separate appeals to the director of national intelligence, Daniel Coats, and to Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, urging them to publicly deny the existence of any evidence of collusion during the 2016 election. Coats and Rogers refused to comply with the requests, which they both deemed to be inappropriate, according to two current and two former officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private communications with the president....Trump’s conversation with Rogers was documented contemporaneously in an internal memo written by a senior NSA official, according to the officials. It is unclear if a similar memo was prepared by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to document Trump’s conversation with Coats. ....In addition to the requests to Coats and Rogers, senior White House officials sounded out top intelligence officials about the possibility of intervening directly with Comey to encourage the FBI to drop its probe of Michael Flynn....“Can we ask him to shut down the investigation? Are you able to assist in this matter?” one official said of the line of questioning from the White House.
Monday, May 22, 2017 8:49 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: If it includes conspiracy to commit murder, then Obama and Hilliary are in deep doo-doo. Trump is first because he is easiest to convict since Trump has already admitted to crimes, no matter whether he and JewelStaiteFan understand or not, while Obama and Hillary have not admitted anything. Trump personally asked the NSA director and the overall director of national intelligence to publicly weigh in on an ongoing Russia investigation. Not only that, Trump basically asked them to lie, since they weren't privy to what the FBI was doing. In what universe did Trump think that either of them would respond positively to such a blunt request? What's more, in addition to directly asking Comey to shut down the FBI investigation, he apparently had some of his aides call senior intelligence officers to ask them to intervene with Comey. What is Trump afraid the investigation will find? Whatever it is, apparently Michael Flynn is afraid of it too. www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/05/trump-asked-nsa-and-dni-repudiate-russia-investigation Quote:Trump made separate appeals to the director of national intelligence, Daniel Coats, and to Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, urging them to publicly deny the existence of any evidence of collusion during the 2016 election. Coats and Rogers refused to comply with the requests, which they both deemed to be inappropriate, according to two current and two former officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private communications with the president....Trump’s conversation with Rogers was documented contemporaneously in an internal memo written by a senior NSA official, according to the officials. It is unclear if a similar memo was prepared by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to document Trump’s conversation with Coats. ....In addition to the requests to Coats and Rogers, senior White House officials sounded out top intelligence officials about the possibility of intervening directly with Comey to encourage the FBI to drop its probe of Michael Flynn....“Can we ask him to shut down the investigation? Are you able to assist in this matter?” one official said of the line of questioning from the White House.
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 3:28 AM
JO753
rezident owtsidr
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 3:51 AM
SHINYGOODGUY
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: At first this seemed like more witch-hunting from the devoid of merit Democraps. However, it turns out that the charter or commission he has been given allows him to actually investigate the actual leaks which actually happened. This would mean he can investigate Seth Rich (the leak) murder by his fellow Democraps, and maybe solve the murder and bring charges or prosecute. If it includes conspiracy to commit murder, then Obama and Hilliary are in deep doo-doo.
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 3:59 AM
Quote:This would mean he can investigate Seth Rich (the leak) murder by his fellow Democraps, and maybe solve the murder and bring charges or prosecute. If it includes conspiracy to commit murder, then Obama and Hilliary are in deep doo-doo.
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:20 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:This would mean he can investigate Seth Rich (the leak) murder by his fellow Democraps, and maybe solve the murder and bring charges or prosecute. If it includes conspiracy to commit murder, then Obama and Hilliary are in deep doo-doo. If the above were true, then why didn't the Republican controlled House ever have Obama investigated? Could you explain that one? SGG
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:31 AM
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:46 AM
6STRINGJOKER
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 7:44 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: At first this seemed like more witch-hunting from the devoid of merit Democraps. However, it turns out that the charter or commission he has been given allows him to actually investigate the actual leaks which actually happened. This would mean he can investigate Seth Rich (the leak) murder by his fellow Democraps, and maybe solve the murder and bring charges or prosecute. If it includes conspiracy to commit murder, then Obama and Hilliary are in deep doo-doo. Oh and, of course, the whole Russian infiltration of the White House with Donny Baby serving as host, well, that's just a pretense to the REAL investigation. Obama, obviously, must pay for his High Crimes and Misdemeanors. You know, now I see the light JSF. How's that saying go; 'and the truth shall set you free' SGG
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:11 PM
Quote:Originally posted by G: "Colluding" is not the same as "talking to."
Thursday, May 25, 2017 11:25 AM
THGRRI
Quote:Originally posted by G: Quote:Originally posted by 6stringJoker: Quote:Originally posted by G: "Colluding" is not the same as "talking to." Except, of course, Russia!!!!! Whoa! Get some rest Jack! You've done enough thinking for today! ==============================
Quote:Originally posted by 6stringJoker: Quote:Originally posted by G: "Colluding" is not the same as "talking to." Except, of course, Russia!!!!!
Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:08 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JO753: In the way that you are a complete idiot. Youv been sucking at Hannity'z tit so long, he coud tell you that you can fly and youd dive off the top uv the Empire State Bilding. Didnt you hear that Fox haz given up on that murder story? http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/23/media/fox-news-removes-seth-rich-story/
Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:23 PM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: The fact that he persists is why I call him a moron.
Saturday, May 27, 2017 2:46 PM
Quote:Originally posted by G: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: At first this seemed like more witch-hunting from the devoid of merit Democraps. However, it turns out that the charter or commission he has been given allows him to actually investigate the actual leaks which actually happened. This would mean he can investigate Seth Rich (the leak) murder by his fellow Democraps, and maybe solve the murder and bring charges or prosecute. If it includes conspiracy to commit murder, then Obama and Hilliary are in deep doo-doo.Oh and, of course, the whole Russian infiltration of the White House with Donny Baby serving as host, well, that's just a pretense to the REAL investigation. Obama, obviously, must pay for his High Crimes and Misdemeanors. You know, now I see the light JSF. How's that saying go; 'and the truth shall set you free' SGGDo you think they will also get to the bottom of the whole collusion with British officials, and Canadians, and dare I say, the Israeli officials? We mustn't have ANY interaction with ANY of our allies, now should we?I'm not sure you fully get what the problem is. "Colluding" is not the same as "talking to." If Trump colluded with any of them to help him win the election, would you have problem with that?
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: At first this seemed like more witch-hunting from the devoid of merit Democraps. However, it turns out that the charter or commission he has been given allows him to actually investigate the actual leaks which actually happened. This would mean he can investigate Seth Rich (the leak) murder by his fellow Democraps, and maybe solve the murder and bring charges or prosecute. If it includes conspiracy to commit murder, then Obama and Hilliary are in deep doo-doo.Oh and, of course, the whole Russian infiltration of the White House with Donny Baby serving as host, well, that's just a pretense to the REAL investigation. Obama, obviously, must pay for his High Crimes and Misdemeanors. You know, now I see the light JSF. How's that saying go; 'and the truth shall set you free' SGGDo you think they will also get to the bottom of the whole collusion with British officials, and Canadians, and dare I say, the Israeli officials? We mustn't have ANY interaction with ANY of our allies, now should we?
Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: At first this seemed like more witch-hunting from the devoid of merit Democraps. However, it turns out that the charter or commission he has been given allows him to actually investigate the actual leaks which actually happened. This would mean he can investigate Seth Rich (the leak) murder by his fellow Democraps, and maybe solve the murder and bring charges or prosecute. If it includes conspiracy to commit murder, then Obama and Hilliary are in deep doo-doo.Oh and, of course, the whole Russian infiltration of the White House with Donny Baby serving as host, well, that's just a pretense to the REAL investigation. Obama, obviously, must pay for his High Crimes and Misdemeanors. You know, now I see the light JSF. How's that saying go; 'and the truth shall set you free' SGG
Tuesday, May 30, 2017 3:26 AM
Quote:Do you think they will also get to the bottom of the whole collusion with British officials, and Canadians, and dare I say, the Israeli officials? We mustn't have ANY interaction with ANY of our allies, now should we?
Tuesday, May 30, 2017 11:03 PM
Quote:Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799 (1799-01-30)) is a United States federal law that forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments having a dispute with the U.S. It was intended to prevent the undermining of the government's position.
Quote:Originally posted by second: The many ways Trump has tried to intervene in the Russia investigation, in one chart www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/24/15677444/trump-russia-intervention-chart The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Tuesday, May 30, 2017 11:28 PM
OONJERAH
Wednesday, May 31, 2017 1:02 AM
Wednesday, May 31, 2017 1:11 AM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:40 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: I haven't seen any reports that this happened. There've been a lot of claims made - but no evidence.
Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:45 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Do you think they will also get to the bottom of the whole collusion with British officials, and Canadians, and dare I say, the Israeli officials? We mustn't have ANY interaction with ANY of our allies, now should we? What is this supposed to mean? SGG
Saturday, June 3, 2017 3:24 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Do you think they will also get to the bottom of the whole collusion with British officials, and Canadians, and dare I say, the Israeli officials? We mustn't have ANY interaction with ANY of our allies, now should we? What is this supposed to mean? SGG Some people are upset that, following an election, officials from our government (America, or the President-Elect's representatives) colluded with officials from other nations. Why concentrate on only one of our allies - the one that liberals have been saying for over 70 years has been the greatest utopia on the planet? Why not our other allies - like the ones I specified?
Saturday, June 3, 2017 5:52 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Do you think they will also get to the bottom of the whole collusion with British officials, and Canadians, and dare I say, the Israeli officials? We mustn't have ANY interaction with ANY of our allies, now should we?What is this supposed to mean? SGGSome people are upset that, following an election, officials from our government (America, or the President-Elect's representatives) colluded with officials from other nations. Why concentrate on only one of our allies - the one that liberals have been saying for over 70 years has been the greatest utopia on the planet? Why not our other allies - like the ones I specified?Oh, I see now. If any of those countries or entities interfered, then yes - investigate. Simple enough, go to where the evidence takes you. SGG
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Do you think they will also get to the bottom of the whole collusion with British officials, and Canadians, and dare I say, the Israeli officials? We mustn't have ANY interaction with ANY of our allies, now should we?What is this supposed to mean? SGGSome people are upset that, following an election, officials from our government (America, or the President-Elect's representatives) colluded with officials from other nations. Why concentrate on only one of our allies - the one that liberals have been saying for over 70 years has been the greatest utopia on the planet? Why not our other allies - like the ones I specified?
Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Do you think they will also get to the bottom of the whole collusion with British officials, and Canadians, and dare I say, the Israeli officials? We mustn't have ANY interaction with ANY of our allies, now should we?What is this supposed to mean? SGG
Saturday, June 3, 2017 6:46 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: What "this" are you referring to? I'm not inferring attribution.
Quote:Pretty plain language. Federal law that forbids "unauthorized citizens" from negotiating with foreign governments having a dispute with the U.S. I can't wait to see how they spin this.
Saturday, June 3, 2017 10:20 PM
Quote:get to the bottom of the whole collusion with British officials, and Canadians, and dare I say, the Israeli officials?
Quote:If any of those countries or entities interfered, then yes - investigate. Simple enough, go to where the evidence takes you.
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:Do you think they will also get to the bottom of the whole collusion with British officials, and Canadians, and dare I say, the Israeli officials? We mustn't have ANY interaction with ANY of our allies, now should we?What is this supposed to mean? SGGSome people are upset that, following an election, officials from our government (America, or the President-Elect's representatives) colluded with officials from other nations. Why concentrate on only one of our allies - the one that liberals have been saying for over 70 years has been the greatest utopia on the planet? Why not our other allies - like the ones I specified?Oh, I see now. If any of those countries or entities interfered, then yes - investigate. Simple enough, go to where the evidence takes you. SGG This was not about interference. Investigate every nation on the planet? That sees quite silly. You think we are Team America: World Police?
Saturday, June 3, 2017 11:08 PM
Saturday, June 3, 2017 11:24 PM
Quote:CNN - The political firestorm around President Donald Trump's top adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner is picking up momentum due to mounting confusion over why Kushner secretly met with the head of a Russian state-owned bank during the presidential transition in December. The White House and the Russian bank have offered conflicting explanations for the meeting between Kushner and Sergey Gorkov, a Putin appointee, which has only fueled the intrigue around the senior Trump aide who was named as a point of focus in the FBI's criminal probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, according to US officials briefed on the investigation. Last month, CNN reported that the FBI's investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election was increasingly touching on the multiple roles of Kushner on both the Trump campaign and the Trump transition team. Points of focus that pertain to Kushner include: the Trump campaign's 2016 data analytics operation; his relationship with former national security adviser Michael Flynn; and Kushner's own contacts with Russians, according to US officials briefed on the probe. There is no indication Kushner is currently a target of the probe and there are no allegations he committed any wrongdoing. A source close to Kushner told CNN on May 25 that he had not been contacted by the FBI. But investigators are interested in learning more about Kushner's interaction with Gorkov, sources told CNN. A new Washington Post report is raising further questions around the circumstances of the meeting between Kushner and Gorkov.
Quote:Late December 2016 -- Kushner meets Gorkov: As The New York Times first reported, Kushner meets with the president of state-run Russian bank VEB, Sergey Gorkov, at Kislyak's recommendation. The Washington Post has reported that the meeting was likely on December 13 or 14 based on Gorkov's flight records, but CNN has not independently confirmed that information.
Quote:January 18, 2017 -- Kushner omits meetings with Russians in paperwork for his top secret security clearance: According to The New York Times, "Kushner did not mention dozens of contacts with foreign leaders or officials including a December meeting with the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, and one with the head of a Russian state-owned bank, Vnesheconombank."
Monday, June 5, 2017 7:55 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: I haven't seen any reports that this happened. There've been a lot of claims made - but no evidence. Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: What "this" are you referring to? I'm not inferring attribution. I should just always 'reply with quote'. It seems like posts sometimes time travel and show up long after I post a response, in between the original post and mine. It was in response to sgg posting this: Quote:Pretty plain language. Federal law that forbids "unauthorized citizens" from negotiating with foreign governments having a dispute with the U.S. I can't wait to see how they spin this.
Tuesday, June 6, 2017 5:10 AM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY: Quote:This would mean he can investigate Seth Rich (the leak) murder by his fellow Democraps, and maybe solve the murder and bring charges or prosecute. If it includes conspiracy to commit murder, then Obama and Hilliary are in deep doo-doo. If the above were true, then why didn't the Republican controlled House ever have Obama investigated? Could you explain that one? SGGMore News about Hillary murdering Seth Rich: Fox News announced Tuesday it had retracted a story published last week that reignited conspiracy theories around the unsolved killing of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich, whose family demanded an apology from the conservative news network. Later Tuesday, the conspiracy's most prominent proponent, Fox News' Sean Hannity, announced on his show that he would stop discussing the case "for now." It was a major back-down for a prominent host who had used his Twitter account earlier to vow he would never be silenced by "Liberal Fascism." www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fox-retracts-hannity-silenced-on-conspiracy-about-slain-dnc-staffer/ar-BBBsOt8?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Tuesday, June 6, 2017 10:27 AM
RIVERLOVE
Tuesday, June 6, 2017 11:16 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove: ] Now that's funny
Tuesday, June 6, 2017 7:30 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove:
Tuesday, June 6, 2017 10:54 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove: Post of the week.
Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:05 AM
Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:12 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove: Post of the week. Thanks. Actually, I lifted it from someone's post on another site. Glad you liked it, although after seeing Auraptor's post listing 37 Hillary excuses, it now seems a tad incomplete. Good drawing of Hillary though. I think it captures her essence.
Thursday, June 8, 2017 7:48 PM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL