REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Demcrats need not worry, the fix is in

POSTED BY: WHOZIT
UPDATED: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 03:55
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1409
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, January 31, 2016 12:18 PM

WHOZIT


http://nypost.com/2016/01/31/this-was-all-planned-former-ig-says-Hilla
ry-state-dept-are-lying


It's up to the voters now, do the Democrats want to continue covering for this crook? Democrats and their whores in the MSM have already damaged their reputations defending Hill and Bill. If she does get a pass the great unwashed will be outraged, Trump could win in a huge landslide. He could win some "Blue" states.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 31, 2016 1:46 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Being of a paranoid mindset, my observation is that NPR reliably spins the news according to Democratic Party central committee wishes, and NPR has taken a very strange turn lately. Not only have they been thumping Walmart's Education Foundation ("To ensure all children have good educational choices" or some such privatization claptrap) they've also provided a forum for one of the Koch Bros to explain his political views. In addition, they're viciously and relentlessly anti-Trump. I think they see this contest as coming down to Trump v Hillary, and Trump as THE threat to beat.

Here is the article to WHOZIT's link

Quote:

The State Department is lying when it says it didn’t know until it was too late that Hillary Clinton was improperly using personal e-mails and a private server to conduct official business — because it never set up an agency e-mail address for her in the first place, the department’s former top watchdog says.

“This was all planned in advance” to skirt rules governing federal records management, said Howard J. Krongard, who served as the agency’s inspector general from 2005 to 2008.

The Harvard-educated lawyer points out that, from Day One, Clinton was never assigned and never used a state.gov e-mail address like previous secretaries.

“That’s a change in the standard. It tells me that this was premeditated. And this eliminates claims by the State Department that they were unaware of her private e-mail server until later,” Krongard said in an exclusive interview. “How else was she supposed to do business without e-mail?”

He also points to the unusual absence of a permanent inspector general during Clinton’s entire 2009-2013 term at the department. He said the 5¹/2-year vacancy was unprecedented.

“This is a major gap. In fact, it’s without precedent,” he said. “It’s the longest period any department has gone without an IG.”

Inspectors general serve an essential and unique role in the federal government by independently investigating agency waste, fraud and abuse. Their oversight also covers violations of communications security procedures.

“It’s clear she did not want to be subject to internal investigations,” Krongard said. An e-mail audit would have easily uncovered the secret information flowing from classified government networks to the private unprotected system she set up in her New York home.

He says “the key” to the FBI’s investigation of Emailgate is determining how highly sensitive state secrets in the classified network, known as SIPRNet, ended up in Clinton’s personal e-mails.

“The starting point of the investigation is the material going through SIPRNet. She couldn’t function without the information coming over SIPRNet,” Krongard said. “How did she get it on her home server? It can’t just jump from one system to the other. Someone had to move it, copy it. The question is who did that?”

As The Post first reported, the FBI is investigating whether Clinton’s deputies copied top-secret information from the department’s classified network to its unclassified network where it was sent to Hillary’s unsecured, unencrypted e-mail account.

‘It tells me that this was premeditated. And this eliminates claims by the State Department that they were unaware of her private e-mail server until later’ - Howard J. Krongard on the State Dept. never giving Hillary an agency e-mail address

FBI agents are focusing on three of Clinton’s top department aides. Most of the 1,340 Clinton e-mails deemed classified by intelligence agency reviewers were sent to her by her chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, or her deputy chiefs, Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan, who now hold high positions in Clinton’s presidential campaign.

“They are facing significant scrutiny now,” Krongard said, and are under “enormous pressure to cooperate” with investigators.

He says staffers who had access to secret material more than likely summarized it for Clinton in the e-mails they sent to her; but he doesn’t rule out the use of thumb drives to transfer classified information from one system to the other, which would be a serious security breach. Some of the classified computers at Foggy Bottom have ports for memory sticks.

Either way, there would be an audit trail for investigators to follow. The SIPRNet system maintains the identity of all users and their log-on and log-off times, among other activities.

“This totally eliminates the false premise that she got nothing marked classified,” Krongard said. “She’s hiding behind this defense. But they [e-mails] had to be classified, because otherwise [the information in them] wouldn’t be on the SIPRNet.”

Added Krongard: “She’s trying to distance herself from the conversion from SIPRNet to [the nonsecure] NIPRNet and to her server, but she’s throwing her staffers under the bus.”

Still, “It will never get to an indictment,” Krongard said.

For one, he says, any criminal referral to the Justice Department from the FBI “will have to go through four loyal Democrat women” — Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell, who heads the department’s criminal division; Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates; Attorney General Loretta Lynch; and top White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

Even if they accept the referral, he says, the case quickly and quietly will be plea-bargained down to misdemeanors punishable by fines in a deal similar to the one Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall, secured for Gen. David Petraeus. In other words, a big slap on the wrist.

“He knows the drill,” Krongard said of Kendall.



--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 31, 2016 4:19 PM

RIVERLOVE


Some choice, a crook or a crock.

Thanks, but no thanks. I'm voting with a write-in for Lynn Gilmartin.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 1, 2016 4:33 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:
Some choice, a crook or a crock.

Thanks, but no thanks. I'm voting with a write-in for Lynn Gilmartin.






HAHA!

Riverlove is me, 10 years ago :)

The fix is always in.

No matter who you choose it's who they wanted you to choose in the long run....

A little bit of the pendulum swinging right for a while, and then a little bit of the pendulum swinging left for a while...

Voting, or entirely removing yourself from the process altogether, is the last vestige of an impotent mankind....

Gloat over your victory. Lick your wounds if you lost. Laugh at everybody for being that "fool on the hill" that was smarter than everyone you know by not voting....


3rd party, and 4th party and 5th party and 6th party and ect, ect, ect is the ONLY answer....

You're all BRAINWASHED TO BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE ONLY 2 PARTIES THAT MATTER!!!!


Until you all wake up and realize that if we TRULY ARE FREE that we should have MANY MORE than TWO VOICES, you're all just slaves :)



The "comedy" of this, is that I'm nearly 40 years old and my teeth are falling out of my face of their own volition without any Jackboot Thugs kicking them out.

I used to have a heart, but that's long gone. Not because I sold it, but because I never found anybody to give it to. I still have a mind though, and I'm just going to go with the flow and get my physical shit taken care of.

In the mean time, if nobody explicity tells me I can't urge others one way or another, I will not waste any time in doing so.



Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 1, 2016 6:11 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


Dream a Little Dream...................Trump's Campaign song!


SGG


Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:
http://nypost.com/2016/01/31/this-was-all-planned-former-ig-says-Hilla
ry-state-dept-are-lying


It's up to the voters now, do the Democrats want to continue covering for this crook? Democrats and their whores in the MSM have already damaged their reputations defending Hill and Bill. If she does get a pass the great unwashed will be outraged, Trump could win in a huge landslide. He could win some "Blue" states.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 1, 2016 6:17 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


I'm going to Iowa to push for that favorite son of America and vote independent.........Bernie Sa...., er, Donald Tr....., Ted, no Ted Cr.....
Ah, fuck it..........if it's fixed what's the use! Fuck 'em all

The rich will still get richer and the poor must grab their ankles, as it
always and ever will be.

How's that for pessimism!?


SGG


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Being of a paranoid mindset, my observation is that NPR reliably spins the news according to Democratic Party central committee wishes, and NPR has taken a very strange turn lately. Not only have they been thumping Walmart's Education Foundation ("To ensure all children have good educational choices" or some such privatization claptrap) they've also provided a forum for one of the Koch Bros to explain his political views. In addition, they're viciously and relentlessly anti-Trump. I think they see this contest as coming down to Trump v Hillary, and Trump as THE threat to beat.

Here is the article to WHOZIT's link

Quote:

The State Department is lying when it says it didn’t know until it was too late that Hillary Clinton was improperly using personal e-mails and a private server to conduct official business — because it never set up an agency e-mail address for her in the first place, the department’s former top watchdog says.

“This was all planned in advance” to skirt rules governing federal records management, said Howard J. Krongard, who served as the agency’s inspector general from 2005 to 2008.

The Harvard-educated lawyer points out that, from Day One, Clinton was never assigned and never used a state.gov e-mail address like previous secretaries.

“That’s a change in the standard. It tells me that this was premeditated. And this eliminates claims by the State Department that they were unaware of her private e-mail server until later,” Krongard said in an exclusive interview. “How else was she supposed to do business without e-mail?”

He also points to the unusual absence of a permanent inspector general during Clinton’s entire 2009-2013 term at the department. He said the 5¹/2-year vacancy was unprecedented.

“This is a major gap. In fact, it’s without precedent,” he said. “It’s the longest period any department has gone without an IG.”

Inspectors general serve an essential and unique role in the federal government by independently investigating agency waste, fraud and abuse. Their oversight also covers violations of communications security procedures.

“It’s clear she did not want to be subject to internal investigations,” Krongard said. An e-mail audit would have easily uncovered the secret information flowing from classified government networks to the private unprotected system she set up in her New York home.

He says “the key” to the FBI’s investigation of Emailgate is determining how highly sensitive state secrets in the classified network, known as SIPRNet, ended up in Clinton’s personal e-mails.

“The starting point of the investigation is the material going through SIPRNet. She couldn’t function without the information coming over SIPRNet,” Krongard said. “How did she get it on her home server? It can’t just jump from one system to the other. Someone had to move it, copy it. The question is who did that?”

As The Post first reported, the FBI is investigating whether Clinton’s deputies copied top-secret information from the department’s classified network to its unclassified network where it was sent to Hillary’s unsecured, unencrypted e-mail account.

‘It tells me that this was premeditated. And this eliminates claims by the State Department that they were unaware of her private e-mail server until later’ - Howard J. Krongard on the State Dept. never giving Hillary an agency e-mail address

FBI agents are focusing on three of Clinton’s top department aides. Most of the 1,340 Clinton e-mails deemed classified by intelligence agency reviewers were sent to her by her chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, or her deputy chiefs, Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan, who now hold high positions in Clinton’s presidential campaign.

“They are facing significant scrutiny now,” Krongard said, and are under “enormous pressure to cooperate” with investigators.

He says staffers who had access to secret material more than likely summarized it for Clinton in the e-mails they sent to her; but he doesn’t rule out the use of thumb drives to transfer classified information from one system to the other, which would be a serious security breach. Some of the classified computers at Foggy Bottom have ports for memory sticks.

Either way, there would be an audit trail for investigators to follow. The SIPRNet system maintains the identity of all users and their log-on and log-off times, among other activities.

“This totally eliminates the false premise that she got nothing marked classified,” Krongard said. “She’s hiding behind this defense. But they [e-mails] had to be classified, because otherwise [the information in them] wouldn’t be on the SIPRNet.”

Added Krongard: “She’s trying to distance herself from the conversion from SIPRNet to [the nonsecure] NIPRNet and to her server, but she’s throwing her staffers under the bus.”

Still, “It will never get to an indictment,” Krongard said.

For one, he says, any criminal referral to the Justice Department from the FBI “will have to go through four loyal Democrat women” — Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell, who heads the department’s criminal division; Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates; Attorney General Loretta Lynch; and top White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

Even if they accept the referral, he says, the case quickly and quietly will be plea-bargained down to misdemeanors punishable by fines in a deal similar to the one Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall, secured for Gen. David Petraeus. In other words, a big slap on the wrist.

“He knows the drill,” Krongard said of Kendall.



--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 1, 2016 6:19 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


The NY Post is toilet paper with printing on it. Quite the novelty!
First of all, that IG must STFU! Where was he when all this broke months
ago? Talk about the fix is in. Quelle surprise! Right before the Iowa
caucus, HA! Dumb motherfuckers will believe this load of crap too.

By the way, The POST, in all it's glory is a BIG part of the MSM. Just so you know.


SGG


Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:
http://nypost.com/2016/01/31/this-was-all-planned-former-ig-says-Hilla
ry-state-dept-are-lying


It's up to the voters now, do the Democrats want to continue covering for this crook? Democrats and their whores in the MSM have already damaged their reputations defending Hill and Bill. If she does get a pass the great unwashed will be outraged, Trump could win in a huge landslide. He could win some "Blue" states.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, February 2, 2016 3:55 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


The IOWA Caucus........................Ahhhhh, Democracy.................
the people have spoken.

Something the BIG Corporations can't buy! Real FREEDOM!


SGG


Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:
http://nypost.com/2016/01/31/this-was-all-planned-former-ig-says-Hilla
ry-state-dept-are-lying


It's up to the voters now, do the Democrats want to continue covering for this crook? Democrats and their whores in the MSM have already damaged their reputations defending Hill and Bill. If she does get a pass the great unwashed will be outraged, Trump could win in a huge landslide. He could win some "Blue" states.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, March 29, 2024 02:54 - 3414 posts
BUILD BACK BETTER!
Fri, March 29, 2024 02:49 - 11 posts
Russia says 60 dead, 145 injured in concert hall raid; Islamic State group claims responsibility
Fri, March 29, 2024 00:45 - 56 posts
Elections; 2024
Fri, March 29, 2024 00:33 - 2075 posts
Long List of Celebrities that are Still Here
Fri, March 29, 2024 00:00 - 1 posts
China
Thu, March 28, 2024 22:10 - 447 posts
Biden
Thu, March 28, 2024 22:03 - 853 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, March 28, 2024 17:20 - 6155 posts
Well... He was no longer useful to the DNC or the Ukraine Money Laundering Scheme... So justice was served
Thu, March 28, 2024 12:44 - 1 posts
Salon: NBC's Ronna blunder: A failed attempt to appeal to MAGA voters — except they hate her too
Thu, March 28, 2024 07:04 - 1 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, March 27, 2024 23:21 - 987 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Wed, March 27, 2024 15:03 - 824 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL