The Unbreakable Trilogy by 6ixStringJack

CINEMA

The Unbreakable Trilogy

POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Thursday, May 7, 2026 12:19
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 17
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, May 7, 2026 12:00 PM

You guys ever watch these???

I almost feel like I have to give M. Knight an apology after watching them after all the ragging I've done on him over the years.

I saw Unbreakable in the theaters on a date... Bad movie for a date, for sure. It was one of those movies that I thought I didn't like just because of the company I first saw it with. I won't say it was GREAT or anything, but it was a lot better than I remembered it. Still a little slow and too low-key for my general tastes though. FOr a movie to be that slow and still be great, at least for me, it's got to make you really think about things. This movie does not do that. Everything that is presented to you is what you're supposed to think about when watching it. The plot twist is "Oh, my new friend is really the Big Bad!".

Meh...

Now Split, on the other hand, was really, really good. Really good. I believe that James McAvoy won an award or two for that performance. If that's not true, it was a crime. Holy crap he was good.

I won't go into any details about the movie, but it is undoubtedly my favorite M. Knight movie of all time.

Then came Glass...

It was hard to decide which movie I thought was better between Split and Glass. They were both very good in their own ways. I would liken Glass to Spider-Man: No Way Home (which I also loved) because of the nostalgia-bait. I didn't have to wait 19 years to see the ending to the trilogy like most other people who watched it. True, I did see the original back in 2000, but like I said, I didn't care for it because of the company I was with, and I didn't even know that there was a trilogy until somewhere around 2019 or 2020.

I watched all 3 movies in a single day with my dad, and got to see Bruce Willis' son, who I've never seen in any other movies or shows, become an adult manning the internet and social media in this 2-person crime fighting team. That was really cool that they got the same kid and didn't just replace him with generic 20-something.

Seeing all 3 of them together: Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson and James McAvoy, and wondering the whole time how they were going to make this movie work and watching them pull it off was a treat. Even if we didn't get our promised Marvel-esque skyscraper battle in the end.

Part of me believes that this was because the budget ran out before they could do it. When I brought that up, my old man agreed and thought maybe all of the cameras being installed in the sanitarium to watch Mr. Glass was all added in after the fact in reshoots to give the impression that this was the way it was meant to be filmed all along. It's easy enough to explain away if that's how it went down, since the lack of a big-city showdown played perfectly into M. Knight's expected twist.

I really liked the 3rd entry. But I have to give the award to Split as the best of the trilogy, since if you leave out the last scene in the diner it is completely its own thing like Unbreakable was, but it was just superior to Unbreakable in nearly every way. As good as Glass was, I don't think you would have enjoyed it nearly as much if you haven't watched the first two.

I appreciate, very much, M. Knight's ability to make you root for the bad guys along-side of Bruce Willis by the end of the movie. That's not an easy thing to pull off.

Overall, I'd give the trilogy 7.5-8.0 out of 10. I'd probably give Unbreakable a 6.5 to 7, while giving Split a 9 and Glass an 8. On its own, Unbreakable would probably have only been given a 6.5, but because of how it tied into the end of the 2nd movie and the entire 3rd movie I'm giving it an extra half-point.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 7, 2026 12:19 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

Also... I found it kind of interesting how the comics were portrayed in the movies.

Any time one of the characters were talking about a specific book or characters, they were all made up. An example of that was Mr. Glass getting an "Active Comics" book from his mom, instead of Action Comics. I don't remember the names of specific comic book characters they used, but like the Active/Action comics change, they were all obviously based off of real-world heroes and villains.

But what I found curious was the scenes inside of comic book shops or inside of "Limited Edition", the comic-based art gallery that Mr. Glass had set himself up with. If you look in the background in any of these shots, all of the big real-life players were there. I recall a scene in Limited Edition where Bruce Willis meets Mr. Glass' mother, and while they're talking, rather than have everything in the background blurry, you also see Glass on his wheelchair talking to some of the rich clientele while 3 framed pictures of legit superheros were on the wall behind them. (I remember Thor was one of them, but I forget the other two). Also, if you look on the racks in the comic book shops, all of the Marvel/DC characters were shown in the background.

I wonder if M. Knight tried to get permission to use the real comics but found out that was going to be prohibitively expensive if he were to use any of them as central points to his story, but maybe he was able to work out a deal with the copyright holders to not have to make fake comics and paintings/drawings of everything in the background as long as they had nothing to do with his story. That would make sense to me. Some free publicity for Marvel and D/C on the periphery on one hand, while lending some more credibility to the movies on the other.

--------------------------------------------------

Be Nice. Don't be a dick.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE
6ixStringJack	05.07 12:00
6ixStringJack	05.07 12:19