Quote:

---

Originally posted by whozit:
I can forgive him, he hasn't been acting like Chuck Sheen or LiLo. Disappointed, a little, forgiven, yes.

---

Quote:

---

D.C. Attorney General Drops Drunk Driving Cases

Wash. DC. Feb. 8 — The District’s attorney general has dropped dozens of drunken driving cases since Jan. 31 and hundreds of others could be dropped as the police department shuts down its troubled alcohol breath-test program. Problems dating back more than three years with the city’s breath analyzers were first revealed in February 2010, when it was discovered the machines’ results were inaccurate. Since then, the D.C. medical examiner’s office has refused to sign off on the accuracy tests of new analysis machines, officials said.

"The alcohol breath-analysis program? It doesn’t exist anymore," said Ilmar Paegle, who discovered problems with the Intoxilyzer 5000s soon after he took over the city’s breath-analysis program on Feb. 1, 2010. Paegle’s contract ended last week. As he left, he said, the police department pulled off the street the Intoximeter, which replaced the Intoxilyzer last spring. "It’s a royal mess," Paegle said.

A spokeswoman for D.C. Attorney General Irvin Nathan said he couldn’t be pulled from a meeting to comment Tuesday. Nathan dropped eight more drunken driving cases Tuesday.

City policy requires the medical examiner’s office to certify the program, and it has not done so, citing concerns raised by the problems with the previous models, Paegle said. Although officers had been using the Intoximeters, the results were not being included as evidence, according to Paegle and internal police e-mails obtained by The Washington Examiner.

The medical examiner’s office declined to comment, citing pending litigation. Dozens of defendants have sued the city after being convicted on potentially faulty breath-test results.

Assistant police Chief Patrick Burke said officers are now taking urine samples to test blood alcohol levels for potential future prosecutions.

Meanwhile, the two police officers who account for a third of the city’s 1,400 annual drunken driving arrests have had their trial testimony called into question. They are the subjects of an internal affairs investigation that began after they spoke out about problems with the breath analyzers.

Officers Jose Rodriguez and Andrew Zabavsky learned that the medical examiner hadn’t signed off on the program and began mentioning that in their trial testimony last spring, according to an e-mail from Zabavsky to police Chief Cathy Lanier. Later in the spring, the attorney general’s office began an investigation into the officers, saying a woman they arrested for driving under the influence in June 2009 had complained the two watched her take a urine test.

In December, the case was turned over to internal affairs.

"On a day-by-day basis, cases are being dismissed because the officers involved are being investigated," said defense lawyer Bryan Brown.

The result, police union chief Kris Baumann said, is "our ability to enforce DUI laws in the District has been crippled".

http://www.duiblog.com/2011/02/09/attorney-general-finds-widespread-br
eathalyzer-inaccuracies-police-shut-down-all-machines/


Washington, D.C., prosecutors' recent systematic dismissal of numerous drunk driving prosecutions -- on top of D.C. prosecutors' continuing striking of breath testing scores obtained from Metropolitan Police breathalyzer machines, for a year now -- shouts loud-and-clear how broken is D.C.'s DWI prosecution system, and underlines how severely fallible is any DWI prosecution in any state that relies on the junk science of field sobriety testing and the highly-flawed approach of using breath testing rather than blood testing to quantify blood alcohol content in one's body.
http://katzjustice.com/underdog/archives/2273-Recent-DWI-dismissals-fu
rther-expose-a-broken-D.C.-DWI-enforcement-system..html

---

Quote:

---

Illuminati Vowed in 1969: "Travel Will Be More Difficult"

br kosher Dr Henry Makow PhD

Like sheep, humanity had better adjust to constant harassment as long as it tolerates Illuminati control of all important government and social institutions.

At the height of the holiday season, millions of travelers to the US were delayed and inconvenienced because of one suspicious incident Friday.

In 1969, Rockefeller Insider Dr. Richard Day, medical director of Planned Parenthood [that genocided more than 100-million US citizens] predicted the future in these terms:

Quote:

---

Travel would become very restricted. People would need permission to travel and they would need a good reason to travel. If you didn't have a good reason for your travel you would not be allowed to travel, and everyone would need ID. later on some sort of device would be developed to be implanted under the skin that would be coded specifically to identify the individual.

And he predicted, or rather expounded on, changes that were planned for the remainder of this century. Drug use would be increased. Alcohol use would be increased. Law enforcement efforts against drugs would be increased.

On first hearing that, it sounded like a contradiction. Why increase drug abuse and simultaneously increase law enforcement against drug abuse? But the idea is that, in part, the increased availability of drugs would provide a sort of law of the jungle whereby the weak and the unfit would be selected out.

There was a statement made at the time: 'Before the earth was overpopulated, there was a law of the jungle where only the fittest survived.' You had to be able to protect yourself against the elements and wild animals and disease. And if you were fit, you survived. But now we've become so civilized – we're over civilized – and the unfit are enabled to survive, only at the expense of those who are more fit. And the abusive drugs then, would restore, in a certain sense, the law of the jungle, and selection of the fittest for survival.

News about drug abuse and law enforcement efforts would tend to keep drugs in the public consciousness. And would also tend to reduce this unwarranted American complacency that the world is a safe place, and a nice place.

The same thing would happen with alcohol. Alcohol abuse would be both promoted and demoted at the same time. The vulnerable and the weak would respond to the promotions and, therefore, use and abuse more alcohol. Drunk driving would become more of a problem; and stricter rules about driving under the influence would be established so that more and more people would lose their privilege to drive.

This also had connection with something we'll get to later about overall restrictions on travel. Not everybody should be free to travel the way they do now in the United States. People don't have a need to travel that way. It's a privilege! It was a kind of a high-handed way it was put.

Again, much more in the way of psychological services would be made available to help those who got hooked on drugs and alcohol. The idea being, that in order to promote this – drug and alcohol abuse to screen out some of the unfit people who are otherwise pretty good – would also be subject to getting hooked. And if they were really worth their salt they would have enough sense to seek psychological counseling and to benefit from it. So this was presented as sort of a redeeming value on the part of the planners. It was as if he were saying, 'you think we're bad in promoting these evil things — but look how nice we are – we're also providing a way out!' More jails would be needed. Hospitals could serve as jails. Some new hospital construction would be designed so as to make them adaptable to jail-like use.

stream http://100777.com/nwo/barbarians

http://files.100777.com/New%20Order%20of%20Barbarians.mp3

---

In the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the author writes that their goal is: "To wear everyone out by dissensions, animosities, feuds, famine, inoculation of diseases, want, until the Gentiles sees no other way of escape except by appeal to our money and our power." (Protocol 10)

"We will so wear out and exhaust the Gentiles by all this that they will be compelled to offer us an international authority, which by its position will enable us to absorb without disturbance all the governmental forces of the world and thus form a super-government." (Protocol 5)

http://www.henrymakow.com/illuminati_vowed_in_1969_trave.html

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
So, Chris.... how does it feel to be teamed up with the local loony tune, against everyone else?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Bytemite:
The speed limit sign in question would be in violation of federal law. You have to step down speed limits within a reasonable distance, and have to provide reasonable notice of the speed limit change.

Because there's no evidence because Alan didn't take the breath test, the case could probably be thrown out. None of us know how drunk he was or not. There's reasonable doubt, can't convict.

I'm starting to side with the "Alan did nothing wrong" argument here. The only thing I couldn't understand is why he was going so fast in what sounded like a residential zone (which otherwise would have suggested he was dangerously drunk), and this explains it completely.

Nice analysis, two.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by pennausamike:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
So, Chris.... how does it feel to be teamed up with the local loony tune, against everyone else?

---

Who?
pennausamike? two? bytemite?

Ohhh, I bet you mean PN.

Not everyone who thinks DUI in this country can be poorly administered to corruptly mismanaged is a looney tune.

I stand by my posts.
Mike

---

Quote:

---

Wait what? Speeding -> refused breathalyzer (shady) -> failed field sobriety test -> innocent!

How'd you work through that logic?

---