Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Trump Falsely Says 5 Million Illegal Ballots
Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:43 PM
THGRRI
Tuesday, January 24, 2017 3:34 PM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Tuesday, January 24, 2017 5:07 PM
Tuesday, January 24, 2017 6:49 PM
SECOND
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Trump genuinely does believe it. All of this creates a conundrum for the press. How are reporters supposed to cover someone who believes in demonstrable lies, least of all a president?
Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:23 PM
WISHIMAY
Tuesday, January 24, 2017 8:04 PM
REAVERFAN
Tuesday, January 24, 2017 8:40 PM
Tuesday, January 24, 2017 11:22 PM
Quote:Originally posted by reaverfan: We all knew he was mentally ill, but it's worse than I expected.
Tuesday, January 24, 2017 11:45 PM
Tuesday, January 24, 2017 11:57 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: I want him to show the proof. I believe that voter fraud does exist and will always exist so long as we don't use photo identification. I have a hard time believing those numbers, but if there actually is proof that up to 5 million people voted illegally, now is the time to show it. If that proof does exist, then we can finally pass a law requiring photo identification and be done with it. Do Right, Be Right. :)
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:05 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: Wishi, I think the Dakota can remember how to be violent.
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 9:27 AM
Quote:Originally posted by G: "Paul Krugman, the Nobel Memorial Prize-winning economist...
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 9:48 AM
RIVERLOVE
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: The Nobel Prize lost all of its meaning when they gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize just 8 1/2 months after being in office.
Quote:Ask the hundreds of thousands of dead Syrians if they think Obama deserved that award.
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 11:23 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: The Nobel Prize lost all of its meaning when they gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize just 8 1/2 months after being in office. They give out a lot of Nobel Prizes in many categories and they're still considered very prestigious. The majority of them are well-deserved, honoring new discoveries or excellence in specific fields. Quote:Ask the hundreds of thousands of dead Syrians if they think Obama deserved that award. Dead Syrians can't answer questions. Anyway, you can't pin that one on Obama unless you feel that having dead Americans is better.
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 11:41 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 1:36 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Remember all that coverage the media were giving the pipeline construction in N.Dakota ? Yeah, that's been pretty much pushed aside. As Trump has given the green light go ahead and build. But the millions of illegal votes !! The art of distraction ? We'll see.
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 1:49 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: The honor of any "Nobel" was diminished when they gave that award to Obama.
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:38 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove: You're entitled to that opinion. Is the $1.2 million dollars awarded for each prize winner less honorable now as well?
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 4:00 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: I'd like some evidence, but if anyone wants to be honest, most of what Trump has said and done has completely flown in the face of conventional wisdom, and it's been done quite successfully. There could be a method to his madness. Remember all that coverage the media were giving the pipeline construction in N.Dakota ? Yeah, that's been pretty much pushed aside. As Trump has given the green light go ahead and build. But the millions of illegal votes !! The art of distraction ? We'll see.
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 7:58 PM
JEWELSTAITEFAN
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: With no evidence to support the claim, President Donald Trump told congressional leaders that he lost the popular vote due to up to five million fraudulent votes, the Washington Post reports. Trump reportedly made the claim during a Monday night reception with congressional leaders, three sources told the Post. Despite the Trump campaign’s frequent insistence that voter fraud cost it the popular vote, no evidence has supported any of the claim. Post-election analysis found little to no fraud during the election, which saw Hillary Clinton win the popular vote by 2.8 million. Prior to the election, the Trump campaign suggested that Democrats, particularly in inner cities would commit voter fraud, and encouraged supporters to “monitor” those polls, a suggestion some interpreted as implying voter intimidation. http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/01/23/trump-claims-to-have-lost-vote-to-fraud.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 10:03 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: With no evidence to support the claim, President Donald Trump told congressional leaders that he lost the popular vote due to up to five million fraudulent votes, the Washington Post reports. Trump reportedly made the claim during a Monday night reception with congressional leaders, three sources told the Post. Despite the Trump campaign’s frequent insistence that voter fraud cost it the popular vote, no evidence has supported any of the claim. Post-election analysis found little to no fraud during the election, which saw Hillary Clinton win the popular vote by 2.8 million. Prior to the election, the Trump campaign suggested that Democrats, particularly in inner cities would commit voter fraud, and encouraged supporters to “monitor” those polls, a suggestion some interpreted as implying voter intimidation. http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/01/23/trump-claims-to-have-lost-vote-to-fraud.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl Why do you keep up with your lies? Have you proof that the illegal voting did not occur? They provided numbers to support their claim, where are yours to prove otherwise? In the following article, 6th paragraph, they point out that 6.4% of non-citizens voted (in 2008). With a non-citizen population of about 30 million, that would be near 2 million just from that set of figures. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sean-spicer-defends-trumps-unverified-voter-fraud-claims/ So where is your specific proof that the scientists and researchers were wrong?
Wednesday, January 25, 2017 10:13 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: In the following article, 6th paragraph, they point out that 6.4% of non-citizens voted (in 2008). With a non-citizen population of about 30 million, that would be near 2 million just from that set of figures. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sean-spicer-defends-trumps-unverified-voter-fraud-claims/ So where is your specific proof that the scientists and researchers were wrong?
Thursday, January 26, 2017 7:04 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Not only is that an article by CBSnews, but it sites a report done by the Washington Post. Uh-Oh Liberals... You know it's bad when the Washington Post admits that 6.4% non-citizens voted in 2008. The number is probably higher than that since you know the Post would try to minimize that statistic as much as they could possibly get away with.
Thursday, January 26, 2017 8:04 AM
Quote:Originally posted by second: House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz will not waste his time and money while doing his job. Learn that lesson, 6ixStringJack, or you will be fired from your next job, if Trump ever gets you one.
Thursday, January 26, 2017 8:08 AM
Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:15 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by second: House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz will not waste his time and money while doing his job. Learn that lesson, 6ixStringJack, or you will be fired from your next job, if Trump ever gets you one. Please... You're talking to a guy who hasn't had any debt since August of 2005, who owns his house and his car free and clear, and spent less than $5,000 to live in 2016 with zero income. The reason why it's easy to believe what I say about my finances and why I don't think anybody is buying what you're selling anymore is because nobody would make up my situation. Don't you have some big important job to get to? What are you doing posting in the RWED at the butt crack of dawn? Do Right, Be Right. :)
Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:42 AM
Thursday, January 26, 2017 10:05 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Aside from that. I agree. Trump should stop talking about it. There is no ROI in pressing it.
Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:09 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second:But if Trump is testing the loyalty of his followers -- only the most loyal will defend every Trump statement -- then it makes perfect sense that, once the illegal ballot story is old news, Trump will have another story to test the loyalty of his followers in another way. Liberals worry that Trump’s antics are ways to distract the public from potential unpopular elements of his policy agenda. But Trump has an even smarter strategy to use the very same antics — slamming Meryl Streep, picking a fight with the cast of Hamilton, lambasting the media, lying about crowd sizes — to distract conservatives from his lack of interest in pushing Speaker of the House Paul Ryan's policy ideas. A good polarizing fight with liberal elites, after all, will give Fox News and conservative talk radio plenty to chew over.
Thursday, January 26, 2017 1:25 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: And here everyone else on the left in the RWED is constantly talking about how stupid the man is. I don't know why you choose to throw it out there that it's going to give the Conservative talk radio and Fox News plenty to chew over.
Thursday, January 26, 2017 1:36 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Chew on this: the only person who could control a President is second in line to replace him if he dies -- Speaker of the House Ryan. Ryan could force Trump to disclose real information about his personal finances or engage in real divestment from his businesses, but it is a power that only works if it is used sooner rather than later. It is too late after Trump has gotten everything squeezable out of Congress.
Thursday, January 26, 2017 1:38 PM
Quote:Originally posted by second: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Aside from that. I agree. Trump should stop talking about it. There is no ROI in pressing it. But if Trump is testing the loyalty of his followers -- only the most loyal will defend every Trump statement -- then it makes perfect sense that, once the illegal ballot story is old news, Trump will have another story to test the loyalty of his followers in another way. Liberals worry that Trump’s antics are ways to distract the public from potential unpopular elements of his policy agenda. But Trump has an even smarter strategy to use the very same antics — slamming Meryl Streep, picking a fight with the cast of Hamilton, lambasting the media, lying about crowd sizes — to distract conservatives from his lack of interest in pushing Speaker of the House Paul Ryan's policy ideas. A good polarizing fight with liberal elites, after all, will give Fox News and conservative talk radio plenty to chew over. The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Thursday, January 26, 2017 2:53 PM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Let's not forget how he was relentless in his defense of Russia while suggesting all 17 intelligence agencies were wrong about Putin's hacking.
Thursday, January 26, 2017 2:55 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Let's not forget how he was relentless in his defense of Russia while suggesting all 17 intelligence agencies were wrong about Putin's hacking. Name 3 of our Intelligence Agencies... lol We've got 17 of them now, huh? Do Right, Be Right. :)
Thursday, January 26, 2017 7:09 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: In the following article, 6th paragraph, they point out that 6.4% of non-citizens voted (in 2008). With a non-citizen population of about 30 million, that would be near 2 million just from that set of figures. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sean-spicer-defends-trumps-unverified-voter-fraud-claims/ So where is your specific proof that the scientists and researchers were wrong? Not only is that an article by CBSnews, but it sites a report done by the Washington Post. Uh-Oh Liberals... You know it's bad when the Washington Post admits that 6.4% non-citizens voted in 2008. The number is probably higher than that since you know the Post would try to minimize that statistic as much as they could possibly get away with. Do Right, Be Right. :)
Friday, January 27, 2017 12:14 PM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Office of the Director of National Intelligence Independent agencies Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) United States Department of Defense Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) National Security Agency (NSA) National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Twenty-Fifth Air Force (25 AF) Army Military Intelligence (MI) Marine Corps Intelligence Activity (MCIA) Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) United States Department of Energy Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence (OICI) United States Department of Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) Coast Guard Intelligence (CGI) United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of National Security Intelligence (DEA/ONSI) United States Department of State Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) United States Department of the Treasury Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI)
Saturday, February 4, 2017 9:01 AM
Saturday, February 4, 2017 9:09 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: California’s voter registration system is “highly susceptible to being compromised,” because of immigration policies protecting the Golden State’s 2.4 million illegal immigrants, authorities have told Fox News. The integrity of elections may be compromised by a lack of oversight of non-citizens registering and voting, said Hans von Spakovsky, manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative and senior legal fellow for the Institute for Constitutional Government at The Heritage Foundation. “If you are talking about California, the state is apparently relying on the illegal alien to tell the state they shouldn’t be registered. There is still an honor system,” said von Spakovsky, co-author of the book “Who's Counting? How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk.” The problem with California is there is no separate verification of citizenship on voter registration, said Charles Bell, Jr., a partner with California-based Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk, LLP, a law firm that specializes in election law. Applicants can check a box affirming they are citizens, and this is not checked against any other government database such as federal immigration records.
Saturday, February 4, 2017 9:11 AM
Saturday, February 4, 2017 9:13 AM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: I'm for voter id and I agree with the fact that they could cheat if they desired.
Sunday, February 5, 2017 4:03 PM
Sunday, February 5, 2017 11:23 PM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Tuesday, February 7, 2017 6:03 AM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: In the following article, 6th paragraph, they point out that 6.4% of non-citizens voted (in 2008). With a non-citizen population of about 30 million, that would be near 2 million just from that set of figures. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sean-spicer-defends-trumps-unverified-voter-fraud-claims/ So where is your specific proof that the scientists and researchers were wrong? Not only is that an article by CBSnews, but it sites a report done by the Washington Post. Uh-Oh Liberals... You know it's bad when the Washington Post admits that 6.4% non-citizens voted in 2008. The number is probably higher than that since you know the Post would try to minimize that statistic as much as they could possibly get away with. Do Right, Be Right. :) Plus the verified 1.8 million dead people which Democraps insist on retaining on the voter rolls, decades after their death - how convenient that they vote in alphabetical order whenever the Libtards need some ballots stuffed. And I think I heard about millions who are registered in more than one voting ward. Although I am not sure that is a big deal, as long as nobody votes twice per election like the libtards do, and even brag about it on television.
Tuesday, February 7, 2017 11:16 AM
Tuesday, February 7, 2017 7:17 PM
Quote:Originally posted by G: Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: My instincts are to believe that because no voter ID is required in many states, illegals cheat. I don't see why an illegal would want to vote - what's it to them? I see no immediate or even long term gain for them to do so unless someone is paying them. Especially if there might be some concern over being asked to provide an ID and being found out. It's not worth it. And even if someone were paying them would they be able to coordinate millions of illegal voters? I am unconvinced in that kind of illegal voting. Rigging/hacking how votes are counted makes more sense to me - hello Russia. We're so busy being lead around looking for illegals voting for Dems when we should have been looking for Ruskies voting for Trump.
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: My instincts are to believe that because no voter ID is required in many states, illegals cheat.
Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:06 PM
Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:48 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Have you provided any facts to show that Trump was in error when he made this statement?
Saturday, March 24, 2018 9:09 PM
Monday, March 26, 2018 8:23 PM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Have you provided any facts to show that Trump was in error when he made this statement? Let's wait and see. Trump ordered an investigation. If nothing comes of it then you have your proof. ____________________________________________ Russia parliament votes 380-3 to decriminalize domestic violence Russia's parliament voted 380-3 on Friday to decriminalize domestic violence in cases where it does not cause "substantial bodily harm" and does not occur more than once a year. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/01/27/russian-parliament-decri miinalizes-domestic-violence/97129912/
Monday, March 26, 2018 11:02 PM
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Have you provided any facts to show that Trump was in error when he made this statement?Let's wait and see. Trump ordered an investigation. If nothing comes of it then you have your proof. Investigation is over folks and the results are in. Bullshit... T
Quote:Originally posted by THGRRI: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Have you provided any facts to show that Trump was in error when he made this statement?Let's wait and see. Trump ordered an investigation. If nothing comes of it then you have your proof.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL