GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Interesting Article on FF, SciFi TV, and cable networks

POSTED BY: LEEH
UPDATED: Thursday, August 18, 2005 09:23
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1553
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, August 9, 2005 1:58 PM

LEEH


A nice piece on why Fox killed FF, and how scifi producers ought to avoid the broadcast networks and go for cable instead:

http://www.syfyportal.com/features.php?id=141

"Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle. . . ."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 9, 2005 3:54 PM

NYWOE


Cool article, thanks for the link!

_____________________________________
If you're an Arizonan and a Browncoat, come join us:

http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/AZ_Browncoats/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 9, 2005 4:22 PM

CAPTAINCDC


I hope Tim Minear reads this article and takes it to heart. Maybe then we will be able to enjoy one of his brilliant series the way he intends us to.

---------------------------------------

The only sovereign you can allow to rule you is reason!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:23 AM

YT

the movie is not the Series. Only the facts have been changed, to irritate the innocent; the names of the actors and characters remain the same


Seems like a reasonable article, until I try to apply it to Firefly.
Quote:

But a word of advice to would-be scifi producers: yeah, you can take the fancy-pants network development deal, take your chances, and probably end up back in the unemployment line in six months. Or, scale back your expenses, skip the networks, put your show on cable, and like "Stargate SG-1," someday you might find yourself still on the air, nine years later.

How could Joss have scaled back expenses? Let me count the ways:

1) Hire mostly unknown actors (he did)
2) Scale back the sets
3) Scale back costumes
4) Scale back locations
5) Scale back special effects
6) Make it in Canada, with enough Canadian content to qualify for gov't subsidies
7) Do without a co-executive producer
8) Take a smaller cut for himself

It's left as an exercise for the student how much 2), 4) & 5) would affect the product, but . . .

6) Nathan could work it, probably Jewel, but three other cast members would be replaced, and fuggedabout Greg Edmonson & David Boyd. You figure it out.

7) Joss was producing three TV series @that time so, not possible.

Imo, one of the reasons Firefly was so good was the FOX network gave Joss US$38million to make it.

Keep the Shiny Side Up . . .

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Best Movie Director
Mon, December 15, 2025 07:45 - 16 posts
The weird...offensive...plain odd side of the Internet?
Mon, December 15, 2025 06:58 - 6 posts
A dead series?
Mon, December 15, 2025 06:49 - 12 posts
Best movie that only a few people know about
Sun, December 14, 2025 23:58 - 122 posts
Who would win in a war?
Sun, December 14, 2025 14:57 - 32 posts
Music Scores - the best suited to the Film/TV.
Sun, December 14, 2025 11:58 - 7 posts
Firefly and Marijuana
Sun, December 14, 2025 11:51 - 71 posts
Tarantino, and Joss Whedon. What if they made a movie together?
Sat, December 13, 2025 06:36 - 11 posts
Recommend me some shows
Thu, December 11, 2025 18:21 - 26 posts
Sci-Fi Visions for Tomorrow - Firefly #1 show to watch
Thu, December 11, 2025 16:47 - 5 posts
HAKEN: THIS NEEDS TO STOP. IMMEDIATELY. I'M NOT ASKING ANYMORE.
Thu, December 11, 2025 10:01 - 62 posts
Where are the Extraterrestrial Civilizations
Thu, December 11, 2025 09:43 - 121 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL