Quote:

---

"People have a right to understand who it is they’re electing," said Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, warning that the information they had received comprised of “a variety of different types of documents, from different types of institutions that are associated with the election campaign, some quite unexpected angles that are quite interesting, some even entertaining.”

Julian Assange, who has lived in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London for five years as officials in Sweden have sought him on criminal charges, is set to deliver his eagerly anticipated address via videolink at the Volksbuhne Theater in Berlin to mark WikiLeaks’ 10th anniversary starting around 11am CET.

Assange canceled an earlier plan to deliver the address from the balcony of the Ecuadorian embassy in London due to security concerns. Some believe the video announcement by the WikiLeaks founder could be an "October surprise" geared towards the U.S. presidential election. Supporters of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump have said they believe the announcement will be damaging to the candidacy of Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.

“I don’t want to give it away,” Assange told Fox News Channel’s Megyn Kelly in August, when he indicated he had a major scoop that could influence the race. “But it’s a variety of documents, from different types of institutions that are associated with the election campaign, some quite unexpected angles, some quite interesting, some even entertaining.”

---

Quote:

---

Julian Assange Disappoints, Fails To Reveal Material Information At Wikileaks Press Conference

In what was a disappointment for anyone hoping for "devastating" disclosures, Julian Assange today held off releasing information about the US elections or Hillary Clinton, despite widespread expectation that he was poised to make a major release. The WikiLeaks founder said the organization would publish around one million documents related to the U.S. election and three governments, but denied the release was aimed at damaging Hillary Clinton.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
WTH, Julian?

---

Quote:

---

While the media is transfixed with the just released Washington Post leak of a private Donald Trump conversation from 2005 in which he was speaking "lewdly" about women, and for which he has apologized, roughly at the same time, Wikileaks released part one of what it dubbed the "Podesta emails", which it describes as "a series on deals involving Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton's Chief of Staff from 1998 until 2001." ...

While the underlying story in this specific case involves the alleged kickbacks received by the Clinton Foundation from the Russian government-controlled "Uranium One" a story which has been profiled previously by the NYT, and about which Wikileaks adds that "as Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer.

Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons" ...


... what caught our attention is an email from Tony Carr, a Research Director at Hillary for America, in which he lay outs hundreds of excerpts from the heretofore missing transcripts of Hillary Clinton's infamous Wall Street speeches, with an emphasis on those which should be flagged as they may be damaging to Hillary.

====

Some comments by Hillary Clinton:

"I'm kind of far removed” from the struggles of the middle class “because the life I've lived and the economic, you know, fortunes that my husband and I now enjoy.”

Joked that if Lloyd Blankfein wanted to run for office, he should “start running a soup kitchen somewhere.

My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.”

---

Quote:

---

“But if everybody's watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position.”

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Wikileaks Releases Hillary's Paid Wall Street Speech Transcripts: Hundreds Of "Sensitive" Excerpts


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-07/wikileaks-releases-hundreds-e
xceprts-hillary-clintons-wall-street-speech-transcripts

---

Quote:

---

The founder of the resource "WikiLeaks", Julian Assange, has stated that he has evidence linking the US Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to the ISIS terrorist group.

According to Assange, Clinton was not only in contact with the terrorists while serving as US Secretary of State, but she also authorized the sending of American arms to Qatar, where they were delivered to Libyan rebels to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi.

Clinton tried to implement the same scheme in Syria. Her actions resulted in weapons and money contributing to the terrorists' attempt to overthrow Bashar al-Assad.

Back in 2013, Clinton denied these allegations under oath.
WikiLeaks promises to reveal that this oath was a lie.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

The founder of the resource "WikiLeaks", Julian Assange, has stated that he has evidence linking the US Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to the ISIS terrorist group.

According to Assange, Clinton was not only in contact with the terrorists while serving as US Secretary of State, but she also authorized the sending of American arms to Qatar, where they were delivered to Libyan rebels to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi.

Clinton tried to implement the same scheme in Syria. Her actions resulted in weapons and money contributing to the terrorists' attempt to overthrow Bashar al-Assad.

Back in 2013, Clinton denied these allegations under oath.
WikiLeaks promises to reveal that this oath was a lie.

---

http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/10/wikileaks-clinton-armed-isis.html

So we'll get to see if this is much ado about nothing.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Nobody gives a fuck what you say, THUGR. Everyone knows you're a troglodyte and a troll, who wouldn't know a fact if it landed on you from 10 stories up.

Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Does 'who' matter?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
If you think your question was based on Sig's signature, then your grasp of English is so bad I don't think I could even explain to you how it is that you're wrong.

---

Quote:

---

So I'll ask again. SIG, who are you worried about Hillary starting a war with. It's a simple question.

---

Quote:

---

Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States' oil-rich ally in the Middle East.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:


Hillary Confirms Saudi Arabia, Qatar Fund ISIS In Leaked Email (2015)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-11/hillary-confirms-saudi-arabia
-qatar-are-funding-isis-leaked-email


And despite knowing this ...


Saudi Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department (2015)

Quote:

---

Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States' oil-rich ally in the Middle East.

---

http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hil
lary-clintons-state-department-1934187

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Just to memorialize that THUGR is pro-war. He doesn't care for what, as long as it's war.

THUGR: The typical Hillary supporter?

---

Quote:

---

Clinton Foundation May Be In Ethics Breach With Bill's $1 Million "Present" From State Sponsor Of Terrorism

Much has been said about an April 2012 email disclosed by WikiLeaks, in which Amitabh Desai, the Clinton Foundation’s director of foreign policy, writes to senior Clinton Foundation officials explaining the “summary of key points” from his meetings with the “Ambassadors from Qatar, Brazil, Peru, Malawi, and Rwanda, in Washington, DC.”

Describing his meeting with the ambassador of Qatar, Desai wrote, “Would like to see WJC [William Jefferson Clinton] ‘for five minutes’ in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC’s birthday in 2011.”

... Hillary Clinton promised the U.S. government that while she served as secretary of state the foundation would not accept new funding from foreign governments without seeking clearance from the State Department's ethics office. The agreement was designed to dispel concerns that U.S. foreign policy could be swayed by donations to the foundation.

However, and where things get awkward for Clinton, is that the State Department has said it cannot cite any instances of its ethics officials reviewing or approving new donations from foreign governments to the foundation while Clinton served as the country's top diplomat from 2009 until 2013, suggesting the foundation may be in breach of its ethics agreement over the not immaterial donation of $1 million from a foreign state.

... Craig Minassian, a foundation spokesman, declined to confirm to Reuters if Qatar gave the $1 million described in the 2012 email. Even if it had, he said he questioned whether the money would be considered a "material increase."

Actually, since according to the Foundation's own website, Qatar gave anywhere between $1 million and $5 million, in the best case scenario the donation would be a rather material 20% increase to Qatar's total. In the worst case, it would be 100%.

.... Last year, Reuters found that at least seven other foreign governments made new donations to the foundation without the State Department being informed, partly, foundation officials said, because of "oversights."

... And just to put a perfect wrapper on this story, here is Hillary Clinton telling Goldman Sachs in 2013, just months after she quit her job as Secretary of State, that Qatar is among the states funding what would emerge to be known as the Islamic State.

If you look at what's happening in Syria, it's clearly a multiply leveled proxy battle. We've got Iran with their agents in Hezbollah, and they're being taken on by indigenous rebels but increasingly a collection of Jihadists who are funded by the Saudis, funded by the Emiratis, funded by Qatar.

Indicatively, this is how much the Clinton foundation has accepted from these three state sponsors of terrorism.

Saudi Arabia: $10-$25 million
Qatar: $1-$5 million
United Arab Emirates: $1-$5 million

Additionally, Bill Clinton has pocketed between $500,000 and $1 million for two speeches sponsored by Qatari entities. Meanwhile the "war" against ISIS continues.

---

Quote:

---

Hillary campaign spokeswoman Jenifer Palmieri and senior fellow at the Center for American Progress John Halpin from April of 2011 mock conservative media mogul Rupert Murdock for raising his children Catholic. According to Hillary's inner circle, ?Catholics are phonies, only opting to be public Catholics because being an Evangelical is socially unpalatable, and attracted to "severely backwards gender relations."

“It’s an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy,” said Halpin.

“I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn’t understand if they become evangelicals,” Palmieri responded.

“Excellent point,” Halpin replied. “They can throw around ‘Thomistic’ thought and ‘subsidiarity’ and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they’re talking about.”

---

Quote:

---

In another exchange, this one from September of 2015, Podesta and Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden rip Southerners and the Miss America pageant.

“Do you think it’s weird that of the 15 finalists in Miss America, 10 came from the 11 states of the CSA [Confederate States of America]?” asks Podesta.

“Not at all I would imagine the only people who watch it are from the confederacy and by now they know that so they’ve rigged the thing in their honor,” responds Tanden.

---

Quote:

---

In an August 2015 message to other Clinton aides with the subject line 'Needy Latinos and 1 easy call,' Mr. Podesta lays out a strategy for getting former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, former Energy Secretary Federico Pena and other leading Hispanic Democrats on board with Mrs. Clinton’s presidential bid."

Podesta also calls Richardson “a d—k," though he'd be a valuable surrogate.

---

Quote:

---

As if there was any doubt at this point that the media is fully in bed with the Clinton campaign, Glenn Thrush, Politco's Chief Political Correspondent, decided to make it crystal clear in the following email to Podesta back in April 2015 in which he admits that he has "become a hack." The email below from Thrush was sent to get guidance related to an article he published the very next day entitled "Hillary's Big-Money Dilemma."

Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u
Please don't share or tell anyone I did this
Tell me if I fucked up anything

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Politico's Chief Correspondent To John Podesta: "Don't Tell Anyone I Did This"

As if there was any doubt at this point that the media is fully in bed with the Clinton campaign, Glenn Thrush, Politco's Chief Political Correspondent, decided to make it crystal clear in the following email to Podesta back in April 2015 in which he admits that he has "become a hack." The email below from Thrush was sent to get guidance related to an article he published the very next day entitled "Hillary's Big-Money Dilemma."

Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u
Please don't share or tell anyone I did this
Tell me if I fucked up anything

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
There are many, many problems with hillary. She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes. Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming a Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election.

hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway, because people really are that gullible. So, why not? But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.

hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.

And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.


But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable, deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her fat finger on the nuclear button and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her waddling hip pocket. Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

There are many, many problems with hillary. She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes. Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming a Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election.

hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway, because people really are that gullible. So, why not? But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.

hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.

And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.


But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable, deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her fat finger on the nuclear button and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her waddling hip pocket. Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
There are many, many problems with hillary. She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes. Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming a Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election.

hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway, because people really are that gullible. So, why not? But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.

hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.

And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.


But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable, deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her fat finger on the nuclear button and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her waddling hip pocket. Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.

---

POLO

President: National poll results

Averages for Mon Oct 17 2016


Hillary Clinton (D) 44% (+6.00)

Donald Trump (R) 38%

Gary Johnson (L) 7%


____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

Quote:

---

Hillary Clinton (D) 44% (+6.00)
Donald Trump (R) 38%
Gary Johnson (L) 7%
=THUGR

---

Quote:

---

Now, for all of you out there who still aren't convinced that the polls are rigged, we present to you the following Podesta email, leaked earlier today, that conveniently spells out, in startling detail, exactly how to rig them. The email starts out with a request for recommendations on "oversamples for polling" in order to "maximize what we get out of our media polling."

I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.

The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations. In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:

Research, microtargeting & polling projects
- Over-sample Hispanics
- Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)
- Over-sample the Native American population

For Florida, the report recommends "consistently monitoring" samples to makes sure they're "not too old" and "has enough African American and Hispanic voters." Meanwhile, "independent" voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.

- Consistently monitor the sample to ensure it is not too old, and that it has enough African American and Hispanic voters to reflect the state.
- On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.

Meanwhile, it's suggested that national polls over sample "key districts / regions" and "ethnic" groups "as needed."

- General election benchmark, 800 sample, with potential over samples in key districts/regions
- Benchmark polling in targeted races, with ethnic over samples as needed
- Targeting tracking polls in key races, with ethnic over samples as needed

Earlier this morning we wrote about the obvious sampling bias in the latest ABC / Washington Post poll that showed a 12-point national advantage for Hillary. Like many of the recent polls from Reuters, ABC and The Washington Post, this latest poll included a 9-point sampling bias toward registered democrats.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
There are many, many problems with hillary. She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes. Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming a Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election.

hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway, because people really are that gullible. So, why not? But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.

hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.

And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.


But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable, deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her fat finger on the nuclear button and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her waddling hip pocket. Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.

---

POLO

National Polling Average


Hillary Clinton

46.3%


Donald J. Trump

40.1%

President: Chance to win


Probabilities as of Sat Oct 22 2016


Hillary Clinton (D) 85% (+71.00)

Donald Trump (R) 14%


____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

Quote:

---

Do you see anything wrong there? If you don't, then you have no business being around polling data.

---

Quote:

---

So... are you saying that Podesta was able to get all of the polls that show Hillary ahead to do what he wanted?

---

Quote:

---

You are right - anyone running for president should simply ignore powerful people. Duh.= GSTRING

---

Quote:

---

Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the Earth- LINCOLN

---

Quote:

---

As Haiti takes stock of the damage wrought by Hurricane Matthew this week, critics have renewed their scrutiny of relief efforts — many of them sponsored by the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton's State Department — that failed to alleviate the country's suffering after a massive earthquake there in 2010.

A small group of Haitian-Americans gathered outside the New York City offices of state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman Thursday to protest his refusal to look into the Clinton Foundation's finances. The same group, known as the Committee to Mobilize Against Dictatorship in Haiti, has held several demonstrations throughout the campaign in an attempt to highlight the foundation's failures.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

RIGGED POLLS

New Podesta Email Exposes Dem Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples"

G

So... are you saying that Podesta was able to get all of the polls that show Hillary ahead to do what he wanted?

---

Quote:

---

So... are you saying that Podesta was able to get all of the polls that show Hillary ahead to do what he wanted? -G
No, not all of them, Just most of them.= SIGNY
Tin Foil Hat award time. = D

---

Quote:

---

You are right - anyone running for president should simply ignore powerful people. Duh.= GSTRING
Yes, they should. This is suppsed to be a contract between the people and their representatives, and the voice of one rich person should count no more than the voice of one poor one, because each is supposed to only get one vote. = SIGNY
More Naive than a First Grader award time. -G

---

Quote:

---

Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the Earth - LINCOLN
I know the Gettysburg Address isn't in your Canadian history, but its concepts should be familiar to you.
Unless, of course, you're arguing for an oligarchy.
Yanno, kind of like you say Ukraine was under Yanukovich.= SIGNY

Needs a Pithy Saying to Guide Her award time. No wonder you're a Trump lover.=G

---