..."/>

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

So....Yeah.... JOBS.

POSTED BY: RAHLMACLAREN
UPDATED: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 08:06
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2622
PAGE 1 of 1

Monday, October 12, 2009 8:54 AM

RAHLMACLAREN

"Damn yokels, can't even tell a transport ship ain't got no guns on it." - Jayne Cobb


[Enters the RWED in a...um...harvester? Those are solid. Boring, but solid.]

This board is (usually) full of smart people. So, I want to see what ideas you have.

The Question:
What can we, the Gov't, or I do to bring back jobs?


And.... GO!



--------------------------------------------------
Find here the Serenity you seek. -Tara Maclay

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 12, 2009 9:23 AM

BYTEMITE


I think that jobs are a local level investment. It works slightly different of course in larger businesses, who might dictate company policy for hiring to a number of regional branches. But I think in general that it holds that if there's growth, then business will hire. Local business is the easiest to influence, so I'd try to start there.

The other problem to overcome is business closure in the past year: less businesses means more supply of employees than demand.

What you could do is either invest or help found businesses on a local level. Now, I don't know that a single citizen of average income can generate many jobs this way, but in lieu of failing banks and interest in the investment market, a large group of citizens coming together on a for profit venture might get you the start-up money you need.

Can government help? Hmm. Well, I've seen some results of the stimulus money, and it all does seem to be working as intended. Jobs are being made, though I can't say as to how permanent they are, and they are government contracted jobs too, which some might find disagreeable.

Because of the deficit, I'm kind of waiting for the other shoe to drop with the stimulus package. But we'll see what happens.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 12, 2009 9:56 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Tax outsourcing.
Heavily.

You wanna be an american biz, you want the tax breaks ?
Hire americans.
(lookin at YOU, Billy Ford!)

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 12, 2009 10:29 AM

GINOBIFFARONI


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

Tax outsourcing.
Heavily.

You wanna be an american biz, you want the tax breaks ?
Hire americans.
(lookin at YOU, Billy Ford!)

-F



The US started all the free trade, and world economy crap...

You bribed, bullied, and blackmailed most of the planet into changing their economies and policies to suit this goal

if you want it to go back to how it was, expect some serious backlash,



Either your with the terrorists, or ... your with the terrorists


Lets party like its 1939

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 12, 2009 10:37 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Jobs are an old-fashioned concept.

We are moving forward to an age of enlightenment.

We don't need no stinkin jobs.

We don't need no stinkin gasoline.

We don't need no stinkin electricity.

Welcome to the Stone Age.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 12, 2009 12:30 PM

DREAMTROVE


I have lots of ideas, but I oppose jobs. It's sort of like asking me how you can start a war with Iran or reinstate the draft, it would need a very hard sell.

Frem,

Nah, won't work. If you tax outsourcing, all that will happen is that US companies that outsource will dissolve and reform as India-based companies, and then the govt. will get zero tax revenue. Actually, this idea is sounding better already. I say go for it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 12, 2009 12:59 PM

DREAMTROVE












What, I'm Vice president? Excuse me, who is the senior god on this ticket...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 12, 2009 2:21 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by dreamtrove:

If you tax outsourcing, all that will happen is that US companies that outsource will dissolve and reform as India-based companies, and then the govt. will get zero tax revenue.



How would that be markedly different than what we have now? We already get just about zero revenue from corporate taxes. Sure, we have one of the highest corporate tax rates on Earth, but that's only effective if we actually hold corporations to it - which we of course don't.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 12, 2009 2:25 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:


The US started all the free trade, and world economy crap...

You bribed, bullied, and blackmailed most of the planet into changing their economies and policies to suit this goal

if you want it to go back to how it was, expect some serious backlash.



Well, yeah... but that was before Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize.



Now all we have to do is go, "Eh, sorry - my bad" and the world will love us again.

I'm not completely joking.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 12, 2009 3:49 PM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

Tax outsourcing.
Heavily.

You wanna be an american biz, you want the tax breaks ?
Hire americans.
(lookin at YOU, Billy Ford!)

-F



What a quaint notion - "American" Express outsources - once you outsource you pay no health insurance and no 401ks and 1/10th the investment in labor - you'd have to be business suicidal not to - if you're any kind of *respectable* capitalist you've already got big one foot in India. Pakistan should be so smart.
What's best for the US? Consumer's want the benefits of illegals and outsourcing - cheap goods - but they don't want the lack of jobs and those pesky ethical concerns. Can't have it both ways. So embrace Public Works Stimulus Projects - can't outsource those.




Scifi movie music + Firefly dialogue clips, 24 hours a day - http://www.scifiradio.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 12, 2009 6:00 PM

MANGOLO


Buy local/made in America as much as possible. Make sure your public institutions are doing the same.

It is pretty ridiculous that often our tax dollars are spent on buying mass transit vehicles manufactured in Europe or Japan. I know the DoD almost hired a french company to build their re-fueling air tankers.

Support small business owners. The profit from small business owners ends up back in your community. So the money you saved by shopping Walmart leaves your community and leaves your poorer for it.

Support your local micro-brewery! (Same effect as supporting other local businesses)




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 2:34 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hey, why isn't this the corporations' responsibility? Why does the gubmint have to pull our bacon out of the fire? Isn't "free enterprise" the font of all wealth? (She asks, only slightly bitterly.)

Shoot, man... where to start???

(1) If you skim money towards the rich (as profit) each time it makes a trip through the production/ consumption cycle, you concentrate much wealth in the hands of a few. The vast majority have less money to purchase goods, demand falls, people are laid off. demand falls even further. It is a self-feeding cycle. The "bailout"- started by Bush and continued by Obama- was simply another way to rob the poor to feed the rich, this time through the avenue of tax money- not simple profit. What Obama should do- IMMEDIATELY- is demand the bailout money back, and distribute it downwards, not upwards.

Furthermore, the money can be distributed downwards in a way that creates job IN AMERICA instead of being exported to to China, India, or Vietnam. Aside from public works (How about a new Civilian Conservation Corps to start restoring the environment and prepare it for climate change by planting species further north, creating swaths of thinned forest to stop megafires, restoring wetlands and barrier islands etc.) we can renovate buildings for energy efficiency, rebuild our infrastructure (not just roads and bridges, but sewage systems, water mains, electrical distribution etc.) and pay for more nurses and teachers. (Healthy, educated people are infrastructure too.) That $700 BILLION designated to help CEOs keep their private jets would have created 1 million jobs at $70,000 each for one year, or 100.000 jobs for ten years. That's 100,000 teachers, nurses, researchers, engineers, construction workers, etc. Money that Henry "Hank" Paulson blew out our collective *ss, with Geithner following the same sh*tstream, and damnit, I want it back! And how about restructuring the tax code while we're at it??

(2) Billions for bailout but nothing for healthcare??? WTF???

(3) Globalization was only designed to help the rich. It has impoverished billions. I'd bail out of the WTO as fast as my legs could carry me, and furthermore I'd stop making the IMF the enforcement arm of union-busting/ impoverishment practices around the world. If we're going to compete globally, we should stop cutting our own throats.

(4) With increasing automation and productivity, there is no need (except, of course, for management to squeeze the highest profit possible out of the fewest people) for people to be working 50, 60, or 70 hours a week. Or even 40. The standard workweek should be 35 hours, with no loss of pay or benefits.

Ya see????

There's nothing going on that money and political will can't fix.

ETA: And all this crap about a jobless "recovery"...? In my book, if there ain't no jobs, there ain't no recovery.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:56 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Quote:

Originally posted by RahlMaclaren:
[Enters the RWED in a...um...harvester? Those are solid. Boring, but solid.]

This board is (usually) full of smart people. So, I want to see what ideas you have.

The Question:
What can we, the Gov't, or I do to bring back jobs?


And.... GO!



--------------------------------------------------
Find here the Serenity you seek. -Tara Maclay







Hello,

I'm quite convinced that the less the government does, the better things will become. If the government proceeds to do nothing for a long enough period of time, I expect the economy and the jobs will improve.

On the bright side, I expect that the actions already taken by our government will have a 'positive' impact for years to come. As inflation proceeds to chew up the value of the U.S. Dollar, it will become cheaper and cheaper to hire U.S. workers.

--Anthony



"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:07 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Anthony, you sound like Herbert Hoover's economic advisor, Andrew Mellon.
Quote:

America was no stranger to economic depression when Herbert Hoover took office. The prevailing economic theory on depression had been to weather the storm. Hoover did not subscribe to this theory, but he was in the minority. His Treasury secretary, Andrew Mellon, believed that the 1929 stock market crash and subsequent Depression was the economy naturally cleansing itself of weaker elements. Mellon’s attitude reflects the “invisible hand” theory of economics espoused by Adam Smith. It was Smith’s theory that shaped the laissez-faire economic policies of the prosperous 1920’s and before.
It was laissez faire capitalism that got us into the Great Depression. It was Bush's re-introduction of 1920's economic policies that got us into THIS mess. However it is that money is concentrated into fewer and fewer hands, whether by default or by government intervention, you WILL generate a depression.

You really should study economics, Tony, and replace some of that conviction with fact.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 5:58 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I think that you will find that depressions and recessions occur under all economic platforms. Planned and regulated, and fast and loose. It's really in the recovery from economic failure that various economies distinguish themselves. Not in the avoidance of such failures.

I don't know if you are an economist or not, Signy. I'm not, but I have done some reading on the topic this year.

It's a terrible shame that when someone disagrees with someone else on this board, the default assumption is that someone is woefully ignorant and misguided. "Ah, if only you'd bothered to pick up a book, there is no way you could come to such a conclusion."

It's never possible that two people can look at the same information and come to different conclusions. Never mind that well-read and brilliant economists have disagreed on the management of economies since the dawn of currency. If only I'd familiarized myself with the right books and experts, I'd not make such lame and deranged assertions.

--Anthony






"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 6:25 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Indeed, economic crises have occurred at least since the

Roman Empire http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_of_the_Third_Century and.. spot-checking my way through history...

monarchic France (right b4 the Revolution) http://www.fsmitha.com/h3/h33-fr.html

Russia under Alexander
http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/Czar+Alexander+I

and of course the panics and depressions of 1819, 1832, 1836-1843, 1893 (world panic), 1901 and 1929 (Great Depression).

The ONE THING they have in common is concentration of wealth whether in the hands of an emperor, monarch, czar, robber baron, or Credit Default Swap trader. The USA stumbled through one depression and panic after another, trusting "the markets" to right the ship, until the Great Depression, when government stepped and threw MASSIVE amounts of (deficit) money at the "lower classes"... at first through "pump priming" and then through war spending... which heralded an unprecedented era of growth and prosperity.

Even Greenspan, free-marketeer cheerleader, admitted that laissez-faire ("let be") capialism is not the way to go
Quote:

The former Federal Reserve chairman, Alan Greenspan, has conceded that the global financial crisis has exposed a "mistake" in the free market ideology which guided his 18-year stewardship of US monetary policy. A long-time cheerleader for deregulation, Greenspan admitted to a congressional committee yesterday that he had been "partially wrong" in his hands-off approach towards the banking industry and that the credit crunch had left him in a state of shocked disbelief. "I have found a flaw," said Greenspan, referring to his economic philosophy. "I don't know how significant or permanent it is. But I have been very distressed by that fact."


Tony, you're right... it's how we recover from this that defines us. Why would you have us go back a re-try what CLEARLY didn't work the first fifty times? Bc if we did, wouldn't that kind of define us as idiots?

Sorry for the snark, but this really gets under my skin.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 6:51 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Oh yeah, one more addendum... is not sufficient to "give" money to people... the Roman Empire did that with bread and circuses, as they became more and more dependent on slave labor (kind of like we are today with automation and cheap foreign labor.) It has to be in the form of jobs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 6:56 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

It seems like there is some kind of belief that if we plan carefully enough, place the right kinds of regulations, and control the economy just so...

that we will avoid these recessions and depressions.

Yet I have seen no evidence that this is the case.

I conversely believe that recessions and depressions are something of a natural economic cycle. I worry that in our haste to intervene in the current economic crisis, we are simply climbing out of one crater to tumble into the next. I feel that we are spending vast quantities of money for a lead parachute that will bury us at the bottom of the next ravine.

Your own figures, in fact, point to a series of US economic contractions which WERE swiftly rectified, followed in each case by eras of growth and prosperity.

In fifty years, we can debate it all again with new information. In the mean-time, it is hubris for anyone to pretend to know with certainty that a particular economic policy is obviously correct.

The greatest depression I feel in relation to this thread is my inability to speak of my economic philosophy without having others respond with snark and snide remarks. I paraphrase: "What an ignoramus!" *grinds teeth* "Sorry for the snark, but honestly, aren't you a buffoon?"

How is that necessary or warranted? By all means, present your position on the economy, but can you possibly build up a case for your ideas without denigrating others? If you have a sound economic platform, share it. If it is logical and good, it will be evident to the readers. Telling people they need to go study is not helpful.

--Anthony







"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:12 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Okay, without snark.

Yes, there is a "natural" cycle at work. It is due to the trend which I have pointed out over and over again: Power concentrates. Wealth concentrates. People have this notion that money behaves like water... that is spreads out naturally, and diffuses on its own.

Nothing could be further from the truth. There are some forces - like gravity- which naturally, inevitably, increase over time. (As a mass pulls more and more mass towards itself, it increases its gravitational force and pulls in even more mass. It's called a "positive feedback" system).

My reading of history is that power and wealth behave like gravity.... a small advantage in power/ wealth is parlayed into larger and larger advantage, until it becomes a runaway train which sucks everything along: the media, military power, the law... The way to interrupt this cycle is to create a system which actively re-distibutes money and power. Better yet, add to that a system which actively prevents the concentration of money and power.

The problem with leaving it all alone is that ... the bigger it is... the harder it falls. Small, local depressions are not as harmful as big ones, but with worlwide financial and economic integration, depressions go global very quickly. So I don't think we're in an era of "leave it be".

Many bright minds have been at work trying to figure out a system which stays closer towards equilibrium, without oscillating through booms and busts. Keynes was only the first.

Planned economies (like China and Europe) are actually making their way through the minefield better than we are, because they're not idly sitting on their hands (or worse yet, paddling towards the waterfall).

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:17 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I suppose I should admit that I find the idea of regular, almost predictable economic cycles to be something of a comfort. It is not particularly shattering to me to know that every 10-15 years will bring a brief economic contraction. (And that was the trend through much of our history.)

Perhaps I feel this way because I come from South Florida. There, we have a routine of preparation for cyclical disaster. Houses are equipped with storm shutters, debris is removed from lawns, canned water and food are stocked in abundance. Not every year brings a disaster, but they come with sufficient regularity that people are conditioned to prepare for them. When it does come, there is a period of discomfort. No power, bad roads, some minor damage to the home.

Conserved resources are spent, as they were meant to be, to weather the disaster period. Soon enough, the disaster passes. The vast majority of Floridians survive each Hurricane without crippling damage to their property or livelihood. The worst hit are usually persons who live in sub-standard housing in low-lying areas with insufficient drainage. This, remarkably, is a failure of government.

Micro-managing the economy smacks of a high-tech weather control project. It appears likely to cost more than Reagan's maligned Star Wars gambit, with results that seem to me to have just as little certainty of success.

Of course, I suppose proponents of the prevailing theories about recovery following the Great Depression would assert that the Cold War runaway wartime spending was a boon to the economy. It may have been? But it does not seem to me like a sustainable means of managing an economy.

I have reservations about a managed economy because I am not sure that even a committee of brilliant economists can anticipate and communicate the needs of an economy more efficiently than the Free Market. I am also convinced that government-sponsored recovery from the (to my mind) inevitable economic contractions are more costly than we can afford.

It may be that I am mistaken. However, whatever I believe and you believe, I will make an effort to listen and discuss this with utmost civility and respect.

--Anthony



"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:30 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


The "free" market brought us this disaster. Just like it brought us our disasterous healthcare and the Great Depression. By their works you shall know them.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:32 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

And your alternative? (Specifically?)

--Anthony


"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:44 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Several. I listed several options already, in answer to "what can we do to promote jobs"? We could start conservatively with re-regulating the financial sector and taking a page from the EU by leaving goods production in the hands of capitalists but having heavy government involvement in wealth distribution.

But there are farther-ranging options available: nationalizing banks, changing business forms allowed by law (eg towards cooperatives), doing away with the stock market etc. How far do you want to go?

Quite honestly, this isn't rocket science. The only reason its presented as so terribly difficult and complex to deal with is bc TPTB don't want to be monkeyed with, so they obfuscate everything.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:52 AM

MANGOLO


One thing, before you can identify an alternative, is: What are basic human rights?

Right now America is a country with over 400 billionaires and 50 million people who go to sleep hungry.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:53 AM

MANGOLO


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
But there are farther-ranging options available: nationalizing banks, changing business forms allowed by law (eg towards cooperatives), doing away with the stock market etc. How far do you want to go?



Nationalizing oil for one.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:54 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I think your basic right should be the ability to find a job which pays well enough to survive on, and enough leftover for charity and peeps who CAN'T work for a living (eg children, the elderly, and the disabled).

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:06 AM

MANGOLO


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
I think your basic right should be the ability to find a job which pays well enough to survive on, and enough leftover for charity and peeps who CAN'T work for a living (eg children, the elderly, and the disabled).



Sounds good. Then you need to add that you will only have free trade partners with those same rights. All other imports will be taxed at a rate to keep domestic products competitive.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Biden
Thu, March 28, 2024 19:42 - 851 posts
China
Thu, March 28, 2024 19:33 - 444 posts
Russia says 60 dead, 145 injured in concert hall raid; Islamic State group claims responsibility
Thu, March 28, 2024 19:16 - 51 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, March 28, 2024 17:24 - 3413 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, March 28, 2024 17:20 - 6155 posts
BUILD BACK BETTER!
Thu, March 28, 2024 16:32 - 9 posts
Well... He was no longer useful to the DNC or the Ukraine Money Laundering Scheme... So justice was served
Thu, March 28, 2024 12:44 - 1 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, March 28, 2024 11:18 - 2071 posts
Salon: NBC's Ronna blunder: A failed attempt to appeal to MAGA voters — except they hate her too
Thu, March 28, 2024 07:04 - 1 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, March 27, 2024 23:21 - 987 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Wed, March 27, 2024 15:03 - 824 posts
NBC News: Behind the scenes, Biden has grown angry and anxious about re-election effort
Wed, March 27, 2024 14:58 - 2 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL