Sign Up | Log In
ANGELUS ARCANUM
So, who would win in a fight?
Sunday, November 13, 2005 5:47 PM
WHISPER
Sunday, November 13, 2005 5:49 PM
STAKETHELURK
Sunday, November 13, 2005 5:52 PM
GIANTEVILHEAD
Sunday, November 13, 2005 5:57 PM
URSULA
Sunday, November 13, 2005 6:10 PM
GUNRUNNER
Sunday, November 13, 2005 6:44 PM
WORKEROFEVIL
Sunday, November 13, 2005 7:19 PM
Quote:As much as it pains me to admit it, Spike is wrong.
Sunday, November 13, 2005 7:40 PM
Quote:Originally posted by StakeTheLurk: I wouldn't count out the cavemen so quickly. Astronauts might have survival training, but cavemen spend their whole lives surviving, and it makes a difference.
Sunday, November 13, 2005 7:49 PM
SUPERDUCKYWHO
Sunday, November 13, 2005 7:55 PM
RUBBERDUCKY
Sunday, November 13, 2005 11:41 PM
FREDIKAYLLOW
Monday, November 14, 2005 5:37 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Quote: Should I go for the sweet spot? Left of the spine, fourth lumbar down,.... Kyra Chronicles of Riddick.
Monday, November 14, 2005 8:11 PM
ANGELCRUSHERD
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:51 AM
Quote:There's nothing like hunting dinosaurs and ancient mammals daily to make you strong beyond today's standards.
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:33 AM
Quote:Originally posted by StakeTheLurk: Quote:There's nothing like hunting dinosaurs and ancient mammals daily to make you strong beyond today's standards. Although I seem to have come down on the caveman side & I agree that they would be physically more robust than the astronauts, let's make one thing clear: Cavemen did not hunt dinosaurs. Now, go repeat that a hundred times to make up for your egregious error.
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 11:48 AM
QUEENOFTHENORTH
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 11:49 AM
STORYMARK
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 12:56 PM
Quote:Originally posted by queenofthenorth: Totally the caveman. Killing primitive animals is a lot more difficult than killing people. Also, since the astronaut doesn't have weapons, rifle training wouldn't do him a hell of a lot of good, would it? I give to you the Seeker of Serenity, the Valkyrie Warrior, the Gourmet Cook and the Truth Scoper.
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:20 PM
EMBERS
Quote:Originally posted by Storymark: I don't know about nutirtion, but humans, as a race have gotten substantially larger/taller over time. I know that every ancient skeleton I've seen in museums come to about my sternum - but then, I'm fairly tall.
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:21 PM
COWOFPAIN
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:25 PM
Quote:but I understand that astronauts are picked to be small, to fit in small spaces,
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:47 PM
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:58 PM
SICKDUDE
Quote:Originally posted by StakeTheLurk: Although I seem to have come down on the caveman side & I agree that they would be physically more robust than the astronauts, let's make one thing clear: Cavemen did not hunt dinosaurs.
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 2:20 PM
CHRISISALL
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 3:13 PM
Quote:Originally posted by embers: but I understand that astronauts are picked to be small, to fit in small spaces, and when I saw the recent show at the Air & Space Museum about the current work done in space, they were all little tiny men (and women) who lift weightless stuff all day, and are not muscle bound (fitting into tiny places...) Plus cavemen fight dirty, and to the death, I'm not sure civilized educated people are really up for that kind of all out rough and brutal battle....
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 5:11 PM
Quote:Originally posted by GunRunner: Maybe the new astronauts are weaklings but the old ones had to fly aircraft with no fly-by-wire controls, which meant they had to have lots of strength to manipulate the controls. As for fighting dirty guys like Ilan Ramon, Buzz Aldrin, John Glenn etc would probably have no problem with it, these were men who bombed and strafed people and dueled to the death with enemy pilots. Some of the first Russian Cosmonauts lived thought WWII, they were some tuff mofos and have no problem with fighting “uncivilized”
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 5:54 PM
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:37 PM
Quote: Maybe the new astronauts are weaklings but the old ones had to fly aircraft with no fly-by-wire controls, which meant they had to have lots of strength to manipulate the controls.
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 7:09 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Ursula: Quote: Maybe the new astronauts are weaklings but the old ones had to fly aircraft with no fly-by-wire controls, which meant they had to have lots of strength to manipulate the controls. Not to disagree about the strength of the original astronauts, but they were small men. A few years ago I saw the Liberty Bell capsule that was orbited by Gus Grissom. The space they gave him was teeny-tiny. How they ever fit him in there, I don't know. I couldn't have fitted one of my thighs in that space.
Wednesday, November 16, 2005 8:18 PM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Quote:when I saw the recent show at the Air & Space Museum about the current work done in space, they were all little tiny men (and women) who lift weightless stuff all day, and are not muscle bound (fitting into tiny places...)
Wednesday, November 16, 2005 8:22 PM
Quote:while cavemen all died before they were 30 so would, by definition, be young and strong....
Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:40 PM
Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:47 PM
SHINYTALENT
Thursday, November 17, 2005 3:20 PM
Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:59 PM
Thursday, November 17, 2005 7:11 PM
SEVEREN
Wednesday, December 28, 2005 12:43 PM
CAT1620RD
Friday, December 30, 2005 8:25 AM
CYBERSNARK
Sunday, January 22, 2006 6:21 PM
VISITINGMYINTENTIONS
Quote:Originally posted by Cybersnark: Cavemen are not stupid. They're uncivilized, true, but not stupid. Stupid cavemen tend to quickly become dead cavemen.
Quote:Also, guys: cavemen = REAVERS!
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL