GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

ME Logo in front of Serenity?

POSTED BY: SPIKEANDJEZEBEL
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:57
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2746
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:30 AM

SPIKEANDJEZEBEL


I was just thinking... Usually, movies have both the logos for the studio (i.e. Universal) and the logos from the associated production company at the start of a feature film. Do you think we will see a feature version of the Mutant Enemy logo at the head of "Serenity", complete with "Grrr...Arrgghh" monster?

Has anyone heard any talk of this?

"I like smackin' 'em!" - Jayne Cobb

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:42 AM

EMBERS


Quote:

Originally posted by spikeandjezebel:
Do you think we will see a feature version of the Mutant Enemy logo at the head of "Serenity", complete with "Grrr...Arrgghh" monster?


I haven't heard a word about this...
of course they've been busy making the movie and maybe haven't thought about the titles yet

but I will cheer loudly in the theater if it is there!
Of course I'll be cheer all our BDHs anyway!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:13 AM

XION47


I was thinking about this a while ago as well. I think the most likely outcome is that the credits will read:

Universal Pictures Presents
A Mutant Enemey Production
A Joss Whedon Film
"Serenity"
Nathan Fillion...etc.

I think that the only logo appearing before the credits will be that of Universal's.

Harken: "Seems odd that you would name your ship after a battle you were on the wrong side of."
Mal: "May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one."
~ƒireƒly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:42 AM

CGREALMS


I doubt they'd use it just because it would be a little jarring jumping from the epic, sweeping orchestral Universal logo clip to the Grrr... Argh... clip.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:36 AM

MISGUIDED BY VOICES


Quote:

Originally posted by CGRealms:
I doubt they'd use it just because it would be a little jarring jumping from the epic, sweeping orchestral Universal logo clip to the Grrr... Argh... clip.



I think the other issue may be a legal one - there seems to be a habit with films of setting up production companies for specific films to limit liabilities in some way (I'm not sure on the specifics, I just recall Kevin Smith mentioning something on one of his DVDs)

"I threw up on your bed"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:39 AM

ANOTHERFIREFLYFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by CGRealms:
I doubt they'd use it just because it would be a little jarring jumping from the epic, sweeping orchestral Universal logo clip to the Grrr... Argh... clip.



Actually, I think that would be hi-larious. I can just see it... large, grand, epic UNIVERSAL over the spinning globe logo thing. Suddenly, paper mummy walks across the screen "Grr.. Argh". The juxtaposition of those two would just be terrific.

Yes they must do it that way!

I can also see them redo-ing the ME logo for the film. hmm...

~AFf

Keep flying

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:43 AM

BRITCHICK


If nothing else, it would be great to have it...right at the end. Just like on the ME shows.

Like fireflyfans.net?
Help keep the site running.. Why not donate?
see links on homepage

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:43 AM

BRITCHICK


If nothing else, it would be great to have it...right at the end. Just like on the ME shows.

Like fireflyfans.net?
Help keep the site running.. Why not donate?
see links on homepage

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:57 PM

BLEYDDYN


Quote:

Originally posted by Misguided By Voices:
I think the other issue may be a legal one - there seems to be a habit with films of setting up production companies for specific films to limit liabilities in some way (I'm not sure on the specifics, I just recall Kevin Smith mentioning something on one of his DVDs)



It actually has to do with inflexible laws in the US and the way movies are usually made. A bunch of cast and crew are 'hired', they make a movie for several months, then they are all 'fired'. But that drives unemployment insurance through the roof. So production companies have to come and go, or they would never be able to afford it.

At least that's how I remember it being explained to me during the short time I used to work at Cast and Crew Payroll (a company that handles payroll for the entertainment industry).

--Bleyddyn

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL