OTHER SCIENCE FICTION SERIES

I predict John Carter will be the new Avatar!

POSTED BY: CHRISISALL
UPDATED: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 11:10
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 7377
PAGE 2 of 2

Monday, May 3, 2010 1:16 PM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by HKCavalier:

Sex sells not because "it's what guys want," it sells because it's man's favorite method of covering up "what guys DON'T want," i.e.: to feel their loneliness, abandonment and powerlessness. Sex as anesthesia. Sex in the media doesn't take away our feelings of loneliness, abandonment and powerlessness, it merely obscures these feelings while keeping them in play and THAT is why we buy whatever the sex is selling: to fill the void.



This, presumably, is why rich, powerful, succesful men have throughout history had so little interest in sex.



I think it could be argued that being rich, powerful, and successful may have absolutely no bearing on how lonely, abandoned, and powerless a man might FEEL at the top.

Uh oh, I post in here again. >_> *flees*

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 3, 2010 8:32 PM

BIGRICHARD


John Carter of Mars looks awesome.
I can't wait to see it.
I approve CiA.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010 6:50 AM

CAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
I think it could be argued that being rich, powerful, and successful may have absolutely no bearing on how lonely, abandoned, and powerless a man might FEEL at the top.



Can you actually provide an argument that the average Chinese Emperor or Turkish Sultan felt as lonely, abandoned and powerless as, say, the average plantation slave, fresh off the boat from Africa?

Because if not, that suggests that the amount of wealth, power, and success someone has, does have an effect on how lonely, abandoned and powerless they feel.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010 7:36 AM

BYTEMITE


Never seen Citizen Kane? That was based on the real life of William Randolph Hearst. Or maybe you've never heard of Howard Hughes?

I also note that you listed entitled inherited elite statuses such as kings and sultans, which would never be obtainable by anyone through "success." And compared them to people forced into the most miserable of situations, who can not be personally blamed for their enslavement or for any failure (opposite condition of success) that put them there.

Perhaps the obtaining of wealth can itself be a shallow grab for status and prestige, much like having an attractive woman, or being popular, or any number of other endeavors that a person might pursue that serve as a disconnect from their reality, and which, ultimately, are temporary states, unstable and perhaps not a good foundation for long-term happiness. Now this isn't true of everyone who is popular, or who seeks riches, some of them are quite happy. But because some of them are happy and feel empowered (and often, money DOES make people feel empowered and entitled), doesn't mean that all of them are. Or that none of them have their share of troubles which can't be solved by power or money. We can't say they are ALL happy. As such, it's not a path that we can claim resolutely leads to happiness.

But, um, I've been trying to move away from this thread to let Chris-is-all have his John Carter series discussions. Perhaps it would be better to continue this conversation in the thread I split off?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010 8:48 AM

CHRISISALL


No.
Do it here!


The laughing Chrisisall


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010 9:24 AM

BYTEMITE


Okay, sure. Thanks Chris. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010 9:50 AM

CHRISISALL


I would invite you to remember that Dark Angel is one of my all-time favourite shows, and Max CERTAINLY ain't no damsel in distress!!!
Also, Wai Lin was my favourite Bond girl (Tomorrow Never Dies), and she held her own with 007.
So it's not like I seek out entertainment where women need to have their noses wiped...



The laughing Chrisisall


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010 10:04 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Yeah, not to mention yon damsel-in-distress may not be exactly the wholesome type...

*snicker*

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010 10:41 AM

CHRISISALL


Yer scarin' me Frem...


The laughing Chrisisall


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010 12:13 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Dude, she scares *ME*.
I've known some seriously evil chicks in my time, one of whom proceeded to hand my ass to me for ruining her fun when I "rescued" her from a trio of jocks...

And then I wound up dating her.


Chicks can be scary.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 4, 2010 7:57 PM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by Cavalier:
Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
I think it could be argued that being rich, powerful, and successful may have absolutely no bearing on how lonely, abandoned, and powerless a man might FEEL at the top.



Can you actually provide an argument that the average Chinese Emperor or Turkish Sultan felt as lonely, abandoned and powerless as, say, the average plantation slave, fresh off the boat from Africa?

Because if not, that suggests that the amount of wealth, power, and success someone has, does have an effect on how lonely, abandoned and powerless they feel.

I would argue that it does have an effect on how much they feel at all, because wealth is an anesthetic. Because they can have their whims satisfied at will, the ultra rich are capable of endlessly distracting themselves. They don't just throw money at their problems, they throw people. Other people suffer the slings and arrows of life in their place.

And yet, not all rich people, not even all sovereigns, are happy. This is manifestly obvious to anyone who cares to take a look. Was Hitler a particularly happy person? And what of our American Presidents, arguably among the most powerful men in the world at any given time? The only one in recent memory that comes across as happy was maybe Reagan, and he was heavily lacquered and medicated. To a man, each president in my lifetime has visibly aged twice as many years as he spent in office.

You think JFK was happier than the average person as he watched secret service men sneaking Merilyn out of the White House? Is easy access to pleasure the sign of true happiness? Then junkies must be the very happiest of mortals.

And to imply that people in difficult circumstances, the poor and the oppressed cannot be happy, even happier than their "betters" is just as absurd. Happiness is a creature of the inner life and is born of acceptance, living life on life's terms, and that is no more nor less available to anyone regardless of their circumstances in life. If the poor could not find happiness within the confines of their circumstances then the moment a government became despotic it would instantly be overthrown by all the miserable poor.

Even a casual acquaintance with history, to say nothing of simple human nature, reveals your argument as specious in every particular.

That you don't know these things, that you worship wealth so ardently that you see it as a principal guarantor of happiness in this world, is sad. You need to get out more.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 5, 2010 6:41 AM

CAVALIER


Well, if the average Emperor was no happier or less miserable than the average slave, I can't think why people are so dead set against slavery.

On the other hand, if the average Emperor was happier than the average slave, then wealth and power must make you, on average, happier and, by your argument, less interested in sex.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 5, 2010 7:09 AM

BYTEMITE


That wasn't what he was saying at all.

People are against slavery for reasons far beyond whether the people involved are happy or not. Now, maybe there's an element in there that slavery denies people the PURSUIT of happiness, which is different from actually BEING happy. So yes, the average slave will be less happy than an emperor, because the slave lacks the ability to act on his free will. And it's wrong that the slave is denied that right, which is why slavery is abhorrent.

But neither does being able to pursuit happiness or act on free will necessarily LEAD to happiness, which is what OUR point is.

You're trying to reframe the argument here for some reason, but what you're trying to reframe it to is nonsensical. No one is saying or would EVER say that because both slaves and emperors can be unhappy, slavery must not be a big deal. You're trying to paint us with a colour that doesn't exist and attribute a point to us that we're not making.

Neither do you seem to be understanding that HK is not talking about whether people are interested in sex, nor ARGUING that the rich and powerful aren't interested in sex. He's arguing the OPPOSITE, that they're VERY interested in sex because they have more leisure time. That leisure time may ALSO contribute to boredom, loneliness, and depression. He's saying that sex is often USED as a DISTRACTION for boredom, loneliness, and depression.

Or it might be that the boredom, loneliness and depression stem from not being in touch with the self, deep down, and therefore being unable to connect on a meaningful level with other humans. So certain pursuits might be shallow attempts at replacement.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, May 5, 2010 11:10 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Crazy Eddie, Byte, Crazie Eddie - folks inside the box are always unaware of what color the outside is.

When making arguments, first it's generally a good idea to find an audience capable of comprehending them, wrapping their mind around the idea - and if it is too big, too oddly shaped, or too radical, well, you might as well describe colors to the blind.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Three-Body Problem by Liu Cixin
Sat, March 23, 2024 18:09 - 7 posts
Video Games to movie and tv series and other Cartoon / video game adaptions
Thu, March 7, 2024 14:26 - 42 posts
Favourite martial arts film of all time-
Wed, March 6, 2024 15:02 - 54 posts
PLANETES
Tue, March 5, 2024 14:22 - 51 posts
Shogun, non scifi series
Tue, March 5, 2024 13:20 - 4 posts
What Good Sci-Fi am I missing?
Mon, March 4, 2024 14:10 - 53 posts
Binge-worthy?
Mon, February 12, 2024 11:35 - 126 posts
Are There New TV Shows This Fall You Must See?
Sat, December 30, 2023 18:29 - 95 posts
The Expanse
Wed, December 20, 2023 18:06 - 27 posts
What Films Do You Want To See In 2023?
Thu, November 30, 2023 20:31 - 36 posts
Finding realistic sci-fi disappointing
Thu, October 5, 2023 12:04 - 42 posts
Worst Sci-Fi Ever.
Wed, October 4, 2023 17:51 - 158 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL